hoboswirl

@Andrewroxsox haha i honelsty just created an account on here so i may discuss with you people!

@Onett i like these discussions too, i do understand what your saying i just misjudged you, i was actually thinking the same thing, i think it would be better if it was just one game and not 2 different games. sorry i misjudged you, ithought you were one of those people that think this is just a rehash.

@theblackdragon oh thanks for telling me that, i didnt mean to start an argument i just dont see why some people are so pissed about this...

@Onett i wanted grey to happen, but this is supprising to me, and im also WAY more excited about a sequel instead of the same game but with a different legendary. i honestly dont see why people are not happy that grey didnt happen. also alot of people(on a different forum)said that they would just buy grey instead of black and white, this is a way that people would have to buy black and white to play the 3rd installment!

@Duney im glad you at least put positive comments when your disappointed

@mullen the main reason I play pokemon is not to learn the stroy or know some npcs, so it's nothing attractive.
if you dont play a game for the story, then what do you play games for? do you just press buttons and look at the colorful pictures?

@Yogsoggoth Everyone says that we shouldn't be upset because we can play it on the 3ds. Well I guarantee that we will not get to play it with 3ds sound and graphics. But then, for that to happen, Gamefreak would have to work and it's so much easier to push out the same tired game with outdated combat system and ancient graphics.
1) its a sequel, its not gonna be anything like platnium or emerald 2)if you think nintendo is being lazy then go work there and see how lazy you will be, but youll fired the next day.3) ruby and sapphire remakes will be on the 3ds so im pretty sure gamefreak can handle 3d graphics.

@Yogsoggoth Seems to me the only people defending the decision to put this on the DS are people that don't own a 3DS.
i have a 3ds and i perfer it to be on ds, dont go judging people!

@pvrexpress dont forget it could have a backwords effect, meaning if they made it for 3ds, people that only have a ds wont spend 210 dollars for one game. Its better they made it for ds because more people have a ds and 3ds owners can play it too, which means more copies would be sold.

@MetalDragonZero this game wont be a "platium" situation, which is exactly why they said it is a SEQUEL to black and white.

@Duney In that case, Nintendo should just discontinue development of all new 3DS games and move them to the old DS since there are so many more DS owners to sell games too. Right?
uhh, no. its probaly for the best theyre selling it for ds so black and white players can get to finish the 5th generation without out spending 170 dollars, plus 3ds owners can still play it.

@GundamMac I dunno if you were trying to be sarcastic, but I'll say this: There's absolutely nothing lazy about that. That's hard work to do, especially for a game as intensive as Pokemon.
I completly agree.

@Nibelilt its not that they are lazy its just part of tradition that the 3rd game of a generation is on the same platform as the first 2. when ruby and sapphire remakes come out im sure it will be on 3ds.