DarylT

@lizabey while that sounds quite lovely it's unrealistic. To run something of that size would require a powerful CPU, much more than the switch is capable off.

@The-Chosen-one no problem

@Sanangelo89 but the world would be so empty and lifeless then. Honestly think about how many times you see anyone when you travel through hyrule. It isn't very often.

@ummyeahnintendo it is not constructive criticism. If you all dont know what you are talking about then it is just slander. That's why no videogame maker agreed with any if the criticism.

@Sanangelo89 realistic as in the real world has roads and grass, not open areas that you just walk to from one town to another.
If you actually look at Breath of the wild you can see that most of the processing is going into the environment. That is why the amount of enemies you encounter is very few and the enemy variety is small.
If you also remove the turn based battling, you would also have to remove the ability to learn different attacks and to level up your pokemon. It would be far to difficult to program and animate.
If you wish them to do that then maybe a side game but not a main entry.

@ummyeahnintendo imnot making excuses, just dispelling the idiotic slander perpetrated by people who do not know how video games and animations work. If you want that you can have 20 pokemon in the game because it takes time and space to animate all of that.

@Sanangelo89 breath of the wild would actually be bad for the series as it would drastically reduce the number of pokemon and moves available in game. It would also make the world unbelievable and unrealistic.

@The-Chosen-one as a life long pokemon fan I must disagree and state that this is the best the series has to offer. Fun characters, good story, and catching and battling has never been more fun.

@ummyeahnintendo you try programming multiple attacks for hundreds of pokemon and having them all different and fit on a cart. That's right, it's impossible.

@Muddy_4_Ever I agree whole-heartedly.