Yes yes let's talk about it. Let's talk about how Pokemon designs started as blatant ripoffs of Dragon Quest monsters. Let's talk about how PalWorld is hopefully going to force Game Freak to actually make a good game and not just a pile of slop and then slapping a Pokemon sticker on it. People... stop running to the defense of billion dollar corporations. I don't care if PalWorld is literally stealing assets if it means consumers FINALLY get a great Pokemon game. Eat it Nintendo!
@Rottytops knowing what we know about sites like Rotten Tomatoes, all I could think of while reading this title was how much the writer is being payed off by Nintendo to convince people this is a good idea... id hope that's not the case but I've also never seen so much hard work out into a propaganda piece.
See the biggest issue people aren't thinking about is the fact we know that if the Switch 2 isn't backwards compatible then Nintendo WILL make us pay $70+ to rebuy our games with little to no upgrade. It's Nintendo. Also how are they going to resell this to the millions of parents buying these for their kids? Parents won't buy these once they realize they're buying the same exact games for their kids again! How many times does Nintendo think they can get away with reselling Mario Cart 8 and Smash Bros Wii U and "New" Super Mario Bros? You and I might pay but in this economy, every day parents won't.
Comments 5
Re: Round Table: Let's Talk About Palworld - Comparisons, Controversy, 'Copying'
Yes yes let's talk about it. Let's talk about how Pokemon designs started as blatant ripoffs of Dragon Quest monsters. Let's talk about how PalWorld is hopefully going to force Game Freak to actually make a good game and not just a pile of slop and then slapping a Pokemon sticker on it. People... stop running to the defense of billion dollar corporations. I don't care if PalWorld is literally stealing assets if it means consumers FINALLY get a great Pokemon game. Eat it Nintendo!
Re: Eiji Aonuma Comments On The Possibility Of A Playable Zelda In The Future
Just give me Linkle!!!!
Re: Soapbox: 'Switch 2' Doesn't Really Need Backwards Compatibility
@Rottytops knowing what we know about sites like Rotten Tomatoes, all I could think of while reading this title was how much the writer is being payed off by Nintendo to convince people this is a good idea... id hope that's not the case but I've also never seen so much hard work out into a propaganda piece.
Re: Soapbox: 'Switch 2' Doesn't Really Need Backwards Compatibility
See the biggest issue people aren't thinking about is the fact we know that if the Switch 2 isn't backwards compatible then Nintendo WILL make us pay $70+ to rebuy our games with little to no upgrade. It's Nintendo. Also how are they going to resell this to the millions of parents buying these for their kids? Parents won't buy these once they realize they're buying the same exact games for their kids again! How many times does Nintendo think they can get away with reselling Mario Cart 8 and Smash Bros Wii U and "New" Super Mario Bros? You and I might pay but in this economy, every day parents won't.
Re: Batman Arkham Trilogy Swoops To Switch This Fall
Has anyone seen anywhere what the resolution and frame rates are? I'm assuming 1080p 30fps for the first 2 and 720p 30fps for Arkham Knight....?