So.. now we know... who to blame for all those annoying wiggle to blow air actions in dkcr that actually compromised the whole rhythm-based platformer identity of dkcr. But then again, nintendo never actually made any of the main DKC games so how would they know what kind of game mechanics enhances or inhibits a dkc game.
@BulbasaurusRex you do realize this is like the first game... like ever... in the history of gaming that purely focuses on Hinduism right? You also do realize there are like a gazillion Jude-Christian games/movies/songs/books/art/cookies/clubs/people/buildings/countries/(I could go on but you get the point)? If so much content is available that exactly caters to your religious taste, why then... do you feel compelled to mention your "not caring about Hinduism"? How would you like it if people start sharing with you that they don't care about Judeo-Christianity?
@UndoControl : Look my point is Nintendo enforces a restrictive policy and threatens ppl who want to experience Nintendo's content in their own completely harmless way. This is not a very smart thing to do in the information age we are in, it actually goes against the need of a part of their own fans. And if they can't service the ppl themselves in a way they prefer it is not wise to block others from closing that gap, especially if it only could lead to more fans, more sales and greater broadcasting reach. But then again we're taking about the company with an ancient online business style
@BenAV if you really think it through you will see their reasoning behind this policy is extremely shortsighted, just like so many other policies they enforce. They gain nothing when (note my choice of words here, I didn't say "if") ppl start having issues getting that access to that content. But this is unfortunately what happens if you don't choose your leaders by their competence and rather do it the traditional shortsighted way. You get exactly the same shortsightedness repeated again and again
Restrictive broadcasting policy for content that its creator claims to be freely available worldwide at a single point in time (exactly like this Nintendo direct) while not upholding that claim, which is caused by their own amateurish broadcasting execution should always be frowned upon. Because it only damages the rep of the creator and it only shrinks the reach of the art. All fans that pay honest money for the creator games should have easy access to such content. It's mostly a service problem and Co-streaming would not even exist if people didn't need something that was already proved by the creator.
Comments 6
Re: Random: Donkey Kong Blows? Of Course, And It's All Down To Shigeru Miyamoto
So.. now we know... who to blame for all those annoying wiggle to blow air actions in dkcr that actually compromised the whole rhythm-based platformer identity of dkcr. But then again, nintendo never actually made any of the main DKC games so how would they know what kind of game mechanics enhances or inhibits a dkc game.
Re: Review: Raji: An Ancient Epic - A Refreshing Experience That Leaves You Wanting More
@BulbasaurusRex you do realize this is like the first game... like ever... in the history of gaming that purely focuses on Hinduism right? You also do realize there are like a gazillion Jude-Christian games/movies/songs/books/art/cookies/clubs/people/buildings/countries/(I could go on but you get the point)? If so much content is available that exactly caters to your religious taste, why then... do you feel compelled to mention your "not caring about Hinduism"? How would you like it if people start sharing with you that they don't care about Judeo-Christianity?
Re: Nintendo Asks That You Don't Co-Stream The E3 2021 Nintendo Direct, Thanks Very Much
@UndoControl :
Look my point is Nintendo enforces a restrictive policy and threatens ppl who want to experience Nintendo's content in their own completely harmless way. This is not a very smart thing to do in the information age we are in, it actually goes against the need of a part of their own fans. And if they can't service the ppl themselves in a way they prefer it is not wise to block others from closing that gap, especially if it only could lead to more fans, more sales and greater broadcasting reach. But then again we're taking about the company with an ancient online business style
Re: Nintendo Asks That You Don't Co-Stream The E3 2021 Nintendo Direct, Thanks Very Much
@BenAV if you really think it through you will see their reasoning behind this policy is extremely shortsighted, just like so many other policies they enforce. They gain nothing when (note my choice of words here, I didn't say "if") ppl start having issues getting that access to that content. But this is unfortunately what happens if you don't choose your leaders by their competence and rather do it the traditional shortsighted way. You get exactly the same shortsightedness repeated again and again
Re: Nintendo Asks That You Don't Co-Stream The E3 2021 Nintendo Direct, Thanks Very Much
@NIN10DOXD I agree, they're like grown ups still afraid to jump from the diving boards that are higher than water level
Re: Nintendo Asks That You Don't Co-Stream The E3 2021 Nintendo Direct, Thanks Very Much
Restrictive broadcasting policy for content that its creator claims to be freely available worldwide at a single point in time (exactly like this Nintendo direct) while not upholding that claim, which is caused by their own amateurish broadcasting execution should always be frowned upon. Because it only damages the rep of the creator and it only shrinks the reach of the art. All fans that pay honest money for the creator games should have easy access to such content. It's mostly a service problem and Co-streaming would not even exist if people didn't need something that was already proved by the creator.