Rain On Your Parade wants very much to be the next Untitled Goose Game. It so desperately needs to be that quirky breakout hit, the virtual talk of the water cooler, the “have you seen that cloud game?” game, spawn of a trillion thinkpieces.
To be fair, it’s a strong concept. You take control of a rain cloud and, er, rain on stuff. Each short single-player stage sees you given one or more objectives, usually along the lines of “soak X” or “don’t soak X”. Things are complicated by the erratic (not erotic) reactions of the “hoomans” you happen to rain upon, and their interaction with the physics that can cause objects you need to soak to get kicked off-screen in a panic, or otherwise simply get in the way of your cloudy goals.
So, yes, a good idea, in theory. Our problem is that we found it all came across as rather uninspired in its execution and occasionally downright irritating in its presentation. Mostly, it’s just a little bit boring, in much the same manner as a wet weekend. Perhaps that’s intentional.
Moving with the analogue stick, you press and hold 'A' to rain. There’s a water metre on the right of the screen that empties as you do the same, but it can be refilled (on certain levels) by hovering over a source of moisture (usually water, but you're also able to rain poison, oil and other substances). Later, you’re also able to create a tornado, blanket the world in snow and unleash lightning strikes. Despite these, there’s never a whole lot to it and we got the impression that the aesthetics and humorous writing are intended to fill in the blanks. They don’t. In fact, we found the tone and writing of the thing a little bit… what is it the kids say now? Oh, yes – cringe. It’s all very twee and affected in a wearyingly familiar sort of way.
However, despite the whole thing feeling a touch lacking, Rain On Your Parade absolutely isn’t without merit. As the game rolls on (like, well, a cloud), your objectives get a fair bit more diverse and require at least a little puzzle-solving and exploration; a school-based level is an early highlight, seeing you undertake multiple disparate objectives as a pleasant preview of the more complex demands to come. There’s also something to be said for the game’s unpredictability; you won’t know where you’re going or what you’ll be asked to do next, and some of the diversions are good for a smile – there’s a full-level homage to a popular stealth series that was enjoyably out-there, and despite a few other whole-level references to other games (Katamari Damacy, etc), Rain On Your Parade feels very much its own thing.
It’s nice, and a bit of a reversal of the usual outcome, to find a game with such an inauspicious start turn into something better. It’s far from perfect – and, to be frank, only just scrapes “good” – but the aforementioned variety does go some way towards making even the dull-as-rainwater early stages more palatable; they may be a bit rubbish, but you’ll be playing them for about a minute apiece, tops. Just like the weather, this one keeps changing.
The quickfire variety does the game a lot of favours, but you’ll smirk and snort with recognition at a Resident Evil reference or momentary flash of invention, rather than laugh out loud at the carnage as per the likes of Untitled Goose Game. Barring a couple of minor difficulty spikes, the whole thing will last you three hours at most, not counting the pretty decent post-game content – new challenges on existing stages and a brand new mode that changes things up in a vaguely interesting way.
Visually it’s all quite slick, with an interesting cardboard aesthetic and a generally smooth framerate – things struggle just a touch on the larger stages, but it’s nothing to kick up a fuss about. We weren’t particularly impressed with the sound design – the sound of rain hitting a surface is (to this writer) one of the most relaxing in existence, and hearing different kind of pitter-patter depending on what you choose to soak would have been a relatively simple-seeming way to immerse the player in the game’s world just that little bit more.
You can also customise your cloud’s default colour and, in a neat touch, manually draw a face on it. It’s a cute feature that allows you to affect a bit more of a personal touch on the game, or just draw genitalia on your cloud as so many of you are no doubt desperate to do.
Conclusion
There’s something just a tiny bit cynical about the “please like me!!” cutesiness of Rain On Your Parade, but despite our best efforts we ended up doing so. Just. It coasts on “what will they do next?” novelty rather than any kind of meaty, significant gameplay, but sometimes that’s okay. It’s something new, which is appealing, and the toybox feel of the proceedings lends itself to a broad appeal – we can see young kids and people who vibe with its twee presentation getting a kick out of it. If you've had your fill of 'cutesy', though, you might find yourself hoping for a break in the clouds.
Comments (37)
Playing it on Game Pass (what a surprise) and it's a decent little game, definitely not oscsr-worthy, but it's worth a shot.
This is an 8/10 at least - a great game that should not be ignored.
@HotGoomba Same. Played on gamepass and got bored really fast. I wouldn't recommend anyone buying this at full price. I'd give it a 5/10
I saw some longish footage for this game and it looks like a really clever and different idea for a game. A tad humorous, but not that much as the reviewer here has said. It looks a tad fiddly to play but I don't know if that was just the player on the footage.
Maybe a bargain basement purchase.
I’m interested in learning why we had to clarify “erratic” was not “erotic.” Somewhere in an alternate dimension, there is a Gal Gun-esque version of this game that would appeal to others outside the twee crowd.
It’s a bummer to hear this is a bit boring, but I’ll likely still get it. Anything that even slightly resembles Katamari Damacy ends up on my wishlist.
@The_New_Butler It's like Kirby or Yoshi games in the sense that the game itself isn't very difficult, but there are plenty of challenging (and hidden) objectives if you are trying to 100% it. There's a new game plus mode after you beat the game that adds even more objectives as well. It's fine if you don't like it of course but I think it's a bit unfair to say it's too easy/shallow if you played less than 20% of the game.
I bought this on day of release and seeing as I'm not usually one for playing many Indy games I found this to be a delightful change of pace compared to all the open world games I seem to play.
I never tried that Goose game but I gotta I've had loads of fun with this one.Wasn't expecting a big score for it and 6 I suppose is fair although id probably go with a 7.
Think I might have to start playing more Indy games after this.
If this was just a great game, I'd probably forget about it, but it's more then that. It's cringey. That one fact makes me want to get it. Sometimes it's just fun cringing at bad jokes, and this game seems like it would lean heavily into that. I'll try and get it in a month or so.
I am enjoying it on Game Pass.
@The_New_Butler Like I said, of course it's fine if you don't like it.
I'm just saying the reasoning you provided doesn't necessarily apply. It'd be like saying I don't like bananas because they're sour, but really I just ate a banana that wasn't ripe yet. Telling other people that bananas are gross and sour - while accurate to my experience - isn't really a fair reflection of what bananas actually taste like.
In this case 20% of the game is what, 15 minutes? It's only a couple hours long to beat and maybe 5 hours max to 100%. I just think you may have jumped the gun on your assessment.
Okay, help a non-native speaker out here: "tweeness" is artificially attractive/too perfect according to Cambridge Dictionary. How am i meant to understand that in the context of this game? As in "it's trying too hard to be likeable"? "It's too obvious that it's going for a certain appeal"?
I'm just curious, would appreciate if someone could help me out a little here!
I have this one gamepass, and I mostly disagree with the conclusion ... but not a lot of the points oddly.
This isn't a game, it's an interactive entertainment piece in the same category as a walking simulator. Levels are stupid easy to pass, the game has a "no pressure" outlook, and if you like pop culture something is going to stand out for you (for me it's a stage where soaking people one after another brings up the DOTA 2, or I guess the quake arena seeing that's where they come from, kill streaks. MONSTER SOAK! GODLIKE! Good times) and you'll laugh. All and all it's hard to go though this experience and not feel like you had a good time at the end.
That being said ... this experience is not worth $20. Realistically, $10 is reasonable $5 is where I would say it's good value.
So I guess both me and Nintendolife are using a lot of words to say something that's actually pretty simple; this game is fine. Nothing really wrong with it, and you'll enjoy it. It's just not worth the price, and almost anything else you spend your $20 on is going to be objectively a better value.
Gamepass here as well. Made me smile at the MGS level. Wife asking me why I was laughing when I came up to bed last night. "Cloud? Cloud? Clooooouuudd?"
Better or worse than Donut County?
I was hoping that this was going to be more fun. Nothing has quite captured that Katamari magic yet.
@The_New_Butler I suppose I'd have to make some assumptions on your thoughts, but perhaps you might say "it's too easy for too long" or "the early mechanics are not deep enough to hold my interest and see the game through."
It just feels a little unfair in my opinion to say that it's "shallow" and that there is "little skill involved."
Going back to bananas for instance, if you said "I wish this sweeter", it would be if you held out a bit longer. If you don't want to wait for it to be sweeter, I think that's fine too, but that doesn't mean it isn't sweet. If you said, "I wish this was crunchy", then yeah, you're definitely not going to like it.
If you like the concept, but you wish the game itself was deeper and more challenging, you just have to get a little further. I think the Kirby games are a great parallel - the challenge/depth isn't in beating the game, it's in 100%ing it.
Sorry, maybe I'm just having a bad day.. I wasn't trying to pick a fight or anything. Honestly, maybe I was a bit over-surprised at your take here because I 99% agree with your opinions in general 🤷♂️ I just really liked Rain on Your Parade. It made me laugh and smile when things have been difficult, and I'd hate for other people to miss that because they might think they wouldn't enjoy the game for maybe the wrong reasons.
Nah, this game was unbelievably boring... nothing fun here
Pretty much exactly how I felt about Untitled Goose Game. Way too brief, and not enough scope to keep me interested. And not as fun or interesting as it thinks it is.
@everynowandben at least an 8? So you’d give it a 9 even. To me, and the reviewer it’s a 6 (I’d even say a 6 is generous, but ymmv).
See how that works? Opinions, man.
Anyway, I’ve been playing it on GP (where the performance is so-so on og Xbone so good on the devs for optimizing it a bit better on Switch -at least from what I’ve read around-). I’m all for quirky games with simple yet inventive and satisfying gameplay (Katamari Damacy is a good example) but coming from the lovely trailer, in reality the game is a bit shallow. And even audiovisually, it’s inconsistent and lacks variety in both visuals and audio. With the staggering amount of good games on Switch, and the fact that I was intrigued by the concept and trailer but came away disappointed, I can’t recommend this. But if it sounds cool to y’all and you’ve looked at a few walkthroughs on YT, go for it!
I’m glad we can have this kind of games and that there’s an audience for them (and I identify myself with being part of that audience, I just found it boring), hope to seem more of them coming.
@StefanN Tweeness is like artificial cuteness. So like store-bought ‘hand-knitted’ jumpers, if that makes sense. Or the sort of person who systematically makes their house look ‘cute’ and ‘homey’ instead of letting it develop organically.
@The_New_Butler Thanks, you too 🙂
played it with kids on gamepass fun for 5 minutes but not worth that price thats in sane. 75% sale its recomended any more not worth it
@DashKappei Yes, I'd say it's at least great, maybe even excellent. I really enjoyed it. I thought the variety of ideas and objectives were fun and funny. I was especially impressed with how many genres they managed to cover in a game about a cloud from stealth to tower defense - even first-person shooter. Does that answer your question? I guess I'm not sure what you were asking.
@nessisonett Haha, those are some great examples, thank you! But i wanted to ask more or less what it means in the context of this game/review. But i think i get it now. The reviewer probably meant it's created in a way that outright says "i want to look cute for you", right? 😄 As opposed to...idk, "Good Job!" for example. That game is really cute, but in a more classy, less on-the-nose kind of way.
@everynowandben Sorry to crash the conversation, just wanted to mention that it made me happy to read that this game helped you through difficult times! (not a developer or anything, just happy for you)
@StefanN You’re pretty much there yeah! The reviewer most likely means it in the sense that the game’s aesthetic and humour feels artificially whimsical. A good example of ‘twee’ humour in this way would be a viral video of a cat doing something cute and funny, except it took hours of multiple takes to actually get that video.
Nah, this is a pretty good game. Gonna disagree here.
It is a good game but no replay value. I will finish it on gamepass.
@Rohanrocks88 it is MGS but its not in any of the screenshots, if anything the level is more like MGS1 than MGS2. Kind of unrelated but I love MGS2 so much, one of my favourite games of all time.
Zion won't be happy about that score.
Was fun to get the 1000gs but that is about it. Not a bad game but definitely a one-and-done.
Poor wormy.
I really like this game and have had fun playing it for a couple hours on my Switch, but I do wish it ran at 60fps. I'd guess it's running at 50 or so most of the time. It is very playable, but it'd just be so satisfying to rain and lightning bolt at 60. Anyways it's a lovely game that had a lot of love poured into it and should appeal to fans of Katamari, What the Golf, Untitled Goose Game, and that make everything fall down a hole game with the raccoon you talk to game[Donut County, I looked it up]
Played this on Game Pass. If you like the goose game you’ll probably like this. I didn’t.
@nessisonett Aaaah thank you so much, that's a great explanation! 😄
Played it on GamePass and had enough after like 20 minutes. It's one of those games that never decides who it's for and ends up being for no one. It looks and plays like a game for kids but is also surprisingly violent (people are just constantly screaming as you set them on fire or poison them) while the tons of clumsily shoehorned references to classic games kids aren't going to understand was a huge turn off. It was like the reverse of the Steve Buscemi meme and the devs were three kids in a trenchcoat saying, "Hello fellow olds!" calling Frogger, a game that came out in 1981, a "90s game" (maybe because they saw it on Seinfeld?). When the target audience for those references is rolling their eyes every time they see one, you messed up.
With a more lighthearted tone (and references they might actually understand) it could have been a decent kids games, because the gameplay is just way too simple otherwise. It's no Goose Game for sure. The soundtrack isn't great, the sound effects are awful and repetitive.
I'd definitely recommend playing it on GamePass (it's on xCloud if you've got a friend who'll let you login to their account for 15 minutes) before shelling any money out for it.
Too bad, it look interesting so I was hoping to read a more positive review. However, I have to admit that this cracked me up:
"or just draw genitalia on your cloud as so many of you are no doubt desperate to do"
Ugh. Humans sure are dumb.
@60frames-please I mean, performance is mediocre on Xbox One too, so I’m not surprised it ain’t locked 60 on NSW considering the disparity in computation between the two platforms
Tap here to load 37 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...