While the Super Mario Bros. movie has gone down as something of a cult classic with Nintendo fans, its production was troubled, reviews were uniformly terrible and it bombed at the box office.
Director Rocky Morton had to deal with a shifting script, difficult actors and a studio which kept interfering, and the end result is a bit of a mess. The late Bob Hoskins - who played Mario - couldn't stand the film, but his co-star John Leguizamo has happier memories.
Speaking to SciFiNow, Morton explained that issues with the movie began right from casting the lead star:
Danny DeVito turned us down. Mario was the main character in the cast, and Bob was available. It was basically about availability. There are all these stories about the way people are cast but it's normally about availability… Then we saw lots of different Luigis and John stood out because of his comic timing, his ability to be real but also be funny at the same time. Bob had that ability too.
However, Morton points out that the original script wasn't as comedic as the final film:
We wanted it to have a reality to it, especially the relationship, and we wanted it to be funny but not just a series of gags. We didn't want it to be a broad comedy – although some of it clearly is a broad comedy – but the original script wasn't like the final script. The original script was written by Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais, and it was much more of a family film that appealed to adults as well as kids. It was more sophisticated and the story of the two brothers was a lot stronger.
But it was an independent film and the producers needed more money and a studio behind them, and the studios rejected the script because they thought it was too dark. That threw them into complete panic, and instead of sticking with the script that Annabel and I wrote with Dick and Ian, they threw it out and told us to work with a new writer. The new writer wrote it in about a week and a half and then we were presented with the script. That was about a week before the start of principle photography. We were given a script that was completely different, and Annabel and I almost walked off the film at that point. The problem was that they'd build all the sets and created the prosthetics, and the cast was together and they'd found this great place to shoot it… We really thought we'd end up walking, but we decided to try to make the new script work as we were shooting.
To add to Morton's problems, Dennis Hopper - who was cast as the lead villain - was problematic on set:
I don't think he had a clue what was going on. There was one particular incident; we had to shoot out of sequence because of the script changes, and we had to shoot on one of the sets that wasn't ready yet, and we had to shoot on a long lens. I had to position Dennis in a certain way because if I shot off, I would be shooting off the set, so I had to change his position and he said, 'Rocky, that's a big change!' and I said, 'All I want you to do is instead of walking here I want you to walk there,' and because of the whole mess he just couldn't handle it. I said, 'Yeah, but we're shooting off the set if you walk that way.' It was stuff like that. On and on. It was mind-blowing.
[source scifinow.co.uk]
Comments (45)
The book Console Wars has a good piece on what happened too. Awful luck happened to that film from beginning to end!
Well, I for one am very happy they stuck it through and created the masterpiece it became.
I don't think Devito would have been any better.
Watching it right now, actually...gotta say, it's a bit of a guilty pleasure of mine. It may not be a cinematic masterpiece by any means, but it's not the worst thing out there.
That trailer almost makes you think that you're going to watch a movie of epic proportions. Almost...
I remember reading that someone was doing a sequel of sorts in the form of a comic book. I don't know if anything ever came out of it though.
http://www.slashfilm.com/the-super-mario-bros-movie-gets-a-comic-book-sequel/
They need to make a video game version of the film. Lol
I actually enjoyed the film...for the entertainment value...but it was a kind of messy plot. It would have been good if it was a darker story, but the original 80's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film had the darkness, and parents were outraged at the violence and tone of that...even though it became a blockbuster hit. Back to the Mario Bros movie...maybe it could have been better if they took away the whole Mario theme and just made it as two brothers in the kingdom, and make it a PG13 rating instead of PG ratings.
Bafflingly terrible movie, although I thought Hoskins was great!
Awful super Mario bros movie but good kids movie.
My children love it. I don't think it's a terrible kids movie at all.
I think it's lovely that one of Bowser's children got involved with the production. Keep it in the family and that.
Devito dodged a serious bullet bill(see what i did there?)! Everything about it was tragic. Nothing looked like it should ... from Yoshi to the Goombas to Hopper's King Koopa ... just a weird guy with weird hair, a long tongue and a rocket launcher. . . and whats with all that organic funky stuff all over the sets! The worse part was the cringeworthy "big reveal" of the surname .. Mario Mario and Luigi Mario ...... YEAH .. RIGHT!!!
I'm downloading it (...RELAX ... ILLEGALLY of course) as I type to refresh my memory!!!
@fluggy That's actually their real surnames. Miyamoto said so and I think it's on Nintendo Life somewhere...
I personally loved the film and I don't understand why people hate it.
So with all of the tall of Nintendo thinking about getting into the movie business, wouldn't it be great to have a fully CGI mario brothers movie done right!?
They should put the film on the Eshop lol or bundle it with the next Mario game a special edition.
1. At least say why the film is bad, because I literally have no idea what is people's problem with it. The CDi games actually have no reason to be liked by anyone, those are games and they have terrible controls and everything. Those cutscenes are terribly animated too along with the obnoxious script and voices.
2. I only know that Miyamoto said that Bowser's koopalings are adopted, I've never seen the opposite.
I would have preferred to see the film as it was originally intended. It definitely would have been better. However, I did enjoy the film as it was. I liked the idea of the alternate world. How it was created. I thought it was impressive given the game it was based on.
Still better than the Resident Evil and Tomb Raider movies.
You do know that when you adopt kids, it's fine to call them your kids, right? So Nintendo said that in the instructions but later clarified that they're adopted.
Plot holes? Nope, don't remember anything like that besides the cliffhanger. "ham fisted line delivery"? Dunno what you mean by that.
I found the plot to be quite interesting, different and cool. I loved the humour too.
I never bother with movie reviews much. I just got a DVD of the film a few years back from my brother and I watched it one night with my parents, loved it.
I don't have the time to watch that video right now so it's on my watch later list for now.
The worse part was the cringeworthy "big reveal" of the surname .. Mario Mario and Luigi Mario ...... YEAH .. RIGHT!!!
Despite being unintentional, Mario and Luigi have had the surname Mario since 1983. Its in the title - "Mario Brothers". In the same way The Hardy Boys featured brothers Frank Hardy and Joe Hardy. If they aren't supposed to have the surname Mario, Nintendo would have dropped the "Bros." part of the title upon realising how naming structures work.
Personally I always liked the film, but I rented it on VHS after all the reviews savaged it so my expectations were very low and I knew it had absolutely nothing to do with the Mario games.
I think if you can watch it without expecting it to be anything like the games it's fairly enjoyable as an adventure movie in a similar vein to stuff like The Goonies and Labyrinth.
The only way you can excuse this movie is from a non-gamer standpoint, otherwise, it's like having a copy of "Bible Adventures". Sure, it not good, or heck, even functional; you have it as a reminder of how awful video game movie adaptations can be.
@fluggy The movie became a story about evolution and how, when the meteor that struck 60 million years ago caused the dinos to die out, there was some separating of dimensions that caused the dinos to actually shift over to a new version of our earth. They stuck around over there, actually became more human somehow (but still descended from dinos), while we evolved from monkeys in a world without any dinos. Hopper takes over Mushroom Kingdom by developing a gun that can de-evolve things (he actually turns the king himself into some kind of fungus...yeah, not sure this part makes sense) and then the king tries to make Koopa suffer by doing the only thing he can by spreading his fungus all over.
Anything here shedding light on the story? I know, it's weird, especially for a script based on the game.
If you kind of just suspend all disbelief like you would for any science fiction script, it can still be a fun movie and so far the only one for Mario fans. Why did they use Daisy, though? I guess someone didn't like Peach.
The only way you can excuse this movie is from a non-gamer standpoint
A Hollywood movie based on Mario just wasn't going to resemble the games. The old cartoons are how stories based on the games should be done but no way Hollywood was going to copy those. Perhaps if it had been animated sure. Being animated would be the only way a modern movie would be close to the games as well; even twenty years later, a Hollywood Mario movie would resemble the old movie more so than the games. Thats just Hollywood adaptations of cartoons for you.
Why did they use Daisy, though? I guess someone didn't like Peach.
She wasn't called Peach in the American Mario games before 1996 so that wouldn't be used. She was only called Princess Toadstool which wasn't an appropriate name for a character we're supposed to initially believe is human and has no connections to the Mushroom Kingdom.
