Buying all of your favourite video games can be an incredibly expensive hobby, and Switch players have been quick to notice that a good chunk of titles seem to be more expensive on Nintendo's newest platform than any other. Dubbed 'Switch tax', this phenomenon does feel like it's becoming a bit of a problem; as ports of last-generation games head over to the console, selling for the full retail price as opposed to a figure closer to its now heavily discounted counterparts, some fans are starting to feel rather annoyed.
It's not just limited to major ports, though; the Switch's eShop is also host to a number of digital releases that can be picked up considerably cheaper elsewhere. Is this to do with development costs? Publishing costs? Do publishers simply think that the Switch is a platform where selling games at a higher price is the norm? How common actually is it for a game to be more expensive on Switch? There are many questions you could ask surrounding the topic and, luckily, a good handful of these have been answered.
By building a database of game prices, and by talking to various publishers, Switcher has come up with several interesting finds. It's worth noting that all of this information was collected in the US, relating to pricing in that region alone, and games have only been compared between Switch and Steam, not other consoles.
The site has 1,042 Switch games in its database, 471 of which are also available on Steam. Buying all of these titles on the Switch's eShop would cost you $7,293.18, whereas on Steam it would only cost $6,550.03. This suggests that there is an average increase in price of just over 10%. Here are some other interesting little finds from Switcher:
Excluding games with physical copies available drops the average Switch tax to 7.2%.
Excluding digital-only games increases the average Switch tax to 17.8%.
55.8% (263) of these games are the same price on both the eShop and Steam, and surprisingly, 8.9% (42) of them are cheaper on the eShop than Steam.
10.8% (51) of these games were released on the eShop and Steam on the same day. Just one of these games was more expensive on the eShop.
Interestingly, the two most extreme cases were Payday 2, ($49.99 on the eShop vs $9.99 on Steam), and Mecho Tales ($0.99 on the eShop vs $19.99 on Steam). Maeva Sponbergs, EVP Communication at Payday 2 developer Starbreeze, said:
The simple explanation is that there’s a drastic difference of included content in the different offerings. The original base game of PAYDAY 2 (which is now priced on steam at 9.90) was released in 2013 and has since had hundreds of updates (free and paid) made to the game throughout the years. The closer comparison would be PAYDAY 2 Ultimate Edition on Steam. Most of those updates are packaged into the Switch Edition.
We'd urge you to give Switcher's full report a read if you're interested - another find shows that Plug In Digital have nine games at the same price on both platforms, but one was half price and another was double. This is apparently due to the integration of DLC in Nintendo builds, or extra hardcore levels being added to Steam builds amongst other things.
Essentially, though, fluctuations in price can be seen going both ways, and while it may feel that Switch games are usually at a higher price, this isn't always the case. Also, games such as DOOM, which was released at full price despite being available for under £10 in the UK on other platforms, will no doubt be priced in such a way to cover the costs of porting and optimisation. Naturally, each game should be assessed on a case by case basis; perhaps simply assessing whether or not a Switch game's price is worth it to us as individuals, rather than comparing it to similar products on other platforms, is the best way to go.
[source switcher.co]
Comments 100
Meh, its a new console and new games (for the console) so i dont begrudge paying this, people have to get paid
I can still find most games cheaper than the RRP so I'm not too bothered.
Payday 2 No one is there right mind would pay £50 for a 5 year old game, DLC or not.
Retailing it at £20 to £25 would have been fairer idea.
Comparing the asking price to Steam is hardly a fair comparison. They don't have expensive cartridges to manufacture. A 10% increase for a physical copy that can be kept for propserity (whilst also saving money on what one would otherwise be spending on additional storage) is a bargain in my eyes.
The very reason why I no longer game on PC is due to the fact that games are no longer being provided on physical media (if the industry won't switch to Blu-ray at least, then what is the point of printing Steam keys in a case?). The crippling "internet required" DRM doesn't help either. While the PC version of most games may objectively be the best, the fact that I cannot buy a physical version that doesn't require a convoluted activation/deactivation process makes the console versions vastly superior, at least as a product.
If I could burn PC games to Blu-ray discs myself without having to worry about circumventing DRM, then I would. Alas...
The difference is actually way higher in my region. Some games costs like 50% in some cases, but that applies to the PS4 and Xbox One as well.
Steam is just very convenient and cheaper in some parts of the world, like South America. Which is why i only buy exclusives on consoles and buy the rest on Steam.
What I find interesting is that, unlike for steam games, you dont find sites where to get codes cheaper than in eShop. When you compare it to mmoga or kinguin or sites like that, you dont find that for Switch games somehow.
What bothers me the most is digital games that come out, same day on ps4 and switch at different prices. Such as flipping death, £15.99 (ps4), £17.99(switch) or banner saga 3, £19.99(ps4), £22.50(switch).
I don't care to pay more for a switch game while it is available on other platforms for a much lower price. I'm grateful enough for all the third-party support (and ofcourse firstparty!) and other great titles heading to switch. Portability is my highest priority and that's why i chose for this system.
The switch prices are consistent to the pricing when they were released on the other systems so it is not 'switch tax'. A lot of people saying they are cheaper on Steam where you don't actually own anything, not the same.
Also if I buy payday for a £10 on the xbox, for example, then I will save myself £30. Well no I won't as I don't own a xbox so I'll need to pay for that too.
Honestly, I have all the new gen consoles and most part of the games that are being released to the Switch I already have. I feel that is unfair the higher prices on the eshoo but just like me a lot of gamers want to play his/her favorite game on the go. Prices should be cheaper and what I do to do not feel myself too poor is use “save coin” website and buy the game on the region it is cheaper.
@dew12333 "Also if I buy payday for a £10 on the xbox, for example, then I will save myself £30. Well no I won't as I don't own a xbox so I'll need to pay for that too." what? what kind of reasoning is that? haha
@Silly_G They're comparing Steam and eShop, why is that not fair? You can't buy physical version on either place anyway.
@dethkult : I was referring specifically to games with physical releases as opposed to digital exclusives.
As for digital exclusives, price discrepancies are virtually inexcusable.
all digital downloads should cost the same, no matter the platform. there is no justifiable reason no to, just another example of how [removed] the "gaming industry" is as a whole. look at phone companies, if one company has higher cost of the same service as a competitor - guess what happens? they either lower the prices or run out business but for some reason that doesn't happen in the "gaming industry"
Please mind your language - Octane
I've been happy to pay the original launch price for the re-release on switch. It's new on switch. Why would they already discount? There's a whole market of people that would buy games on the Switch that would not have bought them on other platforms, if only for the portability.
@Bunkerneath it is not about to get paid, but to be fairly paid. Must be great for both sides, ourselves and them (developers). They worked hard to port the game, great, do not sell for almost free but do not charge us the full price like it was a brand new release!
@Silly_G If you buy your PC games on GOG, and sometimes on Humble, you can do that. All GOG games are DRM free.
@Silly_G convoluted activation process? Where? Steam? No
@Spectra I am not sure it is just that, although it is likely part of the problem of course.
I mean, what would happen if games were cheaper digitally than physically? Less people would buy from retailers and I could imagine that not being good for publisher/retailer relations.
Even if, in most cases, the retailers already sell the games for less, some might not and would still dislike the publisher if they went cheaper...
Publisher/Retailer relations are important, as a lot of game copys are still being sold physically and it is, in big part, up to the retailers to make consumers aware of the products.
@EeryPetrol Get ready to pay $60 for Super Mario Bros. 3. It's technically a new game on Switch, right?
I don't care with the price as long not too expensive.
Even if the games released on multiplatform (example on Switch & PS4), i will definetely choose Switch version despite of higher price rather than choose the PS4 version with cheaper price.
I DON'T CARE with upcoming PS4 games anymore after i bought The Sims 4 PS4 last time.
