@ L.Brown: Really? I disagree. The game obviously isn't perfect, but I thought there was a good range of interesting levels. Combined with the customization system, it held my attention quite well. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
However, it surely can't be argued that Alphabounce has more depth than THIS game, can it?
I have all the DS's (except the new XL), so I have no problem playing GBA games. It's great if you have the older systems, yes, and maybe these G&W are overpriced, but I'm just pointing out that with the DSi it's not a choice.
@6ch6ris6: 2. You do have to use the Dpad if you want to fire lasers or missiles. 4. Chronos Twins is good, but HARD, old-school platformer with a dual-screen/reality twist.
Fine, Nintendoftw. Put your fingers in your ears and go 'lalalalala', ignore the fact that GTA:CW received universal praise, and keep saying that its chosen style (gameplay over graphics) is 'lazy' despite its good craft. The fact that you still insist that CW isn't 'third person' is laughable, and reveals your intent to troll. I'm done talking with you.
^ At least try to sound like you know what you're talking about before you criticize something. Chinatown Wars IS third-person, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with its graphics, which are very detailed and capture the game's world perfectly. They work extremely well, and I'd rather have those graphics than a pretty game with a mediocre experience, like COP.
GTA:CW is a significantly well-crafted game that DOES set the bar, and it is certainly not 'overrated'. And all 'overrated' means is 'I can't understand why most people agree that this is an excellent game, therefore it must not be that good.'
Comments 8
Re: Keep Your Life Collected with Nnooo's MyDiary
@Nintendoftw
No, they are not the same thing. What makes you think that?
Re: Review: Bounce & Break (DSiWare)
@ L.Brown: Really? I disagree. The game obviously isn't perfect, but I thought there was a good range of interesting levels. Combined with the customization system, it held my attention quite well. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
However, it surely can't be argued that Alphabounce has more depth than THIS game, can it?
Re: Review: Bounce & Break (DSiWare)
^ Alphabounce is pretty good, has lots of levels and depth, too. It'll be out for you in a few days.
Re: Nintendo Download: 19th April 2010 (North America)
I have all the DS's (except the new XL), so I have no problem playing GBA games. It's great if you have the older systems, yes, and maybe these G&W are overpriced, but I'm just pointing out that with the DSi it's not a choice.
Re: Nintendo Download: 19th April 2010 (North America)
"I'm with Stuffy here, better go get G&W Gallery 4"
Yes, because the DSi can play GBA games, right?
Re: Review: AlphaBounce (DSiWare)
@6ch6ris6:
2. You do have to use the Dpad if you want to fire lasers or missiles.
4. Chronos Twins is good, but HARD, old-school platformer with a dual-screen/reality twist.
Re: Review: Gangstar 2: Kings of L.A. (DSiWare)
Fine, Nintendoftw. Put your fingers in your ears and go 'lalalalala', ignore the fact that GTA:CW received universal praise, and keep saying that its chosen style (gameplay over graphics) is 'lazy' despite its good craft. The fact that you still insist that CW isn't 'third person' is laughable, and reveals your intent to troll. I'm done talking with you.
Re: Review: Gangstar 2: Kings of L.A. (DSiWare)
^ At least try to sound like you know what you're talking about before you criticize something. Chinatown Wars IS third-person, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with its graphics, which are very detailed and capture the game's world perfectly. They work extremely well, and I'd rather have those graphics than a pretty game with a mediocre experience, like COP.
GTA:CW is a significantly well-crafted game that DOES set the bar, and it is certainly not 'overrated'. And all 'overrated' means is 'I can't understand why most people agree that this is an excellent game, therefore it must not be that good.'