Now we know that the VC for Wii is going down the drain. Why would NOA, or any company for that matter, remove a good product like this? WARN US NEXT TIME, OK?!
I know that Rare developed DKC, DKCII:DKQ, DKCIII:DDT, and DKC64, and Nintendo Published them. If DKC64 (assuming it was already on VC) was removed, then something is going on between Nintendo and Rare. Nintendo DOES own all rights to DK, but Rare did make the games, so it can't be forgotten. And for the removal from NOA's VC, WHY!? I DON'T HAVE EM, AND PLANED TO GET EM! WTF NOA?! Oh well, I still can get em for my SNES. (+ I have the GBA re release of DKC! have not beaten it {FLIPING HARD}, but it is still fun)
I never enjoyed the THQ titles I got. Why? Because I got the cruddy GBA games based off of T.V. shows or movies. and we all know the story with these kinds of games, and for those who don't, just look at Super Man for N64.
Comments 3
Re: SNES Classic SimCity Removed From Wii Virtual Console
Now we know that the VC for Wii is going down the drain. Why would NOA, or any company for that matter, remove a good product like this? WARN US NEXT TIME, OK?!
Re: Donkey Kong Country Trilogy To Be Pulled From Wii Virtual Console
I know that Rare developed DKC, DKCII:DKQ, DKCIII:DDT, and DKC64, and Nintendo Published them. If DKC64 (assuming it was already on VC) was removed, then something is going on between Nintendo and Rare. Nintendo DOES own all rights to DK, but Rare did make the games, so it can't be forgotten. And for the removal from NOA's VC, WHY!? I DON'T HAVE EM, AND PLANED TO GET EM! WTF NOA?! Oh well, I still can get em for my SNES. (+ I have the GBA re release of DKC! have not beaten it {FLIPING HARD}, but it is still fun)
Re: Game Over For THQ As Assets Are Purchased By Rival Publishers
I never enjoyed the THQ titles I got. Why? Because I got the cruddy GBA games based off of T.V. shows or movies. and we all know the story with these kinds of games, and for those who don't, just look at Super Man for N64.