It could be argued that the arcade football genre is more or less dead at this point. While these days FIFA and Pro Evolution Soccer take part in a constant two-horse race – the Celtic and Rangers of video games, if you will – the days when we were swimming in less realistic arcade-style football games are gone. Many long-time football gamers pine for the likes of RedCard, Super Sidekicks, ISS, Tecmo World Cup, Virtua Striker... not even the two Mario Strikers games have a modern-day equivalent. Step forward Golazo!, which tries to take football games back to the early ‘90s. Literally, in this case.
Set in the year 1992, Golazo! lets you choose from 51 international teams and take part in one of three modes: Quick Match, International Cup and World League (which is just a 20-team league format). The latter two are solo affairs only, which is a shame: we’d have loved the option to play them in co-op with a friend. Winning a game in any mode will earn you coins, which can be spent in the game’s shop on new kits, balls, goal celebrations, boots (or “snickers”, as the announcer mispronounces it) and accessories, including the frankly terrifying option to kit out your entire squad in hockey masks.
Gameplay is suitably coin-op inspired: the ball is stuck to your feet, you have just three types of kick to worry about – pass, lob and shoot – fouls are extremely rare, and everyone moves delightfully speedy (there’s a sprint button and a useful tackle-dodging button in there too should you need to turn on the flair). It also attempts to make things interesting by granting teams power-ups every now and then. One team could suddenly find themselves with super speed, making it even easier to dance around opponents, while the other could be granted super tackles, letting them perform ridiculous Shaolin Soccer-style slides right across the pitch. These can be turned off if they aren’t your cup of tea.
The presentation is a mixed bag. The game commits to the idea of ‘90s football by basing many of its fake players on famous faces from that era, although the most notable ones simply play the role of manager and don’t really feature beyond a caricature on the menu screens. More immediately satisfying are two retro-themed filters: the ‘arcade’ one is your typical CRT scanline filter and does what it does, but the ‘VHS’ one does a brilliant job of blurring your screen and washing out the colours just enough to fool you into thinking you’re watching a game someone taped off the telly back in the day. Thumbs down to the irritating announcer, though, who’s annoying tied to the game’s sound effects channel; this means you can turn him off, but need to turn off every other sound effect and the crowd noise along with him.
The list of teams on offer is a little strange too: while the obvious heavy-hitters like Argentina, Italy, Brazil and the newly-unified Germany are in there, there are some odd inclusions and omissions. With the greatest of respect to folks in Panama, Iran and the Congo (the latter of whom have never even qualified for a World Cup), it’s bewildering to see these teams included but not Scotland, who were actually decent in the ‘90s. And let’s not put it down to Argentinian developer Purple Tree possibly thinking England and the UK are the same thing, because Wales are in there too, despite having done sod all internationally until 2016 (sorry, Welsh supporters).
The only other issue is the AI, which depending on the difficulty you choose can tend to be either painfully dumb (our first three goals were all own goals, while at the other end the CPU regularly rounded our keeper then just stood there) or annoyingly decent (shooting isn’t always very accurate, but players on Normal and Hard seem to find the net more often than not). Naturally though, these sorts of games are generally best played with friends anyway, and multiplayer – with support for up to four players – is really the best way to go here, because everyone has the same advantages and disadvantages. You’ll want to play it on the TV, though; the camera’s too far out to make tabletop play comfortable.
Golazo! is a competent love letter to '90s arcade football games, accurately capturing both their strengths and weaknesses. Playing alone against the CPU can be a frustrating affair, but get some pals involved and this one's got post-pub entertainment written all over it.
Comments 27
But is it better than Active Soccer or not?
Seeing a mention of Jay-Jay Okocha on a video game news article.
Claps
You good people of Nintendolife are officially and unequivocally good people henceforth.
A Fever Pitch Soccer re-release is a must. A pure gem from the Megadrive era that played like an arcade alternative to FIFA.
Seems fun for a while. I will definitely pick this up for the competitive co-op.
Loved this games in my childhood, I remember carrying my Internacional Superstar Soccer deluxe and megaman soccer to every friend house and playing the heck out of them.
This game will bring back great memories.
Are there any games being made nowadays that aren't love letters?
It's a very rhetorical phrase. And it's over-used. A lot.
I'd like to see a few game reviews that were love letters to before the days when most new games were love letters.
There are so many 'meh' soccer games on Switch!
I have Active Soccer, and it is 'ok.' That is, once you get through the super laggy menus and turn-off the auto-assists and manually get different colors for your mates if you are playing multiplayer. I wouldn't call it good, and this looks similar review score wise.
Then there is Super Kickers League, Super Arcade Soccer/World Soccer, Soccer Slammers, Legendary Eleven...
And FIFA "We hate Nintendo fans Edition" if you want to sell your soul to EA for a mess of pottage.
Nothing good though.
Just lots of hard to recommend games.
That lack of Scotland is a travesty. I have fond memories of reading Chris’ reviews in ONM of FIFA on the Wii and noticing that Gary Hooper had the exact same face as Kris Commons.
Lack of Scotland is a crime against humanity
totally agree, no Scotand and it has INDIA?? WTF!!???
and in Africa you dont have Cameroon but have RD CONGO?
WHAT THEY WERE THINKING!?
even though, the game is great and Im having a lot of fun with it.
@gcunit I consider your comment to be a love letter to the over-usage of rhetorical phrases...
really on the fence about this one. I love football games, especially retro style football games. not sure I need a 5th football game on switch though lol
Might check this out. I like modern sports games, but I'll always take the more streamlined, arcadey, pick-up-and-play 90s ones over them. Nice that they still have a place.
Glad to see this is decent after the abysmal first draft.
I may check it out at some point.
Anyone know the frame rate of this game? I love the perfect smoothness of FIFA on Switch and am wondering if this game matches that. It sounds like a decently fun game.
I just saw footage from a max games tech YouTube video of handheld gameplay and it definitely doesn't look like 60fps. Bummer, I was thinking about picking this one up. Obviously it could still be a really fun game, and for people who like 30fps graphics it could be worth playing.
I think I’ll hold out for Sociable Soccer, although it seems to have been stuck in mid-development for years.
Do Scotland still play football? (Kidding! I still remember ‘82 when us Kiwis played you in the World Cup)
It's a bargain bin purchase for me, especially with its flaws. Nothing rivals ISS Deluxe from that era, and it should be put on Switch.
@YANDMAN Your needless comment to me the other day on an older article about this game.
'Ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa that's just an effect for the trailer you fool'
Review - 'but the ‘VHS’ one does a brilliant job of blurring your screen and washing out the colours just enough to fool you into thinking you’re watching a game someone taped off the telly back in the day.'
So who's the fool now?
@60frames-please Mate, you're missing out on plenty of good games if you insist on only playing 60fps ones. Frame rate really isn't the most important aspect of a game.
Worth it at $12 and change? Lot cheaper than FIFA..
@scully1888 True, true. The most important aspect of a game is whether the player finds it fun or entertaining in some way. Only each player can really determine that. Frame rate is quantifiable. I always want to know a game's frame rate, or range of frame rates, before I buy. Also, I play many games that have sub-60fps. My favorite game is Breath of the Wild. I simply play it docked 100% of the time so my TV can boost the smoothness of the moving image to 60fps. I've got CTR and have enjoyed it in handheld even though it looks terrible. I can have fun playing it even while finding the choppy graphics unpleasant. I really wish it ran at 60fps! Anyways, I guess I just wanted to explain my view, and that I have many sub-60fps games.
@OorWullie You still i guess?
Boots are for hiking, cold weather, and the military. People play soccer in cleats or tennis shoes (the latter otherwise known by the perfectly acceptable alternate term of "sneakers," not "snickers")
Never will beat virtua striker 1 or 2 or 3
Looks cool, will purchase.
Wheres kickoff revival Dino dini seems to have gone awol.
@60frames-please
Yet you play on a console.
FPS doesn't matter for solo play. Hate to break this to you. And also you realise most switch games use adaptive fps and resolution right?
As for docking... BotW runs at 900 resolution at THIRTY FRAMES PER SECOND.
Why do people lie? "i always play docked... 60fps..."
But do go on and lie more. Next you will be saying it's full 1080p when docked. Ahahaha.
@scully1888
He says BOWT runs at 60fps docked. It is clearly just some idiot. Very few Switch games run at 60fps and when they do it uses adaptive resolution. If he cared that much he would just get a PC.
Instead he is on here claiming Breath of the Wild is a 60fps game... Cause... They'd make it to 60fps... Not boost the resolution on a bigger display.
Too bad about Scotland, but in my (somewhat biased) opinion, it's worse that Norway is lacking. Drew and defeated Italy in 1991, defeated and drew the Netherlands as well as England during the 1992-1993 qualification for World Cup 94 (winning the group, making England miss out for the first time since 1978), and got knocked out of the world cup after all the teams in the group (including finalists Italy) ended up on 4 points.
And what about Cameroon and Switzerland? As far as I can tell, those are the only three teams missing from the (then) upcoming World Cup.
No disrespect to a team such as Iceland, but they were not a team to reckon with in 1992, 24 years before they qualfied for their first ever tournament. And Croatia didn't become a UEFA member before summer 1993, playing their first competitive match in 1994.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...