Zelda. I prefer real-time battles as opposed to turn-based fighting. I don't know why but the turn-based combat employed by most RPGs, including Pokemon, just doesn't feel "realistic" enough. As much as I loved Super Mario RPG, I have always wished that it played like a regular Mario game. When I first played it, I had no idea what an RPG was and tried jumping on a terrapin, the first enemy I saw. When the screen blacked out and I watched the guy run up, hit me, then backpeddle waiting for me to strike back, I was like "What the heck is going on here?" Even after learning the fighting system it just never felt right and I've never really had the urge to play another RPG. Sorry to go so far off topic, but Pokemon's an RPG and I felt like weighing in. No offense to anyone who likes RPGs, they're just not my cup of tea.
For you, the day LordJumpMad graced your threads, was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Tuesday. [url=http://www.backloggery.com/jumpmad]Unive...
LOL. I'd say that's a yes. Sarcasm's alive and well. That reminds me, I've never really played an F-Zero game except for that demo GameCube disc. How is the original, framerate-wise, compared to SNES Mario Kart?
Forums
Topic: Zelda or Pokemon
Posts 1 to 20 of 26
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.