This is disgusting that they even give you this option. I know Nintendo is supposed to specialize in family friendly games, but this would make more sense if it was a cheat or something. Back in the day, games were challenging for a reason. Now you can just breeze by any stage without any rewarding feeling for beating it. I seriously hope Nintendo doesn't do this in future Mario games but that's unlikely because they're using it Mario 3D World, 3D Land, and Super Mario U. I think it's going to be a regular thing now and that's really disappointing.
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
"When expecting booby traps, always send the boob in first." -Megatron-
3DS Friend Code: 3153-3802-3566 | Nintendo Network ID: coldfusion88
This is disgusting that they even give you this option. I know Nintendo is supposed to specialize in family friendly games, but this would make more sense if it was a cheat or something. Back in the day, games were challenging for a reason. Now you can just breeze by any stage without any rewarding feeling for beating it. I seriously hope Nintendo doesn't do this in future Mario games but that's unlikely because they're using it Mario 3D World, 3D Land, and Super Mario U. I think it's going to be a regular thing now and that's really disappointing.
Wait, you failed that many times at a level and saw that? Woah, you really need it then because it dont seem you can handle. Heck, you're probably upset even with the suit you still failed the level. I bet you failed so many times, the game just gave you a fully completed level!
Do you like videogames? If so, you must know
It's dangerous to go Alone.
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
I don't care if it's just a kids game. Teaching children that "everyone is a winner" is a bad lesson. If you don't have skill and just suck, you should lose.
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
I don't care if it's just a kids game. Teaching children that "everyone is a winner" is a bad lesson. If you don't have skill and just suck, you should lose.
You sound like the guy who pre ordered a lot of Rosalina amiibos "If you don't f****** buy, u don't f****** get it, I'm so f****** smart cause i have no life or heart to care about kids and their feelings cause i prey on their f******* sadness."
Do you like videogames? If so, you must know
It's dangerous to go Alone.
So you just feel that you can't brag about beating a level because there is an optional way to keep progressing?
Like I said, back in the day, Nintendo games were challenging and beating a stage or a hard boss gave you a sense of accomplishment. Now all of that is flushed down the toilet and everyone is a winner. It's pathetic.
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
I don't care if it's just a kids game. Teaching children that "everyone is a winner" is a bad lesson. If you don't have skill and just suck, you should lose.
You sound like the guy who pre ordered a lot of Rosalina amiibos "If you don't f****** buy, u don't f****** get it, I'm so f****** smart cause i have no life or heart to care about kids and their feelings cause i prey on their f******* sadness."
I've never bought an amibo and have no idea what you're trying to say.
So you just feel that you can't brag about beating a level because there is an optional way to keep progressing?
Like I said, back in the day, Nintendo games were challenging and beating a stage or a hard boss gave you a sense of accomplishment. Now all of that is flushed down the toilet and everyone is a winner. It's pathetic.
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
I don't care if it's just a kids game. Teaching children that "everyone is a winner" is a bad lesson. If you don't have skill and just suck, you should lose.
You sound like the guy who pre ordered a lot of Rosalina amiibos "If you don't f****** buy, u don't f****** get it, I'm so f****** smart cause i have no life or heart to care about kids and their feelings cause i prey on their f******* sadness."
I've never bought an amibo and have no idea what you're trying to say.
You're mostly saying if they don't win, or can't win, they shouldn't be able to do the next level. That sucks the joy out of games. Kids want to turn on a game, play a few levels, do something else. They don't want to be trapped on a level. The white tanooki suit is for quick players and will not let you 100% the game as you can't change out of it. The suit appeals to casuals and is meant to be ignored by hard cores. But hey, I guess not all people can understand such confusing concepts meant to please the masses.
Do you like videogames? If so, you must know
It's dangerous to go Alone.
You're mostly saying if they don't win, or can't win, they shouldn't be able to do the next level. That sucks the joy out of games.
Exactly, and that's the way it should always be. If it sucks the joy out a game, then you just suck. Games, and the older Mario games were about trial and error.
It's like, I just love a cowboy
You know
I'm just like, I just, I know, it's bad
But I'm just like
Can I just like, hang off the back of your horse
And can you go a little faster?!
as everyone else says. It's a choice. It's also an incentive to keep playing for younger children who don't have the hand eye coordination. That way they don't complain to the parent and the parent might just, i dunno, sell the game back or the kid gives up and the game gathers dust for months until the parent complains and sells it back because said child won't play it anymore.
I don't care if it's just a kids game. Teaching children that "everyone is a winner" is a bad lesson. If you don't have skill and just suck, you should lose.
If you hadn't noticed, Nintendo's bread and butter are the families and kids. The kids who grew up in the 80's who now have kids. Yeah those folks. It wouldn't be a good idea to make things TOO hard that it'll stop a kid in there tracks and make the parents feel like it was wasted money cuz said child doesn't want to continue.This everyone's a winner BS, i totally understand. That is supposed to apply in life like School, work, and life in general. Games are an escape, a hobby, a profession even. The majority of us don't care about this white tanooki suit stuff. I never picked it up. My girlfriend and niece did cuz they sucked.
"When expecting booby traps, always send the boob in first." -Megatron-
3DS Friend Code: 3153-3802-3566 | Nintendo Network ID: coldfusion88
You're mostly saying if they don't win, or can't win, they shouldn't be able to do the next level. That sucks the joy out of games.
Exactly, and that's the way it should always be. If it sucks the joy out a game, then you just suck. Games, and the older Mario games were about trial and error.
Of course some kids aren't good at Mario. I think you're upset because you keep failing the levels and seeing the white tanooki suit, Nintendo mostly saying you suck. I've only ever once had the suit show up for me because the levels are pretty simple, but some kids dont see levels as simple.
Do you like videogames? If so, you must know
It's dangerous to go Alone.
aIf you hadn't noticed, Nintendo's bread and butter are the families and kids. The kids who grew up in the 80's who now have kids. Yeah those folks. It wouldn't be a good idea to make things TOO hard that it'll stop a kid in there tracks and make the parents feel like it was wasted money cuz said child doesn't want to continue.This everyone's a winner BS, i totally understand. That is supposed to apply in life like School, work, and life in general. Games are an escape, a hobby, a profession even. The majority of us don't care about this white tanooki suit stuff. I never picked it up. My girlfriend and niece did cuz they sucked.
Games for the classic NES were meant for kids too. Todays society is much more sensitive and soft compared to back then. I don't think there is any denying that.
Forums
Topic: White Tanooki suit is a horrible idea
Posts 1 to 20 of 64
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.