Okay, enough's enough. Ever since EA first brought the FIFA series to the Switch with FIFA 18, Nintendo fans have been given a lesser version of the game seen on other systems. At first, we gave EA the benefit of the doubt and put it down to the challenges of porting a game to a less powerful system with a user base who hadn't seen a new FIFA game for half a decade.
We even smiled when the game’s producer explained in interviews that the reason the Switch version had fewer modes than the Xbox One and PS4 versions was because "The Journey" story mode was only possible with the power of the Frostbite engine (despite only being a bunch of cutscenes) and Ultimate Team would overwhelm Nintendo gamers if they were exposed to everything it had to offer right away. It was complete nonsense and ever so slightly patronising, but hey, it was their first year, so we held our tongue and decided we’d give EA time to establish the series on Switch and see where it would go from there.

In the years that have followed, however, EA has continued to shortchange the Switch and by this point, with the second Legacy Edition in a row, it's clear as day now that it has no interest whatsoever in providing a game that offers anything remotely new or improved for Switch owners. So with that in mind, we have no interest whatsoever in recommending that anyone purchases FIFA 21, either.
If you're familiar with the Legacy Edition branding, you already know what to expect here: not much. There are no new game modes, no new features, nothing to separate this game from last year's game other than the obligatory squad and kit updates. If you own FIFA 20 on the Switch, FIFA 21 is practically the same game.
Of course, if you own FIFA 20 on the Switch, you’ve probably already been through this, because that game was also a Legacy Edition based on FIFA 19. And, in fact – as we previously revealed in our FIFA 18 review – the whole FIFA series on Switch has always been based on the Legacy Edition of FIFA 18 for the Xbox 360 and PS3; what this means is that for the past four years now, Switch owners have been playing practically the same Xbox 360 version of FIFA 17 with EA showing no real interest in changing things much.

What this obviously means is that all the major features added to the Xbox One and PS4 versions of the game over the past few years once again haven't been carried across to the Switch. Volta street football? Forget it. The enhanced Career mode with its new training options? No chance: you're still stuck with the Xbox 360 and PS3 FIFA 17 career mode here, which itself had been lying unchanged since FIFA 15. That means the Switch’s main single-player mode hasn’t been changed since Steven Gerrard was still a player, rather than the manager of a team who are winning nothing (disclosure: this reviewer is a Celtic supporter – here we go, 10 in a row).
Perhaps most galling of all is that Ultimate Team, traditionally the most popular mode in FIFA, is included here, but is a complete waste of time. It’s almost as if EA has just kept it in to remind Switch players what they could be enjoying if they’d bothered to buy the game on another system: you know, the systems where people actually spend money on microtransactions and are therefore worth allocating development time to.
For starters, it’s half-baked. Well, a quarter baked. It’s based on the Ultimate Team mode from a few years ago, and has no new features like Squad Battles, FUT Champions, stadium customisation or Seasons (where you perform tasks within a certain timeframe to earn XP and unlock special players). On top of that, the fact that nobody's playing it means the transfer market is a ghost town; at the time of writing, there are 19,000 players listed for transfer, compared to over a million on the Xbox One version. It’s all well and good trumpeting that you’ve got Ultimate Team on the Switch when it doesn’t share the Xbox or PlayStation ecosystems and you’re left competing with three guys and a dog.

The frustrating thing is that it’s a Catch-22 situation. If questioned about this, EA would undoubtedly claim that nobody is playing the thing on Switch so there’s no point in putting extra resources into improving it. But the point is, nobody’s going to play something that’s clearly undercooked and frankly inferior to what’s being offered on other systems. We aren’t talking about the gameplay on the pitch: of course, the Switch is a less powerful system, so that’s understandable. But in terms of features, there’s no technical reason why Ultimate Team can’t have every option the other formats do.
Instead of separating the Switch version of Ultimate Team from that on other systems, EA should have looked into making the Switch version a companion piece. FIFA’s mobile and web apps get you to sign into your EA Account and then you can mess around with your Xbox and PlayStation FIFA squads, take part in Squad Building Challenges, sell players and the like. Had the Switch version offered this instead of insisting you have your own standalone Switch team, EA would suddenly have an enticing offer: play your Xbox or PlayStation Ultimate Team at home, then take your team on the move and continue to improve it on the Switch. If Fortnite lets you merge your account between systems, we’re sure EA could have figured it out.
Instead, we’re stuck with a lame duck; a mode nobody’s playing on a game nobody’s buying because it’s a version nobody’s bothered to improve. And we all know how this is going to eventually go because we've seen this game before on the Wii U; EA will eventually stop making FIFA on the Switch altogether and claim that poor sales made it a waste of time, essentially turning the blame to Switch owners for not gratefully handing over almost full price to play a severely undercooked, second class game that sees notable improvements every year on other systems.
The reality is that we aren’t idiots, and the Switch user base isn’t made up of second class citizens. It’s estimated now that total Switch sales have overtaken those of the Xbox One, and that’s with a four-year head start taken into account. It may be a less powerful system, but the user base is undoubtedly there, and Nintendo is once again in a position of power where its players don’t need to curtsy and gratefully kiss the feet of any third-party publisher who generously decides to grace the system with its presence.
Say what you like about 2K Sports’ microtransaction nonsense, but at least it manages to achieve full system parity every year with the NBA 2K games on the Switch; instead of fobbing us off with nonsense about how its story mode is “only possible with the power” of a certain engine or how Switch owners’ glass brains are too delicate to handle every mode without shattering into a million pieces, it just gets on with it and makes it work. 2K proves that if you actually put the work in, you can create a brilliant Switch port that doesn’t make apologies for the hardware it’s running on.

Meanwhile, companies like Konami (who admittedly didn’t even bother trying to bring Pro Evolution Soccer to the Switch) at least acknowledge when they’ve hit the end of the road and aren’t bothering to update their games any more. This year Konami decided to focus most of its attention on working on the upcoming next-gen versions of PES, so it released a ‘Season Update’ (i.e. a Legacy Edition) on Xbox One and PS4 and only charged £25 for it in the UK. Meanwhile, EA’s trying to get you to fork over £44.99 / $50 for what’s basically the fourth Legacy Edition of FIFA 17.
Let’s face it, we all know why FIFA was put on the Switch in the first place while fans of Madden, NHL and the like went without ever getting a Switch port. Ultimate Team’s microtransactions are a huge money-spinner for EA, and it clearly hoped that lightning would continue to strike on the Switch. What it didn’t count on, however, was that Switch owners weren’t willing to accept a version of FIFA that didn’t have the same modes other players enjoy, and so – when it was clear that Ultimate Team wasn’t the same magic money tree on Nintendo’s system – EA shut up shop and went down the Legacy Edition route.

If EA wants FIFA to sell in decent numbers on the Switch, it needs to stop pretending the Switch isn’t a viable platform and needs to stop insulting its owners by chucking Legacy Editions onto the thing as if it was a flatlining system nearing the end of its life rather than a thriving console that continues to break sales records. We’re frankly bored of saying “oh, but it’s still a good game, so here’s a half-decent score for it anyway.” Fool us once, and all that.
This is where we recommend that you buy a cheaper version of FIFA 20 or FIFA 19 instead, because it’s exactly the same game. But what’s this? Oh dear, it would appear that FIFA 20, FIFA 19 and FIFA 18 have magically disappeared from the eShop, meaning FIFA 21 is the only actual option for anyone looking to buy FIFA digitally on the Switch! We’re sure this is some sort of technical glitch and definitely isn’t EA trying to force players into buying the newest name of an old game. We’re also sure that our belly buttons are there because that’s where the price tag was attached to us when our parents bought us at the baby shop.

We’re done with FIFA on the Switch. Do not buy this game. If you do, you are actively informing EA that it’s perfectly fine to put in zero effort and get silly money in return. It was bad enough before, but to actually remove every other version of the game from the eShop is ridiculous. Either find a physical copy of FIFA 20 or FIFA 19 on sale cheap somewhere or try to come to terms with the fact that FIFA is dead on the Switch until EA decides to pull its finger out and offer something worth buying, instead of inevitably blaming us for not being stupid enough to accept an inferior product.
Conclusion
FIFA 21 is the straw that breaks the camel's back. After initially impressing us with FIFA 18 (despite it being based on the previous year's outing, FIFA 17), EA has completely shut up shop and made no effort whatsoever to improve the series on Switch. By now giving us a second Legacy Edition in a row, while also removing the previous games from the eShop to ensure this is the only option that remains, EA has inadvertently created another, more realistic option: ignore this game entirely, and don't give out your hard-earned cash in return for being insulted.
Comments 231
Just to pre-empt the inevitable "EA makes the same game every year anyway, this is no big surprise" comments: it really doesn't. Anyone who buys FIFA every year on other systems (like I do) knows that EA does introduce at least one major feature or mode each year, be that Volta street football, The Journey, Squad Battles, women's football, timed seasons in Ultimate Team, FUT Champions etc. The myth that EA just knocks out the same thing every year is false: that's why this review is so harsh, because this is one of those situations where it literally HAS done that, for the second time in a row, and that's unacceptable.
It's Fifa, they've cornered the market with their game and can get away with being mediocre since they know people will buy it anyway.
@scully1888 Good job headinge off too, I was ready to flame them but I forgot they actually had added new stuff in the past.
Ctrl+C
Ctrl+V
Look, a new Fifa for the switch!
Generous score.
There really are no depths EA won't sink to in order to make a quick buck, have to be one of the laziest companies when it comes to Nintendo platforms.
Honestly, if EA put out a feature complete FIFA on Switch, I'd buy it over the PS4 version - portability would suit the way I play FIFA completely.
As it stands, the Switch version is just so lazy, literally the same game released with kit updates. It's annoying because this year's FIFA 21 on Xbox/PS4 is so good - a huge improvement over FIFA 20, Career Mode finally got some love, the game plays so much better.
As it stands, there is just zero reason to buy FIFA 21 on Switch, especially if you've already bought one of the previous year's ones. Sort it out EA.
Didn’t expect anything more.
reason why i havent bought anything from greedy EA for a long time since mass effect 3 for wii u and need for speed most wanted thats it.
1080p 60fps. Shame on you for insulting us EA. Treat us with respect like Nintendo does.
Great review Chris.
If someone was buying Fifa on Switch for the first time they are arguably getting a very good football game but it is about the principle of the matter and the bottom line is EA are getting away with charging 45 quid a pop for a game that has had zero effort put into it for the last two years.
If you gave it a 1/10 I doubt anyone could really argue.
... and back to Captain Tsubasa: Rise of New Champions I go!

ea must be still butthurt they didnt get their precious/unsafe origin network on the wii u.
This is a EA
I wonder what are that 7 games that they wanna bring (Copy) on thw Switch.
I think Playing Capitan Tsubasa makes more sense
@sixrings
This is the stance you are taking on this game?!
A fool and his money are soon parted.
And they wonder why only 2% of sales came from Switch. EA hasn’t gotten a $1 from me in YEARS and will continue to miss out on my support. Used to be one of my favorite developers in the 90s.
I defended EA to a degree last year, and people who purchased Fifa 20, but it’s pretty much impossible to do it this year.
Gah, I wish Konami would make a pro evo on the switch
Is anyone really surprised in the slightest?
EA is trash and should go by way of the Dodo Bird, posthaste.
The only good games they’ve produced were Dead Space and Mass Effect, everything else was pure poppycock.
Hmph.
-adjusts monocle-
I hope International Superstar Soccer will comeback
Another reason to buy PES over FIFA is that they have a Celtic edition. This looks shockingly bad though and I own FIFA 10 on DS. At least that game was funny.
Thank you. EA can go eat a [redacted]
Its nice for the people that like Fifa i guess.And to be fair, .... every fifa installment is kinda a copy paste. (I played the in the early 2000's) The only noticable diffirence there was, was when it shifted generations. (PS1 -> PS2,....etc) Not the game for me tho
The fact that even the eshop listing says it is the same as last year and no changes were made anyone buying it expecting different only has their lack of reading to blame. That being said it's still no excuse to charge full price for it for something that modders have being doing for free for years on PES games. I am sure with EA's resources they could put a dedicated dev team together for the Switch version and actually have them try and implement some of the features of the primary version of this game or at least some unique modes for the Switch. Seeing as the install base for the switch is still growing any actual effort from them would probably increase sales.
It might be just me but that box art is really bugging me
@PretendWorking
What a patheic comment.
He doesn't like it and his review reflects that. Duh.
I've been boycotting EA since Mass Effect 3.
@sixrings
So you're buying for the image quality, i assume?
Well there's this free application on Switch called "Youtube" that has 1080p/ 60fps that might be for you!
@PretendWorking I don't understand your point. Reviews are done to guide us what we should or shouldn't buy.
@TheFullAndy I don't think this is acceptable however nintendo is releasing a 720p port at 30fps and people are giving it a pass because it's nintendo and pikman is a good game. Guess what I think fifa is a good game that doesn't mean this is acceptable. Keep that same energy that people have when bashing ea and activision when nintendo does something subpar.
@PretendWorking Yeah, you're right, I should have given it a 10 because they said they weren't going to make an effort and they didn't make an effort, so their honesty should be rewarded. In other news, I'm going to make pasta tonight, so when I do in fact make pasta tonight I expect my TIME Person of the Year nomination as soon as possible.
@PretendWorking
NL didn't spend a dollar on this game, review specifically states that they got a review copy from EA.
You must be a lunatic to purchase any Fifa game on the Switch.
I can understand if you don't own any of them but it would be crazy to buy a game that is, literally, copy and paste from the previous version with no real improvements.
Tell us how you really feel, NL.
@PretendWorking what are you talking about?
So because EA said the game will be a legacy edition, that gives it a free pass?
In the same way that EA were honest about what we were going to get, this review is honest about what we got.
You can't expect the review to be good just because they told us the game will be bad before it was released.
Two games I want the most.... Mk9 and Madden.... Does not look like it will happen soon.
Stop paying $60 for old Nintendo games already played 3 times and use the cash to buy an actual Home Console.
When publishers release crap on Switch you can play the better version elsewhere. Basically what the other 98% of sales did.
@sixrings
This doesn't have to be an either or scenario.
You can legitimately complain about that in the Pikmin 3 Deluxe in the review for that game and complain about Fifa in this review.
1080p, 60fps in Fifa is not impressive when no work has gone into it the past two years and it runs on a version of the years old Xbox 360 engine.
@PretendWorking Because our job is to make sure people don't spend their hard-earned cash on stuff that's not worth buying?
What an odd comment.
I do at the very least understand a couple of points; that the 'full' (current) version of FIFA would require significant optimisation to fit onto a 16GB game card, let alone a 32GB version; and Frostbite likely is very taxing on the CPU.
This may not be the easiest franchise in the world to port over, and from a technical standpoint I actually don't expect to see the latest bells and whistles, but what I do disagree with is the pricing. If they're going to give us a product that is essentially last-gen in nature, the pricing should reflect this. £30 tops.
Obviously not on Switch but Konami have halved the price of PES this year as the next version is being built from the ground up so 21 is just a squad upgrade.
@PretendWorking Because they need clicks and this has got at time of writing 41 comments in 24 minutes!
@PretendWorking Why would you not hold a publisher's practices to account. This is a big game, people deserve to know what they're in for and specifically why it's unacceptable. Everything said here in this review is spot on
@Emperor-Palpsy I don't even necessarily want them to update to Frostbite, though: like I say in the review, I completely understand that the Switch isn't as powerful as the Xbox One and PS4 and that Frostbite may be too much for the system. The other missing features, though – like all the Ultimate Team stuff, or the updated career mode etc – those don't rely on Frostbite and their absence is purely down to a lack of effort. Those are the omissions I feel are more frustrating, because there's no technical explanation for it.
@PretendWorking
When you are agreeing with Agramonte (a guy I ignore as he is insufferable) you have already lost the argument!
@PretendWorking you are on a Nintendo website that reviews the latest games released on the system to inform people if they think in their opinion if it is worth buying it and because you don't like they game a negative review you don't think they should publish it to begin with? Just because the game on a base level doesn't actually play badly doesn't mean that it being the same game being released three years in a row with no changes made shouldn't be highlighted.
That score is waay to high. I only bought Fifa 18 as the 1st soccer game in my life and I am 31 now. Not a bad game, but I can already see that Fifa21 is the exact same game just with tweaks in presentation and maybe some slight technical improvements.
Don't buy Fifa 21 at full price(and to be honest that goes for the main versions too😅) , unfortunately this series is not meant for Switch owners to enjoy at its full potential. EA does not want it either so why should Switch owners. Let them be predictable and stop releasing and then claim Switch owners don't like Fifa.
We actually like PS4 FIFA in our household. We probably won't get FIFA 21 on PS4 OR Switch, however, for a few gaming & non-gaming reasons (my oldest needs to study hard this year!)
I think the last FIFA games I played on a Nintendo console may have been 2008, 2010, 2012. Never have and probably never will buy a Switch release.
@PretendWorking That's a totally different issue (that we've covered many, many times before on the site) which has absolutely no bearing on whether we should or shouldn't review FIFA 21.
@PretendWorking ok but your answer avoided why you seemed confused about a website that reviews games on Nintendo systems reviewing a game on one of those systems.
Eternally Atrocious.
Really, there is literally zero reason to own this version if you own other systems and/or don't care about the kit upgrades.
At this point it just feels better for them to stop putting FIFA on Switch altogether.
I'm glad this is getting the review it and EA fully deserve and whilst I appreciate they do put more effort onto the other versions I've never understood this need to have yearly iterations. Even when I've jumped back on board for 99p, they've always felt virtually the same even when a few years apart, 1 or possibly 2 a generation would be more than enough.
Back to this and EA are an absolute disgrace for releasing this
@scully1888 This is likely because, with the PS/XB/PC versions of the game essentially 'one', EA can't justify reprogramming the legacy version of the game to feature those new elements you talk of.
After all, this isn't a simple case of drag-and-drop - all these elements tie into various aspects of the software that isn't present on the Switch version.
I do understand the pain though. I've played FIFA since the mid-Nineties and would love to get back into it.
@PretendWorking Pikmin 3, a game that originally launched seven years ago on a different console?
FIFA has been released in the same form (and at full price) for the past three years.
Should Nintendo have put more effort into Pikmin 3? Hey, every little helps. Will Pikmin 3 be worth paying full price for if you haven't played the Wi U original? Yes, it's a great game – and it's been seven years since it was originally released.
Spoiler alert: You've lost this argument.
To be fair, FIFA on Switch IS a good game.
EA do this to themselves though, and deserve every single harsh criticism thrown at them.
When it drops to what I'd consider a fair price for a roster and kit upgrade (£15-£20), I'll buy it then.
Remember that Nintendolife headline about EA's releases for the Switch in the upcoming months, ''Now that's some support.'' Aged as well as milk...
We went back to FIFA on PS4. My oldest son has been looking forward to the game. He's been suckered into buying it the last 3 years on the Switch but wasn't falling for it again. Now, if it were up to me, I would have passed. We need more competition when it comes to sports titles. However, the greedy leagues and ownership groups make this near impossible.
@PretendWorking big difference between a port/remaster from previous generations to releasing the same game a year later on the same platform. Theres already more than 6 times as many Switch owners as Wii U so clearly most of those owners would never have played or even had access to those games. Comparing the 2 is just idiotic
This game looks like fifa 12 mobile
We need a new Mario strikers.
@PretendWorking
Don't like it, don't buy it amirite?!
You can make that point about the Nintendo games in the reviews for those games.
Does not change anything about this review and the validness of it at all.
@PretendWorking sorry but the only one who is throwing a childish tantrum here is you at the very existence of this review. Also comparing a game that is released yearly with only roster and kit up dates to games that have to be ported over from a different system and there are differences in system architectures isn't even comparing the same type of thing.
Years ago I read an article that said one of the contractual obligations of winning the FIFA license was you had to publish on all major games systems. If that is correct, and knowing how FIFA will want it's brand out there as much as possible, this has nothing to do with profit and everything to do with minimal effort to meet contractual obligations with the licence holder.
The execs can justify it to each other that Nintendo fans don't buy yearly updates and they get to extend the licence agreement and milk the micro translations on PS and Xbox.
@PretendWorking We treat Nintendo exactly the same as any other company; Nintendo just happens to be behind some of the best games money can buy.
Yet 2% of all the FIFA 21 sales that put this game at No 1 in the charts were Switch sales. That’s a fair few thousand copies sold. 🤦🏼♂️
This kind of garbage is what happens when companies buy exclusive rights to sports leagues.
There's no competition with the FIFA license, so no incentive to do more than iterate (or in this case, rerelease).
I remember when 2K sports and EA were head to head every year across a range of sports, and -surprise surprise! - we got significant, competing innovations every year (though not all were successful).
Sad to see a wasted license, and sad to know that even if madden came out on switch it would be some nerfed garbage.
@PretendWorking If you don't believe that, then why are you wasting your valuable time in the comments section of a Nintendo-focused website?
