I have it in Japanese, not English! Trust me, it's great when there's no other option, and playable for sure, but English is so much better. You don't have to worry about translation in sending the save data over to 3DS so that you can use the fan translated version when you craft and then send the save data back...
Not that any of that stuff takes terribly long to do and if you're determined to figure it out you can definitely do so but... it's just so much better in a language you can understand.
Plus everyone else will be playing this time so you get the experience of hunting alongside everyone else as they progress through the game, including my bro who will be hunting with me. And when he stops by to visit we can play locally via local wireless, like we used to in the Splatoon 2 Salmon Run days
Psalms 22:16 (1,000 yrs before Christ)
They pierced My hands and feet
Isaiah 53:5 (700 yrs before Christ)
He was pierced for our transgressions
@JaxonH MH is the first real reason I need a second Switch. My son and I had the last 2 3ds versions and had a blast playing together. Don't feel like spending $360 just for the both of us to play.
John 8:7 He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone.
MERG said:
If I was only ever able to have Monster Hunter and EO games in the future, I would be a happy man.
@Knuckles-Fajita
Negative. No English language update for the JP version, unless they plan to surprise everyone with an unannounced update. Which almost certainly isn't the case
Psalms 22:16 (1,000 yrs before Christ)
They pierced My hands and feet
Isaiah 53:5 (700 yrs before Christ)
He was pierced for our transgressions
@Tsurii Name one time he's done that for an IP that may never see the light of day? There was no way to know if ARMS would ever release. At least for Lucas, Roy, and Greninja they were from existing franchises.
I can't help but think that Nintendo's going to release the rest of the paid online launch info in an early September Direct, maybe alongside another big Smash segment.
Go Vacation's great aside from the need for motion even with it off.
If ever a sequel was to come, that would be one of the things to fix. And the camera control.
After studying and comparing the subscription prices between Nintendo and Sony/Microsoft (yes, they both have the same price for subscription), I think I know the reason why Nintendo's offering is much lower than its competitors:
1- Nintendo is a gaming company as a whole, which gains profit by only selling game software and hardware, while Sony and Microsoft are more of media entertainment companies that gain profit from other departments in addition to the PlayStation and Xbox divisions respectively, which they need to cover the net loss of other departments by increasing the prices of their subscription plans to avoid net loss of the whole company. On the other hand, Nintendo is focusing on only selling games, so $20 per year is going to harm them in long term, providing that Switch Online Subscription is a success.
2- Nintendo is new to the online subscription, and they are testing waters with how this will reflect them through people's receptions towards it.
3- Maybe this is just me, but I think Nintendo, or Kimishima, predicted the increased demand for the Switch and suggested this lower price to appeal more people into buying the switch and confident enough that they, Nintendo, will provide better services that make them worth the price.
Making promise is easy. The hard part is keeping it.
Switch Friend Code: SW-3533-1743-6611 | My Nintendo: azooooz
@toiletduck The only way the cancellation could truly be a positive is while the other platforms have Steep, Switch gets 1080. But I really doubt that's the case.
@toiletduck@Grumblevolcano And in its place we get 2 even older UbiArt games that are likely real cheap on other consoles but will sell for full price on the Switch.
NEW WEBSITE LAUNCHED! Regular opinion articles, retro game reviews and impression pieces on new games! ENGAGE VG: EngageVG.com
@bluemage1989 Considering Smash is as much an advertising platform as it is a video game, it makes sense to put ARMS characters in it if they actually want to promote it as a franchise. It did OK, so I imagine they do. I realize it's another fighter, but it established a recognizable "brand" even if it didn't lead charts pretty well. Smash could elevate that pretty well. It would have to be Springman or RG since they're the real brand identity. Plus Sakurai likes adding characters due to unique actions rather than due to franchise loyalty, and those characters certainly have a lot he could play with. I don't think they're doing it, but they certainly could (and arguably should.)
@Grumblevolcano That email was depressing. It dropped all pretense of "we have more to reveal" and painted "cloud saves" as purely a backup and a feature for easily transferring to a new system rather than being able to log into different systems. I swear if they still hardware lock your games and deny you access to your data on other logged in Switches and just use cloud saves as a $20/yr safety net for when you have to throw out your $300 console I'm going to break some stuff....knightly's taco explosion will be the least of it. I just want to be able to log into my other Switch, download my digital games, and play with my same save data Nintendo....please tell me I can do this.
@Knuckles-Fajita "More people care than the number of people who remembered Steep was gonna be a thing."
Forums
Topic: The Nintendo Switch Thread
Posts 30,641 to 30,660 of 69,718
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic