Topic: The Nintendo Switch Thread

Phill Spencer would love to release the Call of Duty franchise on Switch.

https://www.ign.com/articles/phil-spencer-would-love-to-see-c...

@Giancarlothomaz Microsoft can barely even manage to release games on their own console, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

Xbox's time is ^s_o^o_n

@JaxonH you know I hadn’t considered that. I suppose that components would be cheap enough now to warrant that. That would make me buy two switches actually as the lite would be my travel switch.

@Ryu_Niiyama
A Lite OLED would be a definite must have.

I switched over to the Lite when it released, but OLED was too good. Battery life and screen, kickstand... yum. But a Lite OLED? Ya, I'd probably use that at work most days just cause it would be so small. Would need better battery life though.

@JaxonH have you not realized that Switch is hindering the games Nintendo subsidiaries and close partners develop for then, all the games released in this year for Switch have techinal isseus(Kirby and the Forgotten Land showed this, Xenoblade Chonicles 3 showed this and now Bayonetta 3 showed this, Legend of Zelda Tears of the Kingdom will also have a performance isseu like like Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild, Metroid Prime 4 problaby will have techinal isseus, Pikmin 4 will also have a techinal isseus), do you know all this games have in commom they tried to be ambitous but the limited hardware of Switch countdt keep up, Switch is made for simple games not this ambitous games that Nintendo is releasing in the past 2 years, the sad truth we need to admit Nintendo made a lot of sacrifices for the hybrid concept of Switch to work, but now, Switch aging hardware is hindering Nintendo gameplay and it partners when they want to develop a game on the console.

@Eagly so he act like a typical politician

@Giancarlothomaz
It's not that I disagree with the core of what you're saying. And it's not even that I wouldn't like a new system. But there's nuance in all things. Declaring it to be desperately needed as if there's some kind of imminent crisis playing out... it's sensationalist nonsense.

It's true that some games have had some performance issues that more power could potentially solve. But for the most part, games look good and run well enough. You're not gonna get perfection in most cases. But perfection isn't required.

More importantly, things will be just fine regardless. Zelda will be just fine regardless. The first was basically perfect aside from one spot in the forest, and that was the first game they ever developed. The next one should be even better. Bayonetta 3 is just fine. It looks gorgeous. It runs at 60 frames barring kaiju battles... just because games could be better on a new system doesn't mean it's needed.

There are some games with genuine issues, but Zelda and Bayonetta aren't it. If you're gonna make an argument something is "needed" at least use a game that has real and persistent issues to a degree that severely impacts enjoyment.

But the point is, Switch has been doing just fine the last 5 years. More than just fine. And games have gotten better and better over time as fewer and fewer devs rush trash ports onto the system (though we still get some from time to time, cough cough Alan Wake). On average, 1st party and exclusive games look and run better today than they did 5 years ago. Not worse. On average, multiplat games look and run better today than they did 5 years ago. Not worse.

And if Switch was just fine the last 5 years when it was getting way worse quality, it is certainly fine now. Nothing has changed to warrant some imminent need for new hardware. Would it be nice? Oh sure! Would games look and run even better? Most definitely! Is it "imminently needed"? Heck no

I'd argue and will continue to argue that new hardware is needed. But that's a different argument than trying to say that games on Switch are not compelling in spite of the limitation.

Honestly, the performance compromise equation for Switch compared to the competition hasn't changed much since launch. And honestly it won't change much after a revision is released either. All that has changed is that the gap between Switch and a potential revision is now huge

Post revision? People will still say Switch is sub-par, because it will be. You'll be compromising on performance for portability still. What sucks now is more that we are currently also compromising on some performance for no reason. At least from a consumer POV

My recommendation is to stop obsessing over that which you have no control over, just sit back and enjoy the endless string of masterpiece titles releasing back to back to back to back.

We're in the prime of Switch's life. Enjoy it. Stop worrying about new hardware. It comes when it comes, and nothing anyone here says or does will change that fact.

We're getting straight blessed. Savor it.

@NeonPizza
Nothing wrong with imagination, but most of that is unrealistic and almost certainly won't happen.

I'm pretty much of the view that new more powerful hardware alongside TotK looks to be very likely and that new hardware in general would be good to see but if that's doesn't end up being the case and it happens in 2025 instead (where 2023 is something like Switch Lite OLED), it's not a dealbreaker. I'll just happily continue using my 2017 Switch and hope it doesn't break.

@JaxonH @NeonPizza
Honestly? A spec in the ballpark of the PS4 with some additional modern tricks and an OLED screen are basically a given. I don't think they'd drop the resolution of the screen bellow 720p or reduce the size so that's also a super safe bet. And at this stage? I think HDR is a pretty easy step to take, especially if you have an OLED screen

But those other ideas, ignoring the obviously nonsense ones. I think 3D has basically been and gone at this point so I wouldn't bet on it making any sort of comeback. If you were doing a Wii-style pointer these days you'd probably go the camera pointing at the player route. But honestly I think just having straight Gyro is close enough for most types of content. VR is the space for that kind of thing these days

Higher refresh rates? I mean, nothing stopping that from being a thing. If you can output 4K properly you can output 120fps. I also think that VRR is an obvious thing to include for a gaming console that the Switch is a bit of an outlier not having at this point. I'd argue analogue triggers sit in the same space, an obvious move that the Switch seems a bit out of place to not have

Personally erring on the side of new hardware in 2023, coinciding with ToTK and new Mario game. But I'm curious, all the predictive talk above offers 2025 as the alternative... why is 2024 so unlikely not to even get a mention?

@gcunit If Nintendo's not releasing more powerful hardware alongside TotK, they'd likely do it once the current Nintendo related Switch support is over. Currently we know Sparks of Hope is getting Rayman DLC at some point by the end of 2024 according to the eshop and Splatoon 3 is getting content until September 2024 according to the Splatoon 3 Direct which would suggest 2025 is a point where there'd be no current Nintendo related Switch support.

Backwards compatibility is my main concern with whatever platform Nintendo offers next.

If Nintendo decide to ask their customers to start their collection from scratch, I'll probably pass.

@Magician I'd be shocked if Switch 2 wasn't b/c. Nintendo consistently supports b/c between their portable hardware generations, going back at least one gen.

Given how barren ps5/seriesx look (relatively speaking ) I feel like we should just enjoy the games. Everything could use more power, but I still say dev creativity, optimization and gameplay make games fun.

As always I just want Nintendo to iterate on the switch. It’s my largest game library so if I can’t port that forward I will be disappointed.

I still want a 3ds player though. Too bad all the mod houses have gone under I think. I just wanna play on a screen that doesn’t make me squint.

@Ralizah I'm hopeful the next Nintendo platform will offer b/c with Switch cartridges, but I'm not so optimistic as to believe it'll be an assumed feature.

@gcunit
Not only timelines mentioned by Grumble, but also the fact a revision comes every two years, so if no Switch 2 we'll at least get a revision, and they won't release a revision and only give it 1 year shelf life.

Furthermore, Switch is still selling better than it was in 2019 (there's been drops from 2020-2021 numbers, but it's still on track for 20+ million). So if they don't release Switch 2 in 2023, it's likely because Switch is still selling so well. Which means they're waiting for sales to slow more. And 1 year isn't enough for sales to slow that much.

Hmm, its been several years, but with game development getting back to some form of normalcy I wonder if we'll hear about Tokyo Ogre Gate and/or Cecile from CyberConnect2 next year?