I'm not sure why you try to make everything so difficult...
Wrong as in you didn't know I had already answered your question but said you did.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
In all do respect Indy Devs are doing just fine. Even with the likes of Nintendo`s 6 or so games on the service, Indy Devs still will do just as good as they`ve always done.
They're doing fine because Nintendo's two biggest games are a Tetris knockoff and a Poke' screensaver.
If they released a full Mario platformer those indie devs wouldn't be doing "just fine".
Again, the whole point of WiiWare is for indie devs to be as successful as possible. For some reason people on here don't want those indie devs to succeed.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
And as far as I know Nintendo doesn`t have any Wiiware games releasing anytime soon. So thats good news for Alexsays!
They do but they aren't like the games people on here want.
They aren't putting all their biggest franchises on the service like the fanboys on this site wish they would.
Nintendo can afford to release their games retail. We shouldn't be asking them to take sales away from Toki Tori, World of Goo, etc.
Yeah we already have companies like square enix to do that already, lol. When it comes to first-party titles, Nintendo has released wiiware games, just in a more "indie" style and not all big franchises.
On topic, I don't think FPSs should be on wiiware. As alexsays mentioned, it would likely be one-forth of a game. Also I'm not too big on Doom clones and that's the only type of FPS good for wiiware.
Facebook: bbworks club
Twitter: @bbworks_club
Instagram: bbworks club
id rather not be laughed at while playing a fps so thanks for the suggestion but im looking for a mature shooter
Why would you be laughed at?
cus im 19 id rather not play a game were the main focus is squirt guns. dont get me wrong it looks interesting but im looking for a deeper level of play like golden eye or metroid prime hunters
cus im 19 id rather not play a game were the main focus is squirt guns.
Here's a good quote from a well-respected person on another forum:
GabuEx wrote:
One of the surest signs of true maturity, and one of the first requirements for profound contentedness in life, is reaching the state where you no longer care whether or not what you're doing in private is mature.
BMF, you don't know what maturity is. If you are too immature and unimaginative to play a game that is exactly as you are describing it because it is family friendly, that sounds like a personal problem. No reason to laugh at people who play a game that you've just describing as some ultimate WiiWare fantasy of yours, an online first-person shooter for WiiWare.
Chrono, I didn't say I want it so badly. I'm just saying that it is the exact game you guys are describing. I don't understand why there is this fantastical talk about how great it would be if someone would make such a game when they are already making it.
I'm not sure why you try to make everything so difficult...
Wrong as in you didn't know I had already answered your question but said you did.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
In all do respect Indy Devs are doing just fine. Even with the likes of Nintendo`s 6 or so games on the service, Indy Devs still will do just as good as they`ve always done.
They're doing fine because Nintendo's two biggest games are a Tetris knockoff and a Poke' screensaver.
If they released a full Mario platformer those indie devs wouldn't be doing "just fine".
Again, the whole point of WiiWare is for indie devs to be as successful as possible. For some reason people on here don't want those indie devs to succeed.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
And as far as I know Nintendo doesn`t have any Wiiware games releasing anytime soon. So thats good news for Alexsays!
They do but they aren't like the games people on here want.
They aren't putting all their biggest franchises on the service like the fanboys on this site wish they would.
Wow I`m not going to argue any more with because you just dont get it, You get that Indy devs are doing just fine even with Nintendo making a game here and there. Just look at 2-D Boy. And you also don`t get is that all these Nintendo fanboys can want Mario and Zelda on the service all they want but its not going to happen, so just let them dream all they want.
You say your right, I say I`m right. Your giving me a headache with your ignorance so lets just stop while we are ahead.
cus im 19 id rather not play a game were the main focus is squirt guns.
Here's a good quote from a well-respected person on another forum:
GabuEx wrote:
One of the surest signs of true maturity, and one of the first requirements for profound contentedness in life, is reaching the state where you no longer care whether or not what you're doing in private is mature.
yea well good for him but ill take something more mature
BMF, why would you assume it doesn't offer a deeper level of play (whatever that means)? It has a variety of game modes, weapons, and stages, plus different sizes for each stage based on the amount of players. Short of morph balls, it has everything Hunters has but with more players and a control scheme that won't give you carpal tunnel.
EDIT: I said nothing wrong. You're the first one to call the game immature. Your ridiculously overblown and childishly vulgar response isn't exactly the sign post of maturity, either, haha. You never specified "family" OR "not family," so what's the difference?
cus im 19 id rather not play a game were the main focus is squirt guns.
Here's a good quote from a well-respected person on another forum:
GabuEx wrote:
One of the surest signs of true maturity, and one of the first requirements for profound contentedness in life, is reaching the state where you no longer care whether or not what you're doing in private is mature.
yea well good for him but ill take something more mature
I've never literally banged my head against a wall until now.
You get that Indy devs are doing just fine even with Nintendo making a game here and there.
I've already acknowledged that a long time ago. Because they're not big games.
If they were big games then there would be problems. I've been saying that all along.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
And you also don`t get is that all these Nintendo fanboys can want Mario and Zelda on the service all they want but its not going to happen, so just let them dream all they want.
I've already said it'll never happen, and that Nintendo fanboys want it despite how bad it is for the industry. A reason why I hate them.
Chrono+Cross wrote:
You say your right, I say I`m right. Your giving me a headache with ignorance so lets just stop while we are ahead.
There's nothing for anyone to be wrong about.
You're just repeating ideas I've said and have not already seen them in my posts.
I've already acknowledged everything you keep saying I "don't get". I'm pretty sure the headache thing is all you.
So because you don't want a family friendly game, no one else can? Good logic.
Also, obviously you listed those, but there is no precedent for a family friendly first-person shooter, so unless you specifically had said, "Games that are accessible to everyone suck," your list would obviously only include immature teeny games like Nukem and Doom.
So because you don't want a family friendly game, no one else can? Good logic.
Also, obviously you listed those, but there is no precedent for a family friendly first-person shooter, so unless you specifically had said, "Games that are accessible to everyone suck," your list would obviously only include immature teeny games like Nukem and Doom.
i never said that. you recommended water warfare for me i said no thanks i would like something more mature i dont speak for every one that was only my opinion i didnt claim no one likes that game i simply stated i saw it as a kiddy game in my opinion so i would not like to download it. i do appreciate it in the fact its adding to the fps category in wiiware however that is only 2 fps on wiiware and i would love to see more
Forums
Topic: Who else thinks we need more fps on wiiware?
Posts 41 to 60 of 83
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.