I rented this when I was pretty young, 10 or 11 maybe. I don't really remember what I first thought, but after years and years, I was just surprised it was ever made. I still somewhat enjoyed it seeing it a few times over the years in my teens and 20's. I still preferred the Double Dragon movie over it, but both pretty odd for sure.
I saw it hated it!
The podcast "how did this get made" covered this one. I highly recommend it!
This movie is an underrated classic. Hoskins, Leguizamo, Hopper and Shaw are all brilliant actors. The production design by David L. Snyder (of Blade Runner fame) is gorgeous. It only suffered from Morton and Jankel's conflicting direction. I could go on for hours about how much I love this movie. Re-watch it and you might be surprised at how much fun it actually is!
Not enough Walken in this movie. He would make it better.
His Bowser would be incredible and stuff of legends.
My friend had never seen this, the first Pokemon movie, or the Scott Pilgrim movie before, so we had a big movie night a few weeks ago.
I have to say, it sure was something. I found it to be entertaining mainly because of how bad it was.
The "Super Koopa Cousins" bit at the end was pretty funny, too. Now I know where that's from...
In any case, this was an interesting read. DeVito as Mario would have been hilarious.
I'm not going to act like DeVito as Mario would of saved this trainwreck of a movie, but the thought of seeing The Trashman himself playing Mario with that raspy voice is something I would totally pay to see. DeVito's the kind of guy that always seems to be having fun with his acting roles.
@Bass_X0
She was called Peach in Yoshi's Safari.
Sir, the Goombas are dancing again.
Yeah, this was one of those movies that were so common in the 90s... Possibly funny and fun to watch for kids, but absolutely terrible for anyone old enough to have developed critical thought. Some of the comeback lines were great, though! Luigi: "You just gotta believe, Mario!" (Talking about work) Mario: "Oh, I believe... I believe the rent is six months overdue!"
I think it would have been really interesting if they went for the original, darker script. It worked fairly well for the TMNT movie, and I think it would have worked well here, too. Just because the original audience were children doesn't mean you have to dumb the production down. Kids may come for the action, but the deeper script would have given us something to think about, and probably leave a better impression on adults as well.
@Yorumi Well, this is Nintendo Life... Not unusual to see people defend literally almost ANYTHING Nintendo related, with a few exceptions, as long as they meet certain criteria. Character persona butchering be damned.
@LUIGITORNADO
they shoulda got captain lou albano and danny wells. i woulda had more fun going to see it back then.
@PlywoodStick
i'm a biiiig nintendo fangirl and you will not hear me defending this turd. i saw it back when it came out and even as a kid, i thought it was bad.
i prefer street fighter and mortal kombat over it.
I enjoyed it. It's watchable as long as you're able to separate it in your mind from the games. Just like the original Hitman movie was enjoyable (haven't seen the second).
@JLPick And Howard the Duck made it almost impossible to get TMNT made, only Golden Harvest, the maker of classic Hong Kong action films, was willing to make it.
@Yorumi "You couldn't see the terrible plot(if you can even call it that) the holes, the ham fisted line delivery, and everything else?"
That's exactly why some of us love the movie.
Granted, I would have much preferred to see it with the original script, though. IMO, the darkness, and the post-apocalyptic dressing is what really makes the movie.
@shaneoh I thought the first Hitman movie was actually pretty faithful to the games, although it would be much more faithful if there were a Director's cut without those terrible scenes Sony added in post >_< Like that really stupid scene of the clones sword fighting at the train station. What the heck??
It's so interesting learning the "behind the scenes" about these things 20+ years after it happened. Gives me a good understanding on why the movie came out the way it did.
I wonder with technology, communication, and society the way it is today, if it would be possible to bring the original script to light. Even at budget value, it should be a lot easier than in the 90s.
I feel the same as other who posted that it's a bit of a guilty pleasure to watch. If it's on TV and I have nothing going on, I usually end up watching it.
....But I would also like a modern animation studio to get the chance to do the characters and property justice by creating a new film. I've posted before about this. I think there are many capable studios that if they found the right writer, it would be a huge success.
I'm pretty sure DeVito couldn't have saved this movie, and DeVito made the right choice in refusing to be part of this movie.
Tap here to load 45 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...