Not all Pokémon are created equal. Some of them are powerful, some of them are weak. Some of them are awesome to look at, and others are comparable to a pile of mouse droppings, and the latter are what we have for your viewing pleasure today.
It should be noted that we aren't suggesting that any of the monsters listed in the video are inherently bad or not worth having in your team, but simply that they're not as easy on the eye as others. Also, bear in mind that this is in no way an objective statement and is purely own opinion. Someone's got to love 'em, and it may very well be you. Oh, and some Pokémon are specifically designed to be ugly and we've been careful to take that into account when making our decisions, so put that pitchfork down.
We won't spoil anything about which ones we thought were eyesores, you'll just have to watch the video for yourself below! Do you agree with the monsters we chose? Let us know which Pokémon you think should be in this list by leaving a comment, and don't forget to subscribe to Nintendo Life on YouTube for more original video content, or we'll send Jinx to get you while you sleep.
Lee Garbutt contributed to this feature.
Comments 126
I can't agree with any of them lol
Barbaracle has to be my least favourite...
Spoooooooooooooons.
I haven't watched the video but Shroomish is in the preview and that's one of the cutest pokemon.
This list is a joke, right?
Eh, don't feel like watching. lol
"Please don't have Garbodor/Vanilluxe/anything from gen V on the list like every other one does."
"Number 1, almost everything from gen V."
-_-
Wow that list was... Very objectionable.
And a spot for Gen V 'mons (which imo get way too much hate), but Cryogonal doesn't appear. I think that's the single worst-designed Pokémon. It manages to look overly complex and overly plain and boring at the same time. I keep forgetting that it even exists.
I couldn't deal with hearing "who's that Pokemon" ten bazillion times. lol
Haha, your opinion's wrong. (Yes, he found a way.) I do agree with Tropius and Jynx though, and I guess MHeracross and Barbaracle did have to grow on me.
I'd never ever ever agree more about the first position, I HATE THE FIFTH GENERATION, I never digested it, it's my least favorite generation, and to me almost killed the Pokemon franchise if it wasn't for the 6th generation and the megaevolutions.
What on earth was number 2... I never saw that pokemon...
Only one I agreed with is Jynx. I guess the others have grown on me.
Sorry while I'm generally open to opinion, that last entry invalidates this whole list for me, chucking an ENTIRE GENERATION under the bus comes across as petty, if it bothers you that much just make the whole list using specific gen 5 pokemon you dislike.
Gen 5 has some clunkers and unimaginative stuff... but no more than every other gen does. You didn't even give examples or details on any of the Gen 5 pokemon you dislike, just flashed some pics up while saying not all the designs were bad, which made it confusing whether those pokemon you were showing were exceptions you like or ones you didn't.
I'm disappointed NintendoLife.
Can't say I see much ugliness to any Pokémon at all, except for the deliberately ugly ones. I always look for the intention of the design, and every single Pokémon has logical ties to real world mythology, animals, plants, or aspects of societal structures. As such, I wasn't fond of the list at all. Also, mocking Gen V is very much the most abstract mixed bag of all. It had some of the most epic designs I've ever seen, but at the same time, some of the most irritating design were right next to those.
Still, I personally find Gen I to be the worst of all, design-wise. The inspirations were mostly to obvious to be something I'd consider smart design choices, but I'd still not call even one of them ugly.
I disagree with Castform and Shroomish. They're cute, specially Shroomish.
Yeah, I mostly agree with you choices Alex. Gen 5 is the ugliest generation of Pokémon (with some exceptions), that's the reason I skipped Black/White 1 and 2.
And as I side note. It's not that I don't like the video but as I suggested before, you guys should try using the squids gaming girl to narrate your videos. It will probably be a bit more appealing to non NLife users who watch the video IMHO
@Palom I can agree to an extent in terms of laziness (most of the Pokemon are blatantly obvious homages to past gens, the first one in particular). But the point I'm making in every list on YouTube involving least favorites/worst/whatever always has gen V as a punching bag and it's been beyond done to death.
It's even worse then usual here since it just throws the entire gen into the lot rather then one in particular.
Mega Alakazam and Barbaracle have quite aesthetically appealing designs, I think. The rest of the list is take it or leave it for me, although nobody likes Jynx.
I have to agree with Gen 5, Gen 5 were the games I played least (with the exception of Gen 3 until now as I never had those). I hated the look of them and the fact that you could only get the Gen 5 until after the league drove me nuts.
How can you have a list of terrible designed Pokemon and not include Muk? Or Electrode? Or Lickylicky????? Granted, I love every Pokemon (except Keldeo), but the designs of the ones I mentioned are certainly more deserving on this list than Tropius or Barbaracle.
I'm not a fan of Pokemon, so I don't know too much, but I was under the impression this guy was the worst:
I'm just going to say that black and white was bad but to lump them all into position 1 is a bit of a cheat. you cannot say you are going to name ten and then lump a hundred of them in the top position.
Lets be honest here. out of the ones you showed you missed the abolute worse one from black and white. Trubbish
My worst are any Pokémon that are too human/furry-like, that look like they're made out of something metalic, or that either resemble, closely named after or bear something that resembles an artificial man-made object.
I dislike almost all of gen 5 as well. But I don't know why he picked exeggutor over a literal pile of eggs. I feel there were a much better picks though. Like living swords, ice cream, and a ring of floating keys....Dont even get me started on that washing machine...I feel like Im the only one who even remembers that theres a pokemon...that turns into a washing machine....
Don't understand the hate for gen 5 at all. It was so much stronger in the pkmn and story department than gen 4.
This list makes absolutely no sense. Add to that this list doesn't include Trubbish?
Trubbish.
The only one's I agree with are Jynx and Barbaracle. Shroomish is awesome and so are the 5th generation Pokémon mentioned here.
I think Binacle is way worse than Barbaracle and I like most of the inatimate object Pokémon because making them into animated creatures is much more creative than most of the normal Pokémon designs.
Gen. 5 Pokemon are supposed to be similar to older ones. The whole point of B&W was to have a complete new set of "native" Pokemon and many of them are deliberately based on older ones. To say they're unimaginative is sort of missing the point.
Worst DESIGNED.
As in either, could have looked better, or just don't look good at all.
There are some who are blatantly supposed to look poopoodoodoocacapoopledoople, but personally Kanto Johto, Hoenn and Sinnoh, are the most authentic.
I lol'd at the Gen 5 part, because that's my opinion too. I'd rather have a smaller list of new Pokemon that are pretty good (X/Y) than have a big list of new Pokemon that are below average (Black/White).
To those who seem to have taken this list a bit personally, you do realise this was - y'know - a bit of light-hearted fun?
@Damo
You're missing one vital ingredient.
light-hearted Fun.
Nice choices, but for me there are uglier and more uninspired pokémon than these. Think about that sword-like pokémon from XY. That is not even a creature, it is an object! It feels like the designers still didn't realize what made the Red/Blue pokemon so cute and awesome.
I like Mega Alakazam, I think it would be a better evolution to Kadabra than the normal Alakazam, which is basically Kadabra without the tail and an extra spoon.
These Pokemon are in Cherish balls and are shiny and Ash 65535.
The first ever Rhydon I saw in Pokemon Diamond was shiny it really was and female I evolved it and I wasn't even looking for one. I threw a master ball at it as it was the day. and it took out one of my pokemon as I tried to weaken it.
@RenanKJ To be fair, gen I does have Magnemite, which is a iron ball with magnets and a eyeball, and Voltorb, which is a Poké Ball.
I'm totally on the opposite side of this top 10 XD
Most of the Pkmn mentioned, like Tropius and Rypherior are... well, not my most favourite Pokemon, but right behind them (and I also loved overall the V generation ^o^).
I wonder if that means my tastes are really bad >.>;;;
@blodermoder I agree with you. I love all six generations, including 5. I never understood why it was hated so much. As much as I like 4, I think that's the one that had the most unappealing Pokemon to me.
10-2, I was skeptical. Some of them were indeed ugly. Others, not so. But then #1 happened, and the video was uber-redeemed. Since we're spoiling it in the comments anyway I guess, Gen V is the absolutely, unequivocal worst. Over 60% of the Pokemon are terrible, and even if it's old hat, I'm glad the entire generation was recognized as being bad. But people trying to defend Gen V is really, really funny. This is my favorite thing of today.
My worst: Several Mega Evolutions, such as Mewtwo Y, the red Mega Charizard, Mega Heracross, Mega Abomasnow. And yes, several Gen. 5 Pokémon.
Jynx and Shroomish are cute, though.
I didn't even look at the video because for some reason, there is a ton of trackers that the browser extensions NoScript and Ghostery caught associated with getting it to load. Not letting those trackers through, sorry...
I think this video was made to show off how many shinies this guy has
@LtAldoRaine True story. I guess every generation have its uninspired pokémons. Personally, I love the Gen 1 and Gen 2 pokémons the most.
Hey Nintendo Life, you misspelled "Diamond & Pearl". Gen 4 to me is absolutey terrible. Killed my enthusasim for the series until Gen 5 came and restored it with all the fresh Pokemon. It's potentially my favorite in terms of Pokemon design.
Disagreed with almost all of those, and most of the reasons weren't really that good.
Wow this list is so... bad. He takes the obvious ones, like gen V (which to me personally is a mixed bag - some of them are really awesome, others atrocious abominations) and at the same time complains like he started playing pokemon yesterday and tries to sound competent.
Like Tropius blows because he's not flying... Um... Hello? Is there any reason to actually even point it out? Or is there some hidden sense in Gyarados FLYING that I don't see? To me, Lugia looks atrociously bad with hands for wings. I personally can't stand it.
Exeggutor being bad, because he doesn't have anything to do with Exeggcute? Well, ok. So how do you explain fish turning into flying...non-fish/dragon I guess? Or what could you call basically water snake/eel turns into dragon? Or raccoon into... ferret? There are more, but I guess this one in particiular makes the less sense of them all for some reason.
Speaking of mega evolutions, the most idiotic one to me is Mega Slowbro. Don't get me wrong, I love Slowpoke and it's my favorite pokemon of all time (well, he and Seel and Dewgong), but mega slowbro, other than cute face on the artwork, doesn't make sense at all.
@Hitman1102 I agree.
As for the issue of Pokemon designs... In the first two generations, it is very easy to tell what everything is based upon. From Gen 3 onwards, it starts becoming a lot more difficult to discern the identity of what some of the new creatures are. More and more (especially with Gen 5), there are an increasing number of "things" introduced, that require research to even figure out what they're supposed to be.
The wiki entries in Bulbapedia are very useful to figure out what some of these things are... Who would have guessed that a creature like Palkia might be based upon a Goblin Shark? I didn't even know that existed until I looked up the entry! Or how about the Goodra, which could be based upon either the "blue dragon sea slug" or the Youkai called Shussebora?
The problem is not that the newer designs are "bad" (they're just either weird or "Digimon-like", in my opinion, except for a few awesome ones like Conkeldurr/Roubushin), the problem is that I have no idea what these "things" are without looking up the internet...!
@LtAldoRaine There is at least a point behind Magnemite and Voltorb, though. They're basically mass-manufactured, manmade creatures which were built to be used for slave labor at the Power Plant. They were discarded and abandoned after the populace of Kanto rejected the energy market's move to use the Power Plant as the sole producer of electrical energy for Kanto, choosing instead to generate electricity locally.
With the Power Plant shut down, the artificial Pokemon created to generate electricity, with no incoming energy, probably would have eventually shut down as well (died). That's where Zapdos came in- it generated enough power through natural lightning to keep their energy reserves running. Their fate is unknown after you catch Zapdos, taking away their savior...
Magnemite and Voltorb (and Grimer, for that matter) aren't just slap-in designs, they are characters in a greater narrative. What narrative does a random Sword and Board ghost have in it's habitat?
@Drawdler: Gonna have to agree with you on Cryogonal. Even when I regularly see it in Smash Bros. 3DS, I forget which series it's from.
I did like a lot of G5 'mons, though. I adore my Hydreigon, Samurott, and Meinshao. So I'm not jumping on that bandwagon. (I personally thought G3 was much worse in that department.)
Man, I disagree with a lot of these.
And he can't seem to give any legitimate reasons for any of them. He's just griping for the sake of griping, and that whole deal is so overdone with the Pokemon series.
And yeah, I get that everyone's entitled to their own opinion and all, but come on. Putting the bulk of Gen V on blast for the number one spot is just bandwagoning with everyone else who says the designs are bad in that generation. And, again, he put it on the list without giving any good reason at all. 'Ugly' and 'uninspired' are just insulting to the hard work the creators put into the game.
As an artist, with the point of view of an artist as such, I challenge anyone else to make 700+ unique creatures without taking inspiration from currently or previously existing animals, objects, or anything of the like.
I mean, come on. Gen V gets so much flak, but even Gen 1 was completely inspired by real-life animals, extinct or living [birds, cats, mice, dinosaurs, insects, etc], or inanimate objects that children play with [magnets, balls, mud, etc.], mythology [the dragons and serpents].
It would also help if the reviewer wasn't so blatantly whiny about the whole thing.
