Forums

Topic: Unpopular Gaming Opinions

Posts 1,161 to 1,180 of 12,984

Nintendo_Ninja

TheKingOfTown wrote:

Nintendo_Ninja wrote:

One of the many reasons I'm excited for the new Zelda, is that it won't be as linear. It will take WW exploration to the next level.

That's not really unpopular.

Wrong thread. Whoops...

Nintendo ID Network: Nintendo_Ninja
Mario Maker ID: LR5-VQV-THG

Memeboy3

Nintendo_Ninja wrote:

TheKingOfTown wrote:

Nintendo_Ninja wrote:

One of the many reasons I'm excited for the new Zelda, is that it won't be as linear. It will take WW exploration to the next level.

That's not really unpopular.

Wrong thread. Whoops...

That's OK, Nobody is perfect.

S'up
I love Anime and Wii U and 3DS games with Barry and Ross.
And Im playing Super Mario 3D World, KI:U, Colors, etc
My friend code:
3711- 7655 - 4325
My Nintendo network ID :Pokelover10

Dreamz

IAmNotWill wrote:

Dr_Corndog wrote:

The Wii U is the only current-gen console worth owning, thanks to the Gamepad and its high-quality exclusives. Anyone considering an XB1 or PS4 would be much better off with a good PC.

I know this is your opinion, but come on.

I'm not sure it's really an unpopular opinion; I feel exactly the same way. That's actually the same setup I have myself - a Wii U for its unique games and features, and my PC for everything else.

[Edited by Dreamz]

My 3rd Party Games List: Click here
U-Wishlist: Splatoon, Zelda U

Ark

Yes, ignoring the PS4/Xbox One doesn't seem that uncommon a sentiment online (so long as you factor in the people who are just waiting). Most of the games that appeal to me on both consoles (namely indie games) can be nabbed via PC or last-gen hardware. If either one would start developing a library of Japanese games (ones I actually enjoy, preferably), I'd be inclined to make a purchase. I've had the money for a PS4 stowed away since before launch but need an actual reason to justify buying one.

[Edited by Ark]

.

LzWinky

IAmNotWill wrote:

Dr_Corndog wrote:

The Wii U is the only current-gen console worth owning, thanks to the Gamepad and its high-quality exclusives. Anyone considering an XB1 or PS4 would be much better off with a good PC.

I know this is your opinion, but come on.

It is funny how very few mention Nintendo games as exclusives for the Wii U.

Current games: Everything on Switch

Switch Friend Code: SW-5075-7879-0008 | My Nintendo: LzWinky

SkywardLink98

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

My SD Card with the game on it is just as physical as your cartridge with the game on it.
I love Nintendo, that's why I criticize them so harshly.

Jaz007

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Amen. In fact, I think I might prefer Sony exclusives to Nintendo.

Jaz007

AceDefective

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Meh, preference really. I find Ratchet and Clank to be a fine game, I just don't enjoy it as much Mario or Zelda game.

Non linear story < linear story.
Hence, why haven't gone back to Ultima, and why I probably won't enjoy Elder Scrolls. I'd be to confused on what to do or how to do it.

Just some random loser who loves a variety of things.
Youtube Channel | Deviant ART | YoYo Games account |

X:

SkywardLink98

Jaz007 wrote:

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Amen. In fact, I think I might prefer Sony exclusives to Nintendo.

You'll definitely need a nuclear bunker after saying that.

My SD Card with the game on it is just as physical as your cartridge with the game on it.
I love Nintendo, that's why I criticize them so harshly.

unrandomsam

IGN was right. Yoshi's New Island is better than Triple Deluxe which somehow has managed to lose everything that made me enjoy - Kirby's Adventure Wii (Return to Dreamland).

“30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure”
Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.

Memeboy3

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Jaz007 wrote:

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Amen. In fact, I think I might prefer Sony exclusives to Nintendo.

You'll definitely need a nuclear bunker after saying that.

I suggest maybe two nuclear bunkers.

S'up
I love Anime and Wii U and 3DS games with Barry and Ross.
And Im playing Super Mario 3D World, KI:U, Colors, etc
My friend code:
3711- 7655 - 4325
My Nintendo network ID :Pokelover10

R_Champ

Jaz007 wrote:

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Amen. In fact, I think I might prefer Sony exclusives to Nintendo.

I think it's OK this think this (no nuclear bunker needed), but this is "unpopular gaming opinions". If you go to almost anywhere on the internet not only is this opinion popular, it's defended with legions of trolls and flamers. Very, very popular.

It seems weird saying it on a Nintendo fan site, but it' actually be much more "unpopular" to prefer Nintendo exclusives, which personally, I do. Not because of quality (Many of Sony's exclusive are very high quality as well) but because most of Sony's exclusives are leaning toward the $60-movie genre and less towards raw game-play fun.

Nintendo & Steam ID: R_Champ

SkywardLink98

R_Champ wrote:

Jaz007 wrote:

SkywardLink98 wrote:

Sony exclusives are just as high quality as Nintendo exclusives.
(Should I go hide in a nuclear bunker?)

Amen. In fact, I think I might prefer Sony exclusives to Nintendo.

I think it's OK this think this (no nuclear bunker needed), but this is "unpopular gaming opinions". If you go to almost anywhere on the internet not only is this opinion popular, it's defended with legions of trolls and flamers. Very, very popular.

It seems weird saying it on a Nintendo fan site, but it' actually be much more "unpopular" to prefer Nintendo exclusives, which personally, I do. Not because of quality (Many of Sony's exclusive are very high quality as well) but because most of Sony's exclusives are leaning toward the $60-movie genre and less towards raw game-play fun.

The "Nintendo > Sony" opinion is guarded by just as many trolls and flamers. This is more of an unpopular opinion for this site, as it's a decent split everywhere else on the internet.

My SD Card with the game on it is just as physical as your cartridge with the game on it.
I love Nintendo, that's why I criticize them so harshly.

CaviarMeths

Remasters are awesome and I wish we got more of them. Buying a PS3 right now is a great investment because of the huge pile of remasters and collections.

  • God of War Saga Collection
  • Infamous Collection
  • Ratchet and Clank Collection
  • Jak and Daxter Collection
  • The Sly Collection
  • Killzone Trilogy
  • Resistance Trilogy
  • The Ico and Shadow of the Colossus Collection
  • Prince of Persia Trilogy
  • Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy
  • Mass Effect Trilogy
  • Metal Gear Solid: The Legacy Collection
  • Far Cry Compilation
  • Devil May Cry Trilogy
  • Hitman Trilogy
  • Tomb Raider Trilogy
  • Bioshock 1 & 2
  • Splinter Cell Classic Trilogy
  • Ghost Recon Anthology
  • Tales of Symphonia Chronicles
  • Final Fantasy X/X-2 Remaster

And I'm pretty sure all of these except Metal Gear Solid are $20 each. Tons of content for a low price, and they take little effort on the part of the publishers. Nintendo should be doing this.

[Edited by CaviarMeths]

So Anakin kneels before Monster Mash and pledges his loyalty to the graveyard smash.

Jaz007

@Caviarmeths Agreed. Remasteres are a great way to experience games you've played or missed with updated graphics, which for some games make revisiting them espcially either. They don't take away from new Ames being made, if anything they help fund them and make them less risky. I say the more the better as long as studios that aren't there for new games work on them for the most part.

Jaz007

CaviarMeths

Jaz007 wrote:

@Caviarmeths Agreed. Remasteres are a great way to experience games you've played or missed with updated graphics, which for some games make revisiting them espcially either. They don't take away from new Ames being made, if anything they help fund them and make them less risky. I say the more the better as long as studios that aren't there for new games work on them for the most part.

I think people are under the impression that all remasters are like Wind Waker HD, where it takes Nintendo's A-team 6 months of development to get to the shelves and retails almost at full price. The way Sony does it though is just a quick rendering in HD, package it together, and maybe include the DLC on disk. It's quick and dirty, and a great way to enjoy content that you may have missed when it first came out.

So Anakin kneels before Monster Mash and pledges his loyalty to the graveyard smash.

Dave24

CaviarMeths wrote:

Jaz007 wrote:

@Caviarmeths Agreed. Remasteres are a great way to experience games you've played or missed with updated graphics, which for some games make revisiting them espcially either. They don't take away from new Ames being made, if anything they help fund them and make them less risky. I say the more the better as long as studios that aren't there for new games work on them for the most part.

I think people are under the impression that all remasters are like Wind Waker HD, where it takes Nintendo's A-team 6 months of development to get to the shelves and retails almost at full price. The way Sony does it though is just a quick rendering in HD, package it together, and maybe include the DLC on disk. It's quick and dirty, and a great way to enjoy content that you may have missed when it first came out.

In some cases it's good (like MGS or DMC, those are great), but in others these remasters suck hard, like Splinter Cell Trilogy. Constant framerate drops are not fun at all.

I have nothing against remasters. It is great when they pull a lot of effort and change this and that, like in WW HD, but to me something like Tomb Raider DE or Metro Redux (can't wait!) are enough. Problem with Nintendo however is that if they would made those HD ports, it would be exactly the same situation as with WW.

Dave24

TuVictus

Very unpopular opinion : Nintendo is to blame for their lack of third party support. They thought people would just flock to their console and I see that as arrogant. I really hope they're learning a hard lesson right now.

It simply isn't possible to have a Nintendo console as a primary console unless you only play one game every few months. The wii u will always be a secondary console and probably it's successor as well.

TuVictus

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic