@Heavyarms55 I won't disagree. I think a LOT of people want there to be a Switch collection.
That said, I think Nintendo is clever in doing it this way. They release a limited amount of games. Get everyone hyped for those games. And once they're finished with these plug and play consoles (if they do continue) they can re-release the collection of games on the switch and receive DOUBLE the profits. From a business standpoint, it makes so much sense to do it this way. Sure, customers may be disgruntled for a while because they want it on the switch. But Nintendo would see that simply as this:
People want everything NOW. Which means people who have purchased the switch are also likely to purchase a mini edition to be able to play it straight away.
Eventually we can see which systems sold the most and which we could possibly add a larger calendar of games to if we release switch collections.
Older gamers may not want to purchase a switch, but these consoles would be right up there alley.
Each of these options are key to establishing popularity and sales. If they make a great return, switch VC can be enriched. So perhaps everyone who wants the Switch VC to come out sooner rather than later should think of it like this: these mini's are a great prototype for something greater.
I think anyone asking if these games help up over time needs to REALLY re-look at the NES and SNES classic graphics. It's grainy, it's dated and it technically doesn't "hold up". It's the fondness of the games that holds up. I keep reading N64 graphics just don't look good by todays standards. That's true. Then again, neither do the SNES and NES classic graphics. They're dated. That's why it's a CLASSIC edition. If you're expecting it to look amazing and aesthetically pleasing, you're looking for the wrong thing.
IF you're trying to take a walk down memory lane, this is what you're looking for. I'm keen to see an N64 on the market. I'm sure Nintendo (of all companies) could develop an emulation program for THEIR SYSTEM that would allow at least 90% of games to run perfectly. Then remember the fact that THEY choose the games that run on the system and I think you'll find that the games will run perfectly.
People who then choose to hack the system face the issues of some games not working properly. The system wasn't designed for added games. You added them. These are the consequences. Get over it.
In terms of money making, it's doable. The creation of a small system can be done on the retropie with pretty decent effects, meaning a company that is dedicated to making sure THEIR software works on their system is 110% doable.
In terms of marketing or announcements. I think we'll be waiting until after the SNES and NES classic stops being stocked. It's a no brainer to ensure people purchase the products that they've had to go to the effort of RE-DISTRIBUTING long BEFORE making any announcements. The box would obviously need to be bigger than the other two systems, and the price would be higher still (especially getting all the controllers and the more than likely required extension cables). True fans will be happy to pay for the product. People who don't want it, don't need to get it. I would definitely get it because fills a gap in my childhood. Growing up I was never able to get these consoles and now I FINALLY have the chance. So I'd get em. All of them.
That said, only Nintendo knows what they're going to do. I think its smarter for them to sell out ALL the stock they have for these two systems and then POSSIBLY announce it later this year and release it around June-July of next year. Who knows. Could be later than that even.
AND for everyone saying they don't want these mini's but would rather Nintendo released these games on the SWITCH, and claiming they would make more money that way. You're very incorrect. These systems are most likely for people who would like to play the older games but don't wish to purchase a switch. That means Nintendo rakes in profits from people who want the feel of the old consoles, and don't want to buy the new console. Once they get ALL the money from that, they can then move to (if they choose) implementing these games on a Switch VC. That means, for those who have the mini edtions but ALSO want them on the switch, those people will purchase the games for a second time while others will buy them for the first time. It also means that Nintendo can, essentially, double the profits for these games than they would had they simply released it on the VC. So stop complaining about it. Nintendo clearly understands how they're able to make more money from ONE product (that's one per system). If it were my company, I'd do the same thing because it's WAY more profitable.
and @vitalemrecords I wouldn't say it's trash. And I would imagine a lot of people would disagree with you. But hey, to each their own.
Comments 2
Re: NES Classic Mini Outsold Modern Video Game Hardware In The Month Of June
@Heavyarms55 I won't disagree. I think a LOT of people want there to be a Switch collection.
That said, I think Nintendo is clever in doing it this way. They release a limited amount of games. Get everyone hyped for those games. And once they're finished with these plug and play consoles (if they do continue) they can re-release the collection of games on the switch and receive DOUBLE the profits. From a business standpoint, it makes so much sense to do it this way. Sure, customers may be disgruntled for a while because they want it on the switch. But Nintendo would see that simply as this:
Each of these options are key to establishing popularity and sales. If they make a great return, switch VC can be enriched. So perhaps everyone who wants the Switch VC to come out sooner rather than later should think of it like this: these mini's are a great prototype for something greater.
That's my opinion anyways.
Peace.
Re: Soapbox: Why A Nintendo 64 Classic Edition Might Not Be Such A Good Idea
I know i'm late to the party
but....
I think anyone asking if these games help up over time needs to REALLY re-look at the NES and SNES classic graphics. It's grainy, it's dated and it technically doesn't "hold up". It's the fondness of the games that holds up. I keep reading N64 graphics just don't look good by todays standards. That's true. Then again, neither do the SNES and NES classic graphics. They're dated. That's why it's a CLASSIC edition. If you're expecting it to look amazing and aesthetically pleasing, you're looking for the wrong thing.
IF you're trying to take a walk down memory lane, this is what you're looking for. I'm keen to see an N64 on the market. I'm sure Nintendo (of all companies) could develop an emulation program for THEIR SYSTEM that would allow at least 90% of games to run perfectly. Then remember the fact that THEY choose the games that run on the system and I think you'll find that the games will run perfectly.
People who then choose to hack the system face the issues of some games not working properly. The system wasn't designed for added games. You added them. These are the consequences. Get over it.
In terms of money making, it's doable. The creation of a small system can be done on the retropie with pretty decent effects, meaning a company that is dedicated to making sure THEIR software works on their system is 110% doable.
In terms of marketing or announcements. I think we'll be waiting until after the SNES and NES classic stops being stocked. It's a no brainer to ensure people purchase the products that they've had to go to the effort of RE-DISTRIBUTING long BEFORE making any announcements. The box would obviously need to be bigger than the other two systems, and the price would be higher still (especially getting all the controllers and the more than likely required extension cables). True fans will be happy to pay for the product. People who don't want it, don't need to get it. I would definitely get it because fills a gap in my childhood. Growing up I was never able to get these consoles and now I FINALLY have the chance. So I'd get em. All of them.
That said, only Nintendo knows what they're going to do. I think its smarter for them to sell out ALL the stock they have for these two systems and then POSSIBLY announce it later this year and release it around June-July of next year. Who knows. Could be later than that even.
AND for everyone saying they don't want these mini's but would rather Nintendo released these games on the SWITCH, and claiming they would make more money that way. You're very incorrect. These systems are most likely for people who would like to play the older games but don't wish to purchase a switch. That means Nintendo rakes in profits from people who want the feel of the old consoles, and don't want to buy the new console. Once they get ALL the money from that, they can then move to (if they choose) implementing these games on a Switch VC. That means, for those who have the mini edtions but ALSO want them on the switch, those people will purchase the games for a second time while others will buy them for the first time. It also means that Nintendo can, essentially, double the profits for these games than they would had they simply released it on the VC. So stop complaining about it. Nintendo clearly understands how they're able to make more money from ONE product (that's one per system). If it were my company, I'd do the same thing because it's WAY more profitable.
and @vitalemrecords I wouldn't say it's trash. And I would imagine a lot of people would disagree with you. But hey, to each their own.
Anyways.
That's my spiel.
Have a good one!