Forums

Topic: Gengis Khan II is our Virtual Console game today.

Posts 1 to 20 of 29

Knux

It's true!

Knux

Don

Where is the link that announced this?

Don

mariofan5000

I agree with Don. If there is no proof then i will not believe it.

Edited on by mariofan5000

mariofan5000

KnucklesSonic8

There is no proof. Not yet anyway... If GKII is released today, I'll be baffled... and kinda upset.

KnucklesSonic8

mariofan5000

nooooooooo!!! it's true! i went to the GKII page and it said:
Release Dates:
June 8th 2009 (USA)

mariofan5000

KnucklesSonic8

Darn it....
Just for the record, the reason why it wasn't believed in the first place is because you didn't link it to the PR in the first place because Press Nintendo still has no PR.

Edited on by KnucklesSonic8

KnucklesSonic8

BlueFlameBat

You can't hear me, but I'm groaning.

Grumble

astarisborn94

Finally! It's on the Virtual Console. Know what that means? Licensing issues could slowly be going away!

astarisborn94

Adam

There are no licensing issues whatsoever. You can't copyright historical figures. ...you know Genghis Khan was a real man, right...?

Edited on by Adam

Come on, friends,
To the bear arcades again.

TwilightV

@Adam: I already explained that in some other thread.

TwilightV

Dezner

But...BUT, what about the first game?

Edited on by Dezner

Wii: 6882-4334-4721-0727 --- PSN: OrangeGouf --- XBL: Orange Gouf

Uguu!

Twitter:

Gabbo

I'm with you Dezner. The first one is better and doesn't deserve the cold shoulder.

Gabbo

JTC-Pingas

Hey Dezner. Nice Avatar. Zero Suit Samus is pretty hot

JTC-Pingas

Dezner

JTCPingas09 wrote:

Hey Dezner. Nice Avatar. Zero Suit Samus is pretty hot

Damn Skippy!

Wii: 6882-4334-4721-0727 --- PSN: OrangeGouf --- XBL: Orange Gouf

Uguu!

Twitter:

Nintendo64Dude

Again... Nintendo of America PISSES US OFF AGAIN!

Nintendo64Dude

astarisborn94

Aquateen510 wrote:

Again... Nintendo of America PISSES US OFF AGAIN!

No, it's actually something good this time around. This game refers to a real person, so the could mean the beginning of the end for licensing issues. Normally, I'm in the same position when it comes to one-game week, but I'm willing to make an exception (Just like I did with Mega Man 3 and The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask.).

Edited on by astarisborn94

astarisborn94

Gabbo

Super+Smash+Bros wrote:

This game refers to a real person, so the could mean the beginning of the end for licensing issues.

Sorry, but no. Licensing issues are a consequence of the laws of Copyright, Trademark, and Right of Publicity. These laws remain in effect and Nintendo has no desire to see them go away considering how much Nintendo benefits from them.

Meanwhile Genghis Khan, as a historical figure who died some eight centuries ago, has no ability to tie up the release of this game through licensing issues whatsoever.

Edited on by Gabbo

Gabbo

Knux

KnucklesSonic8 wrote:

Darn it....
Just for the record, the reason why it wasn't believed in the first place is because you didn't link it to the PR in the first place because Press Nintendo still has no PR.

From now on,I will provide a link everytime,don't worry. But what's so bad about Gengis Khan II anyway?

Knux

astarisborn94

SuperSonic1990 wrote:

KnucklesSonic8 wrote:

Darn it....
Just for the record, the reason why it wasn't believed in the first place is because you didn't link it to the PR in the first place because Press Nintendo still has no PR.

From now on,I will provide a link everytime,don't worry. But what's so bad about Gengis Khan II anyway?

I know. It's suppose to mean that Nintendo will finally start clearing up licensing issues.

astarisborn94

Top

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic