Miyamoto Regrets Design Choices Made During Development Of Super Mario Run

I played Super Mario Run in under an hour, then deleted it. The game is simply not fun in my opinion. Toad Rallies are a little better though.

I despise the free to play model. It exploits a small group of people, and allows everyone else to get a product without giving the developer a fair return on their efforts.

It's okay, Miyamoto san.
Everybody can made mistakes.

Never played it. Don’t have any interest either.

I really enjoyed Mario Run and don't regret buying it. With that said, it's great that Miyamoto is able to analyze his own work and think critically on how he can improve it. I personally didn't have a hard time with the main game, but since the mobile gaming market has less dedicated gamers that are crunched for time, I can see why it would be an issue. I still hope that he gives the Mario series another shot as producer or director sometime, mobile or not.

For what it is I’m perfectly happy with the game. I’m glad they went with a fixed cost and I wish all mobile games were fixed. I’d play many more of them. I’ve also spent a lot more time in the remix 10 mode of the game.

Too difficult? Good lord, how low can you get?

I really liked Super Mario Run. Part of it had to do with that difficulty. Those green coins were damn tough to get consecutively. I still play SMR from time to time, which is really a testament to how good the game is, despite the lack of major updates. It helps that it didn’t try to gouge money from you after you pay for the full game. I get that it isn’t the game’s cup of tea, but I find SMR to be a quality mobile title.

I think a huge mistake they did with Super Mario Run was how long it took to get the Android version running.

@PurinPuff 100% agree. Took the words right out of my mouth.

Didn't play it because you cannot play it offline. I don't buy games that I cannot play offline. My phone data plan is insanely limited (data costs a lot in Canada, most third-world countries have better plans than us, yep...). But I'm all for games charging a one-time flat fee instead of trying to charge you forever and ever. I bought games like Xcom and Civilization for my Android phones/tablets, at around $10 - $15 each.

I hate that the mobile game industry has had enough of an impact to even change Miyamoto's opinions on it.

I cannot deny the financial success of many F2P and mobile titles, but that doesn't mean that as a gamer I have to like it. And trust me, I really don't like it!

I think it’s about as good as a mobile game can get, and the only people who think a $10 fixed price is a bad thing are bottom feeders who don’t realize or care how scummy and exploitative the “free-to-play” model is. I have zero doubt that many of the people who complain about fixed prices for games have spent significantly more than $10 on games that pretend to be free, or else wasted countless hours of their lives grinding for pointless crap they don’t need, forever stuck on a micro-transaction treadmill in a game that never ends and thus never stops begging them to spend more money.

My 3 year old son can beat the free first world with barely hitting the jump button. He thinks it's fun, but that told me right there it is not worth paying for.

I prefer a fixed cost but I just didn't enjoy it enough to buy it. I am not into runners anyway.

I bought one copy, then couldn't get myself to do another on Android after iOS.

The fact is I have like 1985 to present memory on how a Super Mario game works. I can not for some reason wrap my hands and mind around not having control other than tapping. It was fine earlier on, but as I got deeper the game started to just piss me off because I couldn't adjust, it's too damn hard because I can't properly control or stop myself from doing things and my mind keep saying push this way, then jump, or slide here then do that. I can't, it's maddening. The game requires some pretty precision tapping and the right kind of tapping per touch so it's already a challenge for those with problems with timing sensitive games too.

"Even legendary designers make mistakes"
Yes I remember Star Fox Zero.

Free to play frustrates the frughk out of me, as game-limiting micro transactions feel grimy as hell. One of the reasons I hate on Fortnite SO-DAMN-HARD is because of the f2p approach it champions (and with which it prospers). As explained on South Park, "freemium" games target those of us who are susceptible to addiction, and who don't have much impulse control. That's some twisted sh!t right there.

yeah Im sure hes losing sleep over it (not)

Interesting, I don't think those things were mistakes, at all. The one mistake IMO is that there were too few levels at launch. There should have been 8, and perhaps even the Star worlds should have been included at launch as well.

On the contrary, I disliked Remix 10, because it goes the way of most f2p games, just giving you endless mindless tasks to do, as opposed to Toad Rally which turned those tasks into a competition of sorts against others, and collecting colored coins in the regular levels, which is the part that gives you the full Mario game experience.

But overall, I still really liked SMR, and honestly got way more than my money's worth out of it.

Possibly the most fun mobile game I've ever played.

From a design perspective, fixed cost was the right choice.

From a financial perspective, fixed cost was the wrong choice.

Please don't tell me all the mobile games are gonna be free-to-play now. It's bad enough that Pokémon, Fire Emblem and Animal Crossing went this direction, and I shudder at the thought of Mario going this way too. Ugh. I honestly hope the free-to-play model will go down a lot in upcoming years but it probably won't be.

@Yosher There's free-to-play done wrong, and free to play done right.

Free-to-Play done right as an example is Warframe. Every single thing in the game is farmable and not locked behind a paywall. You can however spend real money to obtain a special currency that will be useful for in-game trading, and increasing the speed at which you craft and upgrade things drastically. Fortnite does it right too despite things, by making skins the only thing you need to buy if you want it.

Free-to-Play doesn't mean the developer doesn't get anything if they find a way to monetize the game without making it Pay-To-Win. Warframe and Fortnite are examples of doing FtP without resorting to the predatory PtW model.

@aznable True, but then you have diamonds in the rough like Warframe who monetize their game in a way that doesn't make it so predatory.

I know it sounds like shilling at this point, but it's simply the truth.

@Heavyarms55 Again, the problem with the FtP model in most cases is that most companies use predatory monetization practices... If only people could learn from Digital Extremes and Epic Games...

@Realnoize Good point I forgot about that. While I personally didn't mind the required connection 99% of the time (was only bothered that one time I tried to play in a theater and couldn't), it was certainly a mistake to require it. I understand that piracy is a huge problem in the mobile world in particular, but they should have found another way around it.

@MegaVel91 I know there's free-to-play games that do it right, but that still doesn't make me a fan of it. I really just highly, HIGHLY prefer paying an x-amount of money to get the full experience right away without always having that 'Buy This and Buy That so you can actually do stuff faster'-button thrown in my face every time I play these types of games, it's incredibly obnoxious and I don't want to be a part of it.

I don't want it to infect my favourite series and it does pain me to see what it's doing to the series I've loved playing for so many years. I know that it's making Nintendo a lot of money right now but frankly I don't care, I want this model to go away ASAP, but it's way too succesful so it's not going anywhere and I'm sorry but I just don't like it and I never will. If this becomes a gaming standard one day, I swear to God I'll become a retro gamer only, regardless of how 'right' it's done.

Wait, did Shigsey just call the fixed-cost model a mistake?

Oh, Jesus, they're going F2P! NOOOOOO!

I bought this on a 50% sale and I still don't think it was worth my money.

@MegaVel91 If by epic games you're referring to Fortnite, I still don't like that model either. Call me a traditionalist, but I wish, with the exception of expansion packs or similarly styled DLC, that all that content was in the game at release, you pay full price, and it's there, waiting to be unlocked. I especially dislike limited time events. And that's something even Pokemon does with PAID releases - which is even worse. Of course it's free for Pokemon, but if you didn't own the game during the event, or cannot go to a specific store, too bad!

The Miyamoto of old would have defended a traditional difficulty Mario game at a fixed price. But now its all about $$extraction$$ and endless positive reinforcement in your face. Blah.

@Heavyarms55 You're talking about Mystery Gifts? That has been in the game since Gen II And it's a gift that you receive, it's not required in any way for the game.

And on topic: The game is too difficult? Really? The game is fun, but the 10 euro price is quite steep. (Compared to other mobile games) However I do think the fixed price is better than ANY F2P model for this game. I did buy it though, and I actually really enjoyed playing the game.

@MegaVel91 unfortunately the only lesson you have to learn from games that “do it right” like Fortnite is that if your game is huge then it can work. Those games can only work because of their scale and they pound the rest of the industry that can’t match their economies of scale into the dirt as a result.

Great for Epic and players of Fortnite (& Nintendo and players of Pokémon Go) but terrible for everyone else. It salts the Earth.

Super Mario Run is a great game. I loved it - toad rally feels in many ways like the culmination of the Mario series. They got a few things wrong - the always online thing, the number of levels in the demo, the price being a few pounds too high - but, sadly, the main thing they got wrong was over estimating the audience on mobile platforms.

I’ve not really touched a mobile gaming app since buying my Switch and I think I’m unlikely to ever go back to them in the future.

I played Super Mario Run for free, getting all the coins. I was a fan so I had no problem paying for the rest of the game. He has nothing to apologise for. Also, the difficulty ramp was decent enough for me.

And he didn't speak about the elephant in the room, compulsory online internet connection for having to play a game that doesn't need it.

@aznable fortnite’s micro transactions aren’t teally exploitative though so i dont understand why you hate it

Same with Mario Tennis Aces, single player adventure mode is too difficult. When a game becomes frustrating, it's no fun. "When it's no fun what's the point of playing." said Reggie.

Free-to-play and subscription-based both immediately turn me away. I really wish Nintendo wouldn't take this route as it's the last option of the consoles.

@sanderev Gen 2 mystery gifts were obtainable in-game. Since gen 4 they've been online exclusives for limited time only - of content that is in the game, but locked behind a remote trigger. Be it online, or go to Toys R Us or some other store. Bad game design.

For a mobile game i thought it was really good, and the fixed price model was a way better choice than free to play. Free to play model is probably one of the worst things to happen to gaming.

@Realnoize that’s the exact reason I didn’t buy it. I don’t play games that can’t be played offline

I quite liked the game. It’s a good game and don’t see any problems with it. When it came out the fixed price was cheaper and bought it right away, prefer the small one time buy than the small ones here and there. I hope there’s more games to come and wouldn’t mind another game like this one

I have no clue why he felt that the "buy upfront" model was a bad idea. To be fair, it was probably the best choice about the whole thing. The usual limited playtime model is just awful.

Then again, i quickly hit the playticket max, and earned more than i used up.

Overall, it was an OK, albeit highly limited title that could have been much more if not held down by conventions set by the platform it was on.

It's an awful game, and one made far worse than it could have been by the utterly moronic decision to force it into portrait mode. A HORIZONTALLY scrolling game in portrait. Mind boggling.

And all so commuters on trains who can't be bothered to rotate their phones can play it with one hand. A game breaking decision to satisfy laziness.

It's best deleted. If you want to play a game on your telephone.. don't. Just pack your Switch instead.

I liked the game. Played it to completion (as in, unlocked everything) and felt I got good value for money. I wouldn't have spent nearly as much time on it if I had to pay 50p for every 5 or 10 levels.

He should be apologising for not turning up for tea the other night. I had to throw away th Farm Foods chicken nuggets and chips I’d made. Good job I didn’t waste time making blamonge for dessert

Just bring New Super Mario Bros U and 3D World to the Switch

@PanurgeJr and unless youre part of that small group of people your experience is usually far inferior to theirs AND this is now present in PAID games such as CoD

I think Super Mario Run is a great game; it's well-designed, very fun, and good value for the money with a reasonable, one-time cost. The only thing I didn't like were the grindy Toad Runs where you were effectively punished for a single mistake.

I would love to see more games like it, but the cell phone market is apparently conditioned to prefer "free-to-play" games with a rolling cost that can quickly add up and takes advantage of those with no impulse control. I just hope we always have something like the Switch with physical games or full digital games.

Super Mario Run difficult? Really? How could it get easier than that?

Sure, if you want to obtain all the colored coins (pink, purple, black), there is a bit of a challenge... but most people won't even try doing that.

This issue, unfortunately, was the price. People on mobile want free-to-play or free-to-start games. They should've made it a free-to-start game : world 1 is completely free, then every additional world cost 2€ or something. When buying at least one world, you can play the other modes (challenges, remix 10). And they could still provide the full pack for 10€ or even a bit more.

Anyway, I'm one of the few who thinks the game was kinda great and really suited for mobile devices. They should add more worlds and features, but unfortunately that won't happen.

@Yosher The thing, is, Warframe doesn't shove that in your face. It's completely optional and they won't bug you about it, if you don't want to spend money, you don't have to and the game isn't going to throw some prompt in your face telling you that you could if you paid.