Any third party game I want now I get it for my Xbox lol it's cheaper and runs better than on Switch
The Switch Tax? More like a Nintendo Tax. Every Nintendo console has more expensive games u_u
Odd the comparison was done with Steam. Would have liked to see the cost compared to Xbox & PS4. Maybe a comparison of their digital store front prices & a seperate comparison of physical copies.
Games available on both were also typically released on Steam waaayyyy before their Switch counterpart. A fairer comparison would have been to compare launch prices between the two platforms.
Sticking to my Russian account since 3DS times, I face even higher prices due to our neighbours' "Google tax" (one that targets digital content purchases abroad) and in the more recent times, our own Google tax here in Belarus on top of it. But Switch remains the priority platform for me nonetheless - even dipping again with the stuff I already have on other consoles (the only potential exceptions are most of the titles I've already completed elsewhere, unless I particularly want to replay them or finished them back in my strictly jolly roger days), let alone for yet unowned games. Fairune dilogy is on 3DS, Iconoclasts is on Vita, Saints Row 3 is reportedly within the scope of Win 1 competence - but all of them are on my Switch wishlist instead.
And if I can't afford something on release, I'll wait until I do or make use of a sale, whichever plays out first.
I don’t mind paying a bit more for physical Switch games but not more on the eshop. I find whenever a game is new to the eshop it’ll be on sale on the PlayStation store at the same time.
This is extremely annoying in México, games like Fortnite and Paladins suffer greatly from this, example: 1000 Vbucks cost you $129 pesos in the microsoft xbox store, BUT on the nintendo eshop they charge you $198 pesos.
In Paladin's its the same case but even worse, you can buy all champions for about $300 pesos in the microsoft store, but on the eshop you have to pay around $650 pesos, it's outrageous.
I messaged the Paladin's dev through email looking for an answer to this and they told me that they don't control the prices, the platform (nintendo) does, apparently...
Why did they compare the sale price of Mecho Tales? That just invalidates their whole report, how many sale prices have they compared on eShop or Steam?
@Supadav03 I own an Xbox and Switch, I've noticed many games cost more on switch which is why I buy 99% on Xbox when I have the option.
My main concern is actually the drop in price on major third party titles. I wished they fell as quickly as on other platforms.
On the plus side with physical Nintendo titles, they do hold their trade-in value really well.
Im at two minds about that.
Do i think it's a little over priced? Yeah i do - there is a tax on Switch games.
Will i continue to pay for them? Yes i will - in the same way Apple users are willing to pay more for the quality they get in their devices, you pay for quality and Nintendo games are of the highest quality.
I also think the price of every item has a tax attached to it when the quality comes into question.
Clothes and food are an example, you pay more for higher quality.
We're talking a minimum of $5 extra for the Switch version and that's just launch prices for new console titles (Valkyria Chronicles 4 and Undertale off the top of my head), so yeah I'd say it's real.
I'm not bothered about AAA games since you can find most of them much cheaper than the shop, but this is only true for £60+.
Any £20 game on other platform costs £30 on switch. It bothers me to pay 50% more for a switch game.
@geordie yes, I’ve seen the same thing with my Switch & PS4. Especially with physical games. Digital seems to be pretty close for the most part.
This does not take into account discounts then from what I understand? I mean, that would be fine, if there was no systemic difference in discounts between the two platforms, but I'd have to see some numbers first to really believe that. Based on just pure personal experience or anecdotal data, I would assume that Steam is a much more aggressive platform in terms of discounts, so that in the end, the real-life cost of those games would be - for most users, that don't just buy any game they might want play right away on a whim - much lower indeed.
If the difference is that eShop is 10% more expensive that Steam you are already excluding physical games. If you consider physical games (Xbox One and PS4) the average increase would be much bigger.
Now you have to add Nintendo Online which is a paid service while it was free on DS, Wii, 3DS and Wii U (a big bonus back then), the proprietary overpriced Nintendo cartridges, the mandatory downloads for most big games, etc.
Besides, as some people have commented, sales on PC, Xbox One and PS4 stores are far better (around 50%) and include more relevant games so you can get first or third-party games that are recent AAA games with a big discount. That alone makes the difference between them and Nintendo much bigger, because discounts on eShop focus on indie games and the offered first-party games have very small discounts (around 10%).
