Topic: If you could have any of these on the VC...

I would go with superman 64. Sure it was hard, looked terrible and......wait...no. Ghostbusters, I have been spoiled by the 360 version, pac man I refuse to play because of the glitches. Therefore, I choose e.t. I actually saw a copy in my local play n trade. They were selling it for 50 cents. I asked them why they were charging so much

Well, I've played them all, and I hated Superman 64 the most, so I agree with the Club Nintendo magazine; Ghostbusters sucked, but at least it was kind of entertaining.
I love the Atari 2600, I thought its Pac-man was nice (I still have it), until I played Ms. Pac-man and discovered that the game was wrong made; finally I really liked ET, used to play it for hours when I was very young; it ain't as bad as they say, it just wasn't good enough to save the videogame industry.
I pick ET.

Wow, you just entirely missed the OPs point.... You HAVE to choose a craptastic game. That's why he went with the NES version of Ghostbusters.

AUGHHH!! It's my worst nightmare come to life...

Ugh, I would have to say whichever would be cheapest.....probably E.T. or Pac-Man...

but the best might be Ghostbusters, but if it's mixed with THOSE awful games, it can't be good.

I have to go with Rocket Knight Adventures and Sparkster. Those games are awesome.

Superman 64 just because it would mean we'd be getting an N64 game in so long, plus, it's a third-party title.

I guess my vote officially goes to Superman 64 at a discount of 900 Wii Points.

Current tally:

E.T.: 2
Superman 64: 6
Ghostbusters: 6
Pac-Man: 6

It's pretty sad that the only way these games would ever get votes for "I want it" is when they are pitted against each other.

Why would anyone choose Superman 64? Have you ever actually played that game? Obviously not, or you would NEVER, EVER choose Superman 64. I used to own both E.T. and Pac-Man, and Pac-Man does not belong on this list, unless it's to further show how bad the other two are. E.T. wasn't all THAT bad, but it was not a good game. I don't remember anything being wrong with that port of Pac-Man, but maybe it's just because I was really young when I owned it.

Superman 64.

@grensworthshero: Did you vote yet? I can't remember.

I guess I should now - and my vote goes to...

...

...

...

...

...

It's like choosing your preferred method of execution...
...

...

...

...

...

Pac-Man. I watched AVGN's Ghostbusters review.

My vote goes to Pac-Man for the Atari 2600. Sure it's an half-baked port, but it's a port of an legendary game.

Sure the Atari version of Pac-Man is lackluster compared to the original, but that doesn't make it a terrible game IMO (especially when compared to the other options).

My vote goes to Superman 64 so I can experience just what made this game so famously crappy first-hand. Although, like Chicken Brutus, there's no way I'd shell out 1000 points for it.

Superman 64 just for the LOLs. I wouldn't ever download it though.

I wish we could get Ghostbusters for the Sega Genesis, that one was awsome!

Pacman and Ghostbusters aren't that bad

Oh, you meant which one of these I can bring to the VC? In that case, switch mine to E.T, since that will require Nintendo to give Virtual Console support for Atari games. (Sure, Puck-Man will have the same effect, but we already have Puck-Man on the Virtual Console!)

After watching the AVGN Ghostbusters video, I'd have to say ET. I hear it's not really that bad (and not just from people on this thread).