eduscxbox

@Chocobo_Shepherd Exactly. It's always the extremes.
What is offensive to me might not be offensive to you.

And there is no problem in voice that "I find the outfits offensive", it is a valid criticism, I just can't threat staff because I think the outfit is offensive.

@DiggleDog Some people treat freedom of speech as 'I can do anything I want without consequences', but that's not how it is.

Freedom of speech rules only opinions and actions who doesn't harm other people rights. You can have any political opinions you want, religious opinions, and even opinions about companies and people.

But Harass, threat, stalk and so many other things mentioned are NOT freedom of speech. This is crime and should be handled accordingly.

You are not free to cause harm to others, physically or emotional, under the banner of freedom of speach.

• You can criticize the quality of a product
• You can criticize a company decision
• You CANNOT harass the staff of said company

People should stop mixing freedom of speech with this 'behavioral anarchy'.

Also, it is great to see a company doing something about it for real. Congrats to Square Enix for that.

@Aurumonado Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War was 5.

@Sisilly_G it is highly unlikely a Call of Duty title would fit completely even on bigger storage cartridges, so it would make sense not add a higher cost for a bigger cartridge if the full game wouldn't fit anyway.

@Vyacheslav333

The point is that Activision didn't promise anything. Microsoft promised to bring Call of Duty to switch and is now confirming this.

Activision is now under a new administration, lead by the Xbox Team, that has had nothing but good actions towards Nintendo.

Cuphead came to switch because of Xbox, so did Ori. MS and Nintendo also partnered on Cross play for Minecraft, There is even achievements for Minecraft Switch version on the Xbox.

MS has a good history with Nintendo, so I'm expecting good things.

@Vyacheslav333 just because it is a port of an older game doesn't mean they can do that in 1 day, it takes time to do a port, it is not simple.

Acquisition just cleared, ABK on Game Pass will start 2024 only, so it will take a while.

I don't know for sure.

For Mario games, yes, play them all in order, they all great to play to this day.

But for Zelda, I don't know. A Link to the Past is a huge gap from the first and second zelda on the NES.

For some people the first game of Zelda series can be a real put off.

There are also great mobile zelda games, like Minish cap for people who want to experience 2D zelda.

Also, when it comes to 3D there are lots of different experiences, there is Wind Waker, BoTW and My favorite Skyward Sword. All of them have different approaches, so to me it wouldn't make a difference to play them in different order. I think playing in order makes sense if it is a direct sequel, just like BoTW and the new Tears of the Kingdom, then sure, play BoTW first.

Last but not least: Zelda games are not in chronological order anyway, so why bother playing in order?! Play the one who you find more attractive first. I did that, and I've gone from not liking zelda to loving it.

I used to think nintendo should stick to hybrid model. But honestly, I don't know how long nintendo can mantain an hybrid console and third party AAA on consoles natively.

If they made a more powerfull hybrid it will need to be at least as big as a steam deck, with makes portability worse.

Honestly, I would like nintendo got back to the old model of having two consoles, a portable and more powerful one.

Would love to see how a Nintendo powerful hardware at the same level of PS5 and Series X would sell on the market.

Imagine having every single third party on board, with the same quality as rivals, plus Nintendo own franchises, on a single box?! I would love that.

It certainly would help lots of people who have PS or Xbox for multiplatform and Nintendo for exclusives, and would also help Nintendo as those people would now buy all their third parties on a Nintendo platform as well.