Many people have been praising Kinect as 'a revolution in gaming' because of its controllerless control method and voice...er...control. In my opinion, though, Kinect is a step backwards. Firstly, I think the voice control is plain pointless. It's easier to press a button to play a movie than to say "Xbox, play". And, in the words of the brilliant Charlie Brooker, "talking to your Xbox makes you look like a dork". I also think the motion control limits the kind of game you can play. In some cases, like the dancing game shown at E3, it works well, but wouldn't you rather turn a steering wheel to drive a racecar than use your bare hands? And how would you play a game like Super Mario Bros without a controller? Does anyone else feel the same way I do about Kinect? I have nothing against motion-controlled games, but to me Kinect is just a gimmick.
No animals were harmed in the making of this post.
WarioWare: DIY: FC - 0904 7088 3011 Favourite users: PunnyGuy, StarBoy91, cloudcult10, Xkhaoz, Dragoon, DannyBoy, NintyFan, NintendoPurist, Sadman, Wooperman1, Golgo, GamesX99, turtlelink. The rest of you are cool too, though.
BEST THREAD EVER future of NL >:3
[16:43] James: I should learn these site rules more clearly
[16:44] LztheBlehBird: James doesn't know the rules? For shame!!!
Forums
Topic: What is the point of Kinect?
Posts 1 to 2 of 2
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.