@Quarth: I don't disagree with any of that. All I said was that you should reply with that sort of stuff to @Cobalt rather than sending out byte-sized "u suck" statements that add even less to the discussion than his "constant negativity and bashing of Nintendo and the Switch". Again, several other people are just as negative about this game, yet he's the only one who got told he's a dumb troll. Ironically, the people telling him he's a stupid idiot at the very same time also claim he's acting childish. If you really think someone is a troll fishing for attention, why reply at all?
@Quarth: My sentence was a bit long, but the answer to your question was right after: "they aren't all that different from some guy who's exaggerating his disappointment".
@blecch: They actually made a PSTV years before they made the PSTV (I was going to add a list of all of the other stuff Sony made that you could technically also call 'PlayStation TV', but it would be a bit too confusing): you could connect the PSP to your TV with an officially licensed cable. They took it up a notch with the PSP Go, which you could put inside a cradle to simultaneously charge and connect to your TV (of course, you had to buy the charger, the cradle and the TV cables separately, each!), and connect a PS3 controller to it via Bluetooth (also bought separately, and although it required some magic through a PS3, it did work). The downside was that PSP games displayed in a tiny rectangle on your screen rather than being fullscreen at all times, so you'd need to use the zoom function on your TV to see what was going on. PS1 games, however, work marvellously. It takes a couple of extra button presses, but it does work more or less exactly like the Switch, only with a much less powerful device and a much lower resolution. Still, it's possible!
@JaxonH: I think you're comparing apples and oranges here by comparing Vita-exclusive games to just anything that was released on the Switch. If you look at Switch exclusives, there really aren't that many to begin with either (I don't consider marginal updates like Pokkén or Mario Kart 8 to be exclusives). If you compare both systems by looking at all games including ports or multiplatform titles, there's a lot of great games on both systems, in fact there's a lot of games that exist on both systems, like World of Final Fantasy (the Switch admittedly got an extended edition), Ys VIII, Rayman, Shantae, lots of indie titles, and so on. I do agree completely about the analog sticks being place too close to the screen and all the other usual complaints. Luckily hackers have managed to solve most of the Vita's problems like allowing you to use microSD cards instead of the outrageously overpriced proprietary memory cards, or overclocking the system and hacking the resolution of lots of games so that they can now run at native resolution with good fps. Not all games are salvageable this way because Resident Evil Revelations still runs terribad even with all of the hacks, but it does breathe new life into what were previously considered to be shoddy ports, and luckily the Resident Evil Revelations ports on Switch are nothing short of outstanding (besides the load times, anyway).
@Quarth: It's hard to take your objections to melodramatic comments very seriously when most Switch games reviewed on this website are either the best games of all time (8/10, 9/10, 10/10) or the worst ever (4/10) - for the record, I don't agree nor disagree with the exaggerated reviews and review scores (and you can certainly say that exaggeration is the way all review mags/sites work), but they aren't all that different from some guy who's exaggerating his disappointment in much of what's been, being or going to be released and in the people who go out and buy games that are just 'okay' because someone's been hyping them up about it, thereby perpetuating mediocrity. Either way, if you don't like what he's saying or don't like the way he says things, just don't read his comments. The ignore button works perfectly so long as you're logged in and you aren't blocking JavaScript.
@Faruko: I'm pretty sure his point is just that he wants a real No More Heroes game and fears that if lots of people were to purchase this one (which I doubt), and because a full-fledged game takes more time to develop than some minigames, the developers might only make No More Heroes minigames anymore. Nice refutation of a strawman, though.
@westman98: I don't think he said it did. It is simply pathetic how you and some others constantly riff on the guy even when he says virtually the same thing as others. Comment #1, #3, #5 and #11 are just as negative, yet for some reason @Cobalt is an idiot, a troll, and what have you. Just because he isn't necessarily correct in thinking that the success (or far more likely, the lack thereof) of this minigame collection will decide the future of the series, doesn't mean you are entitled to mock him every single post he makes. You nor the others ever even disprove anything or explain why you think he's (always, necessarily) wrong! All you keep on doing is saying "ha ha your stoopid" every single time! What a joke. By the way, there's an 'ignore' button for people whose opinions you don't want to read.
@BenGrimm: I played the first ones (aka the actual games) and my thoughts are summed up perfectly by @janpampoen's comment. None of what made those games great is in here.
Besides, it seems most of you are forgetting the whole reason why people are so disappointed: in the very beginning, it was mentioned that a new No More Heroes game was coming to the Switch. Months later it turned out to be this collection of minigames. It's like if Nintendo had said "Pokémon is coming to the Switch!", millions of people got excited and anxious to learn more, then months later "It's finally here, Pokémon Quest!"