Just use a price tracking website and wait until the price drops to where you want it. Simple.
Retailers like Amazon will sometimes drop a price for less than 24 hours, only to raise it beyond the original price thereafter.
The point is, if you shop smart then you can save money.
This isn't news...digital games on the eShop (since the Wii) have always been more expensive than they're steam/retail counterparts. In retail, games usually will slowly drop in price over time and/or a sale can be found (like 25% off). On the eShop you're lucky to find a 3% sale for a 5 year old game. And with Steam, Steam is usually always cheaper, plus Steam always has good sales to buy from.
"Switch Tax" isn't a thing. It seems like you just now noticed there's a price difference after a decade of there always being one.
Plus, you'd think the eShop would be cheaper considering there isn't any hardware with it, but nope, it's still basically the same price as a physical version.
Pretty real to me. If they think they're going to launch Diablo 3 at $60 on Switch, they're not getting my money. It's a 6 year old game.
There is no Switch tax here, games on PS4, XBOX ONE, and Switch are all 79.99+15% sales tax. GO CANADA!
@Spectra How is digital distribution a ripoff? Do you have evidence to back up your claim or are you just being a troll?
@TossedLlama Yep and it's enhanced for those with Xbox One X.
I don't mind paying the "Switch Tax". Therefore, I demand my games coming complete on the cartridges and not with those dammed extra download requirements like L.A. Noire.
@Spectra You complain about things, you bash things that people like and tried to turn your opinions into facts, so you definately are a troll...
@Alantor28 you sound like the troll complaining about his opinions, which I agree with Digital pricing something at the same cost for a physical version makes it a hard pill to swallow in most cases, unless you are getting something more because you are not getting a version of the game where you don't have a backup of that game, and don't have the ability to trade that game in. Distribution of the game, and cost of the cartridge are factors in why you can understand a physical game being more. However if it's digital those things are not there.
I will repeat again... lets play the game! Save Coins, change region, buy and be happy! Thats the only solutions right now!
Proof of the "Switch Tax"
The game Rime. Physically released, was $10 more on release day on Switch than XboX or PS4.
Now on sale for $10 on both, physically, while Nintendo still has it at full price.
@dougphisig Hmm, well you do have a point there.
@xpromisedx
Lol I'm glad you liked that one. Although there is an element of truth in what I'm saying because if you look at the price of the consoles/pc when they are released then the switch will have been cheaper. So depending on how many games you actually buy for that console it may still have been more expensive per game!
But like you said 'clutching at straw' kind of....
@dougphisig And I can totally understand where you're coming from. It sucks for most gamers. But to me in my honest opinion, I usually buy my games both physical and digital and I never encountered any problems with that.
This research is garbesh anyway. It is skewed in favour of the switch tax. What needs to be done is compare the physical releases across the three main consoles.
@Spectra Dude, calm down. I'll drop it, okay man?
I live in Russia and the difference is much higher. Games on PC are 2-4 times cheaper (even without discounts).
@bratzdoll Valkyria Chronicles 4 is the exact same price for all three consoles on Amazon, and this has been the case for every major simultaneous multiplat release I've ever looked at. I'm sure there have been exceptions here and there, but they are exceptions, not the rule.
@JasmineDragon I live in Europe so I was checking Amazon UK (it's £8 more expensive on Switch) and some domestic stores here (the price tag is 5€ heavier), which prompted my comment. I'm glad that's not the case over there!
I'd like to think these are exceptions, not the rule, but it's a bummer when I see it on most games I'm interested in [Darkest Dungeon (edit: Banner Saga Trilogy too) is another one].
Very interesting article! To be fair, you have to compare apples to apples and that does not seem to be the case of $9 vs $49 for PayDay. Nevertheless, I'm sure is overpriced and in that case, you shouldn't buy it. Go for a used cartridge, wait for a discount, game it on a different system if you can.
