The eagerly-awaited second game in the Oddworld Quintology, Xbox launch title Munch's Oddysee had a lot riding on it. Poached by Microsoft to bolster their hard-sold new console, much was expected of this long-awaited adventure; previous acclaimed title Abe's Exoddus promised Munch coming up next, with Squeek's Oddysee to follow – not to mention an indeterminate number of promised "bonus games", of which Exoddus was the first.
Of course, hindsight shows that in a business as malleable as video games, you probably shouldn't make such big promises, and of course, the Oddworld series went off the intended path with games like Stranger's Wrath and a bevvy of cancelled instalments such as Hand of Odd, Sligstorm and The Brutal Ballad of Fangus Klot. Oddworld was something of a sadly forgotten commodity until, in 2010, The Oddboxx brought the entire franchise to Steam.
For the first time, Munch's Oddysee and Stranger's Wrath had escaped the confines of the Xbox. We've already seen the latter on Nintendo Switch in a really rather good port, and now Munch's Oddysee has followed suit with a technically superb version that looks great both handheld and on the dock. Unfortunately, such technical talent doesn't overcome the sad fact that Munch's Oddysee is the worst game in the Oddworld series, and always has been.
That's not to say it's outright terrible or has nothing to offer, but the move to 3D after Abe's Oddysee and Exoddus was an awkward one, with the game's opening area immediately setting off alarm bells as you take control of Abe and run around collecting small green globs called "spooce" and use them to activate mechanisms. It's not hugely different from the tutorial-heavy exhaustion of the opening stages of Abe's Exoddus, but it's a stark reminder that game design was in something of a weird place back in 2001.
You're taught how to navigate the world, utilise the series-defining Gamespeak feature to command fellow Mudokons, and generally pushed to perfect extremely specific actions in a specific order for the entire opening. This creates a fragmented, inorganic feeling that never goes away; it's in keeping with the feel of its predecessors, which took the "cinematic platformer" approach meaning every step was carefully measured, but it doesn't suit the 3D space in the slightest.
As well as Abe, you'll (of course) be able to play as the titular Munch on his quest to save his species, switching between the pair to solve puzzles. Each has their own special skills, but there's not a lot to them – Abe can possess creatures as before and command fellow Mudokons, whereas Munch can swim and order around the slightly nightmarish Tribble-like Fuzzies. Much of the co-operation simply amounts to opening doors for one another and having Abe ferry Munch around the levels. Not exactly mind-expanding, and it all feels very rote.
Play control is shaky and doesn't feel brilliantly thought-out – you use the B button for an enormous number of context-sensitive actions, and you'll find yourself frequently doing the wrong thing. Your positioning is so finicky sometimes you'll need to physically move objects away from other objects, lest the game has no idea what on earth you're trying to do.
Generally, there are too many commands applied to too few buttons, which raises the question of why the Gamespeak system doesn't use a modifier like in the Abe games – such as holding L1 or L2 then pushing a button to select the phrase. In Munch's Oddysee, everything's applied to the face buttons. The Switch has more inputs than an original Xbox controller, so why not make use of them? For the sake of accuracy? This isn't some vintage arcade title, it's a disappointing follow-up to a beloved PlayStation blockbuster. Nobody's going to get upset if things are changed for the better.
The camera has a tendency to act out in small spaces, which – as you'll recall – comprise most of the areas in the game. It's just part and parcel with the awkward feel of the whole thing. We suspect that at the time, Oddworld Inhabitants had a case of eyes bigger than their stomach. We can imagine this dual-character gameplay working on a grander scale, but levels here are short and repetitive, often requiring the same actions to be taken repeatedly with no variation at all.
The claustrophobic feel of the environments could be excused as a product of compromised design on a then-unfamiliar console, but there just isn't enough here that actually works to distract from the flaws. The traditional Oddworld creativity and humour is present in the cutscenes, but you aren't going to pay six times the price of the Steam version just to watch those.
It's a shame, because this is a terrific port from a technical point of view – it runs at a smooth 60 frames per second both handheld and docked, with graphical fidelity much higher than the original Xbox version. We experienced a few brief hitches in the hours we spent with Munch's Oddysee but besides that, it was all smooth sailing. We only wish this effort had been put into every aspect of the presentation, though. The menus are clunky and confusingly laid-out, but so is the game. Most baffling is a seemingly complete lack of subtitles – the characters all have unusual voices that can be tough to make out over the ambient sound, so their omission feels a little egregious.
Conclusion
It really sucks having to rate Munch's Oddysee so low – this version has obviously been made with care, but as the old saying goes you just can't polish a... well... you know. There are a handful of moments where things come together to a limited extent and the Oddworld magic show signs of life, but it's always been the ugly stepchild of the series and the already-on-Switch follow-up was a brilliant return to form – we hope that the existence of Munch's Oddysee on this format is a matter of simply getting it out of the way before a re-release of the much n better Oddworld: New n' Tasty and the upcoming Oddworld: Soulstorm.
Comments (47)
"It's not outright terrible" .. 3/10 LoL that is however a terrible score
@The_Top_Loader A 'terrible' score would be a 2/10... according to the scoring policy at least.
Ouch you guys really didn't like it did you!! To be fair your not wrong in most respects but i will still be picking it up, preferably physically, for the nostalgia and to be able to play it without having to have the OG Xbox set up. Can't deny i have a lot of great memories of playing this at launch.
Seeing this get blasted apart is therapeutic in a way... schadenfreude?
I’ll be picking up Stranger’s Wrath instead.
I really haven’t heard good things about this one. Some games might be better served just staying on their original consoles as they’ve not aged well. Better to have good memories of a game than ruin those memories seeing all the flaws in perspective.
@nessisonett I am with you on that. Well said.
Bet if this had Nintendo's name slap on it, it'll get at least a 7/10. There's nothing wrong with the game, if you enjoy it back on the old Xbox, it's literally the same game but in HD.
@nessisonett It seems like this game should have gone the remake route- or at least have had some QoL changes. Adding subtitles, changing the command layout, adjusting the camera, etc. would have helped, but the review makes it feel like there are more fundamental problems with the gameplay that would require an overhaul to improve the game.
People still cares review?Okay.
This game is flawed to hell and back, but something about it kept me pretty engaged the whole way through. Even tho it’s not polished, some of the mechanics were really cool. Plus odd world just has this unique charm that gets me. Definitely afraid to revisit, but I’d give it at least a retroactive 6
Wow that's a low score.
Better game than Stranger's Wrath IMO
This was the first xbox game I ever got. Crappy or not I’m getting it for nostalgia
Pac-man has never been so convoluted.
I love this game. Was one of my early games on xbox. To me it was a solid 7
Ouch, this is a very low score. I have the game locked and loaded on my Switch already. And I am pretty far into Strangers wrath, wich is a pretty fun game by the way. I hope the game works out for me.
I tried this at the time on Xbox and could not get into it, i really enjoyed the first 2D games.
Maybe i didn't give it enough of a chance, but it didn't give me the same feeling as the originals.
I remember playing this for a few minutes at a friend's house when it was still relatively new. Didn't come away impressed, but also didn't seem to think it was bad. In any case, I'll stick to Stranger's Wrath.
Hate to see it get such a low score seeing I’m such a big Oddworld fan, but I can’t argue with the points made.
Wow this guy really doesn't like this game lol.
I got it because it was on sale for $10 off and I had $10 sitting in my account making this a $10 purchase at the time. I never really played the original despite having owned an original Xbox and I got the better games in the series already so I figured might as well see what this is all about.
Hopefully Oddysee and Exoddus are the next 2 games coming.
I remember this being touted as one of the big launch titles for the original XBox, and then not hearing much about it afterwards. Maybe this is why.
@Dr_Corndog Halo was always the big Xbox launch game, Jet Set Radio Future was also a big deal. I think this was their attempt at getting an exclusive platformer to draw in a younger crowd, and Oddworld was a well known franchise, but this was never really that big of a deal. Strangers Wrath was the only attractive Oddworld exclusive they had, but that came out much later. I feel like this game was always a bit too odd for most platformer fans, but maybe that was the point.
This is the most unkind score that I have seen for this game. I get it, you love Abe's Oddysee and obviously hated Stranger's Wrath and this game. Personally, I think Stranger's Wrath is my favorite of the series. I do think Munch's Odyssey wasn't as good as the other games, but it is probably more a 6 or 7 out of 10.
It's bad but Strangers Wrath, Oddysey, Exoddus and New N' Tasty were A M A Z I N G do will be Soulstorm.
Munch was rushed, that's why it's so crappy. Even Lorne Lannig said that in some interview. HE apologized for it even!
What a waste of time and energy. Jesus.
Man, I like Munch's Oddysee. Ouch. Can't deny that it is the lesser of the series though.
Edit: A small correction:
"The Switch has more inputs than an original Xbox controller"
Unless, we're counting the home and capture buttons, which aren't really used for gameplay, then no, the inputs are the same. OG Xbox had no bumpers, but the black and white buttons were there instead. So the modifiers weren't implemented for some other reason.
I was one of the few, the brave, that had an OG XBOX instead of a PS2 (I even shelled out for the DVD controller...) and played the hell out of this game. I actually have some nostalgia for it but I've been debating whether I should leave it in the past or not. I kidn of want to play it but feeling cheap
@Dman10 Oh no, no. I liked Stranger's Wrath a lot. I love Oddworld, I just don't love Munch. And I've tried to, believe me!
"ugly stepchild" 😂😂
Nah, remakes of later Oddworld games, but no New'n'Tasty? Why?
btw, would like to see Soulstorm on Switch, should it be released at all of course.
This is only amusing as it used to be used as a bludgeon against the Gamecube for not having good games.
This, Shrek and Halo. I remember those fighting well in GameFAQs.
@BenAV 3/10 is beyond bad lol despite what their scoring system says
Get a second opinion if you have any interest in this game. This review seems to weight the games shortcomings a tad heavily. It may not have been the series’ strongest offering, but a 3/10 is severe. It’s 6.5 or 7 easy, though I don’t agree with charging what Nintendo does for these remasters.
A big Oddworld fan, I am enjoying this game and looking forward to more on Switch soon!
That header tagline! Hahaha so good! 😅
Oh well, I have found memories of this game as it came bundled with my Xbox so I played it right through.
@bluemage1989 Is avoiding the awkwardness of resetting up your X-Box really worth spending $30 (or the equivalent)? Some people waste their money double dipping on video games for the stupidest reasons.
You know this was actually a decent game for its time.
I got it for Xbox when it came out, and I thought it was at least a solid 8.
Then again, you guys and the rest of the games media gave Devils Third 3/10.
Simply all jumped on the band wagon and never even finished it, maybe played it.
Multiplayer was absolutely class.
And single player, yeah maybe dated, was fun for what it was.
That game was always a 7/10 as that Multiplayer saved it.
Basically don't listen to this review.
If you want to play it, give it a whirl.
I'm sure it hasn't dated great, but there's no misconceptions this is an old game remastered.
Should be reviewed on its merits of then.
Not now.
I think many games you reviewed deserved a 3 more than this game...
@BulbasaurusRex basically yeah it is worth $30 dollars to save having to move around everything in my gaming room set up, There is also the collector in me that just likes buying games i like to see on the shelf and this is one of them.
I don't know. I am still kind of interested in this one. Don't know if I will ever get around to playing it though.
This game really hasn't aged well and was a product of it's time in terms of game design. I do remember when it was coming up to both the launch of the Gnaecube and the XBox there were magazines dedicated to the launches of both comparing the exclusives and what was similar and out on the PS2 already. Probably the last great generation where there were loads of third party exclusives just developed for a single system which was also the last generation where all the systems were worth owning at the same time, although very expensive.
This is a very unfair score, the game is great, I mean 5 or 6 ok, but to give it 3 is a bit of a joke
The fact that this game has been given a 3 out of 10 is ridiculous. The game has so much humour and not just in the cutscenes, the animations the way the different characters interact and behave. Yes I agree the controls are a bit clunky and the level design a bit dated but this is an old almost retro game. I prefer this game to Stranger's Wrath. As for New and Tasty being a better game than this, NO WAY !! The puzzle solving and just out right funny gameplay and crazy ideas, make this a game worth experiencing. A 6 / 10 yes a 3 / 10 and you appear to have missed the point. Did you actually bother the finish the game before you rated it so low ?
The flip side of the coin when old games are brought to Switch in any form just remind me how old I am. I mean seriously I remember when this game was released the first time. The Xbox system release was a cause for so much buzz in my high school. LOL there was a good amount of kids that were betting it wouldn't catch on. The only thing everyone agreed on is because it's from Microsoft they have the resources to keep it alive a lot longer than anyone else.
I appreciate that Stuart Gipp (reviewer) was transparent about his reason for the terrible score, this is his least favourite Oddworld game. I loved this game on the original Xbox, and it's awesome to have this version to play on the switch. Bottom line: This port won't change your mind about the original game, but if you enjoyed playing it on the Xbox, you should enjoy this update, as it runs at 60 fps in a 16x9 aspect ration (except for the movies).
There should have been Switch ports of Abe's Oddysee and Munch's Oddysee.
Tap here to load 47 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...