Ok so the site is called "NintendoLife" but you guys let someone who doesn't understand Nintendo's history write up a list that is completely messed up.
WiiU should be easily in the bottom 3-4, easily. It barely sold. It cost Nintendo a ton of money. It was a miserable failure. 3rd party companies would barely touch it.
The fact that the WiiU was listed above the NES makes me question the authors age or even knowledge in general.
How the hell can the system that solely revived the US market after the Atari 80's crash be ranked the 3rd worst Nintendo console? What are you smoking?
The GBC could play the entire library of GB games and then some. So how is it worse? Lack of GBC only games? You don't have guidelines that make sense.
The GBA being ranked where it is, you didn't own a GBA.
The GC was considered a market failure even when it had a bunch of great games.
The Nintendo 64 hurt the hell out of Nintendo vs Sony, but gave us OOT and Mario 64 and Majora's mask.
I just don't get this list at all. It was written by someone who doesn't understand Nintendo, the market and how each system affected gamers at the time of release.
I can't believe you ranked Switch #1 when it hasn't been on the market for 2 years yet. That is ridiculous.
Comments 1
Re: Guide: Every Nintendo Console Ranked From Worst To Best
Ok so the site is called "NintendoLife" but you guys let someone who doesn't understand Nintendo's history write up a list that is completely messed up.
WiiU should be easily in the bottom 3-4, easily. It barely sold. It cost Nintendo a ton of money. It was a miserable failure. 3rd party companies would barely touch it.
The fact that the WiiU was listed above the NES makes me question the authors age or even knowledge in general.
How the hell can the system that solely revived the US market after the Atari 80's crash be ranked the 3rd worst Nintendo console? What are you smoking?
The GBC could play the entire library of GB games and then some. So how is it worse? Lack of GBC only games? You don't have guidelines that make sense.
The GBA being ranked where it is, you didn't own a GBA.
The GC was considered a market failure even when it had a bunch of great games.
The Nintendo 64 hurt the hell out of Nintendo vs Sony, but gave us OOT and Mario 64 and Majora's mask.
I just don't get this list at all. It was written by someone who doesn't understand Nintendo, the market and how each system affected gamers at the time of release.
I can't believe you ranked Switch #1 when it hasn't been on the market for 2 years yet. That is ridiculous.