Ryan Craddock of Nintendolife makes an article about a game that was made to help people make and publish games, admits to it being legal, but still links the game they are complaining about to their own web page so they can make money off of clicks and advertising, but complains about Nintendo letting a LEGAL game on to their store, which is twice the size of the Full Game Kit version that nintendolife also linked to, that nintendolife may be also getting paid click commission for. Clearly some work went into adapting it to work on Switch. It's twice the size of the Full Game Kit. Here's a quote from the developer of the game kit. misspelling and all. "Don't worry about license agreements, you have full commercial usuage rights! Your game is ready to build and deploy for web, standalone and Android mobile devices. Easy to port to other platforms." Then you link to a story that another nintendolife writer, and Editor, Thomas Whitehead, ran on RCMADIAX, which was clearly written in a more open minded and adult tone. He even ended it with "For now, the eShop is host to an exceptionally broad range of games, of varying types and price points. When all is said and done it is the gamers that will decide what content they want on Nintendo hardware." Thomas Whitehead's article is a glorifying example of objective not subjective writing. Ryan Craddock's piece is hot garbage and shouldn't be something nintendolife should endorse or be proud of. My opinion, Ryan Craddock can go back to writing articles on Facebook. Clearly that's where he honed his writing skills. Also, complaining about asset flippers, but still sponsoring them on "NINTENDOlife" makes you sound like a close minded bigot.
Comments 1
Re: Nintendo Accused Of Hosting Asset Flip Game On Switch, And Fans Aren't Happy
Ryan Craddock of Nintendolife makes an article about a game that was made to help people make and publish games, admits to it being legal, but still links the game they are complaining about to their own web page so they can make money off of clicks and advertising, but complains about Nintendo letting a LEGAL game on to their store, which is twice the size of the Full Game Kit version that nintendolife also linked to, that nintendolife may be also getting paid click commission for. Clearly some work went into adapting it to work on Switch. It's twice the size of the Full Game Kit. Here's a quote from the developer of the game kit. misspelling and all.
"Don't worry about license agreements, you have full commercial usuage rights! Your game is ready to build and deploy for web, standalone and Android mobile devices. Easy to port to other platforms."
Then you link to a story that another nintendolife writer, and Editor, Thomas Whitehead, ran on RCMADIAX, which was clearly written in a more open minded and adult tone. He even ended it with
"For now, the eShop is host to an exceptionally broad range of games, of varying types and price points. When all is said and done it is the gamers that will decide what content they want on Nintendo hardware."
Thomas Whitehead's article is a glorifying example of objective not subjective writing. Ryan Craddock's piece is hot garbage and shouldn't be something nintendolife should endorse or be proud of. My opinion, Ryan Craddock can go back to writing articles on Facebook. Clearly that's where he honed his writing skills.
Also, complaining about asset flippers, but still sponsoring them on "NINTENDOlife" makes you sound like a close minded bigot.