I have a bad feeling that the Switch's screen will limit the performance, because it instantly switches between the TV and the small screen when you decide to continue playing outside.
Making promise is easy. The hard part is keeping it.
Switch Friend Code: SW-3533-1743-6611 | My Nintendo: azooooz
"we will launch it in March, the final month of the fiscal year. The fact that we can only ship for one month during this fiscal year was part of the background for determining the annual shipment number. Please also be advised that we have been preparing for a possible increase in demand as a result of the presentation and the hands-on experiences next January."
That "for one month" could be interpreted that they will sell it for one whole month before the end of the fiscal year, i.e. early March release. Or maybe I'm reading too much into his word choices. :---D
Also, they can ramp up the production if needed.
@BiasedSonyFan
I'm pretty sure I put it down as 800GFLOPs. But on a log scale and in real world use 100GFLOPs either way doesn't make much difference. Think about the much greater difference between the PS4 and XBOne and how much of a deal has been made about it. If it wasn't for digital foundry frame rate analysis I doubt anyone would have noticed the gap in actual game performance.
Some playlists: Top All Time Songs, Top Last Year
An opinion is only respectable if it can be defended. Respect people, not opinions
I agree that it won't matter to third parties unless the switch is a major hit.
Here's a question that's not being asked, let's say the Switch does get some sort of meaningful third party support. Who exactly does that pull in other than gamers who still rock Nintendo only.
From a third mostly western party and consumer level the Switch is in a awkward space between two console refreshes, and it presumably won't support VR like the other two systems will.
I'm a bit curious after seeing the Pro and Switch how Microsoft plans to market the Scorpio.
WAT!
Hey check out my awesome new youtube channel shingi70 where I update weekly on the latest gaming and comic news form a level headed perspective.
@BiasedSonyFan
Sure but a lot of that depends on what people are comparing it to. It doesn't change the fact that the actual difference in content that's possible isn't really there. For example the Wii could have been a lot more powerful than it was but it probably wouldn't have made much of a difference in the perception. Imagine if the Wii had been as capable as the Vita even as a home console. Would it have changed anything in terms of public perception? Other than cost, probably not.
With the PS4 and XBOne? There's more or less no gap between them. But they're about the same price with more or less the same library of games. So all of a sudden the gap in power, as small as it is, really mattered. Even though they can basically run all the same games at more or less the same quality.
So with the Switch I don't think it matters much in the end whether it's 500GFLOPS, 1TFLOPS or somewhere between. It'll make a difference for how well games on it run for sure and fingers crossed it's leans towards the latter. But whatever it is people are still going to perceive it as underpowered. It might be the difference between 30fps and 60fps but, other than extreme edge cases, it's not going to be the difference between a port being possible or not.
I think one thing Nintendo needs is to retain exclusives like Monster Hunter, which according to the head of Capcom may now start appearing on PS4 & Xbox One to drive sales in the West, and seek to sign up new exclusive deals. Especially when Monster Hunter kept 3DS systems selling late into its life.
NEW WEBSITE LAUNCHED! Regular opinion articles, retro game reviews and impression pieces on new games! ENGAGE VG: EngageVG.com
@erv It would've helped if Nintendo bought Capcom. They already missed out on Atlus which ended up going to Sega. They could do with some more studios/developers to bolster their exclusives.
NEW WEBSITE LAUNCHED! Regular opinion articles, retro game reviews and impression pieces on new games! ENGAGE VG: EngageVG.com
@FragRed
I don't think there's much risk of Monster Hunter not appearing on the Switch. If you break down sales of all Monster Hunter games by platform? Portable versions have outsold home console versions by ~5:1. So I think it's fair to assume that the Switch version will outsell the PS4 version. Even if it's not exclusive it probably won't matter much.
@FragRed
Frankly I think you've got it backwards. Japan is where Monster Hunter lives or dies and in Japan portable gaming is king. So I don't think the game existing on the PS4 and XBOne is going to make much of a difference. Most of the sales will be on the 3DS and the Switch in Japan.
Capcom wanting Monster Hunter to be big on the PS4/XBOne? I don't think that's going to have an impact on the Switch. Remember that they tried to do the same with the Wii, PS3, 360 and Wii U. Hasn't worked yet. But it remains a success on portable systems in Japan.
@MarcelRguez
That's the question though, what western fanbase? In Japan the game doesn't sell well on home consoles because home consoles aren't as popular anymore. In the West the game doesn't sell well full stop. I don't think them trying to build an audience for the game on the PS4 outside of the Japan hurts the Switch. Because the game isn't going to sell on the PS4 in Japan and it's not selling outside of Japan currently.
It's a move that might pay off for Capcom but even if it does I highly doubt it impacts the Switch at all.
Some playlists: Top All Time Songs, Top Last Year
An opinion is only respectable if it can be defended. Respect people, not opinions
Forums
Topic: The Nintendo Switch Thread
Posts 6,001 to 6,020 of 69,785
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic