@UGXwolf
Your idea sounds very interesting... I'd play that mode... although I only see it in a single player mode.
Wi-Fi Game List:
Xenoblade Chronicles X
Splatoon
Super Smash Bros. Wii U & 3DS + All DLC
Mario Kart 8 + All DLC
Mario Golf: World Tour + All DLC
Mario Kart 7
Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon
Wii U & 3DS Game Wish List:...
3DS Friend Code: 3737-9553-9610 | Nintendo Network ID: Toadette75
Playable bosses? Plz no. I'd rather not have playable characters that completely redefine the rules of Smash.
It honestly just sounds like a glorified 1 vs. 3 from Mario Party, except without the randomness.
It'd be a 1-v-4, they wouldn't normally be playable, they'd only be usable for the solo player, and how does sounding like a Mario Party 1v3 with less random sound bad in any way, shape, or form. Mario Party is awesome.
Playable bosses? Plz no. I'd rather not have playable characters that completely redefine the rules of Smash.
It honestly just sounds like a glorified 1 vs. 3 from Mario Party, except without the randomness.
It'd be a 1-v-4, they wouldn't normally be playable, they'd only be usable for the solo player, and how does sounding like a Mario Party 1v3 with less random sound bad in any way, shape, or form. Mario Party is awesome.
If I wanted to play Mario Party, I'd play Mario Party, not Smash Bros.
Playable bosses? Plz no. I'd rather not have playable characters that completely redefine the rules of Smash.
It honestly just sounds like a glorified 1 vs. 3 from Mario Party, except without the randomness.
It'd be a 1-v-4, they wouldn't normally be playable, they'd only be usable for the solo player, and how does sounding like a Mario Party 1v3 with less random sound bad in any way, shape, or form. Mario Party is awesome.
If I wanted to play Mario Party, I'd play Mario Party, not Smash Bros.
It's ok, when SmashBros. Wii U comes out, everyone online will pick Temple with Items on.
Because SmashBros. is not a real fighting game.
For you, the day LordJumpMad graced your threads, was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Tuesday. [url=http://www.backloggery.com/jumpmad]Unive...
Thought her Down-B would be useless until I heard it can reflect projectiles, I hope you're right.
In the Rosalina announcement video, there was a scene were Rosalina reflected Mario's F.L.U.D.D with the same move in the new pic.
Edit: Well, now that I think about it, that looks to be it's only use, and it doesn't seem so bad after all, if Link throws a bomb at you, you can use her Down-B to disable it and possibly throw it back, and Down-B would likely be very useful against a Diddy Kong matchup, being able to pull his Banana's to you and you them against him, or again, disabling them.
Somewhat situational.
I figured you'd bring this up. That wasn't reflecting back at Mario, not the kind of reflection I was hoping for. Mario's Fludd is useless, too, unless they buffed it, which we don't know yet.
Speaking of FLUDD, anyone find it complete and utterly useless? Mario has been my main for all three games, never used FLUDD in Brawl. Failed to see a point.
Bigtime
3DS Friend Code: 1203-9892-7345 | Nintendo Network ID: martinf
Speaking of FLUDD, anyone find it complete and utterly useless? Mario has been my main for all three games, never used FLUDD in Brawl. Failed to see a point.
The move is good for edgeguarding. It can push opponents when they're trying to recover so they fail in recovering.
Speaking of FLUDD, anyone find it complete and utterly useless? Mario has been my main for all three games, never used FLUDD in Brawl. Failed to see a point.
Fludd gives no advantage in the neutral game, unless it does damage. Pushing the opponent, who's off-stage, away from the edge, is impossible if your opponent always recovers low, and that's almost always the case in Brawl. Yeah, it's useless.
Forums
Topic: Super Smash Bros. for Wii U - OT
Posts 4,221 to 4,240 of 27,917
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic