Topic: Doesn't make sense (SF4)

Apple lets you use 5 devices to an account in which all your purchases are bound. You can go higher than that but you have to contact them.
Sony has the best way to do it. You have 5 systems, and you can manually deactivate a system yourself instead of calling them.

And this is assuming you don't consider the Iphone/touch a gaming device, which, I'm sorry, but it is even on a basic level.

And again. Devs make games to make money, not to please the masses. That's what indie games are for now.

i really don't want to see a SF4 port on the Wii. I want to see more original titles. I guess if the only choice is port or nothing more, then ok, but unlike the situation with call of duty for instance, here Capcom's developer explicitly said that they want to make more fighters for the Wii... so the last thing i want is for them to waste time in making a port instead of creating new exclusive fighters.

I don't really care if something is a port or something new - if I don't own it already it's new to me. Besides they've done that already - instead of a port of Resident Evil 5, we get the Darkside Chronicles. Great...

I'm going to be honest here, you're not missing a whole lot by not playing RE 5. You need a friend to play with to avoid extreme frustration from the lacking partner A.I. Also, a Wii port would lose one of its best features, which was the superb graphics.

As long as it's in 480p then it's all good. But it's all about the experience and gameplay. They even tease that the wii can handle it, then why tease instead of deliver?

Well the iphone also has resident evil 4, terminator Salvation too. But why don't people consider the Iphone a gaming device when it can pull out graphics just as good as the DS.

I've beaten a friend's copy of RE5, and I'm pretty sure that it isn't the final chapter. There are still a few questions to be answered. Anyway, Capcom probably has a reason for not giving Wii owners ports of these games. The one I can think of is that if they really care about their consumer-base, as shown with the RE4 port, they don't want to give people piece of s*** ports.

There is one thing that i can think of off the top of my head that could explain this but it sounds ridiculous
steve jobs probably has capcom by the balls on wall street?

but overall
street fighter on the iphone is just plain stupid

Yeah, but I'm specifically talking about fighters here. TvC is just as good as SF4 if not better, and it's not on-rails.

I am a huge Street Fighter fan and this breaks my heart why in the heck would you want junky touchscreen controls for SF4? Does Capcom even care about the quality of this game? And no I am no fanboy just imagine the fall out if it had been for ds and was touchscreen only that would rate a major league outcry.

But for iphone - no one blinks. DOUBLE STANDARD!

Lol'd.

Capcom are moron's.
Hey lets not put it on the Wii but instead on the Iphone.

Wow.....Boggles my mind how F*cking dumb developers are these days.

Super Street Fighter IV is coming soon so Street Fighter IV (on any system) is already obsolete.

I imagine that putting it on a single-touch system (rather than the iPod's multi-touch) would have caused an outcry.

I have to be honest - as much as I love Tatsunoko Vs Capcom, I don't think it's as good as Street Fighter 4. It's close, yeah, but it's like comparing Marvel Vs Capcom to Street Fighter 3. I'd like to have them both on my Wii - and the fact that Super Street Fighter 4 will have Cody, Guy, Dudley, Makoto and the return of the car smashing bonus stage ... well it just makes me sad thinking I wont get to play it

@madgear I actually prefer TvC over SF4. SF4 retreads too much ground for me to enjoy it much - it's basically a love song to SF2 fans. And while I agree SF3 is better than every other fighter ever made MvC, the Versus series gets huge kudos from me for its originality. Crossovers had never occurred before the Vs series. It also pretty much invented the over-the-top fighter style (full-screen attacks, projectiles are very common, combos counts often over 30). In terms of enjoyment, I'd say SF3 and MvC are equal, and TvC is better than SF4.

SSF4 having SF3 characters makes it a LOT more appealing to me though. I wanted Elena to feature, she was awesome.

I hope the Wii get's Super Street Fighter...yes without any numbers behind it! Reintroduce the original Street Fighter but a "Super" modernized version yet have it take place in the 1980s.

I haven't played SF4 but I wish TvsC had Sakura. She was one of my favorite characters in Alpha 3.

There's only eight character in the whole game too. Everybody who really cares about the Street Fighter series would have gotten SFIV for PS3 or XBOX 360 when it came out, even if they had to buy a new console just to play it.

Oh no, Bass - I really care about the Street Fighter series. If you saw my game collection you'd see a ton of rare titles - I have imports of some of the rarer titles such as Super Turbo for Matching Service on Dreamcast, Saturn X-Men Vs Street Fighter ... actually I think I have every single Street Fighter game released in some form with the only exception being Capcom Fighting Jam.

However I don't have Street Fighter 4 I refuse to buy another console, so I either have to pray for a Wii release or just go without...

Right but if cAPCOM cared about a portable SF4 - they could have put it on DS or PSP.

Look, it is just that consoel owners and physical media are under a distrubing trend of getting crapped on ignored in favor of digital distribution and iphone and now facebook and junk.

This is bad cause quality is dropping with it, as this game proves.

We pay MORE for quality and instead we get ignored completely,. It sucks, it really sucks.