Topic: Ogre Battle 64 vs Final Fantasy Tactics.

With the awesome reviews Ogrebattle 64 has gotten I really want an idea of how it compares to FFT.

I know the game play style is a bit different, but what I'm curious about here is in the quality of:
Story (as it's affected by the player's decisions, as well as how it stands by itself)
Game Mechanics Depth (character classes, items/equipment, and player choice influence)
Challenge (how much does this thing get you to think about what your doing, and what you might do vs. how much is a grind.)

Opinions Greatly Appreciated!

I find Ogre Battle 64 Awesome but I don't know about FFT Since I Never played a FF Game

I just started playing for the same time. If you enjoyed Final Fantasy Tactics you'll enjoy Ogre Battle 64. Battles are simpler though and I haven't quite grasped the deeper part of the mechanics yet but I'm quite enjoying it. I don't think your choices affect the story.

Well Tactics is often hailed as the best the genre has to offer, not that I've played either...

Tactics A2 was great though, so I have faith that Tactics lives up to it's praise.

Original Tactics was okay... to me Tactics Advance was the best. Haven't played A2 though...

Tactics Advance was mind numbingly easy though, and laws were terrible, and then there were a bunch of aggravating missable things.

A2 fixed those things though, the difficulty is still somewhat easy though, even on hard since the AI is dumb, but it's decently tough at the start since enemies have access to useful abilities before you.