@PretendWorking
Off you pop!
Well that was quite the tantrum!
@Damo I don't think that's true. Nintendo gets passes around here while ea and activision get treated poorly. There is no outrage article highlighting 720p 30fps instead it's casually glossed over.
I bought Fifa 2018 at launch because I knew it would be the same thing on the Switch year after year. Happy we got the free World Cup updates for that edition!! Everything else has looked the same since
The cover looks like a good summary of the quality.
@PretendWorking I don't think your dozen or so clicks will generate that much revenue tbh.
@damo Time to stop feeding the trolls.
@sixrings There's definitely outrage in the comments section. And it's not unmentioned, it's just not as egregious as doing it 3 times on the same system in consecutive years. I would say the first warrants disappointment, the latter warrants this review.
@TheFullAndy I'm not a one of those against the masses types but I really don't think going against the grain means you're having a tantrum. Are the people who don't agree supposed to just nod their heads and move along. What is even the point then of having a comment section if it's just going to be an echo chamber. I'm not happy with these rereleases but at least they're 1080p 60fps and annually go on a reasonable sale. That's a lot more then some of Nintendos recent ports.
I played the hell outta FIFA 18 on Switch. And when 19 introduced online play with friends on Switch I picked up that too. But there's been no reason to get it since sadly. Love having FIFA on the go but the price is too much for what they offer.
Will buy elsewhere, possibly Stadia so I can still play it on the go.
@sixrings A good game running at 720p / 30fps is still a good game, though. And as @shazbot says, we do highlight resolution / frame rate issues in all of our reviews.
@shazbot maybe but the scale of the outrage is significantly higher in regards to ea while again because in general we like nintendo we forgive them of their sins.
@sixrings 720p is 'fine' for docked mode. 576p handheld might leave things looking a little blurry, and a downgrade over the original. For me that's a bigger possible issue.
And Pikmin doesn't really need 60fps.
Yoshi's Crafted World, IMO, would have benefited from higher resolution and lower frame rate for instance. Instead of it looking (what I'd consider) a blurry mess.
@Damo but I'd argue if you hadn't bought fifa in the last couple years then it is still a good game.
It's a poor business practice but the game itself is good.
@sixrings If you hadn't bought FIFA in the last couple of years then you'd still be better off buying FIFA 18 second-hand from eBay or somewhere rather than splashing £50 on this.
@ObsidianEleven if they can get arms, smash, mario kart 8 deluxe, tropical freeze, new super mario Bros u deluxe, and mario 3d world to all run at 1080p 60fps then with enough time they can get pikman 3 to run at 1080p.
Fine isn't good enough unless there is a discount that comes with it.
@sixrings But do you agree that these are at least different tiers of seriousness?
One is a rerelease of code first written for the platform for the 2018 edition, and already published twice in 19 and 20 with new kit.
The other, even if not upgraded, is at least new code running on a new platform, even if you (and many others) feel they're lazy ports, at least they're ports not rereleases.
It's a false equivalence. Or do you disagree?
@Damo that is true. I exclusively game digitally like many others though so it wouldn't apply to me. I find it more troublesome that they removed the older cheaper fifas off the eshop then anything else.
@sixrings They did say at the end of the review, in the positives, that it still has good gameplay. I don't think they actually called the 'game' itself bad.
@scully1888 The Switch could easily run Frostbite. Heck even the 3DS can run Frostbite. Frostbite is a scalable engine, it runs on mobile phones. It even runs on the PS3. There is absolutely NO technical reason why the Switch cannot run Frostbite. For instance the Switch runs The Witcher 3. And Doom. And Skyrim. And so many other amazing looking games.
No. The only reason why the Switch can't run Frostbite is because EA is a lazy greedy trash company. Even a 1/10 would be too high for this trash.
Thanks for the bold and honest review. EA should know that there is no necessity to release a FIFA game for Switch.
@shazbot they managed to port all the other Wii u games at better frame rates and resolutions. So I have a problem with paying the same price for less effort.
In regards to fifa they have to pay their licensing fees so I'm not exactly sure how you expect that to happen. They're being honest about what you're getting. You don't need to buy it. But at the very least if you feel the need to write about this companies poor business practices you shouldn't gloss over nintendos.
It'll be interesting to see what score G.I. Joe Operation Blackout gets when it releases tomorrow. I've got it preordered (and downloaded) with a 15% discount.
I simply got too tempted as I really like these crazy 3rd person action games/shooters. I'll probably regret it at some point, however.
@sixrings there have been numerous discounts on eshop since launch for FIFA 20. The last one was ridiculously cheap. There's been plenty of opportunity for someone to buy it at a reduced price.
And if they had left FIFA 18/19/20 on the eshop, they're also under no obligation to reduce the price of them again. To believe they should would just be someone being entitled.
Yet when Nintendo releases a "legacy edition" of a Pokémon game, it gets praised to high heaven.
Anyway, I'm glad that we're still getting FIFA on Switch, even if they are barebones. They tend to drop in price by around 60% quickly enough, so I'll grab it then for the updated content. And unlike Take Two's games, the entirety of the game is on the cartridge.
But I won't be supporting EA on day one like I have with FIFA 18 and 19.
I doubt soccer mum who is buying FIFA for little Timmy on his switch will be reading this review.
Glad to see such a frank and damming review for this. Excellent stuff
Good, never hold back against garbage ports with no effort put into them.
@sanderev As I understand it, Frostbite 3.0 has only ever run on Xbox One, PS4 and PC, so I'm not sure where the suggestion it could run on the 3DS comes from.
@Silly_G Which 'Legacy Edition' of a Pokemon game are you referring to?
Cue EA going: "wHy DoEs NoBoDy BuY oUr GaMeS oN sWiTcH?!?"
EA have been crapping all over console makers for decades. Hot and cold with Sega forever even though they basically made EA sports. Nintendo got 0 love on Wii U after selling boatloads of scaled down games on Wii. I'm tired of them playing the highest bidder and telling everyone else to shove off. If you want to make a new game that's fine but changing the data files out and slapping a brand new price on it is crap.
Watch this not sell well and they pull Nintendo support for not selling enough when it was their own fault. Yet to even give us an NHL or madden or anything UFC so even this is just chunk change thrown at us from their leftover ps3 builds.
I love playing fifa but on PlayStation.
They should call the switch version
FIFA DELUXE
@scully1888 I guess he means like ultra moon but that's a stretch. It's not comparable in amount of changes to this.
@sixrings
To be fair I was just playing with words they used for fun, Pretend brought up tantrum and because he wasn't liking the replies he was receiving seemed to start throwing one. No one told Pretend to leave, people exercised their right to oppose his views.
Regarding Fifa, I love 1080p 60fps games, but it isn't an impressive feat when no work was done otherwise to the game bar a kit, squad, UI overlay update for 45 quid a pop.
And yes people buying Fifa 21 as their first Fifa game will get a good game of football but this review is fair to point out the total lack of effort made on the game fron the previous year, sorry two years, but is still being sold at a premium price. Maybe someone reading this review can now buy Fifa 19 or 20 instead for a fraction of the price, or skip it entirely, as it is essentially the same game so this review has been useful.
You can talk about Nintendo games all you want but I am only talking about the game in question in this review.
@scully1888 It's a scalable engine. And yes there are only PS4, XBOX ONE and PC games of. But it was developed for the
PS3 originally. Also it runs in some capacity on mobile devices. Since Fifa is actually better on phones than it is on the Switch.
And then compare it to the beautiful open world of The Witcher 3. Which.. ALSO runs on the Switch. (And PS4, XBOX ONE and PC) There is 0 reason why it can't. Well... except for corporate greed from EA.
@Silly_G
Or when Capcom releases a new handheld Monster Hunter; I've been trying to get into MH lately and bought Generations Ultimate for Switch, Tri for the 3DS, and then Freedom Unite for my Vita.
And the thing is that they seem pretty similar. Even Rise has the map with the numbered areas like all the other handheld MHs (I don't know about World or Iceborne, I prefer to play on handhelds).
@shazbot even if needed, it would be cool to have a handheld football game. I played the hell out of the 3ds version and liked the WiiU.
@sanderev I'm all for criticising EA here but I think we need to be accurate too. FIFA Mobile doesn't use Frostbite, and the Switch version still looks and runs better.
wow the promote gambling to kids fffffffffff cccccccccccccccc acting like a bunch money grabing ccccccccccccccs shock horror. Sooner goverments ban this garbage the better and RIP EA
Switch needs the Super Mega Baseball version of EVERY sport.
(except NBA - 2K totally covers Switch with their best effort, regardless of what you think of it, it's consistent across platforms)
#7 on the EU eShop anyway
@scully1888 yes but in this case that’s exactly what EA have done. Re-packaged the same game with zero effort put in.
It’s great they add new stuff to other versions which makes it even more frustrating that they don’t on switch.
Also removing old versions for sale is another poor move imo...
@scully1888 thanks for the read, I love this review! It was very entertaining! I'm sorry you had to sit through such a rubbish game but I hope you got some catharsis from putting your experience into words!
@sixrings Yeah, removing the older ones is pretty bad. It's like an admission that this is basically the same game.
@datamonkey That's exactly what the review says, yes
Why isn't Pro Evo on Switch ?
It baffles the mind.
@Lindhardt fully agree dude
@Kilamanjaro totally agree, I got Fifa 18 and enjoyed the world cup update and am very pleased thats the one and only version I bought.
A zero from me. Lasiest company.
@durr because Konami is lazy too. Everyone is lazy but nintendo.
EA is disgusting how do you have the nerve to sell a roster update 2 times in a row. No one should buy this even if you are the biggest Fifa fan. Also, I love that IGN copied their review of Fifa 20
@Dpishere You got that right!
I see a lot of people keep mentioning Pikmin 3 Deluxe, as if releasing a seven-year-old game at 720p and 30fps is somehow comparable to releasing exactly the same game three years in a row. The two are completely different situations. Coverage of one doesn't automatically influence coverage of the other.
MEAgre, drEAry, yEArly rehash.
EA make it so easy with these releases.
Selling a sports game which is about a year(s) old with nothing but a roster update and slapping a sticker of new game on it.
That's the EA I remember.
bad game
110 stars
After the IGN-review Nintendolife finally has the balls to do an honest review. About time...
I remember the days when I used to look forward to a new Electronic Arts game.
Desert Strike/Future Cop
Road Rash
Proper games, made well. Some of the best.
Classics.
And now, whenever I see their name attached to a game, the only thought in my head is "wonder how many IAPs that's got.."
The more I think about it, the more it was here that soemone actually defended a comment I made about EA being absolute TRASH when it comes to stuff like this, I'd love to know who it was. As for the review, spot on. Worst thing is, You are absolutely right about EA using this as a proverbial stick to beat down actually putting some effort in. The Audacity.
Great review!
Thank you. With that review you are helping a lot to people that were going to buy this game thinking it was different from last year.
And I’ve seen that people are mad about this game, and what EA has done. Actually, in Metacritic, User’s score (of more than 200 people) is 0.1
And the sales reflect the anger of the community.
Hope this reaches to EA, so the make an improvement for next year
Btw, since you deleted PretendWorking’s comments, I missed the fun part lol
@Damo "Yeah, removing the older ones is pretty bad. It's like an admission that this is basically the same game."
To be fair to them, they admit it pretty prominently on the box and in the descriptions.
Also, if they left them up, they could just leave them up at full price. They weren't permanently reduced in price or cheaper than FIFA 21 has launched at. I don't really see any wrongdoing in EA taking them down, like I don't see any wrong with Nintendo taking Pikmin 3 down from the Wii U eshop.
Excellent review, calling out EA for this utterly shoddy and contemptuous display for Switch owners. This game should be killed with fire. We can see what developers are capable of on the Switch when they put effort in - there are a LOT of good examples - I can't see a game like this putting too much strain on the system if they actually bothered to optimise it for the Switch!
Seriously, just give us a port of the Amiga version of Sensible Soccer (or SWOS).
Worse than Macbat 64 xx on the topic of football Ansu Fati is going to be the next best player in the world. Xxx
So as a purchaser of this game I have this to say. I bought 18 on the switch and really enjoyed it, I also usually buy PES but after the last few came to game pass on Xbox after a few months I thought I would buy FIFA 21 on the switch.
I play career mode, I like having the updated team rosters, new young players to scout, purchase and develop. I will definitely get my money's worth from the game.
I do think the game should be cheaper but in EAs defence they're not pulling the wool over anyone's eyes they're telling us what it is even on the front cover of the physical release. If you want the same game with updated rosters the option is there for you
@Crozzymodo
It’s true, but they didn’t put any effort on this game. There are no improvements since the last year.
I understand that if this is your first FIFA on switch, you’ll enjoy it, since is a good game. But for all the other people, the game doesn’t worth it
And I think it should be cheaper, since is the same game as FIFA 19, and that game was $19
They should at least put it to $30 But 50 is too much
@Benjinat yeah people who don't really love football and follow all the teams latest player transfers and new players from the academy should definitely get 19.
Really is no excuse for the price side of things, especially when PES have done that on PS4 and Xbone
It's your fault for keep kneeling to EA and getting excited everytime they announce an insulting game for Nintendo owners. Get this through your skull:
EA DOESN'T LIKE NINTENDO
They prefer the sonys and xboxes because they can release their awful games and practices and everybody buys them while in Nintendo they have to compete with Nintendo's quality games (ther worst Nintendo games is miles better than the "best" EA game).
They keep insulting us, patronizing us and treating us like third rate customers because you jump like babies everytime a "rumored" game comes from them to a Nintendo console...and either never comes or we get a garbage effort.
Respect yourselves more. STOP BUYING EA GAMES!
Enough is enough.
@mr_benn +1 SWOS
It’s not insulting to Nintendo owners.
Even Nintendo sell their 7 year old games again for full price with little addition.
@scully1888 Well, yes and no. The majority of people play Fifa solely for one reason and that is FUT. They don't care about Volta, Career Mode, etc. And if I have to be honest FUT really doesn't change that much from year to year. There were some sparks of creativity here and there, but it's mostly the same. People just want to be part of the live content that is going on during the year.
@Shiryu I was tempted to buy captain but reviews were just average, do you think it’s a good game?
Well this is no surprise at all. It's EA. It's like trying to pet a wild skunk. What do you think is going to happen?
The last soccer game I played was FIFA Road to World Cup 98 for the N64 and I LOVED that game Haven't touched anything since because I doubt anything else is worthy of kissing it's feet.
Don't worry. EA will blame Nintendo fans for not shelling out blindly for their shoddy insult of a game.
@RustedHero this guy doesn't think EA has made a good FIFA game in 22 years! This is the nintendo fanboy hyperbole I come here for.
@Onkel_Laser FUT does change every year, though. Just not on Switch.
@scully1888 apologies, I miss-read your comment earlier, hence my original reply.
I agree with you... lol
Yeah, its no wonder EA keeps getting away with what they're doing....People buy FIFA and Madden year in and year out, then you got people in this comments section defending EA/trying to change the subject and bash Nintendo.
Yeah...I don't want to hear how "lazy" Nintendo is when you've got the same people defending EA. If you think Nintendo is "lazy" for Pikmin 3 and/or Mario 3D All Stars, that's fair, but the last company you should be defending is EA.
This shouldn't surprise anyone. EA doesn't give a crap about the Switch, at all. They are doing almost the bare minimum with games they are putting on Switch and ones like this are likely only because they have to for the FIFA license.
Yet, somehow people buy this garbage that EA even said beforehand was going to be garbage (from a garbage company).
I actually like EA and have a number of their games on other consoles and wish she'd bring more to Switch. That said, there is no defense for the way they are treating Switch owners here.
The comment section is shattered.
@WahooTime lol, you got them. I think what makes this more atrocious is it is being passed off as a sequel, even Nintendo doesn't do that.
EA just give us the Mass Effect trilogy and you can go back to being irrelevant again,at least to me
Terrible company, terrible lazy cut and paste port, score too generous.
I'm glad I bought this game on Sale for like $9.99 (or maybe $14.99) back around world cup. By "this game" I mean FIFA '19. Got a great deal then and it's still the same game, so from my logic, I received THREE YEARS worth of Fifa games for less than $5 a pop. Go me! haha
@KryptoniteKrunch I'd just like to hear the same vitriol towards nintendo for their shenanigans.
Both companies are lazy at times
@scully1888 And as someone who played FUT quite a lot, I say it doesn't. It's the same every year. The Squad Building Challenges were a new invention which went in the direction on live daily content. Still your goal is to get CR7 with 99 Stats all around. Although people have those cards already in their older versions.
@sixrings
Plenty of people on here do though. Pikmin 3 and Mario 3D got plenty of flak on here.
Just give me SEGA Soccer Slam HD.
At least we get Alpaca Ball on 10/15.
Reduced features should mean a reduced price. I’ve got FIFA 18, and it was pretty good. I’m tempted by FIFA 21, purely because after a two year absence the mighty Fulham are back in the Premiership (and bottom of the table) ... but I’ll get it on the PS4, depending on the level of micro-transactions
@Onkel_Laser Respectfully, I play it every year a lot too, and every year there's at least one major new feature that keeps it feeling fresh.
16 - FUT Draft
17 - Squad Building Challenges, FUT Champions
18 - Squad Battles, Daily & Weekly Objectives
19 - Division Rivals
20 - Season Objectives, FUT Friendlies
21 - Stadium Customisation, Online Co-Op, Team Events
It's hard to explain without insulting fans of FIFA... but when I play the Switch version of the game I can literally see the workings of the simulation and it completely ruins the experience. That mixed with outrageously repetitive commentary renders it unplayable.
@MJKatana If you were raised watching the anime it is a 10/10 GOTY candidate.
At first I thought, "surely the game deserves a score of 1 instead of a 2", but then I thought "better to save that score for FIFA 22 Legacy Edition".
"[I]t's clear as day now that [EA] has no interest whatsoever in providing a game that offers anything remotely new or improved for Switch owners. So with that in mind, we have no interest whatsoever in recommending that anyone purchases FIFA 21, either."
PREACH!
@KryptoniteKrunch this thread is universally EA sucks and is lazy. The PIkman 3 thread is 50/50 lazy vs half of nintendo fans claiming 720p is good enough and fine. That's a big difference in my opinion
@sixrings um yeah but pikmin 3 is adding a crap ton of content as well as a two player mode that is going to heavily strain the hardware. This is a garbage port of an ps3 game for the third time in a row. I mean if they only made one and called it fifa switch then like chris said that wouldn't be much of an issue. The problem is that they released the same game 3 times in a row to get suckers to pay full price expecting something different. Pikmin is a port done right and dk tropical freeze was underwhelming and was voiced quite clearly so don't claim the we treat nintendo as a saint nonsense. In fact I'm happy about the Sue's and backlash and such it makes it a better company. EA earned its worst company in the US status. They just put more time into the content then technical stuff and that is fine and not lazy in the slightest. Is it perfect? Hell no it should have been 1080 p. Is it one of the better ports out there? Hell yes it adds an insane amount of content for a deluxe like a persona 4 golden persona 5 royal amount of content!
Im still pissed there's no NHL for PC or Switch which are the two platforms I have.
@sixrings
Its because its a bad comparison to begin with. Pikmin 3 Deluxe is actually adding content and its a new release to most Switch owners anyway. Some people are okay with 720p because that is an acceptable picture quality. I know I couldn't care less about picture quality... Before the switch came out, I was enjoying 3DS games all in the 240p or whatever it was.
And of course EA has a negative stigma on a Nintendo site, they've been ignoring the Switch for the most part until they announced those 7 games or w/e earlier this year.
@scully1888 Well said. And a really good review.
@Beatley82 couldn't agree more.
I mean, all Nintendo has been doing is remastering games for the Switch so why should EA give a damn about the Switch.
@ritouf Not if you don't play ultimate team it isn't a gacha game. I play career mode, offline and for the most part it's very enjoyable. And sometimes local multiplayer with my brother in law.
All in the while other sports game developers actually give effort to making their Switch versions a viable option. EA seriously needs to open their eyes now, because we're already almost 4 years into the Switch's lifespan and they can't even get a single thing right all this time.
Their new covers look like they were made in Microsoft Paint or Photoshop on Windows 98.
@KryptoniteKrunch it is extremely difficult to get an apple to apples comparison giving people an out for not being consistent. On the pikman 3 thread I mentioned how even the evil ea manages to remaster hot pursuit for less money and a better resolution. As for the extra mode? I'm skeptical it's anything note worthy after funky Kong, the five minutes of new levels in captain toad, toadette in NSMBUD. The only time nintendo added anything significant in their ports was the battle mode in mario kart 8. That's not agood track record. But at the very least all the other ports looked and ran better.
@scully1888 Now Madden on the other hand, they take a mode out each year. xD
It's almost as if the athlete on the front cover understands the pain of Nintendo fans and is venting his frustrations.
@holygeez03 Ooooo a simple HD remaster of Sega Soccer Slam would be amazing!
@sixrings thanks for the reply.
Clarification, you think that Nintendo's behavior is worse than EA's because the resolution and framerates are lower? Would you be okay with reduced complexity to boost them?
My understanding is switch is slightly more powerful than WiiU, so I'm personally ok with ports that run the same as the Wii U; it's a port, not a remaster.
And to your second point, thar same argument can be made re: Nintendo. You're getting the game on the box? They're not hiding the ball, why are you not okay with that?
It seems strange, you seem upset about Nintendo not releasing dramatically new games years later on another platform, but nonchalant about EA releasing the exact same reskinned game repeatedly on the same platform. I just don't understand how Nintendo's behavior is worse in your estimation, let alone comparable.
Unless your only metric is fps / res, which to each their own but I'll state remains strange to me.
@KryptoniteKrunch Not on switch, we don't buy Madden 😥 mutant league football, anyone?
"At least one new mode"
Imo, that's exactly the issue.
The series is one of the biggest and most consistent money makers in the industry, coming from a publisher sitting on Scrooge McDuck's money vault, adding/changing things that don't require full re-releases for full price.
"A mode or two" is, at least in my opinion, not much less of a problem if said modes are sold for full price, not to mention the MTX shenanigans on top of all this.
If there's one game or genre, where a season/battle/subscription pass model would make sense, it's sportsball stuff covering minor changes with the occasional DLC mode.
Imo, a full, new release is only really warranted if there are major changes. New engine, vast render or gameplay overhauls or if the patchwork framework simply can't be tinkered with anymore.
The switch version definitely is a fringe case and they don't literally "release the same game over and over" normally. The same is said constantly about UbiSoft and even Nintendo as well, much to the same effect.
But let's not kid ourselves here, what they are releasing, especially considering the price point, is not too far off of that claim.
While I agree with the fact that this is a rehash of an old game and doesn't deserve any monetary support, I don't agree with your review. Per your guidelines, if the gameplay is solid then it should receive at least a 5. If you didn't want to review the game fairly, then refer to the previous iteration for a serious review and simply state that you refuse to review the game on the basis of it not changing anything.
Any chance of a Soccer 2K game? Our better yet, Rugby 2k for the ones who like manly sport out there 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Wilforce "I don't agree with your review. Per your guidelines, if the gameplay is solid then it should receive at least a 5"
Actually, that's a pretty good point. From the review guidelines, it should probably be a 6: "A good example of a six is a lazy sequel".
I'd say FIFA 21 is probably the epitomy of 'lazy sequel'.
Normally I don't particularly enjoy a lot of IGN's stuff or find them too reliable for reviews, but their review for FIFA 21 Legacy edition cracked me up and I don't doubt it at all. In one section they said "this is what my thoughts were on last years game," showed a paragraph, then said "these are my thoughts on this year's," and copy and pasted the same paragraph with some slight changes like the dates. funny stuff man, funny stuff
@ObsidianEleven Thanks for catching that. I read from the bottom up and stopped at 5 since that was the closest low score I could find. Again, not saying EA is right because reading that line in context makes it sound like I'm defending EA, which I'm definitely not. Also, love your Avatar image.
@shazbot I don't understand how nintendo was able to boost the resolution and frame rates on the other ports but not pikman. Their past ports show that upgrading the graphics should be possible. Again I am skeptical of the added content of pikman based on previous ports deluxe add ins. I really want to buy pikman but I'm not going to because 720p in 2020 really offends me I realize people prioritize different things. Personally I prefer the higher frame rate and resolution of last year's fifa at a discounted rate then what nintendo is offering. To be very clear neither is good for the consumer and I'm very frustrated with nintendo whom I have a great love and appreciation for. Maybe that's the problem because I love them I have high expectations from them. It seems others look at it differently. Because they love them they look over things. I'm very neutral about ea but I will say for all the hate they get on this site they are one of the few companies releasing games. Where's konamis games? Capcom just gives us ports. I'm begging for Namco to give me some ridge racer, tekken, soul calibur. Activision I'd love some call of duty. Codemasters where is F1? So although I understand why people are mad at ea here I don't understand why they aren't equally frustrated with nintendo and why they are so happy to banish one of the few big name third party developers from the system.
@sixrings NFS may be 1080P, but it's only 30fps.
16 replies to this topic? I really don't think this is the hill you want to die on.
You're going to compare the outputs on Switch of EA and Activision, to the output of Nintendo themselves? Lol, really? 😂 What have they done for Switch owners that even compares to BOTW, Smash, Mario Odyssey, Luigi's Mansion 3, Link's Awakening, Astral Chain, Pokemon, Xenoblade 2 and the remake, Splatoon 2, Animal Crossing, Both Hyrule Warriors, Both Fire Emblems, to name only some?
The Crash & Spyro trilogies (the latter isn't even fully on the damn card), and some barebones soccer games and a couple of (albiet good) racing game ports from 10+ years ago. 👏 👏 👏 😒
We can point out many dumb Nintendo decisions, but your obsession over Pikmin 3 is warping the overall picture.
@scully1888 Just give it a 0 already - no need to save that score for the next year.
@EVIL-C no one's going to change the others mind. I don't agree but ok have a good night.
Btw both the crash and spyro remasters where significantly better than what nintendo offered us for the mario collection
@sixrings Those were reMAKES, not remasters. 🤦♂️
Mario was a complete release, unlike Spyro.
@EVIL-C all semantics. They cost the same. That's what matters. But let's not open a whole other conversation.
@sixrings Fair enough. I can understand that you prioritize different things than me.
For me, I haven't played Pikmin (or any of the Wii U stuff) and I can understand why Wii U owners are pissed at Nintendo.
I don't think we need to rehash why people are displeased at EA, but my understanding is that Pikmin 3 has several new added modes (including co-op for the main campaign). From a gaming perspective I personally would prefer new features / gameplay over graphical upgrades, but given the Switch's mild power improvement over Wii U, I can understand how rendering the same scene twice would prevent it from getting bumped to 1080/60.
But, to each their own. Thanks for explaining your position better.
@sixrings No. Remakes have actual design, content and mechanical changes. Remasters, by tradition, take the exact same product, clean it up, and present it in a fresh way for modern audiences.
If you can't see the difference between the Remake of Resident Evil, and the remaster of Mario Sunshine, and understand the fundamental difference as to why each is what they are and why, then please educate yourself before going on continuous tirades.
@Agramonte Thanks for the financial advice. I will give it the due consideration that your earlier financial advice tells me it warrants.
Holy crap, this is the most scathing review I’ve seen from Nintendo Life. If this is a 2/10, I don’t even want to know what a 1/10 looks like.
What a savage review, love it!
@EVIL-C Remakes take actual work recreating the game from the ground up while remasters are ports in higher resolution. So we are in agreement that the remakes of spyro and crash were a far better deal than the remasters of mario.
Someone recycling old content onto the Switch? Unthinkable!
They removed the older games from the eShop? Well now that just clearly states their intention. Still better to buy the old games used by now.
@sixrings Oh yes, in that sense. A remake will always take more effort. I honestly was disappointed that Sunshine was a mere remaster. Sunshine has always had a lot of problems, especially the terrible camera. It REALLY needs a full remake. I finally beat it after after 18 years, and I'd be lying if I said I didn't find some fun in it. Those secret stages without FLUDD felt like precursors to Galaxy level design. So, Sunshine did something right regardless.
did not got my money since andromeda.
this company goes against anything i like about gaming. its not the programmers fault, its the greedy ceo and its managers.
@EVIL-C
sunshine was by any means an awfull mario game IMO, confirmed by my 8 year old son, who only plays mario 64 and mario galaxy, and hates the setting and controls
@PALversusNTSC It's definitely the worst 3D Mario game. No disagreement with anything you said.
I give Nintendo credit for at least trying something new.
That’s one angsty review! Whew!
...
(And Ioved it!)
I would love to have a Mario Superstar soccer or something like that...
Konami, wake up and release a Pro Evolution Soccer on Switch. we lack a real soccer game!
Well done Chris glad someone is saying it.
Also here we go 10 in a row is the best line I have ever read in a review 😃
Looks like it’s currently sitting at a 0.1 user score on Metacritic. Is that a new record?
Wow, this was a scathing review! Deservedly so; it has my backing all the way. I don't think I've seen steps taken in the gaming world that are so patronising and demeaning to consumers. There is actually no other explanation for releasing this game other than the one that is so glaringly obvious: that Switch owners are being taken for mugs.
I also implore people to boycott this. Hopefully they may get the message by the time Fifa 28 comes out.
So just to clarify for my own understanding, Pikmin 4 is just Pikmin 3 with different hats?
And this is why monopolies suck save for the postal and currency systems and the board game.
Article thumbnail sums up the review quite well.
@Lindhardt More people need to hit Ctrl-X before this has any hope of changing.
Normally, I'd complain about a game that's just as good as its predecessor being scored more harshly, but here I think it's justified.
Of course, when EA comes out with a good game (and without any of their usual microtransaction abuse) like "Star Wars: Squadrons," they don't even attempt to try to bring it to Switch.
@sixrings For many genres, 720p @ 30 FPS is perfectly acceptable and shouldn't offend anybody. There are some genres where 60 FPS is needed, and developers should do the best they can, but otherwise anything better than that should be treated as a bonus. I personally can't tell the difference, anyway.
By the way, it's extremely annoying to see you misspell "Pikmin" in almost every one of your comments.
@Silly_G What legacy Pokémon releases? "Sword and Shield" added a bunch of new Pokémon and other things despite what was removed, their remakes and expanded versions always add a bunch of new things (save for perhaps "Pokémon Crystal"), and even "Pokken Tournament DX" added a bunch of exclusive DLC fighters and an extra gameplay mode despite having an inferior local multiplayer mode. While the Pokémon franchise does love to milk its products, they generally add enough good new content to make that Moo Moo Milk worth the full 100 PokéYen.
@ObsidianEleven Well, "Pikmin 3" actually controls better on the Wii U, so there could very well be some people who have yet to buy it and own both consoles who would prefer the Wii U version (not many, but there could very well be some). That's different than removing redundant legacy versions, which I agree is harmless. It's not like anyone would choose to have outdated rosters given the choice, not unless he/she is a massive fan of a team who was a lot better two years ago.
This and other BS from this ***** hole company are why I haven't bought a game with the EA name on it in at least a decade and they keep on with their stupidity. EA is the worst company in the gaming industry hands down!
EA can go die in a fire!
It's hard to tell how much of this is a review and how much is a soapbox.
@0blivion Yes, remarkably so, old chap. sips tea
@BulbasaurusRex for cartoon like games which Nintendo has previously managed in Smash Bros, Mario Kart 8, Kirby, Luigis Mansion , DKTF, NSMBUD all managed to get to 1080p and Mario Odyssey, Mario Tennis Aces at 900p you think 720p is perfectly acceptable?
This is absurd. I understand people love Nintendo but this is rationalizing poor behavior.
@noswitchbutidc indubitably. -takes a sip from his pint of beer-
@scully1888 My local book currently has Celtic at +270 against AC Milan so I'm definitely getting in on them at that price.
"The new FIFA has the lowest Metacritic average in the series' history — but does a game with a license to print money have any reason to evolve?"
Here's a good read, regardless of platform: https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2020-10-14-fifa-21-critical-consensus
@sixrings Sure, it is, when those other games simply went beyond what was needed or expected. 720p is good enough for any game, and anything better is simply a bonus. 720p resolution has never been poor behavior. That could change in the future, but as of right now it's the acceptable video resolution standard, just as MP4s are merely considered a bonus over the standard MP3 format.
@BulbasaurusRex I think what is acceptable it subjective. Full HD should be the minimum when everyone else is aiming for 4k.
Maybe you still find dvds acceptable. Perhaps a landline? basic cable? How about dial up Internet? Just because all these things still function doesn't make them acceptable. Well maybe if you're on a tight budget. The rest of the world uses Iphones, high speed Internet, cable + hulu/netflix/crave.
At last a review that does not just go by what it says on the tin, it opens the tin and looks inside.
I like the knicker pun 😀
@Shiryu Is it because it's soccer/football, or because it's anime? Be honest.
@Dog Both actually!
Surely the right question to be asked would be:
"Why isn't PES on the Switch?"
God ***** Damn it!
This version is awful.
We do not have any major promo. No RTTF or any promo like that.
It is the worst experience from this series. I played FIFA 19, 20, and 21 and this game on Nintendo Switch is on free-falling !!
2k on switch is great.
The Show is coming to Nintendo next year.
Fifa is already being half-assed, and there's no Madden or NHL in sight.
WTF, EA?!
We're a legitimate user base, treat us with respect!
How can those developers stay interested in making almost the same game every year? It's hard to believe these games would not be uninspired.
None of you had noticed!!! Because none of you had probably owned a ps3!!
The last Fifa on the ps3 was fifa 19, however just like the switch version, fifa 19 and fifa 18 were legacy editions. So basically it was fifa 17 with new shirts. They did that not because they dont care, not because its impossible to implement these features to the older generation systems, but mainly because it costs them too much for a console that is soon to be dead. And they stopped after 2 legacy games.
This is all the more proof of a new switch coming very soon. Will they implement the new fifa 21/22 for the new switch? Will they continue to make legacy editions? IDK! But i think EA is doing it again by waiting to put that effort for the new console so that they don’t have to do it twice.
What do you guys think?
@Aneira it will come. Pes is building a whole new game probably for next year. But im assuming it will be on the switch. Most likely on the new switch revision.
And for those who say they can’t implement frostbite. The new Plants VS Zombies is on the switch with frostbite engine and it runs great!
EA other game engine, Valve’s Source is also on the switch; “Apex Legends”
So it is possible but the switch is treated as an older generation console, probably because these companies know of Nintendo’s plans
Waited for eshop discount and bought this for the first time on Switch and I have to admit that this is a good football game.
I understand it is annoying that Switch was left out of the updates but the career mode is still quite deep, graphics and gameplay are still good and lots of licensed teams/leagues are in it.
If there was a rating for unfairness/laziness this’d get a good 10/10 from it but overall, I don’t think this is a 2/10 game.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...