I'd like to see the same comparison run on Switch games which are also present in the iOS and Google Play app stores. I'm guessing the Switch tax is far more noticeable there.
Much ado about nothing. Games always cost more on console to make up for the loss that companies typically take on hardware sales.
@Silly_G nice post dude. Well done. 😊👍
The big publishers being exceptions (EA, Activision), most game developers don't have large profit margins, so I'm generally happy to pay what they ask.
Probably already been said but a more fair comparison would be to compare the price between switch and PS4/Xbox.
The switch tax is worrisome for sure, but I actually do not mind paying a bit more so I can play it on the go. Hence with Wolfenstein, Doom, etc.
A note beforehand: some people REALLY need to read the complete article the guy made, before spouting their nonsense, based only upon partial information, all over this comment section...
As I always thought: there is NO real Switch tax to speak of, PERIOD.
But regardless, and as fully expected, it won't stop people from making the most idiotic claims, and fanning the flames to perpetuate this rather pathetic lie. Even in the face of complete and utter logic and facts, people will still (and sometimes desperately) stick to their previous opinions or beliefs, whether or not that makes them look decidedly clueless in the process...
People comparing other versions of games to those on the Switch, tend to forget, or simply overlook (perhaps even on purpose, to make or solidify their point?) that porting to the Switch takes considerably more effort: the Xbox One and PS4 are FAR closer to PC's than the Switch will ever be, so the process to port games to those platforms, will be quicker and cheaper, or even more or less instantaneous in some cases.
Whereas on the Switch, extra steps need to be taken to cut content, downgrade things, and rearrange/reprogram stuff to account for it needing to be translated to an entirely different platform.
These things take (considerable) time, effort, and thus: money. Money that companies must be able to see returns on. Companies are in the business of making a profit, after all. They're not philanthropic institutes...
Sure, we could label those costs as "Switch tax", but what they actually are, is simply operational and/or manufactural costs, which exist regardless of and have nothing to do with a special fee that people have to pay, to be able to play these games on the Switch.
It's an unfortunate fact, that it may ultimately not always be the most beneficial thing for the end user sometimes, but people REALLY need to understand this point, because it's a simple truth, that needs to be factored into the equation, whether we like it or not.
And even more essential to that point, is that it doesn't matter if it's the physical or the digital form of the game, since besides putting it on the cartridge, there is NO difference in the extra effort, that the developers/programmers have to make, to bring their game to Nintendo's platform, so no: digital versions of multi-platform games on the Switch are NOT directly comparable in price to other digital versions.
And as such, those cannot serve as some kind of objective yard stick, along which the cost of Switch versions/conversions can be measured...
The fact that the PC/Steam versions are often the cheapest versions, by FAR, is simply because 9 out of 10 times (if not always), development is done on PC workstations, so it isn't really all that strange that the prices are more "malleable", for lack of a better word, on that specific platform...
Then there's the even more delusional and short-sighted comments about not wanting to pay full price for older games such as Diablo 3. As the article clearly states, it comes with any and all DLC included, contrary to the PC and/or other console versions, and again: it needed to be optimized for the Switch, and the game comes complete on a cartridge, so I'd say the explanation for those costs is pretty damn clear.
And above all that, I never saw that many complaints for the Switch port of Skyrim either, which for all intents and purposes, is an even older game...
So, in short, none of the "but it's cheaper on other platforms" or "but it's an old game, so it should cost me next to nothing" comments are of any relevance whatsoever, nor are they valid reasons or explanation for why this difference is there.
The actual facts ARE a very valid reason as to why this difference is there, but, as also clearly noted in the article (and in the source information that the article is based upon), and apparently ignored by just about everyone that still complains about the non-existing Switch tax, is that this goes BOTH ways:
Games are NOT always more expensive on the Switch, so it's not as black and white as some people seem to make us want to believe. And even if games ARE more expensive, then it's actually relatively easy to extrapolate where that comes from, and it really has NOTHING to do with any kind of dark, malicious and mythical formula such as a "Switch tax"...
Payday 2 was free a while ago on Steam. It's the full game and is permanently there in my Steam library forever.
On Eshop, you really need FREE TAX on here ALASKA. XD
HINT: "SWITCH TAX" it depends on your country and government never collected tax. Just go ALASKA. XD
I found an example of the reverse. Physical copies of Wonder Boy 3 were £5 cheaper on Switch than PS4 at launch back in April.
@ThanosReXXX I think you' re taking the term tax to literally lol. It just refers to games being more expensive on average on the switch, it doesnt in any way imply that nintendo or any other company is taking a big chunk of profit.
And while it is understandable that developers have more costs to port a game to the switch as a gamer it' s crazy to spend more money to play the same game but now with worse graphics and framerate issues.
This is one of those things you should expect.
Nintendo games are always more expensive and their sales are usually pretty poor. Hopefully that changes but I doubt it by the look of the fan base that will defend every decision they make.
@EightBitMan
“If Nintendo made a disc-based console with a built-in hard drive, this wouldn't have happened. I don't buy into the "oh, but it's portable excuse / rationalization"
Whether you choose to buy into it or not, it’s the reason. And a 100% valid one, as a portable system with a Disc Drive and a HDD is a ridiculous idea.
“Naturally, each game should be assessed on a case by case basis; perhaps simply assessing whether or not a Switch game's price is worth it to us as individuals, rather than comparing it to similar products on other platforms, is the best way to go.”
The article gets to the crux at the end. With the Switch there are clearly people happy to pay for the more flexible version using the systems portability. Others only using it as a home system will see less value in the Switch version.
Choices, you see. A Good Thing.
@dBackLash I think that it's the other way around, and that it's the other people taking the term too literally. Apparently so literally, that it warrants making an article about, to find out if it's really a thing or not...
Operational costs are just that: operational costs. And if one company has a higher bill in that regard, than the other(s), then it's completely logical for these extra costs to end up influencing the retail price of the final product.
That doesn't mean that we have to like it, but it's a simple fact, and it's not like Nintendo, or any of the other companies making games for them, is making extra money on the Switch version of their game over the backs of Switch owners, which is apparently exactly what this supposed "Switch tax" seems to mean for some people...
And the whole point of the article, and even more so: it's source, is to show that games aren't more expensive on average on the Switch at all. It literally says in the article, that it goes both ways, with certain games also being cheaper on Switch/more expensive on other platforms, and the source material going even more in-depth on that.
I already mentioned this in my previous comment, but in general people just look at the negatives first, because that's the easiest path to take.
I don't necessarily like the extra costs, nor do I agree with every move that Nintendo makes, but besides all that, the whole story about where these extra costs come from, regardless of what weird kinda label people want to slap onto it, is perfectly explicable.
A lot of it is probably ambitious publishers hoping to make cash on the new console. Payday 2, for instance, might have succeeded if it launched for ten bucks. At fifty though people just ignore it. I'm looking forward to the eshop getting more competitive over time.
@RedMageLanakyn It's always a mixed bag though. As consumers we can say "oh it's a 6 year old game for $60 when it's $35 so many other places." OTOH you're paying for labor. It no doubt took a lot of man-hours to do the work to port that game for Switch. That represents a lot of labor, and it has to be paid for like a new game is paid for.
If anything that argument is probably the best argument to end consoles and just put everything on mobile where it's a standard platform without having to pay for porting.
The phrase Switch tax to me has always meant only 1 thing - games released simultaneously on Switch and either/or Xbox 1 and PS4 cost more on the Switch b/c of the price of the carts that Switch games are on. I'm sure I'm not the only one who sees it that way.
Why any report would compare the price of digital Steam games to Switch games is beyond me and seems like a total waste of time.
And, if they wanted to compare the price of games released digitally on Switch and Steam at the same time that's still a pointless report b/c Steam games, and all PC games in general, have been cheaper in general than console games for about a decade now. I'm not sure why, but they have. So of course games on Steam are overall cheaper than Switch, console vs PC, end of story.
For those looking for a good example, "Yoku's Island Express" released 2 months ago on June 18th on Switch, PS4 and Xbox One physically. It's $40 on Switch, $30 on PS4 and X1. That is a perfect example of the "Switch tax". A game costing more on Switch b/c of the price of the cartridge, the cost of doing business on the Switch, the so called Switch tax.
https://smile.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_2_19?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=yoku+island+express&sprefix=Yoku+island+express%2Caps%2C136&crid=1YA1NHJ6U8OQ1&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Ayoku+island+express
For those who have read this far, Yoku's Island Express is currently on sale on the US eShop for $11.99, down from $19.99.
https://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/yokus-island-express-switch
There's a lot of cases where it does make sense (porting over Doom is a great example) there are a few where it doesn't. Jackbox Party Pack in particular seems to average slightly cheaper on Switch (It's on sale more often than on other platforms from what I've noticed too)
Eh, either way I find it worth paying a little extra for the portability convenience.
This is why I'm glad I own all the major platforms. I've saved a lot by buying cross-platform indies through PSN. Not only is it cheaper, but you also get trophy support and whatnot, which is more for less unless portability is a selling point for you on some of those games.
When a game relases on Switch on the same date as competition's version and with a higher price tag without any explanation yes, it's a concern to me.
But I pay the Switch tax as I did with Street Fighter 30th Anniversary Collection, and call it this way because that's what it is.
For me, I don't have a capable PC and don't have the other two consoles, so price comparison literally means nothing to me. A game could be $60 or $6 dollars on the competion, it doesn't affect me either way.
Regarding the pricing of ports on Switch, that's nothing exclusive to the Switch, lol. When Super Bomberman R was ported to PS4/XB1 this year, you could find a Switch copy for cheaper. ZombiU was cheaper on Wii U when it was ported to the competing consoles etc. etc. Ports are priced as New games on a specific platform because they're new games on that specific platform .I know that sounds obvious as heck, but people don't still don't seem to grasp that.
Of course there's always the exceptions like Okami on Switch which was $20, but yeah.
There are definitely games that cost a bit more on Switch than on other platforms, though I don't think the problem is as bad as some might suggest. Then again, the Goosebumps game from three years ago (which takes around three to five hours to complete) just went up for preorder today for $30, twice what it originally cost three years ago. This is an unusual example, but still, damn. Do they actually think anyone will buy it at that price?
@NEStalgia If it's a small company I can see that argument, but this is Blizzard/Activision, the same people who thought it was a good idea to put a real money auction house in the game at first, so this game doesn't get a Switch Tax pass from me. If they sold this game at $40 they would recoup their costs very quickly I would think.
When I can buy the same games on other platforms that have the same benefits of the Switch, for cheaper, with no downside, then I will complain. As it is, yeah sometimes games cost a little more on Switch.
But for me, that slight price hike is worth it right now
The closest alternative to Switch is something like the GDP Win 2, which is a glorified Chinese piracy machine that can play a handful of notable steam games. But does not run an modified OS designed to fit a device of that size.
Well, the US has basically nothing to complain about then with those 10%. In Russia, the region-free nature of the Switch has played a cruel joke on it. Steam games are often region-locked, and thus have regional prices, which can be 2-3 times lower than Europe or the US.
Unsurprisingly Nintendo fans come up with all types of poor excuses for why the technically inferior Switch ports are more expensive and still worth it.
Nintendo fanboys are so delusional.
NINTENDO HUUUUUUGE SUMMER SALE!!!!!11
So what do we get? Zelda 50% off? Nope. Splatoon 2? Nah. Xenoblade 2? Ofcourse not. Mario Odyssey? Lol no. That lazy Kirby game? Get outta here. Old Wii U ports like Mario Kart? Hell naw. Full price bruah.
Here is WWE 2K18 and Qbik
@Silly_G That's why I prefer GOG over Steam (in addition to the fact that they have a huge selection of old DOS games). They provide you with straight installer files that you can keep forever and don't require the Internet after the initial download rather than the c*** that Steam pulls. While this may cost them a few sales here and there due to people sending copies of the installers to their families and friends, they understand that the friendlier consumer practices are worth it in the long run.
