It's well documented at this point that the Wii U didn't do too well from a third party support perspective. After a good start of unprecedented partnerships and definitive ports of major triple AAA games, developers started jumping ship left and right when the Wii U's sales momentum hit the brakes hard. Obviously, Nintendo wants to turn things around this generation with the Nintendo Switch, and it's revealed an impressive list of companies that have pledged to support the console, but—in all honesty—we've been here before.
ProJared recently got a chance to interview Reggie Fils-Aime on the Nintendo Switch and one of the questions that came up was how the company intends to keep third parties on the Switch. Here's what he said:
This business is pretty simple. What third parties want are: a large, growing install base, a development environment that's easy for them to work in, they want the ability to monetize their content—whether on the initial sale or downloadable content. That's what they want. And we were not able to deliver that fully on the Wii U. We are going to be able to deliver that fully with Nintendo Switch. Certainly, we've seen tremendous excitement, as we've now revealed launch date and launch price. We've announced Unity Engine and Unreal Engine. Obviously, the long list of developers highlights that people are excited to develop for the platform. With our launch, with our own first party games, we'll sustain momentum and create that opportunity for third parties.
It does seem like the Switch has more going for it than the Wii U did at the same point, but as always, time will tell.
What do you think? Will third party support stay strong with the Switch? What do you think will be different this time around? Drop us a comment in the section below.
[source youtube.com]
Comments 101
This was a fantastic interview. I love the dynamics between Reggie and ProJared, whom, in my opinion, has been one of the most straightforward and fair reviewers of the Switch.
SWITCH!
@MasterGraveheart I agree; Reggie's a lot more relaxed here, and the interview goes over some interesting stuff.
That interview was great, especially the part where Reggie challenges ProJared to say the worst thing he's said about about Nintendo directly to his face! xD
I'm glad to hear Mr. Reggie can be calm and confident during interview.
I'm thinking Switch definitely has more going for it.
Just on a 1st party level, there's like 8 games releasing in 9 months.
Another thing I like is how it's actually getting special editions from 3rd parties, something we never got on Wii U. Sonic Mania got that cool Genesis collector box, and Disgaea 5 Complete also has a special edition... it bodes well for future titles.
Even Dragon Quest Heroes 1 and 2 come bundled together versus just the sequel releasing on PS4. That's love.
edit
And ya that was an excellent interview. Can we officially mark down Monster Hunter now... Reggie's look was telling
@allav866 Certainly one of my favourite Reggie moments of recent years! Great interview, great people.
My only gripe with the interview was that at some point it felt railroaded, given the whole "I'll interview you!" shtick was already done with The Completionist a few months ago.
Other than that, though, it was a nice interview. And Reggie challenging Jared to say something bad about Nintendo was both funny and awesome at the same time.
Also, Reggie being aware of consumers being sick of paying for the same content over and over, as previously mentioned, is another nice change of pace.
The highlight Jared representing Monster hunter. Atta boy!
Like you say, time will tell. As someone aiming to pick one up around Christmas, we'll all have a better idea of what the Switch's future is like at that point. Frankly, give me Gamecube vc and I'm happy. Still bitterly regret having to sell that lovely little toy.
Yeah right, we'll see about that. Looks dead so far
Bit off topic but I want to take the Switch on holiday without the dock. Anybody know whether it's possible to charge the joycons without the dock? Or do I need the recharging joycon grip?
They also like power Reggie.
I think they have a much better chance of succeeding with the switch than the WiiU, soft launch titles aside
@Monkeyofthefunk Didn't see anything about that (yet). It may be possible that when you charge the tablet, it charges the joycons too.
I would like to see good 3rd party support but I'm not holding my breath. I do think that there is room in the games industry for Nintendo to just be themselves and do OK.
-Ability to monetize content: check.
-Easy development environment: check
-Large and growing install base: So far, check. With the (currently unannounced) 3rd party holiday lineup, several major IP releasing this year, and plenty of hendheld IP making their way soon, things are looking good on the growing aspect.
@Monkeyofthefunk The Joy-Cons charge when connected to the tablet, so as long as you bring your AC adapter to charge your tablet, you'll be fine.
With the system being easy to develop for, supporting different engines and the more standard control setup possible with both joy cons. Things look much more promising. I think third party support will be stronger with the Switch.
Well with the Switch able to perform standard Nvidia processor calls, and with the help of engines like Unreal, the development end is already multiple times more easier than it was with the WiiU. Simultaneous ports of games should not be a problem. All Nintendo needs is getting a couple million units and strong titles into the hands of people within the launch year to convince devs to stay for the long haul. And it seems like those 2 Million units at launch will be reached.
I reckon we skip February this year. It'd then be just over two weeks to go! Can't wait to get me some sweet switch action.
Smartphone app for matchmaking, lobbies and voice chat is so daft.
Oh and if you are a switch owner who only owns a Windows Mobile or blackberry OS phone then you will be well and truly screwed.
That was a fun/interesting interview "Say it to my face" -Reggie LOL
It's not just 'get 3rd party on the Switch, its 'get he sort of 3rd party Nintendo fans wan to play'.
It seems pointless bringing dudebro games to an audience that traditionally prefers Japanese and Quirky stuff.
For me I don't need online play or voice chat or anything like that... All I wants is games! The more the better, I do hope Switch gets some 2015-16 ports as I would like to play some on the go (Doom) lol ... I sure as hell hope 3rd parties don't jump ship, the Switch has loads more going for it than WiiU (gives WiiU hugs) ... Please Ninty, very few motion control games and all that just amazing games!
If you look at the Wii U launch line-up of 3rd party titles it looks pretty impressive. If you look a little closer though you will see that they were pretty much all ports of games which had been available elsewhere for some time and often on PS3/360 which had obviously been out for years.
The Switch needs to get some 3rd party multi-platform titles (like the sports games and popular FPS) but also a few top quality exclusives. They cannot rely on only having 3rd party exclusives from indie devs like the Wii U mostly did.
That said... There will undoubtedly be PlayStation/Xbox fans who dismiss anything Nintendo does now, but there will also be a large number of people (probably the sort that aren't on games forums being massive fanboys towards their chosen system or calling EA the most evil organisation on the planet) who would love to be able to play FIFA, NBA, Madden, Call of Duty, Battlefield, Assassin's Creed and other high selling titles like that on the go or at work in breaks. Nntendo needs to win those people over to make the Switch a big success and it will take 3rd party dev support to do that. Even if there aren't too many exclusives the multi-platform games can't feel like hobbled versions.
@BionicDodo
This exactly! Like most people remotely interested in gaming, I bought both the Wii and an Xbox 360. By the time Wii U was released I had already played all Mass Effect games, Batman Arkham games and Assassins Creed. As the Wii U was new, like now with Switch, all launch games were a premium price and I could not pick out a single game that made the console a worthwhile purchase. It wasn't until Pikmin 3, Wind Waker HD, Bayonetta 2 and Mario Kart 8 were all available did I invest.
Here lies the difference with the Switch, the launch line up might be sparse but at least it's clear. We all know exactly what'll be available on the day and what's coming up. The prices are high now but they'll drop by Christmas, which is when most people will buy the system.
The atmosphere surrounding Switch is much closer to that of the Wii and N64, people are aware of it and interested.
All he states is the obvious he doesn't go into detail about how Nintendo will keep 3rd party support, if no one buys 3rd party games or the ship starts sinking again. Because lets face it the 3rd party games that matter like Battlefield One are not coming to the Switch, even FIFA will be a custom made game for the Switch so the Switch is already at a disadvantage when it comes to 3rd party Support.
@JaxonH and these 8 games releasing in 9 months is the whole point, according to Reggie. They're aiming for a steady flow of releases on Switch rather than floods followed by droughts.
(The launch lineup is still growing, however. I just heard that I Am Setsuna will also be released on March 3!)
@nhSnork
That's what I gathered. They're using the time they had to play catch up to stockpile games and use them to plug gaps over the course of the generation.
I heard that I Am Setsuna would be there at launch. Also, Redout and Binding of Isaac Afterbirth+ are launch games with physical releases. Should have made Setsuna physical... I would've loved that game to see a retail release.
Also heard Disgaea 5 Complete is at launch, but I'm seeing conflicting reports on that. Nintendo hasn't done a very good job of making it clear.
Also Bomberman just dropped to $49.99 on BestBuy ($39.99 with GCU) although it's still not live to preorder yet.
The look on Reggie's face in the article image makes it look like he's thinking the complete opposite: "Oh crap, we don't actually have any games!" Guessing it's not intentional (and just the screenshot that was taken) but it's hilarious.
That was a fun interview! "What's the worst thing that you've said about Nintendo and say it to my face"...
Hmmph... on a serious note, I really like the Switch, and I know I will enjoy it greatly and find it's features very useful, but I have a bad feeling that it won't be much more popular than Wii U in the west. Reggie's words about Third Party support and a steady flow of titles ring hollow at this point. I seriously hope it'll turn out great!
I'll believe when I see it. Lately nintendo has been all talk, no action, and a whole lot of broken promises....
It felt like to me at least, the wiiU had a much bigger vocal third party support at launch. Yeah mostly ports, but at the start of wiiU's life that were good ports. I know third parties have been praising the Switch but it does look and feel like a we will wait and see. Possibly just doing a bare minimum to get something out on the system without having to invest too much into it. I was expecting on the day of the official switch reveal a big show of support from 3rd party with a massive line up and to be honest I think Nintendo did too. WiiU get third parties complained that they couldn't compete in sales with the first party games so I think Nintendo have such a small amount and in most cases "remastered" wiiU ports to give third party a chance. So come on Ubi, EA and Activision pull your weight and make the switch a must buy.
Japanese third party support ...I can believe it. This will be the new Vita and get a ton of 3rd party support from Japan. Western third party support? I am very skeptical.
And there's a lot of people that wants to play the likes of Mass Effect Andromeda, Red Dead Redemption 2 AND Nintendo games but they are forced to have two gaming machines.
The interview was fun anyway !
I'm not that worried about 3rd party support. Even if a game only sells 100 000 on the Switch, if the game has already been made on the PS4/Xbox1, and porting it is a simple task, then it will be ported. That was the main problem with the Wii U (and Wii and Gamecube for that matter).
Deja vu all over again.
This is how we want to see our game reps. Real people with opinions not intrinsically tied to selling a product or protecting a public image. Rather than this becoming any sort of norm, I can only imagine Ready Reggie getting in trouble for going "rogue", as it were.
He can be a likeable enough guy when he's not a corporate figurehead. I would have liked to hear his honest-to-goodness unfiltered opinion on Nintendo's decline sometime.
Fantastic interview, it's as fun to watch as it was clearly fun to make for those involved... A really Nintendesque interview let's say XD
I wonder what would happen if an unstoppable force met Reggie's hands.
One serious problem for 3rd party developers is that poor 32GB of storage. Modern day patches are often huge and lots of games recieve big updates right on launch day. And then there is of course DLC. Do we even know how much of that 32GB is available for use and how much goes to operating system?
I think the Switch has some important things going for it over the Wii U. First, consumers appear to be much more enthusiastic about the device than the Wii U, and the key concepts are easier to understand and explain. Second, the console comes with everything you need to play it in every unique way it is intended to without extra purchases. Finally, developers won't need to feel pressured to incorporate a significantly different control scheme or gimmick to take advantage of the console. Console games having the option of being portable is great without needing any of the other features being added in if they dont need to be.
@neufel fingers crossed.
@Megas Ehh..... It does, but it's entirely possible that MonHan is coming to PS4 & XBONE. I always pictured a free-to-play title being on those systems, I think that would make a great deal of sense.
Hopefully, MonHan Switch would retain the classic formulae for the title, with added online functionality.
@Monkeyofthefunk the JoyCon are recharged when attached to the Switch itself. It does not need to be in the Dock.
"What third parties want are: a large, growing install base". The big question is how they will achieve that with 300 $ launch price? Didn't they learn anything from 3ds and wii u? 3ds was a flop until they slash price to 150$
Imagine Wii with a 300 dollar price tag
@dimi This is the problem I see. I think the tech is great, I understand it's easy to port to but without a decent install base third parties will do the bare minimum to support the system. If Nintendo shave a bit off the starting price, even selling at a loss to start with if necessary, then they will get a decent user base and third parties will support it fully.
I'm not fully fluent in management speak so forgive my rough translation. Once translated I believe it means "we'll have a little third party support this year but if the hardware sales are good we might get better support next year".
There is definitely alot more Japanese support on the system and I'm sure the westen support will come over the year or so.
@JaxonH great comment, i always find your view on things insightful . We all maybe a little on guard due to what happened on Wii U but as you said it looks better already for 2017. All we need announced is a New Metroid, an definitive edition of Smash Bros, a fixed version of Star fox zero with more control options, F-zero , Animal crossing, and a new Kirby. Then we'd be set for awhile 1st party-wise.
As for third party I am hoping Lego dimensions gets Switch support as well as COD, BG&E 2, Marvel vs Capcom Infinite, and whatever 3rd party devs can make work for Switch.
@dimi i see a price drop possibly happening Around the holiday when Super Mario Odyssey comes. They will need to be very competitive then due to Scorpio and Pro fighting for our money.. we only have so much to spend
@jaymacx
Thank you.
I'm feeling really good about a new Metroid. With Reggie's comment, and thinking back about how they said they had 2 in the works the e3 before last, I'm thinking a full Switch title was the other one, and they're gonna reveal it this e3.
What I'm not feeling confident we're getting is F-Zero, although I do suspect we'll see F-Zero GX on GameCube as VC. Then again, with both Redout and Fast RMX releasing right away at launch, maybe Nintendo approached them and said "Hey, we have a new F-Zero coming, and we know how our games hog the spotlight, so if you want to release your games on Switch, do it now, and we'll come a year later with F-Zero after you've had a chance to sell".
Heeeeeey, it's ProJared! I'm subscribed to that guy!
I went looking for his interview with Reggie just yesterday but I couldn't find a thing on his channel. What gives!?
@kobashi100 Please don't use the r-word on this site. Thanks.
He always says this though. What else is he supposed to say?
List of launch titles is still smaller than Wii U's was. If there aren't enough must have games early on, sales will suffer and third parties will drift away
I already preordered my switch. Having said that, I have 0% confidence that third parties will support the switch or that there will be a huge install base when Nintendo is barely supporting it in the first year. But that's not why I bought it, I bought the switch for first party games.
That was a good interview.
However to trust third parties is ill advised. Just my opinion.
I hope it all turns out well but I have my doubts.
@Metal_Slugger
That was a fun interview; although disappointed he asked about Monster Hunter. Yes he's a fan, yes it's a big series, he's loads of people will be wondering about it; I'd have asked about some more obscure things. Not that we would have had a complete response though.
Or maybe I'm still on the fringe holding out for Ace Combat on the Switch.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
Ummmm. They are also ignoring the elephant in the room... A lot of third party games DID NOT SELL ON THE WII U...
They must sell or no third party.
@Monkeyofthefunk
There is a grip which charges the joy cons. But it's not the one in the box.
Where is the link for this video
"Nintendo wants to turn things around this generation with the Nintendo Switch, and it's revealed an impressive list of companies that have pledged to support the console, but—in all honesty—we've been here before."
Love me some Mitch. The only one around here not drinking the kool aid.
As far as the interview goes, it's just more empty talk from Reggie the talking head. There is no substantial 3rd party support coming to Switch, unless it miraculously sells something on the same trajectory of the Wii.
@gatorboi352 Most people aren't expecting PS4 levels of 3rd party support, but expecting support better than the Wii U had isn't unreasonable.
Also, I love how back and forth the comment section is on this site, lol. In most cases it's pretty negative, but as soon as anything even slightly positive gets posted, everyone jumps right back on the hype train.
@kobashi100
We don't know that yet and if you have a windows phone or blackberry seriously what are you trying to prove?
Nice of him he asked Reggie for a Switch version of monster hunter!
I thought that interview was great. Reggie seemed more relaxed. I know he gets a lot of flack from people, but I honestly don't think he has as much power in Nintendo as people think he does. He's mainly a PR guy, and I think he relates well to fans and is not above some self-mocking.
Can't trust anything that comes out of Reggie's mouth.
Well, I didn't see much. So it doesn't mean much at the moment.
@MasterGraveheart Yeah, that was a fun and good interview. Thanks for the heads up. Agree with @JaxonH that I think I saw Reggie pull out his poker face from his back pocket and fumble it onto his head. "I have a secret and I can't tell you but I want to tell you — but I have no secrets!"
Of course it helps that it's pretty much inevitable that it will land there.
@Monkeyofthefunk I remember some Nintendo rep on a video (Treehouse?) mentioning that the Joy-cons are always charging while on the Switch. At the time, I took it to mean even when it isn't plugged in. In other words, I think it charges them while it is running on battery power, so it would be crazy if it didn't charge them when you had the Switch plugged in.
@Lord Most (all?) Nintendo Life articles have a little "via link" surrounded by square brackets right at the bottom of the text. In this case, it says via YouTube.
Going to go with almost got it right. Yes that is what we developers look for in a platform. However the strong growing platform is a chicken and the egg problem that we are all familiar with. So not a whole lot Nintendo can do other than foster the tools and strong hardware while getting dev kits in the hands of devs. Nintendo is faultering on the last two. The switch is under powered. No amount of unreal or unity porting is going to magically remove the tedium that will come from down scaling games so those two engines will run at a solid frame rate. That makes things difficult, requires alteration of assets and may require changes to the pipeline to allow for that to work. A lot of studios are using proprietary engines that will need to be ported so 3rd party middlewear like unreal is pretty meaningless in those scenarios.
What developers want is high return from little work. We have already put the time in and now we want to easily slip that onto other machines for a low cost in 3 months. Overhauling assets is high cost and takes more than 3 months. You will see borderlands 2 Vita scenarios with this thing. Developers will have to take their latest creations and pair them back as they go, but what is the incentive when Xbox one and ps4 already control a huge chunk of the market.
Don't get me wrong this is the coolest piece of hardware Nintendo has ever made, realizing a dream that dates as far back as I can remember into the 80s. A concept that was tried with the turbo express and in many other incarnations since. But third parties are clearly not throwing their weight behind this thing. Ubisoft is the most laughable by far. A version of Rayman that was exclusive to Wii u that ended up getting life on several hardware platforms. A snowboarding game that could have run on Wii u or ps3. Just dance, a game that can honestly run on anything and honestly doesn't really show case what the system can do other than be set up at a party. They could honestly release just dance on any Android iOS device at this point with many of these machines being connected to a TV like the shield k1 and people could use their phones etc. Not seeing a lot of faith in Ubisoft here. FIFA the only title out of EA is just as sad with its last gen version of the game. I could just keep going. This is the Wii u all over again with third parties. To add insult to injury the latest GDC numbers are terrible for who is working on this thing. I can honestly say must publishers don't seem keen on investing in switch dev kits as no one seems to have actually worked on the machine. These people are unicorns who have worked with it.
So not a whole lot of faith for Nintendo here. Launch lineup is still soft. I honestly hope by July they have a show for us showing the great games and 3rd party support or its going to be a rough year for them as they crawl into next generation.
@KirbyTheVampire
"Most people aren't expecting PS4 levels of 3rd party support"
Sadly, Switch needs PS4 levels of 3rd party support to have ANY chance whatsoever.
" but expecting support better than the Wii U had isn't unreasonable."
Based on everything we know up to this point, it seems like a bit of a stretch.
For instance, day 1 Wii U had Assassins Creed 3 and Black Ops 2 available. Those two games alone trump anything Switch is putting out day 1. Zelda coming out day 1 on Switch is a bit mitigated by the fact it's also on Wii U same day.
I mean, let's just all be honest here; the reason 3rd parties aren't flocking in droves to Nintendo's platforms is also in large part due to Nintendo's often times smug or disinterested behavior towards a lot of them. Make no mistake about it, Nintendo's Japan brass is a somewhat arrogant group towards western 3rd parties unless they see a perfect fit, of sorts.
It's too early to tell at this point. Whether or not we want them, the Switch NEEDS third-party support.
Reggie: "What's the worst thing you've said about Nintendo, and say it to my face."
Loved that part, lol
right lets all agree here to not pull that "gimp port, no buy" policy from the Wii U's early years. The intention was pure but all publishers saw was low sales as no audience.
If you're unhappy with the quality of a port but are interested in the game or series being on switch then buy it new but at a discounted price, ether through sales or just general waiting for the Amazon price to go down. Show publishers we want their content and will pay in full for quality.
Obviously if the game is literally broken or is garbage anyway don't buy it
I "hope" they don't jump ship, but it's really all up to Nintendo as was the case with the Wii U. I will be playing the system regardless, but I'm through crying rivers if 3rd parties do what they feel is best. All I ask a 3rd party to do is, if you are going to wait to see how a system does first, then don't say "you pledge to work on it", cause that means you have a clause, a condition-- simply say that you will release a game depending on how successful the system sells. If you all in, then be all in, don't sell consumers short for your own goals.
It makes me fearful when Reggie says that now they can provide that kind of environment.
I'm not saying "Get ready for monetized consumables, useless vanity items, pay-to-win equipment, insane niche catering DLC smorgasbords, combo-gacha mechanics, treasure gambling, and pay-for-impatience strategies" but, you know, get ready for all that.
@Pod you're probably right. I don't think Nintendo will be playing that game (pun intended) with their first-party line-up, but they have to provide a platform for the third-party publishers that wish to do that. The Wii U failed on that front as much as from an install base standpoint. It can be argued that with continued third-party support, the Wii Us failure would have been less dramatic.
@StuOhQ
While Nintendo kept insisting that their users should be protected from aggressive monetization schemes and invasive online DRM, they eventually caved in and allowed self-publishing and self-pricing on the eShop, meaning the store was flooded with indie-games of questionable quality at queastionable prices.
This time around, we'll see how they manage it.
@dimi the Wii could have sold for higher. It was actually very underpriced the way it was that popular in its peak around 2009. Of course the price had something to do with the popularity but it was much more than that, it was a phenomenon. Like people buy iPhones no matter the cost, that's what it was.
I'm glad Reggie's optimistic. We have heard the Switch is easy to develop for...
I guess only time will tell. So far most of the third party games are ports from last year or before.
With Nintendo having 'Switched' their game up this time 'round, I believe the 3rd party support will be there. I feel like they gathered all the 3rd party devs in a room and said "Ok guys, what do u need from Nintendo to support the Switch?".
How ballsy Jared was telling Reggie to his face he didnt enjoy Phantom Hourglass and thought Other M sucked. XD
There are people out there that would prefer that Mario Kart Deluxe, Splatoon 2, Xenoblade 2, and Super Mario Odyssey be launch titles, but Nintendo knows that they must spread it out over the year to maintain momentum. So, clearly some people just want Nintendo to fail by asking that of them, for releasing everything at once leaves nothing, and eventually this leads to a drought...
For the BS PR Reggie is oft quoted in, this is surprisingly frank and straightforward.
The fact that there is no "unprecedented relationship" nonsense out the gate is honestly a relief. All those ports had issues, the worst being Mass Effect 3 - a title whose major selling point is loading saves from previous titles - making the Nintendo fanbase resentful and skeptical of 3rd party offerings, and made the system look obsolete day 1.
The biggest advantage the Switch has is it's very clear message. The Wii U's message was totally missed, many customers thought it was a Wii accessory and as a result, momentum stalled quickly as customers did not fully grasp its tablet concept.
The Switches message is clear, which should on it's own lead to more sales and in turn, better 3rd party support.
@Monkeyofthefunk having the joy-cons attached to the swtich, whilst the Switch is plugged into power will also charge the joy-cons 😃
Wii had the install base and TONS of third party support......
..... but because of the relative weak guts in the system the third party support was all spin-offs or stripped down ports instead of mainline or cutting edge AAA titles. So the result was the same. Then Wii U did NOT have the install base, still a weaker system and lost all 3rd party.
3rd parties will overlook difficult of programming if the install base is big enough, but you'll still get garbage versions if your system is not up to snuff what they're releasing on other systems (see recent DQ Warriors 2 comparison)
@leuvsion Thanks.
I would have said Red Dead Redemption 2, for third a party game I would like to see on Switch
@Raptor78 Hope they do. They didn't even put 1-2 Switch as bundle title. Nintendo can make money on the long run. Its a company that can afford to operate on a loss for 2 years.
I don't care what anyone says, I like Ol' Regg.
Didn't that interview confirm that the voice chat is only posible with a smartphone app? was it only implied?
that's a bummer for sure... =/
@pandarino I agree. The Japanese developers will be all over the switch. Which to me is a good thing. That's basically what happened with the 3DS and look at all of the great games we have for it! Time will only tell if western developers jump aboard. We are seeing progress though, especially with Bethesda Studios on board with the switch now.
@gatorboi352 Its true that the Switch will have a weak line up at launch, but honestly what console didn't have a weak line up at launch? I remember when the PS4 first came out. There was hardly anything, especially anything I wanted to play. It really didn't start kicking off until a year later. So Im going to be patient and give Nintendo some time. Then I will see if the switch is worth buying.
@drewber2635 at least there was a feeling of great things to come for early PS4 adopters. Sony made sure of that. Nintendo has not.
No more Monster Hunter for 3DS please! That console already had an overdose MH... I really want Capcom to focus on making a visually stunning Monster Hunter for the switch instead
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...