Comments 8

Re: Soapbox: 'Switch 2' Doesn't Really Need Backwards Compatibility

another_one

Well, I’m gonna add to the disagreement chorus ‘cause we’re all soapboxing to soapbox here I suppose. The core of it for me is that there are a lot of games on Switch that aren’t firing on all cylinders and could better realize their potential from a boost in hardware. That’s really what it boils down to for me.

Take the SNES as a comparison, a lot of those games are presented in a pixel art style that would scale and look identically at a higher resolution, they don’t look any better for it, higher resolutions just need proper scaling to maintain the presentation. And most of them run at 60fps, something like StarFox would be about it for benefitting from higher power.

With the Switch, almost every single game would present better, have a greater fidelity of play, with some combination of higher resolution or frame rate (and this would be a bigger ask, but improved texture resolution). They’re just so dang compromised across the board that I will experience the thought at some point for nearly every single game, “imagine this more realized at higher specs.” It’s not a deal breaker for Switch games (love em), but it does make the argument that “it’s the least in need of back compat of all time” a silly argument from the soapbox I’m standing on.

Re: Soapbox: After 10 Years I Finally Got A Wii U, Here’s What I Thought

another_one

I also picked one up for the first time about a month ago and it’s similarly filled me with delight having the breadth of the library all there before me. That, and enough time has passed that a lot of recommendations have been parsed out and provided to sift through the whole of it. Especially with the all the “eshop is closing soon” game roundups.