Showing 21 to 40 of 93
21. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 17:45 BST
They learn through repetition that lying on the bed is pleasurable, but being found on the bed is displeasurable. You can train mice similarly with electrified buttons and food-dispensing buttons and stuff.
False; that's a gross over-simplification of the learning that goes on in dogs, and completely removes the social element. That's always been where there's an enormous lack of intellectual rigor by those that argue for a strictly reductive "classical conditioning" model for learning: you can assert that an a animal connects some stimulus with some action or event, but that tells you nothing about how that association is made, on what level, etc. It's an entirely different event when a dog avoids the disfavor of its owner and when a rat reacts to a bell, etc. The remarkable thing I've noticed about dogs is that, when covering tracks, it is not a matter of simply being punished for being on the bed. Their punishment is generally just a scolding word, which is devastating for a dog in that the dog is aware of the relationship with its owner, constantly observing its owner's approval / disapproval of it (in even the most subtle turns of voice), and hates losing favor for doing something it should know is wrong. It is, indeed, almost like guilt when you watch a dog that has been scolded for going against its owner on a rule it knew perfectly well.
Now, I do think imitation is a better argument, and could open up another angle for showing intelligence in cats. I'd still put say that it's an oversimplification to place imitation above sociality, language, and the need for approval, so far as the history of humanity and advancement is concerned. Prior to and outside of the process of imitation that is certainly important in children, there is the receptivity to learning from others due to a fundamental need for approval, recognition, etc that is more to be found in dogs than cats, and those complex twists in the infant-parent relationship are much more closely paralleled by that between dogs and owners than by anything in cat behavior. Because of that heightened sociality, dogs can indeed learn to recognize a much more complex system of language, gestures, and signs than cats, and I'd still argue that, while imitation is important, language and sociality rank higher if you're looking for an account of human intelligence. But I'll certainly concede that imitation in cats is something to take seriously and could be a real sign of some level of intellect.
Ah, thank you for that Futurama pick. One of my favorite episodes, manipulative though it may be.
Twitter is a good place to throw your nonsense.Wii FC: 8378 9716 1696 8633 || "How can mushrooms give you extra life? Get the green ones." -Lakitu 64Join us in the epic Nintendo Life Wii Music Thread
22. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 17:49 BST
The Secrets Inside Your Dog's Mind
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 18:22 by Vendetta
Ex cineribus resurgoWii / Speak / Music: 3991 9961 5576 0184 · · · · Mario Kart Wii: 3609 8999 1445· · · · · · · ·Alien Crush: 1934 4006 9660The Conduit: 2622 0458 3119· · · · · · · · · · · · · · Water Warfare: 4726 5832 1608· · · · · · · Onslaught: 0388 6842 8268
23. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 18:08 BST
Dogs are animals that are used to living in packs. They live by the rules of submission and dominance, and dog trainers always emphasise that in their training. I don't think that behaviour you described should be read as anything more socially advanced than showing submission towards the owner, whom it considers as the dominant dog of the pack. The scolding may not invoke in the dog a "devastating" reaction that's "almost like guilt". It may just signal to the dog that this other animal is exhibiting all the signs of dominance and aggression that mark it as the alpha dog, so the dog submits to the alpha dog's will.
Many animals have this social mentality. Evolutionary biologists have had a lot of fun trying to explain why butterflies/moths will give up territory without a fight when they see another butterfly/moth in that spot, why birds will back down from fights when they see more dominant birds, and why certain pigs in a farmhouse become the slaves of other pigs.
Now Playing: Bioshock
24. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 18:18 BST
I agree with the opening point, it is a social mentality that dogs have as a result of their evolution in packs and so forth; but my point is that it is indeed thoroughly social in nature and not really reducible or comparable to simple classical conditioning with stimuli and rewards. I think you agree to that extent. The further consequence is that, regardless of the roots of that sociality, it predisposes dogs to be able to take on much more involved interactions and to be able to get much closer to having language-like communication. That means that they can then learn behaviors that are enormously complex, like herding animals or aiding in hunting, either of which involves a whole lot of awareness of cues and context in order to make the appropriate decisions.
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 18:19 by warioswoods
25. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 18:29 BST
Awwww. Maybe the high-brow discussion should end, and everyone can just post pics of cats and dogs until one side concedes defeat by way of overpowering cuteness.
26. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 18:32 BST
Cuteness and badassedness. In the same shot, no less. My favorite.
EDIT: And I've got nothing against cats, especially the ones with the personalities of dogs. I just think the relative independence of cats defeats the purpose of having them as pets.
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 18:35 by Vendetta
27. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:26 BST
I just think the relative independence of cats defeats the purpose of having them as pets.
Do you apply that same argument to avoid marriage?
28. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:29 BST
Cat. I love having my cat around never knowing when he'll come and go. I like dogs (when I say dogs I mean proper dogs not these handbag ones that are so far removed from their ancestors as to be considered almost another species entirely) but I do not believe that they should be kept indoors.They are an outdoor animal and should be treated as such. I wouldn't own a dog unless I had a lot of land for it to live and run around because that is what a dog should be doing.I don't have much respect for people who get a dog then leave them at home all day while they are at work ,that is tantamount to cruelty in my book .Plus they are far too much of a burden for me I'm afraid and tie you down i.e holidays etc (no way would I leave them in a kennel !!). When I retire then I will get a Husky or German Sheperd to keep me active and I will have the required time to spend with them.
What's this bit for again?
29. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:40 BST
Yikes, Clix... that was a bit rough, don't you think? Assuming I'd hold a wife in the same esteem as I would a pet... wow. Project much?
Cute pics though, I'll give ya that.
30. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:42 BST
I'd still rank that shot in 22 way above all the combined cat pics, but at this point we're certainly in subjective territory.
31. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:48 BST
Nah. Women are independent. Yet it's still worth it to have one as a companion. Why not cats? They're cuter and can't yell at you.
32. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:49 BST
That's why I love 'em! If you tell a cat 'come here boy', they'll look at you like an idiot then show you their ass. I respect that.
I agree with Luigi78, half of my reasons for disliking dogs are more to do with their owners and the fact they shouldn't own one in the first place. They can be high maintenance, and unfortunately most owners can't be arsed.
@CC: They can still scratch your eyes out though. Meow!
EDIT: @Stevie: I like that description.
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 19:55 by Machu
33. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:53 BST
I am definitely a dog person.
I am of the opinion that a dog becomes like another member of your family where as a cat is like having a cool lodger. That is the difference for me.
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 20:05 by Stevie
This is good
34. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 20:03 BST
@ClixIdeally, yes... but let's be realistic, it's far from always that's the case. The independent part, that is... not the having one as a companion part. I've left relationships where one demands the sacrifice of individuality on the alter of insecurity. Maybe I should try cats.
@'ChuYou got issues. LOL
35. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 20:40 BST
I think I've made my point.
I made Kid Tripp! PocketGamer gave it a 9 out of 10! You should totally buy it now!
[16:39] BadKitty: you trying to steal stuff from me? u_u
[16:41] kribs: don't worry Emmy, even if poix tried to steal something from you, he wouldn't finish stealing it
Nintendo Network ID: pixelpowa | Twitter: thatpixelguy
36. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 20:46 BST
Hmm would I be a creature that eats it´s own poo, smells and drools... Dog.or would I be intelligent and agile... Cat.
Like comparing Garfield and Odie.
Old Nintendofan from up north...
37. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 20:48 BST
I would be a kitty.
Leap before you think!My Backloggery: http://backloggery.com/samsam12My YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/fudgenuts64
38. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 20:49 BST
The demon-cat is scary woah, but that last pic is priceless!
That one's no fair though, the poor thing's just yawning.
Edited on Thu 24th September, 2009 @ 20:49 by Machu
39. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 21:01 BST
Can I be a shroomdog?
If not, a normal dog would be fine, as long as my owner promises to dress me like this.
Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.
40. Posted: Thu 24th Sep 2009 21:02 BST
Hmm would I be a creature that eats it´s own poo, smells and drools... Dog.or would I be intelligent and agile... Cat.Like comparing Garfield and Odie.
Would I rather be an animal that has a history of eating its dead owners and couldn't protect you to save its live....catsor would I rather be an animal that would protect its owner to the death and is totally loyal...dogs
This is easy to make one look worse than the other!
"The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
Treaty of Tripoly, article 11