Watched Varan the Unbelievable, The BFG (1989), The Thief & the Cobbler. I will say the The Theif & the Cobbler was quite a strange one. I remember seeing it on Cartoon Network back in 1997. I didn't really get it tbh.
The BFG (1989) is by far the best adaptation. I wasn't too fond of Disney's film back in 2016. But I love the 1989 animation style, which I thought could rival most of Disney's films at the time. It really help adding a bit of a dark tone to the movie. Making the giants even more frightening really does wonders.
Lastly, Varan the Unbelievable is an odd one in Toho's films of the 1950's. While it's not bad by any means, I consider it to be one of the weaker films compared to Rodan. I think it was also the last Toho film to be released in B&W. I remember see it released on DVD by Tokyo Shock back in 2005. But I've never bothered buying nor did I even see the American version either. But it was released on Blu-ray alongside Dogora (which I do own DVD), Gorath (never watched), & Space Amoeba (which I did owned on DVD until it was lost) in Japan. So I'm gonna import it from amazon JP.
I sell my famous Chesapeake Tupperware.
I ACCEPT NO DEBIT CARDS!
DO YOU HEAR ME!?!
@DanijoEX-the-Pierrot i see. I actually don’t think All Dogs Go to Heaven 2 is a downright awful movie like what some do suggest, it’s just a mediocre and kind of disappointing sequel that mainly suffers from the characters and animation and maybe the story. I know afterward they released a show and a Christmas special, but I haven’t seen either of those. It’s so weird that usually, whenever they make a sequel to a critically-acclaimed movie without the original director or staff, the sequel is usually bad. If they got Don Bluth on it, then it maybe could have been better, but I feel like All Dogs Go to Heaven is that one movie that’s good as a one-off and doesn’t need a continuation or show because it had an already perfect and beautiful ending.
Haven’t seen the Pebble and The Penguin (though I saw YouTube Movies also has it for free) but I have seen some of his other lesser acclaimed works like Rock-a-Doodle. Didn’t like that one a bunch, mainly cuz a lot of the characters were kind of annoying and the plot went by too fast. There were two characters in particular that I thought were the worst personality-wise in that one, but the voice actors and actresses were good at singing.
Watched the original Evil Dead last night. While Evil Dead 2 is better in pretty much every way, the first film is still a classic with a great haunting atmosphere and spooky scenes.
I saw an interview with Bruce Campbell saying that you can actually watch all three evil dead movies as one continuous 3 hour epic. Watch Evil Dead 1 up till the end when the demon pov is flying towards Ash, then start Evil Dead 2 at the moment when Ash is flying through the woods. Watch Evil Dead 2 up until Ash is sucked into the portal, and Start Army of Darkness when he lands in the medieval times. I think I might try that one of these days.
@Pastellioli I almost forgot about Rock-a-Doodle. I didn't think much about that when I first saw it. Thumbelina & A Troll in Central Park are pretty ok. Not great but not bad either.
Titan A.E. is an interesting one but it's a "acquired taste" kinda movie.
Other than that, my personal Don Bluth film favorites are Anastasia, Bartok the Magnificent, All Dogs Go to Heaven, & Titan A.E.
Recently, I watched The BFG (1989) on Tubi the other day. I wasn't too fond of Disney's adaptation so I prefer this one. I think it captures the mood, tone, & feel of the book really well.
I sell my famous Chesapeake Tupperware.
I ACCEPT NO DEBIT CARDS!
DO YOU HEAR ME!?!
@DanijoEX-the-Pierrot I remember Rock-A-Doodle a ton. I had vague memories of seeing it years ago before rewatching it. It isn’t super memorable though compared to the better Don Bluth movies I’ve seen.
Nice list! I agree with All Dogs Go to Heaven. I think that and NIMH are some of Don Bluth’s best when it comes to their stories, characters, and writing. I need to watch Anastasia though.
I have heard of Titan A.E. Is it a pretty good movie despite some of the reception? I haven’t actually seen anything about it or know much about its plot. I also heard a bit about The BFG, but I don’t know much about it besides Disney’s adaptation of it.
Watched the original Evil Dead last night. While Evil Dead 2 is better in pretty much every way, the first film is still a classic with a great haunting atmosphere and spooky scenes.
Yeah I think 2 is not as much a sequel as it is a replacement of 1.
@Pastellioli Titan A.E. kinda got low reception in 2000 when it first came out in theaters back then. At the time, most critics were wondering what audience the film was trying to aim for. So reception wasn't kind to it in 2000 compared to now since it's considered a cult classic nowadays.
As for the BFG (1989), you can watch it for free on Youtube. I forgot about that part since I was watching on Tubi. I think it's pretty charming really. I'm planning on buying on DVD whenever I get the chance.
I sell my famous Chesapeake Tupperware.
I ACCEPT NO DEBIT CARDS!
DO YOU HEAR ME!?!
Watched Thunder and the House of Magic yesterday. This was another movie I saw years ago (on Netflix) but saw YT had it for free, so I gave it a rewatch cuz why not.
This movie is about a kitten who is abandoned by his owners. He stumbles upon an old home owned by an elderly magician, who lives alongside his pet rabbit and mouse and his own live gizmos and automatons. After he is hospitalized following an accident, his real estate nephew takes it as an opportunity to sell his home behind his back, and it’s up to the kitten and the rest of the house’s inhabitants to save the house.
Although the title would make you think it would focus on magic, it doesn’t actually really do that. There are parts that are full of spectacle and wonder and the fact that it’s about a house owned by a magician, but it’s focused more on the house, and the film kind of felt like Home Alone because the animals and automatons defend the house by pulling interesting and sometimes flashy tricks and traps on people wanting to buy the home to make them go away while they wait for the magician to recover and come back home in time.
The movie has pretty decent animation. While I think the animation is not super groundbreaking or stunning, it doesn’t look cheap at all and it works well for the film. It’s still good animation! The one part of the animation I liked a lot was this part where the magician and his gizmos and automatons were playing music on the piano late at night, as well as traps and tricks they pulled on this pair of moving guys. The perspective the scene is shot at, and the creepy, Halloween-y look of it and the bright neon and dark lighting makes it look like a dark ride at an amusement park, and I thought that was pretty good and super interesting for the animation. I’d say the animation shines the most during scenes that are supposed to be magical and full of splendor.
However, I was a bit disappointed the film didn’t focus too much on the “magic” aspect of the house. During the first part where Thunder enters the house in the attic, the attic has a bunch of cool, mysterious, and actually magical-looking toys and contraptions, and throughout the film some of the characters think the house is haunted (mainly from the automatons causing stuff to fall and move around) but I was expecting the house to actually be a magical home with a bunch of spells and magic (kind of like what I saw in another animated movie called The House of the Lost on the Cape) and it’s only really considered magic because of the magician who owns it and the automatons and gizmos he built that live with him.
The characters, while most of them were fine, some were just awful. The antagonist was super cliched in my opinion, but Jack and Maggie were the actual WORST personality-wise.
I’m probably gonna ramble a bit, but from day one they hate Thunder and do a bunch of acts to get him kicked out even though Thunder literally doesn’t do anything to hurt or affect them. The film says the two dislike Thunder because of the magician having a fondness for cats and they are jealous that he’ll take away their popularity, but the two are just way too mean spirited and a-holey for almost the whole movie; they lie various times and twist events around to make Thunder look bad so that the automatons will dislike him and kick him out, Jack threatens Thunder on so many occasions to get him to leave (which all fail), lock him up in a cage, and, the worst of all, they played a role in the magician getting hospitalized and they try to blame it all on Thunder! And then another part I remember was that when the automatons didn’t follow orders from Jack because they started liking Thunder more, Maggie goes “you’re all a bunch of losers!” to them. Even though Thunder (with some help from the automatons) did most of the work in dissuading people from buying the house, Jack and Maggie aren’t even appreciative. One time, after Thunder escapes from his cage with help from a chihuahua (which ultimately causes a misunderstanding that dissuades a buyer), Maggie takes all the credit for it! She initially looks and even kind of sounds regretful, but she still claims to have done it and stays hateful toward Thunder. It’s only nearing the film’s climax that they go “we took things too far” and realize their mistakes when they get Thunder seen by the magician’s nephew, initially with the intention of having the nephew kick Thunder out, until he unexpectedly comes the next day in a hazmat suit and wields a freaking GUN so he can shoot and kill Thunder, since he has an allergy to cats and has a strong hatred toward the house inhabitants for preventing him from selling the house. It’s only nearing the end the two stop acting like that, but they are so unlikeable for almost the entire thing and do almost nothing but try to make an innocent kitten look bad and make him homeless again.
@DanijoEX-the-Pierrot Ah, it became a cult classic! Usually I hear cult classic movies are super good, so maybe I’ll try watching it soon when I can. They have a bunch of Don Bluth movies on YouTube for free so I can try checking if it’s on there.
I also didn’t know The BFG was free on YouTube. I find that YouTube Movies has a ton of stuff for free to watch but some of it isn’t listed on free primetime movies and you have to search for it yourself. Cool, I’ll try it soon when I finish watching some other movies I’m planning on seeing soon on Disney+.
@Anti-Matter Yes! I posted about it last week. Honestly, I'm excited for this one. Will admit, it does surprise me there's no lost village smurfs since they've been in the current cartoon series (for those who don't know, there's a new Smurfs cartoon released in 2021 still on-going, with a third season on the way) and the recent games. Otherwise, I'm looking forward to it. Like the animation style, the Smurfs have a bit of a cuter look to them. Kind of like a blend of 3D, with elements that make them appear 2D.
Given how YouTubers hate this movie, I have to say my opinion is an unpopular one. At least on the YouTube front anyway.
The resident Trolls superfan! Saw Trolls Band Together via early access and absolutely loved it!
There are no other options. There are no "flops". There are no "duds". No "colossal failures".
Everything is either a "classic" or a "cult classic".
To your example specifically, if Titan A.E. were truly a "cult classic" movie that was "misunderstood on release" but "everyone loves it now", then it wouldn't have a bang-average "6.6" rating on IMDb.
But it does.
It just bothers me, seeing the endless deluge of stupid articles calling forgettable box office disasters like Madame Web, or the 1993 Super Mario Bros. movie as anything but the junk that they were regarded as then, and are regarded as now, and will always be regarded by in the future.
Don't believe me? Think of say, the 5 worst movies you've ever seen. The ones you're sure that everybody hated. Then google the title name along with: "cult classic". You'll find almost all of them called that somewhere on the Internet.
@OldManHermit You definitely can watch all 3 back to back, and I have before many times! I used to host an annual Evil Dead marathon, screening 1, 2, Army of Darkness, and a bootleg copy of the musical back-to-back, with the musical timed to start exactly at midnight. Evil Dead will always hold a special place to me, as it was at my second Evil Dead marathon that I met my eventual spouse (nothing screams "that's the one" like someone else cackling inappropriately at the exact same moments you yourself find hilarious!) 2 is definitely the best, Army of Darkness is the most fun, but the scrappy earnestness of the first one makes it just as worth watching as the rest!
As for the others? Ash vs. Evil Dead is a good time, though it's incredibly uneven. When it works it works, when it doesn't I zone out pretty hard. Pablo and Kelly are both great additions, though, and nothing with Lucy Lawless can be all that bad!
Now this may sound harsh, but Evil Dead 2013 is an abomination that deserves to be locked in a cabin with a deadite. Its cardinal sin is a complete lack of fun, which is an undercurrent that runs throughout the whole rest of the series; even in the darkest moments of The Evil Dead it's still there. 2013 is miserable from the word go, and barely remembers to smile for its entire run time.
By the time we got to Evil Dead Rise I had no expectations, but in my opinion it's a really freakin' good time that stands toe to toe with the original trilogy. I love it! It's goofy when it needs to be while staying genuinely creepy throughout, and all without Ash!
@MontyCircus I don't think cult classic is supposed to mean 'everyone loves it now', just that it has a passionate fanbase - often quite a small one, in the case of films that were poorly received on release, but a fanbase nonetheless. But I do concede you could say that about almost anything.
Thank you Nintendo for giving us Donkey Kong Jr Math on Nintendo Music
Dog man was pretty good, tomorrow i reckon i'll go see Captain America even though i did not like the previous one, oh and i got myself a copy of The Thing on bluray, a true classic!!!!
i enjoy Mario Kart Double Dash and Cups of Tea !!!!
