I don't think 3D Land is the best example because it seems to play like a sidescroller in platformer form. I'm thinking basically platformer with no sidescrolling, so 64, Sunshine, Galaxy, etc would be closer to it in order to make use of both the TV and GamePad for dual/coop play as I was talking about in an earlier post. Again, in that case you could have 2 players each controlling 1 on them on in the same area, together, (That's where the GamePad comes in so while 1 person controls Mario on the TV the other is using the GamePad to control Luigi) or if a 2nd player isn't available the CPU would control 1 of them, but you'd have an option to change who you wanna control.

Other than thatas stated in my rpevious post it'd be nice to see Nintendobring recognition back to the franchise whole as shifting from Super Mario Bros, considering how it generally started with Mario Bros and then became Super Mario Bros, as opposed to Super Mario.

Ehh, no Super Mario 64 isn't what i'm describing because Luigi is nowhere to be found exception for the DS version, and even that type of switch out isn't what I'm referring to; I mean for 2 players to play at the same time. And jnust exactly how does the inclusion of Wario and Waluigi defeat the purpose of my opinion? Nintendo never cllearified us enough background on Waligi to simply dismiss him as to whether or not he's Wario's brother, and they do share similar characteristics; Wario is to Mario as Waluigi is to Luigi. That said, it certainly doesn't defeat the purpose of the type of gameplay I'm describing.

Super Mario Bros. Not Super Mario Cousins.

Wario is Mario and Luigi's cousin as is Waluigi. Wario and Waluigi are brothers. All confirmed by Nintendo, no holes to be found.

If Nintendo wants to sell Wii U consoles, it has to develop a cutting edge 3D Mario that lives up to Galaxy's newly found standard. Your idea isn't exactly cutting edge nor reasonable.

Confirmed by Nintendo, really? Source? Because this is nowhere to be confirmed on Wikipedia or Wikia (por at least I've never found this confirmon either site). But OK, let's assume this is true Nintendo confirms that Wario and Waluigi are brothers, but cousins to Mario and Luigi. This still doesn't explain how it "defeats the purpose of my opinion" for the type of gameplay I'm talking about. There's no rule stating that the series suddenly has to be named Super Mario Cousins (although now that you mention it, it would make for a rather interesting branch-off or whatever in relation to the series or franchise) simply because Wario and Waluigi together as brothers can oppose Mario and Luigi together as brothers as enemies. After all, Wario became Mario's enemy since Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins.

TurokU

I agree that it's not cutting edge (although don't know where reasonable comes in).

But in games like NSMBU, I think it would be awesome to have Wario and Waluigi with unique mechanics. Certainly better then generic toads with no known relation to Mario's family whatsoever.

Hmm....yea I'd actually have hard time finding them to do anything much different if it were another NSMB, though, which is why i suggesteda 3D platformer.

Not cutting edge nor reason....uh-huh,OK> Correct me if I'm, wrong but uh, didn't Nintendo just sell us a brand new NSMB game, this time around on Wii U? is that "cutting egde" or reasonable to reproduce something that quite honestly doesn't doesn't do justice enough to separate it from its predecessor? (As if the music weren't indication of this enough already, and with a total of 4; 1 on the DS, onon 3DS, 1 on Wiii and 1 on Wii U) Still, for anyone to call a dual/coop play system that's never been done before on a 3D platformer, maybe you just need to think outside the box a bit more because this is in no way, shape, or form not cutting egde nor unreasonable; Nintendo wants people to play together with the use of the gamePad, this is that opportunity. Cutting egde? Well I don't know just how far your extention or what your definition of cutting edge goes, but in Nintendo's case It very well could be. Besdies, look at all the Wario spin-offs; They seem to sell some here and there, proof that it doesn't always have to be cutting edge. In fact. I could possibly find other similar holes. Just saying.

The idea isn't plausible. I couldn't see Nintendo doing it.

That is a neat idea but it wouldn't be appropriate for the series.

I can't figure out how Nintendo can still call it Super Mario Bros. when Wario and Waluigi are involved. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Wario is in any of the Mario Bros. games.

You're the 1 who made the claim that Nintendo confirmed (which I still haven't found any solid proof nor source of anywhere) Wario and Waluigi as being cousins to Mario and Luigi, so why does it matter?; If anything, they're doppelgangers. Technicaly, if you wanna call it a Mario Bros game, (or at least cancon to the whole Super Mario franchise) (Net that I'd countt as a Bros game myself) but was dropped into Super Mario 64 DS, which again I honestly can't understand their logic at the time (not exactly appropriate imo there, either, with the questionable exceptions, imo, of Luigi and Yoshi) because the controls alone weren't exactly fitted for it, thus making the extras tougher to use. 2nd, I wasn't exactly hinting at the idea of them being playable in my idea, but more or less as main or maybe near final bosses, which you'd need Mario and Luigi fighting together (or at least id' be the most practical way tod efeat both) to defeat them fighting together. This again is why I mentioned earlier gameplay references of Bros, where maybe some or the more normal enemies could share gameplay attack mechanics because idealistically, you may want to encounter them with both Mario and luigi while not entirely required.

Now, perhaps if Nintendo wanted to take the duo in a spin-off direction, say maybe Wario/Super Wario Bros, (Tittl being the same sense as WarioLand is to the Super Mario Land series; place Wario's name voer Mario Course, yet again it'd be more practical of Nintendo to cinfirm a last name 1st) I could possibly see this gonig somewhere.

To be honest I bought a Wii U for Rayman Legends, I know that there will be 3D Mario, Zelda and Metroid games down the line, which will be excellent - but right now my hype level for Rayman is off the charts!

Well, Super Smash Brothers Brawl was my favorite Wii game so I'm excited for the new Ssb. Also looking forward to Monolith Soft's new rpg.

zelda 3... OH WAIT!

Lol, 3? There's already tons of em, we kow they're gonna make another. But Chronologically, like after Adventure of Link? So many I'm not even sure which roder each game is in anymore, and according to Gametrailers retrospect they kinda confirmed as there being 3 timelines, it's weird.

I'd really really need a new Metroid game, not to the prime style, but a 2d or something like other M, with amazing cinematics, huge space battles with the ship, a lot of exploration and ground/air battles. That would amazing.

I hope you mean cinematics without dialogue.

But yeah, I actually would like to see something like Other M in the way it switches between 2D and 3D with a third-person view.

I just need new EVERYTHING on 3DS besides Mario and Kid Icarus. New Star Fox (screw that lazy port), new WarioWare, new Metroid, new Sin and Punishment (only because Treasure said they're doing something, and collaboration with Nintendo means they could use the Kid Icarus air battle engine with some alterations), new Kirby (it's the goddamn 3DS, we need a 3D title), new Zelda (again, screw that port, especially considering the game has dated quite a bit) and anything else I'm forgetting that isn't announced yet.

Jaja, I must confess that I've enjoyed very much those dialogs.

Think I said this earlier, but if they do makea new Star Fox the only way I'd play it is online multiplayer, which I don't know how it plays on the 3DS, butimo would work best on Wii U via dual analogs for control. Of course, that wouldn't encesserilylimit you from having other possible options on the GamePad touchscreen.

Star Fox in the Arwing wouldn't be the same with dual-analog.

Though yes, online multiplayer is a must. WTF were they thinking with SF643D?

Why wouldn't it be the same with dual analog? Suppose you use 1 for boost foward and back, left and right, and well I dunno strafing might be weird, I dunno.

I'm not sure what you want out of dual-analog, but what I usually think of is simple, move and strafe with one stick, aim with the other.

With Star Fox (in the Arwing) you aim where you move.