Topic: "How Nintendo could WIN E3" - IGN.com

The greed people have. We get a new 2D Mario, a 3D Mario, a new Zelda announced, a new Metroid game, and a bounty of new releaces, and people still say last year's E3 was terrible?

@Dragoon: Well duh! Everyone knows that gamers are never happy, even when they get what they want. Such spoiled ones they are!!

I found it extremely retarded when everyone was whining about how Nintendo had to "redeem themselves" for the E3 back in 2008. Really, that was just stupid... I happened to enjoy that year very much (especially when Punch Out!! was announced).

They could announce a 2D Mario Adventure game for DSiWare. Plus a virtual Handheld (which probally won't happen this year)

A system update for DSi that lets me have an SD card menu.

More info On 3DS

Zelda Wii Trailer

A Metroid game for DS

Give me a free wii.
that stuff would definately make ninty 'win' E3 2010

In comparison to the E3 they had for 2006, yes. By far.
It will be very hard to beat that show.

I actually liked last year's E3, Other M surprised me...to be honest IGN is just screwed up, lol.

A New Smash Bros, with a Better online, like Street Fighter.

Or A New F-zero game

this year will see Zelda, Pikmin 3, Nintendo 3DS, Vitality Sensor games, and some surprises... looks good to me.

Actually, a new Super Smash Bros. sounds nice...

Meh, Nintendo stopped being an interesting developer a few years ago. Handing off Star Fox and F zero to high level third parties would definitely be something of great interest.

I know you specified "high level," but I should still mention that neither franchise has the greatest third-party history. At least Star Fox doesn't. I'm not a fan of F-Zero GX, though I'm probably in the minority there. I'd like to see Retro (who got their start working on a never-to-be-finished racing game, I believe) or the Excite guys handle it. Retro could probably handle Star Fox, as well.

Oh you're so tough taunting an ill-defined group of people online.

Aside from NSMBW, it would have been disappointing to me, too, if I hadn't long since stopped caring about Nintendo's E3 conference. The only other exciting moment was when I thought the Golden Sun announcement was going to be Mother 3.

To be honest, Nintendo already won the E3 of 2010. Why? Because even if Nintendo doesn't show a darn thing besides the 3DS, the casual crowd will go crazy over the new hardware and it will sell thousands if not millions. Nintendo doesn't even need to try to technically "Win" E3 anymore.

Even though Star Fox was started by a third party developer

It wasn't started by a third-party. It was Miyamoto's concept, and Nintendo co-developed it. I think the third party was just for programming, which isn't that unusual.

@Adam: Darn, I thought I made a point. oh well

They're not going to announce anything. They're just going to have Miyamoto dance around the stage nude for an hour.

_{Happy nightmares, folks.}

How is that a nightmare?

Since when was E3 a competition to be WIN'ed?

The idea of somebody Winning E3 was probably a poor place for them to start. The article wasn't all bad, almost like the forum here about Nintendo and this year's E3.

For Me I would love to see Nintendo actually do something useful (and don't forget fun) with the vitality sensor as well as showing off some game that lets you dual-wield two Nintendo Wii remotes (like how Sony's Move has been showing a lot of).

@Stuffed - I'm stil hoping the dual-wield WM+ will be in Force Unleashed II... Lucasarts can show that.