The point with Fortnite and Warframe is that they give you the choice to pay **if you want to** and don't make it a requirement to experience the full game. Those skins you can get? They aren't required for game progress. Yeah, Platinum in Warframe will make the process of crafting and upgrading faster, but you still have the option not to spend the money, and most crafting times in the game will have you getting that thing in a matter of hours, so it's not so obnoxious unless you're just impatient.

While the debate between free-to-start vs buy the game continues, lets not forget the room between free-to-start and $10 for a mobile game that looks a lot like games that sell for 99 cents. While Nintendo may not have wanted to get in the mud with the other 99 cent apps it didn't need to go to 10x their price at $10. It could have sold for $1.99 or $2.99, sold a lot more, and probably made more money than it did selling for $10 via quantity of sales. I'd say $4.99 is probably the most anyone would have found acceptable for a 1 button endless runner, $10 just smacked of greed and hubris for this type of game.

Think of it this way, imagine Super Smash Bros Ultimate selling for $600. That's what $10 looks like for a mobile 1 button endless runner. How many of us are going to pay $600 for Smash? All the people who say free-to-start sucks, it's better that SMR is $10, better be willing to pay $600 for Smash, it's by Ntinedo and therefore worth 10x more than similar games.

Loved SMR. OMG, it has a learning curve, but it’s not that steep. I was able to beat every version of every level and found it challeneging and fun. As for the price, $10 for probably 50+ hours of gameplay in my pocket...sign me up for that every time.

$10 for a mobile auto running game, Nintendo was smoking crack again. You're better off with buying Drastic for $5 and playing DS games with physical buttons on your Blackberry Key2.

The only game I paid $10+ for and was worth it was The World Ends With You for Android.

I like Super Mario Run and I still play it on occasion to this day at times. The flat fee as opposed to microtransactions was one of the reasons that made me buy it. I think had it been more upfront of the cost of the game to the user at the beginning - as opposed to springing it on them after they played a couple levels - it could have been better received.

And the three month exclusive window for iOS killed a lot of the hype by the time it got to Android.

Too expensive and needed more content and a way to keep users coming back, but I don't regret buying it

@ReaderRagfish Would Super Thwomp Run be like Night Trap, or a tower defense style? You control Thwomps in an effort to smash as many running Marios as possible?
I'd buy that fer a dollar!

@diwdiws The randomness as to how the game functions- weapon drops, hit rates, damage rates- is like playing a slot machine.

Dark Souls pvp, Halo pvp, even Goldeneye never pulled that sh:+

I've got zero respect for the game's internal dice mechanic, and the people I've seen literally unable to stop playing unless the cord has been pulled haven't given me any incentive to NOT hate on Fortnite. It's an easy target, tbh

I bought the game on sale and I do think that £5 was the sweet spot.

The biggest negative however was the fact the game could not be played offline. I only ever considered playing the game when on the underground or in places I have a small amount of time to kill; usually where signal is limited. Block some features to online only but not the base game!

I thought Super Mario Run was kind of easy for a Mario game. Getting all of the colored coins was challenging, but optional, and the main levels were pretty simple.

Who was saying it was too difficult?

Btw, I loved it. And $10 was a sweet deal.

A dreadful game from a game producer who should be retired off!

Eh. I didn’t buy it, there’s really nothing here that you can’t get from one of the New Super Mario Bros. games (literally, any of them) or from Super Mario Maker. I don’t really care how they monetize their mobile phone games, just as long as it doesn’t spill over to their real games.

Still holding out for the Wii U, well... Switch version now.

@rjejr "How many of us are going to pay $600 for Smash?"

However many buy amiibo.

I downloaded this and didn't even try it since it requires internet. At my old job I had very little signal so I couldn't even mess with the game on my lunch break. When I get home I have a console to play so this has no interest then. I do like the pay up front model though which most of the games I have on my phone are that.

I'm still baffled that people complained about the $10 price tag being excessive, but I only play console games really. I think most mobile games cost way more than $10 if you actually pay for all the features with their damned microtransactions.

Endless runners do not excite me.
Even Mario can't save an endless runner from being a bad experience.
Phones aren't made for Mario.
Mario is at his best when you can explore and have tight controls.
Phones give you sloppy, limited controls and take away exploration.
That's one of the reasons phones never took over gaming like some thought and consoles are having record sales. Phone gaming tends to be shallow.

@Syrek24 Don't presume things about which you know nothing. I own the game, and I've given it a reasonable shot on my iPhone X. Portrait forces everything to an absurdly small scale and compromises the game hugely.

It was never going to be a good game, but it would at least have been more playable and easier on the eyes had it been designed for landscape mode. It's a horizontally scrolling game for goodness' sake, in what world does portrait mode make any sense?

Don't let people download your game and discover that you're coasting on ten-year-old visual design and thirty-year-old progress structure, that the kingdom builder mode is vapid and tacked on, that you don't bother with locking out devices that can't run the game properly, and the game isn't actually much fun when none of the later obstacles are in play.

And THEN ask people to pay $10 for what they can only presume to be more of the same. They're not going to be in to it.

Aside from arguably needing to make a more ambitious game in the first place, Nintendo should've charged $10 up front, if that is the price they wanted. For all the same reasons they usually cite, when not offering demos, as well as the reason that all the digruntled parents presented: You can't use iOS Family Sharing with a product purchased in-app.

They committed a huge no-no in selling to family audiences on Apple's devices, and I'm pretty sure they're aware at Nintendo.

@aznable that has nothing to do with any micro transactions or it being f2p though

@diwdiws Casual players won't buy anything, because frankly no one in their right mind would waste money on something they can already play for free. Addicted players will provide the majority of the income.

@aznable and so? If the micro transactions doesnt affect the gameplay why should it matter?

@PanurgeJr The F2P model....a.k.a. the "Whale Model" was born and bred in the casino. It tells us everything we need to know.

I won't pretend to know how much development costs were to create SMR, but the initial price of $10 was too steep for my blood for the type of game it was, and on mobile. I have zero issues with the game itself, but as I spend my gaming time in full fledged experiences, I just was not going to be a likely buyer. I think if they could've started with the 2 or $3 range, I may have bit, but that's in the past now. Still glad the game exist for those that like it.

@Syrek24 You're not entirely wrong, but there's a growing problem in the current state of the world and particularly the rise of technology where more and more things are reduced to "most people have x." There's a very fundamental brokenness in a society where "being anything but average" is akin to becoming an un-person, and not keeping up with what is now "average" for "a majority" is akin to being exiled. That can not, and will not end very well. Ostracized, exiled, forgotten populations, through history usually do not allow for the status quo to remain, even if burning ruins is all they leave behind. Sure this is just a mobile game but every time I see that argument used I want to punch someone

Never played it because I got irritated with iOS users having first dibs and android users left behind.

I downloaded it for free and still felt ripped off.

My only issue with Mario Run is the requirement it always be Online. Whenever Nintendo kill its servers, it will be dead.

I regularly play old (like 2008 old) games on my iPhone and appreciate titles that do not require an internet connection.

This recent Nintendo attitude of "people don't like it because it isn't so easy it is not a game" really worries me. If difficulty was an issue here, they should have made MORE levels and had it be even easier in the beginning. Kirby Star Allies and the new Pokemon seem to be a result of this "so easy anyone can play without trying". Point is, there were a lot of other probs with Run. Not enough content initially - constant internet connection - the initial statement from them that there'd be NO NEW CONTENT after the $10 purchase, etc. That said I had a lot of fun with it - but I don't think difficulty was a factor in sales. Difficulty with immediately retry-able gameplay is a huge positive in mobile stuff and indie games, etc.

@PanurgeJr I generally agree and don’t care for free to play. My favorite games on iOS/Android are Dragon Quest ports which weren’t cheap as far as apps go.

That being said, free to play does work if the content is great and if people have a compelling reason to spend money on in-game items. Examples would be Pokémon Go or Fortnite.

SMR is completely Ok compared to Animal Crossing Pocket Camp - that's pure Cancer in mobile format

Loved Super Mario Run. Very underrated.

@diwdiws Gameplay? no. Experience? sure. Anyway, read my first post, I already said why I don't like it.
I don't see what you're not understanding.

Yes, less of good hard games fixed price games like SMR and more crap like f2p Animal Crossing Pocket Camp, please.

@aznable i did read your first post

“Free to play frustrates the frughk out of me, as game-limiting micro transactions feel grimy as hell. One of the reasons I hate on Fortnite SO-DAMN-HARD is because of the f2p approach it champions”

Again i dont undestand your post because fortnite doest have game limiting micro transactions and its not really technically f2p only the battle royale mode

"One of the reasons..." the other- and dominant- reason I think Fortnite sucks Lt. Major Wang is further in the post bruh, and has to do with a more fundamental disdain for everything wrong with the games core mechanic.

"Again i dont undestand your post because fortnite doest (sic) have game limiting micro transactions and its not really technically f2p only the battle royale mode" unless you count V bucks.

... or the macro-transaction that is buying the complete PvE game "Fortnite: Save the Walrus" but hey... whatever. It doesn't have game limiting micro transactions. You're totally right.

At the end of the day, I dislike Fortnite, and you might like it, or love it, or hate it, or whatever. Trick is, I don't care, and would never have said anything about it. Cuz your opinion is your opinion.

Namaste

And fortnite sucks.

I enjoy SMR, and I prefer the pay-once, fixed-price model. I hate f2p, and that it has negatively affected Myamoto's decisions.

@Syrek24 OK, wow pull back there.

My 5 and 3 year old still play Super Mario Run... like 1-2 times a week. My 5 year old has gotten I think all of the hard coins to get in the 4 free levels. They both enjoy Remix 10, and they occasionally do the Toad Rally.

But the whole point of a demo - which is what the free portion is - is to entice you to want more. But like I play the game and find no challenging appeal. Toad Rally was kind of fun for 2-3 days but the reward is bleh. I'm not into collecting stuff to dress up the kingdom. My kids are, but they get plenty of items in the free version.

If the game drops to like $1, maybe I'll buy it if they still ask to play it. But I mean they get more fun out of Disney Tsum Tsum and the PBS Kids Game App, which are both free and seem to provide them way more enjoyment (and in the case of the PBS app, more education).

I love Mario, but Mario Run is a pretty meh on a scale of 1-10, aka right at a 5. It's OK, it's a short time killer, but it's nothing memorable.

@Syrek24 If you think I complain a lot you're sadly (?) mistaken since I'm almost always positive on things (at least on Nintendo). As with always online, I can't afford to pay for packages everytime since they're expensive, and since Super Mario Run isn't exactly the type of game that should require an internet connection I'd rather prefer it NOT to force me to play at home (meanwhile the other alternative is too expensive). Maybe I might have sounded like I was groaning but I genuinely like this game and want to play it wherever and whenever without worrying about an internet connection

Focusing on collecting while automatically running didn't work for me. I just didn't want to retry the levels like that. It was not fun and the online requirement for a paid game is silly and inconvenient.

Miyamoto should have taken the same approach as Mario Tennis Aces, and released a bare bones single player with very little content and levels. It's too difficult to play games that are challenging. Also he should have shown more confidence that it has always online DRM. Nintendo fans have shown they will accept games that require an online connection ,even with single player modes.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

I got bored half way through the game and haven't finished it yet.
I really like Mario but couldn't get into this one. This is probably because I conciser mobile devices as time waster (waiting for something with nothing else to do) and not gaming devices.

You cannot learn and grow unless you try, fail, and learn from the pain of the experience. The decisions were made for what was thought to be good reasons, but they were not the best choice. Sounds like he is growing and learning from his mistakes, which is the best thing any of us can hope for.

But a gaming world where no one tries something different is a world EA/Ubisoft sequels.

i played this game to death and loved every second. i wouldn't change a thing about it

I think they should have went with Base Game+DLC AND no forced online. 11€ at once really is a lot for mobile games, but smh some people have no issues playing 100 bucks a month for microtransaction in Pokémon Go >_>

I like it as it is...

Just make a REALLY good New Super Mario Bros. on the Switch instead... and a 3D World sequel...

But Super Mario Run was fine..