I disagree with the majority of the list [Jynx being one I've never liked, and the only inclusion from Gen V that I would agree with is Druddigon], but aside form that, the entire list was completely baseless and picky, without any good reason behind any of it.
Excuse me, but Castform is the cutest damned little thing in the known universe. Or at least it was until Lillipup came along, but still.
adorbs
@GoshDangTravino Originally, part of the point of Pokemon was that every creature in the world was obviously inspired by something in ours, with a stylized spin to match the world's narrative. That distinction is becoming more difficult to discern with every passing generation.
I agree with #1/Most of Gen 5, but I just can't see the others as hideous at all. On a side note, did anyone else see a resemblance in voice between Alex Olney and Yahtzee Croshaw from the Escapist?
What a terrible list. "Most of Gen V"? It should be "Most of Gen 1".
Get this taken down.
Awww, look at all the angry Pokefanboys. Should have made it a top 100, then we could have scratched the surface of badly designed creatures...
Smh, what's with all the Gen 5 hate? Probably just Genwunners who hate it. Gen 4 is the worst generation, next to Gen 6. Gen 5 made a lot of improvements to the gameplay, music, graphics, and story. I will never understand the hate for that generation.
Anyway, here's my top 5 worst Pokèmon designs from their represented generations:
5. Gen 3 (PKMN Ruby/Sapphire) - Slight improvement over Gen 2, but there's still some ugly ones.
4. Gen 5 - There's some really cool Pokèmon here, but at the same time, there are really bad ones.
3. Gen 2 - (PKMN Gold/Silver) - Too many boring Pokèmon.
2. Gen 4 - This generation sucks, and so does its terrible, ugly Pokèmon designs.
1. Gen 6 - Less Pokèmon, and more forgettable ugly Pokèmon.
Generation 5 had the worst designs imo. The cheesy, horrible names didn't help it either.
There's one who looks like an actual bag of trash. I'm not even f**king kidding. His name is "Trubbish" also. Seriously. What the f**k.
I pretty much agree completely.
I guess everyone is entitled to their very wrong opinions.
I thought the two Gen 1 entries were going to be the only ones I agreed about until you got to Barbaracle. I'd never even seen it before, and it's really awful.
Where's the ice cream Pokemon, Vanilluxe?
GEN1 4 LIFE
Also most of these Pokemon look fine. Where are the Keychains?!
"Number 1: Most of the Pokemon from Black and White"
Oh ok you're one of those people.
You forgot Magmortar and Hawlucha.
There are times when I wonder if the Pokemon community is even more whiny then the Sonic fanbase...
I'll give you some of these, like Jynx (mostly a bad choice as it was accused of being racist — I mean they couldn't have seen that and thought it would be fine at the time), Castform, or Rhypherior.
Some I think are decent, like Barbaracle (reminds me of a Mega Man boss for some reason?), Mega Heracross (Heracross is also one of my favorites! high-five), Druddigon, Shroomish, Crustle, etc.
I do like Tropius though, I find him to be one of the better ones; though he'd be better if he didn't fly. I agree he looks strange when he flies. Also, it would be a bit better if you were more specific with Gen V — I mean honestly, surely, the worst Pokémon ever imagined must be Garbodor right? Of every bland Gen V design, that one easily takes the smelly, stale cake.
But overall a good list, @AlexOlney! Even though it's a lot more subjective, think you'd make a Top 10 Best Designed Pokémon? Or simply your top favorites?
I'm surprised that key ring Pokemon didn't show up on here, but yeah, a lot of these are kind of bad.
DUCKLETT IS ONE OF THE BEST DESIGNED POKEMON'Z EVAH!!!
=w= This is my onion named opinion, and i'm sticking to it!
@SheldonRandoms The best designed Pokemon is Ristar...
I MEAN STARMIE! Uh...yeah!
everth1ng from genwun and uparwds, dduuuuuuuuuuuuuh!!!1!?!
Spiritomb. It's just a mess. Definitely a design where GameFreak said 'That'll have to do, it's lunch time'. And Zygarde, possibly the worst Legendary Pokemon.
Most of the Mega evolutions look pretty awful.
In any more Pokemon lists, please don't use that 'Who's that Pokemon?' sound clip.
@PlywoodStick You named your Starmie Ristar? That's swelltastic!
Wow. I disagree with almost all of that list. Also I know this falls under the "most of fifth gen" category you said, but Vaniluxe probably should have had special mention because that thing is beyond ugly.
I DISAGREE WITH ALL OF THE LIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I really disliked the list, especially the insults to Tropius and Shroomish... and that the whole list in general was full of insults to both the pokemon and Game Freak.
Anyone else notice how much of the in-game footage was from a heavily hacked game? All shiny and level 100. Could've at least turned the shiny code off.
while I question the inclusion of Mega Alakazam (though I laughed for about 30 seconds at the reason), I'm glad I'm not alone in my opinion of most of Black and White's pokemon, that's one of the main reasons I never bothered with Black 2 or White 2, couldn't stand most of the new pokemon compared to the awesome ones back in gen IV.
Also, you forgot that Bidoof needs a place on that list
IMHO, Gen V had the best Pokemon, whereas Gen 1 was pretty uninspired.
Muk.
I rest my case.
As someone who got introduced to GEN 3,4,5 and 6 Pokemon at the same time (and therefore I have not positive or negative perceptions derived from the games that introduced them), I would say my personal ranking for the design of those four gens goes like this: 5>6>3>4.
@-Crystalline- Yeah. Because a pile of purple goo was much better.
Or a poké ball with eyes.
I don't really agree with the list. Chikarita's evolved forms look about as dumb as Tropius, considering they look similar.
My list, by generation:
1/2>3>4>5/6
We'll I'm glad you got that off your chest Personally, I've never seen a fan made Pokemon I didn't hate. A top ten worst of those things would be truly terrifying.
Wow, so much hate in the comments. I just want to say...
1) SPPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNSSS!!!
And 2) How did Aromatisse not make the list? It's just pink fluffy stupid uninspired piece of crap.
C'mon nintendo life, I like your stuff, but putting most of gen 5 up as number 1 was just lazy.
Ok gen 5 had that one flounder pokemon, WORST EVER. But for some reason even the bad ones like vanillish grew on me! I liked having a completely new set of 150 pokemon to work with. X/Y let me down on that front.
Ice Cream Cone and Keychain deserve special mention.
I don't mind Mega Alakazam, but to each their own.
I think it's high time for the next Pokemon game to introduce Extinction of various species - get rid of some of these awful designs, including select "Legendaries" that just look like clouds of gas.
@Squid I believe he's already hard at work on that list!
@SaGa_K What can I say - I needed footage for the video, and without the time to actually play through hours of game for a few seconds of footage, the only way was to do a little hacking
that number one pick and the alakazam mega pick kinda upset me... the number one spot feels like a cop out put in purely to stir up rage alakazam was never given a good explanation just ... spoons. whats your problem with the spoons why do you feel them ruin his design you said more words than "buuuuuuutttttts" about castform you could come up with somthing more about alakazam to
@LeeGarbutt Looking forward to it! Hopefully there won't be as much backlash along the lines of "why didn't you put X in there, that's my favorite!"
@randomlypikachu Yeah, I have to agree with you there. I don't really understand what's so bad about it. Honestly, of all the Mega Evolutions, Mega Alakazam's design is definitely not one of the worst offenders. Instead Mega Manectric or Mega Salamence come to mind...
@Squid Alex has a top 10 best designed Pokémon video in the works. Given the rather "heated" reaction to this video, I'd watch that one from the safety of a nuclear bunker
Terrible video. It is one thing to make a list about his personal favourites, but another to call something "the worst design" adding an "ever" at the end to imply that his "opinion" is fact. Let's not even talk about his reasons. I mean come on .... spoons? lower part looks like an arse? gosh ...
Aaaw, see I started coming to NintendoLife recently over Kotaku for Nintendo news because it seemed like you guys didn't do these dumb negative opinion articles.
There's no need, it's just insulting your reader's tastes. I don't like Jynx, Rhyperior or Barbaracle either, but I love the designs of the others. I especially liked Black & White's designs and loved that you couldn't get the old gens, forcing people to use new ones and not rely on the same boring team each time. I wish they 'd do that every new gen! X & Y were cool but for me they suffered as the new Pokemon were so few and the old so many I found I struggled to make a team entirely of new creatures.
I agree about Gen V, I never played BW but had that Pokédex 3D free app which came with the 3DS very early on in its lifespan. Trubbish and those ice cream Pokémon are the absolute worst.
I am glad that in X/Y you could create a gen 1 team really early on (my team initially became: Charmander, Weedle, Caterpie, Pidgey, Pikachu and another that I don't remember). I always found gen 1 to be the best for pretty much everything though that may just be nostalgia goggles.
@PlywoodStick so the problem is your own knowledge base is not wide enough then?
Sorry, I don't mean that in an insulting way (though I can see it totally sounds like that) but just because YOU haven't heard of goblin sharks or blue dragon sea slugs doesn't mean they're not a valid point of reference for the artists and designers. Instead of complaining you didn't initially know what it was and had to look it up, why not enjoy the fact you're learning about wonderful new things through the game
And Honedge is based on the common mythology of a possessed/sentient blade. It's a very common myth/legend in many cultures across the globe so it makes sense to draw from it. One of my favourites from X&Y, though I do love ghost types in general.
Whats the name of the plant looking Pokemon which James summons, and tries to eat him every time? (In the cartoon)
That always has me pissing myself laughing!!
@Ichiban Victreebel.
Where was shoe?
I agree with most of this but I seriously recommend you watch Pan's Labyrinth.
I don't get why you put Shroomish and Rhyperior on the list, especially since Mr Mime exists. I mean, I don't even mind gen 5, but some gen 1 pokemon are just BAD. Muk, Eggcecute (which imo looks much worse than its evolution), and Voltorb, for example.
Whilst this was diverting, I think a vote would also be a good idea.
My Favorite Pokemon (see avatar) is of the Gen V(Black & White)... sigh
Gen 5 is the best! What are you talking about!?
@randomlypikachu I think he hated the "spooooooooons" is because he'd rather have "foooooooooooooooooorks".
Also, eye herd chu liek Duckletts :3
It's click bait like this that makes me not feel bad about using adblock
What pokemon is the #2 one? I haven't seen that one before. Considering Ash has a Frodagier in the footage, I'm guessing it's a pokemon from X/Y, but I really don't reconize it.
@Zelda64L Number #689 http://www.serebii.net/xy/pokemon.shtml
You trollin' us?
Am I the only one who likes Jynx? I guess it had something to do with creating a fairly decent one with Perish Song, way back on the original Silver, but still I think it's a funny, likeable pokemon.
Also Tropius and Exeggutor look great of course.
The only one I could agree with is the #2.
But... Rypherior is such a cute Pokemon...
READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gen 1 is one of my favorites, but it's just as bad as Gen 5 with Pokemon designs. Stop hating on Black and White, and your not a real fan if you skipped over them!
But back to Gen 1... Grimer is a pile of sludge, muk is a bigger pile of sludge, diglett is a brown oval, dugtrio is 3 brown ovals, magnemite is a magnet, magnetron is 3 magnets, koffing is a purple ball, wheezing is 3 purple balls, honestly I could go on FOREVER.
I'm not hating on either generations, I love Gen 1 and I had a really good time in White and White 2. But Gen 1's designs are a joke.
@mjc0961
Gen 1 and 2 could only do so much with their graphics, but apparently because of nostalgia they just simply COULDN'T be on this list! Gen 5's ugliness is just a matter of opinion. Nintendo tried to be creative with designs, but not all agree.
@SockoMario @TysonOfTime You both mispelled Gen I.
People's reactions to this video in a nutshell........
I love how most of Gen 2's Pokemon are incredibly uninspired yet they always get the pass with most fans, but god forbid they actually get creative in later generations.
There are god awful designs in every gen.
@Interneto Huh, I never did evolve Binacle and I guess I never fought anyone with this one. Thanks for the information.
Was this supposed to be some sort of joke? If so I think you tried a bit too hard to be funny. Seriously, Castform looking like a a butt is your best? Thats 6-year old level humor.
If it was serious though, if these truly are the "worst designs ever" I think its safe to say we have absolutely nothing to worry about.
I know it has nothing to do with the subject of the video, but people who call their character 'Ash' and have a hacked, shiny team (pre-Gen VI) are one of the reasons I hate playing Pokémon socially.
Haha, funny video idea, but I found myself not agreeing with too many choices.
When I did agree, I agreed whole-heartedly!
Jinx and Executo(sp) are pretty stupid and creepy looking, but I actually like Barbaracle and Shroomish.
@Zombie_Barioth
My first thought on seeing them was that it looked like it had a pair of uh...
@Action51
When was that though?
I gotta admit though, I found Jynx a bit creepy as a kid, the original version that is. Not anymore though, pretty much all Pokemon have grown on me over the years.
Why is Darmanitan shown. I always kinda digged its look. It's unusual but still pretty cool.
What a miserable bugger!
Tap here to load 126 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...