Saber Interactive's World War Z is the very definition of a bland, middle-of-the-road game that takes very obvious inspiration from much better titles – in this case the Left 4 Dead series – and serves up a rather lazy rehash, excelling at nothing in particular while still providing a reasonably breezy good time, so long as you've got a couple of friends at hand to plough through its campaign with.
There's really nothing that surprises or delights here, as you (and up to three other players) bound around the globe in a five hour campaign that takes in locations such as New York City, Jerusalem, Moscow and Tokyo. It's all perfectly serviceable stuff; hold off waves of zombies here, escort a bus there, mow through millions of cannon fodder, braindead enemies and level-up as you go. It's on a par with the uber-bland Brad Pitt movie of the same name and, rather foolishly, abandons the lore of the original Max Brooks book – lore which could have really helped to infuse this sterile world with just a little more in the way of character.
The main difference between this and other zombie shooters – the real selling point of World War Z – is the ridiculous number of undead you can have on-screen at any one time, with the game's signature hordes stacking up upon one another in order to scale walls and reach your location. Shooting out the lower levels of these undead pyramids and watching them all tumble to the ground is where this one excels. It's genuinely fun taking out a huge number of shambling foes this way, but in every other instance, what's here is largely forgettable stuff that fails to infuse its action with any real dynamism, instead delivering hugely repetitive gunfights that lack any meaty challenge or strategic spark due to enemies that provide little in the way of variety.
While in the likes of Left 4 Dead you'll instantly hear, know and recognise different enemy types – immediately shifting tactics to deal with the incoming threat of a boomer, for example – in World War Z, everything looks and feels far too similar. It has "gasbag" enemies; hazmat-suited foes who explode in a green mist and poison everything around them, and there's the usual gamut of shielded foes to battle with, but they're so easily dealt with and get so quickly lost in the chaos of huge throngs of Zs that they never really make you feel like you need to switch up your tactics to handle them.
It says everything you need to know about World War Z, really, that as we sit here and try to recollect events for this review we've got nothing more than a great big mishmash of uneventful firefights to rake over; we've killed millions of zombies in our time with this game, defended checkpoints against swarms of undead, set up turrets and laid down barbed wire, prepped our team for onslaught after onslaught, and barely raised an eyebrow the entire time. It's all fine, serviceable stuff; braindead, repetitive and safe.
In terms of this Switch port, we have at least been fairly impressed with how well things run. The frame rate tumbles into the low 20s from time to time, for sure, there's no gyro support (not a huge deal with the game's generous aim assist) and image quality can get blurry when large hordes arrive at your location, but on the whole, this is the full-fat World War Z experience, looking decent and playing well on a portable console. We did have some rather long waits for online sessions when playing with randoms, but overall this is a very solid port of a game that we expected to struggle on Switch – so kudos to Saber Interactive for pulling it off.
If only there was more to it all in the end; a little more variety and flair, some more inventiveness in set pieces or outlandish weapons with which to slay your foes. As it is, World War Z is an entirely solid but completely bland effort, it does exactly what you'd expect it to with nothing in the way of surprises or style. If you've got a few pals to jump into this one with you'll have a decent time, but it's nothing you're likely to remember for very long.
Conclusion
World War Z is an unremarkable zombie shooter that serves up a decent five-odd hours of action if you can find a few friends to play with. It's repetitive stuff; basic and unsurprising for the most part, but this Switch port is solid, managing to provide the full-fat experience without too much in the way of technical issues or other shortcomings. If you're in the mood for blazing through bland masses of zombies with a few friends in tow, this one's got you covered – just don't expect much more than that.
Comments 39
I play it, definitely an 8/10 in my book though the price could be a turn down. I say either wait for a sale or just get it for cheaper on other platform unless you really really want to play it on the go right now.
Your opening paragraph reads like the conclusion, I didn’t feel any need to read anymore.
This one was definitely on my radar but for only 5 hours of muddy unforgettable gameplay, it's no longer appealing. Ever since playing Dead Rising 2 years and years ago, I appreciate a good zombie game that has hordes and hordes of zombies to mindlessly kill. It's too bad WWZ didn't take a page from DR's book and lean into the humorous side of the zombie apocalypse to actually set it apart from the other zombie games.
I'm still considering getting Dying Light because it has a lot more going in in the world, but I would prefer a 3rd person zombie survival kind of game. Maybe one day we'll get the Dead Rising games or State of Decay games.
PJ, you really cut to the chase on this review! I wish you had better news to report, since I ordered a copy earlier this week.
Well, there are times when you just wish to run around and slay things and power up (a la Earth Defense Force or the Musou games) so I'll give this a try at least, for stress reduction.
Uber-bland Brad Pitt movie? BLASPHEMY.
World War Z is a awesome movie.
@JonSpangler lol, awsome movie 🍿
Well, I liked the book, I enjoyed the movie and bought the game before reading the review,so... maybe I will enjoy it?
The book was great! I got this game free on the epic store a while back and I agree middle of the road is about right.
It actually sounds fun if it had gyro. I presume it doesn't? Anyway, thanks for the review. May be a bargain basement purchase.
(I've read the book & seen the movie too, lol)
I actually think this is more of an 8/10, on other platforms of course.
Even though the reviews dont rate this game over Back 4 Blood......for some reason I enjoyed this title (before the DLC) more than Im enjoying Back 4 Blood.
I dont really know why when even I expected to like Back 4 Blood more than WWZ
I enjoyed the movie, and am quite tired of the criticism of movie based on it "deviating from the book". I get the impression that a lot of people that repeat this are just parroting it. The central conceit of the book (while fiction, it's not strictly a novel) is that it's a collection of stories garnered from interviews with survivors of the outbreak and subsequent aftermath. Given that many of the stories related in the book, some just a few pages, would serve as a synopsis for an entire movie on their own, it would be impossible to film one movie that encompasses all of the narratives contained therein.
@Astral-Grain
i really suggest to buy dying light, i never played before just now on switch and is an amazing game , the first person is really immersive, both main map are generous and the parkour system is amazing, combat is OK started dull at the beginning but as you progress in the power skill tree it starts to become more deep, looting is soooo additive as the crafting system and the durability of the weapons is lighter than breath of the wild , there are 4 main dlcs one with a entire new map bigger than the mains one together and new game play mechanics,one with an arena game system ,one with a separate game based in a fantasy setting with rewards you can bring in the main game and one with another 2 quarantine zone to explore(hard areas) graphic are good especially on the portable mode(after the patch witch improved the resolution and frame rate is consistent at 30 100% during the day and almost 100% during night really worthy the full price
Games like these do require more then one to enjoy them.
I love Dying light for the atmosphere and a wold you feel like you have a lot of freedom being the master of your own destiny. Having watched a video, this does look a bit more...hmm...like the zombies...mindless.
Can it be played in first person? Love it on series X as basically makes it L4D.
Good time for Rebellion to announce Zombie Army 4. It would be an excellent fit for the Switch.
Ouch, I feel like this review is a little harsh. I personally enjoy it more than Back 4 Blood, but to each their own.
The lack of gyro aiming is the biggest con. How did that not make the list?
You know what, sometimes bland is exactly what we need in a game. They don't all have to be hyper specific about stuff.
It's a game to play with friends, same as Left 4 Dead and those. If ypu like this kind of game, you'll have a blast with this one. For that, it's a pretty good game! Sure it's not worth that price, but it doesn't deserve that score neither. A 7 should be more fair, although for me was a 8.
Really fun game, that's what it looks for.
@Gwynbleidd Don't smell this review, it's way too harsh imo. It's not a bad game by any means. It's just a simple, fun game that doesn't intend to become a masterpiece. If you like the Left 4 Dead kind of game, you won't go wrong with this one.
Probably you'd do well in waiting for a sale, though.
Well dang, I'm sold. I usually can't get interested in a first person game unless it has RPG elements, but since playing games like Subnautica and Alien: Isolation, I've learned you don't need to have RPG elements to be immersed in a game, and a lot of first person games have loads more detail and immersion than most 3rd person games.
Thanks for all the Dying Light details and the suggestion @aresius
I mostly enjoy the game, except for some infuriating moments where single player with ai just doesn't work sadly. Some missions I just keep failing on easy because I can't be everywhere at once, and have all the ammo and guns required to take on the hordes within the time limits. As for the movie, I liked it, and never really understood the bad media around it. It's a zombie story, it's enjoyable, it has towers of zombies. Mindless fun, alright, but fun nonetheless.
You’re welcome, I am sold enough to buy the cloud version of the sequel on February
A low 20's framerate in a game like this isn't good, sounds like a very so so port for those without the other consoles. Kinda have to laugh at Saber's boasts now as clearly a bit more power could have got a locked 30fps.
@Gwynbleidd You know WWZ is a book right? The game is actually pretty good and has a strong following, plays like a 3rd person L4D with huge hoards of Zombies.
I'll pick this up cheap later.
I love a good zombie horde.
Days Gone does the hordes the best, shame it's a Sony exclusive.
I’m a little disappointed that this is Vanilla? They could have at least given us the GOTY edition with Marseille.. Now we will get Marseille next year for additional cost👎🏻
@Astral-Grain DS and state of decay I found to both be very blehhhh.
Excellent game to be honest. Nuff said
World War Z is a good political novel, Hollywood turned it into an action-horror movie and now - a mediocre game.
@MsJubilee I agree 100%. I would love Zombie Army 4 to come to the Switch! With gyro aiming and local wireless play please! Which this game unfortunately doesn't have 😔.
@Gwynbleidd Its not really based on either it just takes the general ideas of massive hoards in a city what WWZ made popular and combining it with L4D.
@Astral-Grain Dying Light has been a joy so far on the Switch, especially in Hand-held. They've just released a patch that locks the frame rate and bumps the resolution. I'd honestly say its up there as one of the best ports on the system. £40 very well spent.
@AmplifyMJ and this is exactly how people form a totally unfounded opinion. I hope there are few people like you.
@Saint_Link it was a criticism of the review not the game, I actually read the entire review, my point was that opening paragraph read like it was a summing up of the entire review, a conclusion. I think it was a mistake on the part of the reviewer and would potentially put off someone interested in the game. I would never hinge my purchase decision on the opening paragraph of a single review, but I guarantee you some people do. Your reply to me was unnecessary and a bit harsh.
I bought this game yesterday while it was still on sale on the eshop. I ended up getting the deluxe edition and played for a little bit and I like it thus far. The games does look a little blurry sometimes but it still looks great and so far runs really well. I played offline to get the hang of it and the only gripe I have is that the bots don't heal themselves but they were still useful most of the time. I will try online soon and see if my friends plan on getting the game so we can play together.
@Diogmites
I have to confess that I only played WWZ for a couple hours near its release, put it down for a while, and then never went back. It just didn’t grab (and bite?) me like Dying Light did. I didn’t DISlike it - I remember being impressed by the hordes and all the armaments to play with, and do intend to return and give it a fair try at some point.
Still, my time with the game was brief, only in 1-player mode, and quite a long time ago, so I can’t offer any really helpful impressions. I think it would be a good sale pick-up if you just want to blast zombies, but Dying Light was a richer experience.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...