@Spectra Not in the U.S. they don't. Here, everyone always charges full retail price for new releases, online or not. If the digital stores were cheaper, they'd be significantly undercutting all the retailers in the video game market and put a real dent in the economy.
Now if a game has been out for a couple of years then you can probably find a new copy cheaper online...unless it's one of the various Nintendo Selects titles in which case the digital and retail versions are just as cheap, so even there it generally evens out.
@Moon Really? I seem to recall that Wii games were generally $50, while they were $60 on PS3 and X360. There were of course reasons for that, but it still disproves your claim of Nintendo games always being more expensive.
If I were a developer or publisher, (indie, mind you) I'd be charging more on the Switch than say, something like Steam. If it were an $8 title on Steam, I'd charge $10 on the Switch, but maybe open with $5 sale. These guys gotta be able to justify their Switch dev kits. I'm not a big fan of indie titles, but if you are, support what you care about. If it means payin' a little more for something you love, made by people you care for, to play in a new way, do it.
This article has no real information on switch tax.
@Silly_G Sounds like you need to look into gog.com
all drm free. If you want to burn it to a disc then go ahead. they're a really great alternative to steam.
I don't consider quality gaming on-the-go a "tax". Also won't call developers (you know the people making the games you folks buy) greedy for spending time and effort to bring these games to us. It was never a cheap hobby.
Why are people upset over this? It truly baffles me. If you don't like the prices, then surely just shop around as not everywhere sells at the same price.
I would expect Switch games to be priced slightly higher due to manufacturing costs etc...but I haven't bought a game on release release day for years - except BotW on Wii U for fear of a low print run.
To me, games are always more expensive on the new console. It happened to Wii U as well. Games on launch day (AC3 & Black Ops 2) were already available and were priced less on other consoles but no one seemed to complain about it. Even games later released on Wii U suffered the same fate as the current Switch games. I don't think I actually have a point, just rambling on..... sorry
@BigKing I love Nintendo consoles and their games. For me they are the best games I have played in my 3 decades of game playing. (Dark Souls, Bloodborne, Uncharted, Red Dead etc are a handful of exceptions- I know there are more but luckily I also have a PS4). However I agree with you completely on this issue. The eshop sales are laughable. Every now and again you get something good like Hollow Knight at 7 quid but on the whole it’s like 2-3 pounds off a game. Whereas on ps store I have recently bought two Wolfenstein games, alien isolation and windjammers. The combined price was near 20 pounds. Over on the eshop Zelda costs more than the physical edition. It’s nuts. I only buy games on the eshop which are less than a tenner. I can not justify paying over 30 for a game I may not be able to play one day. I mostly buy the arcade archives and Neo geo titles which I feel are fine at 6 pounds. I cannot understand anyone who defends Nintendo on this point.
Valkyria Chronicles on the PS4 is £45 (PSN), whereas it's £50 on the Switch (eShop). Via Amazon the price difference is £42 vs £50.Given that the PS4 version is superior, this kind of stuff just looks bad for Nintendo.
@Octane Probably end up more expensive than that depending on how long you have a Nintendo Online subscription for XD.
@BulbasaurusRex It's also the reason why Nintendo generally doesn't do sales very often. In terms of size of the overall company, they are easily the smallest out of the 3 (and have all of their eggs in one basket). They cannot afford to piss off retailers especially in NA.
The other two have other things they can fall back on (Sony being a huge multimedia publisher in both movies and music and Microsoft with their operating systems and other software).
Let me tell you loud and clear, there is no switch tax. You think that games are physically cheaper on other systems that you get a better deal, no because you have a disc drive data that has to go on a hard drive. Depending on the hard drive, and newer games having more memory, you will probably have to get a new hard drive before long. With the switch cartridge format, it might be a little more expensive, but majority of games are on the cartridge, do you would only have money to buy sd cards if you need it.
@Bunkerneath The cost of porting a game is cheaper than the cost of creating the game from scratch.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...