ProPAIN

@Itsashame to be even more fair I don't think Nintendo will let any throwing of them under the bus to slide, regardless of its rightness or wrongness. I'm pretty sure the first two rules of video game publishing are "you do not publicly speak ill of the platform holder".

Now what, if any, repercusions for Adhoc come from this remain to be seen (or not, NDAs being a thing).

edit: added "publicly"

@Itsashame
" Unless Adhoc is lying (that would be quite risky..)"

I'm not saying that Nintendo should be absolved of any blame in this whole thing but Adhoc has already shown that they are capable of deceitful behavior; they didn't disclose in any meaningful way that the game was going to be censored at all, even when they had opened up preorders. That is more than enough for me to take anything they say with a pinch of salt.

I wish "The New Tetris" would release on N64 NSO. I have very fond memories of it,; it was one of the few games me and my sister could play competitively at the same level and the soundtrack is amazing.

So she essentially wants to be cast in a remake of "Legend"

@Specter_of-the_OLED While I don't agree with your assessment of Melty Blood I do wonder how Gran Blue beat out VF5.

@blindsquarel four of the games at EVO are on the Switch so I still see the article as relevant to a Nintendo website.

I'm thinking the reason why rollback might be skipping the switch may have more to do with the differences in platforms; PC and PS4 are both x86 based while the switch is ARM based. Its a long shot but maybe after they get rollback working on ps4 and PC they will add it to the switch version.

Although heavily tinfoil there is also the possibility that they plan on having PS4 and PC cross play but Sony doesn't want the switch to be part of that and Atlus just doesn't see a good return on the expense to give it to a seemingly smaller fighting game base on the switch.

I find it odd considering Capcom FIghting Collection is going to have roll back and this isnt