Holy heck is this "soapbox" article bad. Lists botw as a reason why it's fine when it was put on one of Nintendo's worst selling consoles. The DS and Wii sold like fire because they had backwards compatibility and were just shilling out to sell extra copies like botw by releasing it on their worst selling console.
But hey gamers! Just trade your switch and your entire libra--what's that? Most of your library is digital and literally unable to be sold. Well sucks to suck I guess? Guess you'll enjoy that sweet 50 dollars off the 'switch 2' that game stop will give you. Aren't they just so generous.
Legit can't even fathom how out of touch you have to be to try and defend a company that has a track record of having some of the weakest launch titles for multiple systems. And you don't even mention anything like that in the article! Wild.
Comments 1
Re: Soapbox: 'Switch 2' Doesn't Really Need Backwards Compatibility
Holy heck is this "soapbox" article bad. Lists botw as a reason why it's fine when it was put on one of Nintendo's worst selling consoles. The DS and Wii sold like fire because they had backwards compatibility and were just shilling out to sell extra copies like botw by releasing it on their worst selling console.
But hey gamers! Just trade your switch and your entire libra--what's that? Most of your library is digital and literally unable to be sold. Well sucks to suck I guess? Guess you'll enjoy that sweet 50 dollars off the 'switch 2' that game stop will give you. Aren't they just so generous.
Legit can't even fathom how out of touch you have to be to try and defend a company that has a track record of having some of the weakest launch titles for multiple systems. And you don't even mention anything like that in the article!
Wild.