Comments 5
Re: New 'Life Is Destroy' Trailer Showcases Another Game In Travis Strikes Again
@Quarth: I don't disagree with any of that. All I said was that you should reply with that sort of stuff to @Cobalt rather than sending out byte-sized "u suck" statements that add even less to the discussion than his "constant negativity and bashing of Nintendo and the Switch". Again, several other people are just as negative about this game, yet he's the only one who got told he's a dumb troll. Ironically, the people telling him he's a stupid idiot at the very same time also claim he's acting childish. If you really think someone is a troll fishing for attention, why reply at all?
Re: New 'Life Is Destroy' Trailer Showcases Another Game In Travis Strikes Again
@Quarth: My sentence was a bit long, but the answer to your question was right after: "they aren't all that different from some guy who's exaggerating his disappointment".
Re: Square Enix Preparing Dragon Quest XI S Surprise For 1st January
@blecch: They actually made a PSTV years before they made the PSTV (I was going to add a list of all of the other stuff Sony made that you could technically also call 'PlayStation TV', but it would be a bit too confusing): you could connect the PSP to your TV with an officially licensed cable. They took it up a notch with the PSP Go, which you could put inside a cradle to simultaneously charge and connect to your TV (of course, you had to buy the charger, the cradle and the TV cables separately, each!), and connect a PS3 controller to it via Bluetooth (also bought separately, and although it required some magic through a PS3, it did work). The downside was that PSP games displayed in a tiny rectangle on your screen rather than being fullscreen at all times, so you'd need to use the zoom function on your TV to see what was going on. PS1 games, however, work marvellously. It takes a couple of extra button presses, but it does work more or less exactly like the Switch, only with a much less powerful device and a much lower resolution. Still, it's possible!
@JaxonH: I think you're comparing apples and oranges here by comparing Vita-exclusive games to just anything that was released on the Switch. If you look at Switch exclusives, there really aren't that many to begin with either (I don't consider marginal updates like Pokkén or Mario Kart 8 to be exclusives). If you compare both systems by looking at all games including ports or multiplatform titles, there's a lot of great games on both systems, in fact there's a lot of games that exist on both systems, like World of Final Fantasy (the Switch admittedly got an extended edition), Ys VIII, Rayman, Shantae, lots of indie titles, and so on. I do agree completely about the analog sticks being place too close to the screen and all the other usual complaints. Luckily hackers have managed to solve most of the Vita's problems like allowing you to use microSD cards instead of the outrageously overpriced proprietary memory cards, or overclocking the system and hacking the resolution of lots of games so that they can now run at native resolution with good fps. Not all games are salvageable this way because Resident Evil Revelations still runs terribad even with all of the hacks, but it does breathe new life into what were previously considered to be shoddy ports, and luckily the Resident Evil Revelations ports on Switch are nothing short of outstanding (besides the load times, anyway).
Re: New 'Life Is Destroy' Trailer Showcases Another Game In Travis Strikes Again
@Quarth: It's hard to take your objections to melodramatic comments very seriously when most Switch games reviewed on this website are either the best games of all time (8/10, 9/10, 10/10) or the worst ever (4/10) - for the record, I don't agree nor disagree with the exaggerated reviews and review scores (and you can certainly say that exaggeration is the way all review mags/sites work), but they aren't all that different from some guy who's exaggerating his disappointment in much of what's been, being or going to be released and in the people who go out and buy games that are just 'okay' because someone's been hyping them up about it, thereby perpetuating mediocrity. Either way, if you don't like what he's saying or don't like the way he says things, just don't read his comments. The ignore button works perfectly so long as you're logged in and you aren't blocking JavaScript.
@Faruko: I'm pretty sure his point is just that he wants a real No More Heroes game and fears that if lots of people were to purchase this one (which I doubt), and because a full-fledged game takes more time to develop than some minigames, the developers might only make No More Heroes minigames anymore. Nice refutation of a strawman, though.
Re: New 'Life Is Destroy' Trailer Showcases Another Game In Travis Strikes Again
@westman98: I don't think he said it did. It is simply pathetic how you and some others constantly riff on the guy even when he says virtually the same thing as others. Comment #1, #3, #5 and #11 are just as negative, yet for some reason @Cobalt is an idiot, a troll, and what have you. Just because he isn't necessarily correct in thinking that the success (or far more likely, the lack thereof) of this minigame collection will decide the future of the series, doesn't mean you are entitled to mock him every single post he makes. You nor the others ever even disprove anything or explain why you think he's (always, necessarily) wrong! All you keep on doing is saying "ha ha your stoopid" every single time! What a joke.
By the way, there's an 'ignore' button for people whose opinions you don't want to read.
@BenGrimm: I played the first ones (aka the actual games) and my thoughts are summed up perfectly by @janpampoen's comment. None of what made those games great is in here.
Besides, it seems most of you are forgetting the whole reason why people are so disappointed: in the very beginning, it was mentioned that a new No More Heroes game was coming to the Switch. Months later it turned out to be this collection of minigames. It's like if Nintendo had said "Pokémon is coming to the Switch!", millions of people got excited and anxious to learn more, then months later "It's finally here, Pokémon Quest!"