The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists! - I saw this a few weeks ago, but I saw YouTube Movies had a couple of Aardman movies on there for free and I haven’t seen this, so I gave it a try and went in blind.
The film centers on a pirate captain who wants to plunder enough treasure and gold to win a pirate competition, but he and his ragtag group of pirates have been unsuccessful in finding gold during their raids. After they raid a ship carrying Charles Darwin, he takes the pirates to London to win gold for the pirate competition via a science competition with the captain’s special and prized “parrot,” a dodo. However, the existence of the dodo captures the attention of the pirate-hating Queen Victoria, and after that a ton of wacky hijinks ensue.
I already expected this to be a super fun movie since I’ve seen Aardman’s other work, and it sure was! The film’s premise combining pirates, fiction, and real-life figures was super fun, and it provides plenty of comedy throughout the whole thing.
The characters were nice too. A lot of Aardman’s work have plenty of charming characters that pair well with their wonderful claymation and here it’s like that again! The titular group of pirates have a lot of different personalities and have plenty of character, and I especially liked the film’s take on Charles Darwin, him having an intelligent chimpanzee assistant and his introduction. I also think Queen Victoria’s depiction was funny too, and she gets crazy and a bit unhinged later on, kind of like Mrs. Tweedy from Chicken Run. I was very shocked with her intentions with the dodo, that being she wants the dodo in a petting zoo, but in actuality she wants to use the dodo for a dinner where she and several world leaders all eat dishes using endangered animals, and she fights tooth and nail by using a pair of swords she hid in some mechanical part of her dress, and it’s more hilarious when you remember she’s fighting so she can continue to hold a special dinner. I was actually so surprised and laughing when they revealed that, and I love how wacky Aardman makes their characters.
The comedy in this one was also top notch. Plenty of goofy dialogue and moments (both big and small) and so many hilarious scenarios and situations. Parts that I found hilarious was Darwin’s introduction where he’s writing on the ship and has a completely unfazed reaction to the pirate raids, and then after realizing his ship is getting attacked, he proceeds to randomly write about how he doesn’t have a girlfriend, as well as some moments in the pirate tavern early in the movie when the captain is signing up for the pirate competition and it showcases his rivals. This was a really good time, and it really showcases a lot of Aardman’s signature animation, charm, silliness and humor present in so many of their shorts and films.
Chip ‘n’ Dale: Rescue Rangers - Recently got Disney+ again and rewatched it this morning. I’ve been in the mood to rewatch it after enjoying Who Framed Roger Rabbit, which this is inspired by. It’s based on the Rescue Rangers show, though the movie isn’t a direct adaptation and has a significantly different plot.
In this one, Chip and Dale were once popular and famous actors in the Rescue Rangers show in the 90s, but after a falling out that caused the show to get cancelled, they both went their separate ways and have not spoken to each other since. However, decades later, they team up again to find the whereabouts of their co-star Monterey Jack, who goes missing alongside several other cartoon stars in a mysterious case that the police haven’t been able to solve.
The movie has plenty of similarities to Roger Rabbit, mainly from the film being set in a world where cartoon characters and humans co-exist and the premise being centered on a mystery. Although I don’t think this is on the same levels of good as Roger Rabbit, it’s a really decent spiritual successor. Rescue Rangers is seemingly an odd choice for a Roger Rabbit-inspired movie, but it works super well surprisingly. When I got ads for this years ago, I was expecting this to be a terrible and unfunny film, but I was wrong!
The film, like Roger Rabbit, has animated characters interacting in a real-world setting and humans, but uses plenty of modern animation styles rather than only 2D. It has 3D animation, 3D cel-shaded animation, 2D animation, photorealistic animation, claymation, and puppetry, as well as multiple different art styles. It’s cool seeing different forms of animation and art styles together, and makes it feel like a big collaboration between multiple people. I find it a bit disappointing the 2D animation in the film is 3D animation cel-shaded to look 2D, but they explained the movie had a low budget and they had to use 3D for a lot of it to make it work, and given its a straight-to-streaming film and those tend to have a smaller budget than theatrical films, it makes sense, but there are scenes and cameos where some characters are animated with actual 2D.
The film’s take on Chip and Dale differs quite a bit from their OG depictions, but they retain a lot of traits from their original personalities, and given the premise of the film, I’d say the changes work. One notable change is them being voiced by John Mulaney and Andy Samberg respectively instead of Tress MacNeille and Corey Burton (though the two briefly voice them in the film), but the film explains their higher-pitched voices were apart of them acting and they both have normal voices, and I found that explanation fits Chip and Dale well since here they are (or, were) actors, plus the new voices I find still fit their personalities. The film’s take on Peter Pan originally being a child star and then getting tossed out after he started growing up was an interesting take, mainly from how they wanted to apply what sometimes to child actors after they grow up to a cartoon character, but they did him so dirty in the film… While I think the main characters were good and I liked their dynamic, the rest of the Rescue Rangers are largely absent from the film and don’t really do anything until later on. There’s an officer named Ellie who helps them (in a kind of similar role like Eddie from Roger Rabbit) and they kind of give her a backstory and she’s shown to be a big Rescue Rangers fan, but I think she wasn’t developed a whole lot, and there was also a clay detective she works for who I think also wasn’t that memorable, but it mainly comes from the film’s focus being on Chip and Dale’s friendship, so the rest of the characters don’t get much development or focus. Compared to Roger Rabbit, which focused equally on toons and humans, this focuses more on the toons, and the humans are not really present besides Ellie.
The comedy is eh. I didn’t think it was all that hilarious (though also because this is my 3rd time watching it) and it has some standard but sometimes unfunny jokes. However, Rescue Rangers is metafictional and self-aware of cliches, jokes, and tropes all too common in Hollywood movies and makes fun of them, and it makes up for the mediocre comedy. One example being Chip criticizing film companies making popular cartoon characters sing, and when him and Dale are forced to sing at one point, the film intentionally makes them hilariously bad at rapping and it works since it’s both funny and shows how bad and cliched it is, plus there’s something with bad songs where they try to rhyme with the same word that is so funny.
Another one is the evil all along trope with the clay detective where when he reveals to Ellie he worked for Peter Pan, they both point out how cliche it is for him to have been secretly bad. Another standout with the self-awareness is them making fun of the uncanny valley style from 2000s movies with a town full of uncanny-looking characters and the bootlegging machine, which is the film’s equivalent to the dip from Roger Rabbit. It’s take on bootlegs is so unique, and although the film isn’t too funny, it’s self-awareness with cliches, bootlegs and modern reboots of old IPs are one of the best parts, and it feel like the movie is a gigantic dissection of popular movies as a whole.
Along with the humor comes cameos. A TON of cameos, which this movie is only really known for and why people talked about it for a week and forgot about it afterward. A lot of the cameos provide a bit of fan service by having various characters appear in scenes and interact, and it was cool to see a couple characters I recognized, but the most notable one is Ugly Sonic, which was a cameo that is so insane and unexpected for this but fits so well with the self-aware humor. They make a ton of references to that awful first Sonic trailer and draw attention to his weird teeth, and even though he seems like he doesn’t do much at first, near the end of the film he assists Chip and Dale by distracting Peter Pan while riding in an FBI helicopter, and it’s so crazy. The film is so weird but in a good and entertaining way.
If you really like Roger Rabbit and want to watch something similar to it, I’d say give this one a try! It’s a really serviceable successor that is surprisingly good and does a decent job at following Roger Rabbit’s footsteps. Also, sorry for the long rambling. You can tell how much I loved this one lol.
@Splash_Woman haha, that's awesome! Nothing like a mutual love of schlocky horror to bring people together.
I saw the musical many years ago, sadly I was not splattered with blood.
The series was great. A perfect send-off for the Ash character. I can't remember what season it was, but there was a scene with Ash doing battle with a possessed intestinal track and sphincter, which was one of the funniest things I've ever seen.
I must admit I've never seen the 2013 evil dead. It came out during a time when a ton of my favorite 80s movies were getting needless, mediocre remakes, so I avoided it on principle. Sounds like I didn't miss much!
I think I might give evil dead rise a chance though based on your recommendation and that of a good buddy of mine.
Forums
Topic: Movie thread.
Posts 6,421 to 6,440 of 6,966
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic