Forums

Topic: Wich game is better, Mario Galaxy 1 or 2

Posts 1 to 20 of 49

Chaoslink1

These are my 2 favorite mario games, but If I had to choose wich one is better then I would say ......... The Original
Why, because the stages are much longer then In the second one,there's the comet observatory hubworld other then that tiny starship Mario and the story of the first one is so much deeper and darker then in the sequel.
Don't get me wrong,I really like the second game too and there is stuff better about that one as well:Yoshi is in it,you get Luigi much earlier and they brought back Whomp's Fortress and that secret place from Sunshine. But I just think that the original is just a masterpiece over the sequel and just can't stop being played

So,wich game do you think is better?

[Edited by Chaoslink1]

My favourite games: http://chaoslink1.deviantart.com/art/Top-10-Favourite-Video-Game-meme-Chaoslink1-309965952?q=boost%3Apopular%20%28%28my%20top%2010%29%20AND%20%28by%3Achaoslink1%29%29&qo=0
Retro games, Modern games, all AWESOME!!!

Switch Friend Code: SW-5737-7446-0788 | X:

Birdman

I personally liked Galaxy 1 more. The sequel had lost the freshness of the original, some annoying mechanics that I didn't like from the first game (Spring Suit) returned, and at times the level design just felt cheap. Also, I always like sequels less than the original games.

Exactly.
My Birdloggery

Amorous_Badger

2.

Basically the same game, with more bells and whistles and YOSHI.

Monster Hunter Tri.
EU
Badger SKR6R7

ville10

I also have problems deciding which one I like more. It's hard to say that Galaxy 2 was just as good an experience as the first, everything is better he first time around, but they are almost equal in quality. I think i might prefer Galaxy 2 because there are fewer stars per galaxy (more variety!) and Yoshi adds even more variety. The first one felt like a more complete adventure however, with a deeper story and so on.

ville10

IanMage

I thought the 2nd game felt like nothing more than extra levels. The introduction seemed rushed, and lacked the depth that the first game brought with it's exciting intro and story; the 2nd game uses the same "come over to the castle and have cake" story as Super Mario 64. If you only consider the worlds and design, the 2nd game is much better. But it didn't feel as exciting as the first. I also greatly missed the Observatory.

[Edited by IanMage]

3DS friend code: 1160-9727-7802
Wii U ID: ianmage1
I'm working on an animated feature film called "WhiteLand." Check out my progress: http://www.youtube.com/user/ianmage1

Punny

It's so hard to say which game is better because they are both equally awesome! On one hand, the first Galaxy is more fondly remembered for its near-perfect 3D platforming (which was a breath of fresh air back in 2007 after the mixed reactions of Super Mario Sunshine) and emphasis on story telling (which the Mario series isn't known for). On the other hand, Super Mario Galaxy 2 fixes the (very minor) problems the first game had while adding great new features. Its graphics were more colorful, its gameplay was more challenging (Grandmaster Galaxy, anyone?), and the inclusion of Yoshi boosted the fun factor. Unfortunately, it wasn't as revolutionary as the first one. Don't get me wrong, I loved Galaxy 2, but I still have a soft spot for the first game (just my opinion).

I'm back (for the moment)!

LEGEND_MARIOID

I'm a huge fan of both, but I think its generally regarded by reliable reviewers that Galaxy 2 is better. I agree wholehartedly.

"They say video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll."

Odnetnin

For some reason I had to laugh at this thread title. On the one hand you have a fun, repetitive, and too easy 3D platformer in the original Mario Galaxy, and on the other you have easily one of the best games of all time and 3D platforming perfection in 2. No contest for me.

Joetherocker

Galaxy 2 was pretty much a perfect game, so I'm going to have to go with 2. I liked the first, but I got tired of it after beating the story, whereas I got everything in Galaxy 2 simply because it was so fun.

Wild signature appeared!

3DS FC: 4270-1110-7770

Hokori

3DS version

Digitaloggery
3DS FC: Otaku1
WiiU: 013017970991
Nintendo of Japan
niconico community is full of kawaii!
Must finish my backlagg or at least get close this year
W...

bboy2970

Galaxy 2 for sure. Both are masterpieces fo sure but the sequel just puts the first game to complete shame. Everything about Galaxy 2 is just so perfect. And I love how every star introduces something new. it never sits on one idea for very long before its on to the next. It is literally perfect.

My backloggery: http://backloggery.com/bboy2970

shinesprite

Definitely the first one. Don't get me wrong, they're both stellar games. However, Galaxy had a sense of exploration, which was dearly missed in its sequel. For this reason, I kept coming back to the first one for months, Galaxy 2: under two weeks.

shinesprite

TeeJay

The second game rocks, but I miss the observatory, and I miss flying around with the red star. Super Mario Galaxy 2 doesn't have the story the original does, or the heart-wrenching ending, which I loved. The levels in the second one are more nostalgic, but the levels in the first were more epic, in my opinion, because at the time there was nothing like it.
The Original's levels dampens the impression the sequel's levels give.

Final Verdict: The original.

If you add me, I need to at least know you or I won't add you back.

Switch Friend Code: SW-5283-4033-0929

noname001

I'm donning rose tinted glasses for a game only a few years old.
When I played through Galaxy, I was constantly in awe. Galaxy 2 was utterly fantastic as well, but being a sequel, it didn't have the same punch.

noname001

Jango-Forest

I prefer the first Galaxy, the levels and worlds were just more interesting. Also there didn't seem to be as much spherical platforming in the second, which was sort of the point of it being a "Galaxy" game. Still a fantastic game though.

Jango-Forest

pixelbuffer

So would it be better to start with Galaxy 1 or 2? Judging from some of these replies, if I play 2 first I might not appreciate 1 at all.

pixelbuffer

X:

Highwinter

Galaxy was such a unique experience, especially after the disappointment of Sunshine and waiting so long for Galaxy.. It was great to play something that felt like a true successor to Mario 64. Everything about it was done pretty much perfectly, it's one of the few games I can say deserves 10/10 without hesitation. I have to comment on the difficulty level inparticular, which I thought they really nailed. Parts of the game could be very challenging but it progressed at a good pace, so you never felt out of your league or frustrated at dying.

The second game definitely didn't pack the same punch for me and I was disappointed with the smaller, more linear levels. I much preferred the big worlds from the first Galaxy which gave you more room to explore and find hidden stars. The hub world was just terrible, although the addition of a map screen was appreciated.

Also, unlike the first game which really had a perfect difficulty level, the second game definitely becomes frustrating when you reach the bonus levels and quickly begins to feel like the game is just throwing everything at you to be as hard as possible, unlike the natural difficulty curve the first game had.

Highwinter

Kingbuilder

1 is definitely my favorite.

“The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.” - "Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them."

SuperMarioFan96

Definetely 2. More levels. More variety. The second 120 stars were not just "play through all the levels again" this time. Much harder. Yoshi. They were both awesome, but Galaxy 2 was just better.

"Oooh, yes I said it! I said it! I said it 'cause I caaan!"
My Backloggery

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.