
Inti Creates' 2011 on-rails ecchi shooter Gal*Gun, a bishōjo game that has only ever seen the light of day in Japan, finally makes its way onto western consoles in this remastered edition that comes complete with dolled-up visuals, full voice-acting and all previously released DLC. But does it improve on the decidedly-average Gal*Gun 2? No, not really.
In Gal*Gun Returns, you assume the role of Tenzou Motesugi, a lad who's fairly unpopular with the local ladies – until one day he's accidentally shot with over fifty pheromone arrows by Patako, an apprentice cupid angel and major league klutz who's really struggling to complete her angel school assignments. With this insane amount of pheromones now coursing through his cursed body, Tenzou becomes a target for the out-of-control lust of every single female in Sakurazaki Academy, and must use a pheromone gun to overload incoming girls with excitement, dropping them to their knees in ecstasy so he can make his escape.

Gal*Guns Returns' story mode sees Tenzou blast his way through the dull, lifeless interiors and exteriors of Sakurazaki in a super basic on-rails fashion, shooting at pupils and teachers alike as they pop out from around corners and throw themselves at him with love letters in hand. As well as surviving this onslaught over a handful of extremely samey and unchallenging stages, Tenzou must also choose from one of four "true love" girls as he starts out on his campaign who he will attempt to successfully make fall in love with him through a series of very basic dating sim aspects and mini-games that are dotted throughout proceedings.
As you walk around a school shooting teenage girls and their teachers here, as you scroll your gun's target over them, you'll see icons pop up in certain areas of their bodies; hit these targets and you'll perform an ecstasy shot, downing them in one and adding to a little gauge that, when full, enables you to enter "Doki Doki" mode. Here you can rotate and tilt a 3D model of the girl you've activated Doki Doki on and the objective is to use the ZR button to zoom in on areas of her body and take a shot.
The longer you stare at any one area the more aware she'll become, attempting to block your view by covering up. But that's OK! Because if she blocks you as you stare at her rear end, for example, you can just turn her around and stare somewhere else that makes her nervous and uncomfortable. Successfully pulling off shots in this mode fills another gauge which, when full, throws the unlucky lady into a fit of orgasmic ecstasy, with the knock-on effect of taking out all the girls in her proximity once you resume normal shooting action, like some sort of orgasm grenade... or... something.

All of the shooting here – and it's literally all mindless, repetitive shooting – is accompanied by an endless soundtrack of girls moaning and climaxing, a bit of an awkward audio backdrop when you live with other humans, and one that saw us turn the sound off completely for most of our runs through the game because it's just too much to listen to – a bit of a shame as this updated version features fully-voiced ladies for the first time.
Gal*Gun Returns also features a gallery where you can go and view models of girls who you've bested in Doki Doki mode. Freed from the constraints of having to shoot them, here you can zoom in, out and around their bodies at your leisure, turn on a little fan so their skirts lift up or even push a button to make their boobies jiggle.
All of this stuff aside, whether or not you're into this type of game or not, the fact is that on a mechanical level, this is a seriously dull and basic on-rails shooter that's neither fun nor challenging. There are four different routes through the campaign depending on which "true love" you choose to woo, there's a Doki Doki Carnival mode that lets you enter Doki Doki with multiple girls at once, and a score attack mode thrown in for good measure – but all of it is so lacklustre, so repetitive, old-fashioned, unchallenging and short-lived (you can rinse the campaign's four routes in as many hours) that it's almost unbelievable that it's being sold at the hefty price it is.

In terms of controls, you can use the left and right shoulder buttons to slow down or speed up how your aiming reticule moves around the screen as the game auto-drags you around its dull locales but, to be honest, this doesn't really help matters when things get busy as it's hard to centre your target precisely over the spot on a girl's body that grants you an "ecstasy shot" when they are charging you in groups. This game really needed gyro controls in order to at least make its dull shooting feel a little bit more responsive but, given the lack of care shown to all other aspects of the actual gameplay here, it's no surprise that they aren't included.
If the on-rails action was actually good here, if the campaign made any sort of an effort by adding even basic, expected stuff like multiple paths through an area, variety in enemies and attacks or just any sort of surprises or challenge whatsoever, we might be able to summon some sort of half-hearted positivity towards the whole endeavour – but it doesn't. Beyond the cringe-worthy "titillation" aspects of what's going on here, there really is nothing else; it's a short, shallow, mechanically basic yawn-fest that's neither worth your time, attention or the column inches its banning from Xbox consoles has generated.
Conclusion
Gal*Guns Returns is a so-so remaster of a tedious on-rails shooter that features dull, unchallenging and highly repetitive action set against a cringe-worthy story that's neither titillating or in any other way engaging. This is a very short and basic game for the asking price, and one that it's hard to see anyone outside of hardened (no pun intended) Gal*Gun fans deriving even the slightest amount of enjoyment from.
Comments 96
What is this? A video game for pants?
Feels like one of those meme games that mocks Japanese culture that you're not supposed to take seriously. XD
@Lordplops
Excellent!
Did somebody mention pants?
Fifty bucks? I can buy two pair of pants for that.
"As you walk around a school shooting teenage girls and their teachers here, as you scroll your gun's target over them, you'll see icons pop up in certain areas of their bodies; hit these targets and you'll perform an ecstasy shot, downing them in one and adding to a little gauge that, when full, enables you to enter "Doki Doki" mode. Here you can rotate and tilt a 3D model of the girl you've activated Doki Doki on and the objective is to use the ZR button to zoom in on areas of her body and take a shot."
Yes I can see now that this game is in fact not pathetic at all!
I honestly had heard this one was pretty decent, wasn’t expecting this absolute slaughtering of a review.
@TheFullAndy you sound pretty obsessed with people enjoying a video game. I would recommend counseling, looks like there are deeper issues there
@nessisonett I'm sure it's decent if you like the concept and basic gameplay. If you don't, well...
Double Peace on PS4 was pretty excellent for what it was, but it still got a scathing 3/10 review from whoever reviewed it on Push Square.
I do agree it's a little overpriced for the length, though. Which is a common problem with rail shooters. DP gave a lot of incentive to replay the game. I think this game is a little more limited in this regard.
If I knew someone who bought this, I'd probably have a restraining order made, cause you just know they aren't ok
It’s a shame this is so rubbish, as normally I love everything IntiCreates puts out (Blaster Master Zero, Curse of the Moon, Mighty Gunvolt Burst). They really need to stick to 8-bit action platform games as that seems to be their true calling.
@gortsi my thoughts exactly. Plenty of games shows books movies i dont like Just ignore them.
@gortsi
Hey enjoy the game all you want, don't get so hung up on little old me thinking you are pathetic for doing so!
From what I have played of the game so far, its very funny. The writting is funny, the graphics are good, the game looks great and sounds great. Score attack or whatevervit is called feels harder than the story mode as you have the same health the entire time on all stages. And nah, I don't find the moaning sounds embarrassing. So far the game is great fun. I don't think price should factoring into to the review, but for me it was well worth what I paid for the game.
Nintendo Life and frivolous Japanese games. You can predict 95% of the review without reading it. It's like you guys are forced to cover these.
@Divinebovine for what it's worth, this game and GG2 are on my Switch wishlist, and Double Peace is long in my Vita library alongside other gems like Valkyrie Drive. Start restraining, Joker.😄
@Tobiaku price can NEVER factor into articles like these - it's the least constant data on the whole subject. I'm tired of fanheads acting like discounts were invented last night.
Personally I find this to be a fun, although very silly (which afterall is literally the point), on rail shooter.
Is definitly simpler than the newer entries, but that also mean the gameplay feels more focused (no extra bonus targets or objectives, no extra mechanics, just aim and shoot at the 'enemies') and at the harder difficulty I even found it a bit more challanging at times. The girls hit (confess?) faster and you get no upgrades, so I took damage and did mistakes that the more recent versions almost seemed to try to patch out and help you avoid.
Also the 4 routes are definitly simpler with no extra missions and no different paths, but by being completly separated they also manage to offer more of variation with their events and minigames.
Not gonna say it's perfect and the fact it's more basic than its sequels is still probably a downside despite its pros, but if you can accept the main concept and story for the silly scenario that it is, then this is definitly a solid fun on-rail shooter imo.
I liked GalGun 2, but see... it had gyro aiming. This one does not. Disappointing.
The only thing that's pants is this game.
@Nancyboy
Fifty bucks? I can buy two pair of pants for that.
More like 1 1/2 at today’s prices. And like Snoop once said, “with 1 and a half pair of pants, you ain’t cool”
@nhSnork I agree, I just mentioned price because the reviewer called it overpriced. Overall, its not exactly the same as the other Gal gun games, but if you like them you will likely like this too
@JaxonH That this game had motion aiming on older systems, but not on Switch, a system where half the userbase practically DEMANDS motion aiming, is baffling.
@TheFullAndy you’re so right, there’s something about this game that makes the fans of it look a touch sad..
Ironic a game about pants end up being pants
I'd love if it one of these games ended up being like game of the year. That'd just confuse the hell out of everyone.
"I hope Gal Gun tells us to burn our pants, these things are driving me nuts."
stands up
"Don't you hate pants?"
Oh a gal gun review nice, I hope it wasn't written by-
"review by PJ O'Reilly"
Nevermind. Seriously, if you're a reviewer and you're known for not liking games like this, why would you let him review the game? It's so idiotic imo, it's like if you have a reviewer at IGN who hates RPGs, and you have him review octopath traveler or something
Finally, another Japanese anime-style game with fan-service elements. Can’t wait to read the review for thi-
>4/10
>Checks who reviewed it
>PJ O’Reilly
Why am I not surprised. You’d think he’d learn from last time..
Your reviews for these types of games is always full of the same, scornful writing and negative outlook as if it’s such a crime for it to exist.
Why even bother reviewing something you clearly hate? Instead, leave it to someone who actually likes these games and can provide a fair review while not bashing the fanbase at the same time like you do.
Honestly...
@EliteXeos KEEP SPITTEN 🔥🔥🔥BROOOOO
50? thats asking alot for a game thats this basic Your money is better spent on the spyro games.
@EliteXeos I understand where your coming from but there are only so many reviewers on this site you could ask the reviewer why he didn't like it but this is far from a bad review just look at this spyro review its bad. This is a bad review Edit: Oh I didn't know this guy
was know for not liking the kind of game sorry if I didn't make sense but uh still I think the spyro review is worst, and maybe the other reviwers don't feel good playing this type of game and thats why they got him to do it another time. (Idk its the only reason I could come up with)
@Doofenshmirtz If you like ecchi games you may like it. If you like the other Gal gun games you probally will like it ^_^
Currently at my second playtrough of the story mode.
Didn't expect more. The 1st one on PS4 was OK, the 2nd on Switch was weaker and I definitely won't get this one
Sounds more like a criticism of on rails shooters as a genre than a game. Every 'negative' I could quite easily point to other on rails shooters be they HotD, all those Wii ones and whatever comes out now.
Plus the obligatory looking down at people who like these games expected from NL.
I'm enjoying it a lot, finally able to play it in English is a joy.
The most amazing thing is these Gal*Gun games are made by the mighty Inti Creates.
I picked up Double Peace a few years ago based upon the strength of the developer and the games really are mechanically boring and just not fun at all. Maybe the 3rd dimension is a curse for them.
Wow no gyro controls? I'd hate to play this game with sticks, no wonder you guys had a bad time. Glad I grabbed it on Steam.
And we wonder why gamers still have a reputation of being lame geeks who can't get a boyfriend/girlfriend. -sigh-
At least it doesn't have a 1 handed mode, right?
Dear non-British People:
They're talking about underwear
@Effortless-gamer I wonder why people still use stereotypes.
All the gamers I know personally have relationships; some even have kids.
Lets face it, you are either the target audience for this or you are not, and the target audience doesn't even consider how anyone else scores it. This is pure fan service.
I feel bad for the reviewers that have to play these games. The effort it would take to straight-faced review the gameplay of games like these deserves a medal.
Not like I expected NL to have anything positive to say about this kind of a game. They never do.
But I bet 100 dollars right here that if these game were exactly the same, but instead of girls, it were zombies, and instead of "lewd" content, it was blood and gore, it'd be at least a 6/10. Maybe even a 7/10.
Western culture isn't just totally fine with violence, it actively enjoys it while shunning "lewd" content as taboo at best.
@Purgatorium They don't have to, they choose to, but alright bud
I personally don't care whether sexual themes are the focus of a game or not. In fact, I'd love to see a critically-acclaimed game that effectively uses sexual themes as its main subject matter/gameplay.
However, I find it interesting how these sort of games attract such ardent defenders. O'Reilly does point out that he wasn't a fan of the sexual content, and I think that is a fair criticism. If the game doesn't titillate you, you're left with whatever gameplay it has left. From how this review reads, it seems like the gameplay is dull, hence the score. From a cursory glance on the internet, it doesn't sound like the Gal*Gun franchise has produced any critical darlings.
As others have said, if you're into the genre, you probably already intended to get the game. For the rest of us, this review signals we aren't missing out on anything. Gal*Gun certainly doesn't seem like the hill to die on in terms of arguing whether certain audiences (particularly Western audiences) are prudes. That said, those criticizing the fan base aren't acting any better.
@Solomon_Rambling
Yours is a fantastic comment and I say that as someone very much guilty of criticising.
But I don't regret my criticism as this game and it's ilk is just creepy and weird, end of.
Looking through the comments and can see most people clearly either don't watch too much anime or don't watch it at all.
Don't like anime? Simple don't get the game and don't comment on reviews of games you clearly don't have any interest in from the get go.
Props to Nintendo to supporting all types of games even those sony wouldn't touch.
@Solomon_Rambling "O'Reilly does point out that he wasn't a fan of the sexual content"
So surely this guy knew the kind of game he was reviewing beforehand? If so then this review was going to be biased before it started
Game to me was OK I'd say 5/10
Tbh I much prefer JRPG's and anime fighters but decided to give this a try and was just abit boring and no real reward and the "on rails" made it feel too arcady. Would of been better if it was third person and could move around myself
@UltimateOtaku91
Is anime fawning over school girls?
@TheFullAndy
You're free to whatever opinion you have. If I were to further criticize you for your opinions or comments, I'd be a hypocrite!
@UltimateOtaku91
I can see your point, and I agree that reviewers have to be mindful of their biases. However, fans of the genre have a bias as well and may skew the review too positively. That's why I think it's great to read multiple reviews so that you get different perspectives. Given that you gave the game a 5/10, I don't think you disagree that much with O'Reilly at the end of the day.
@TheFullAndy anime is just the term for a style of Japanese animation and yes the majority of it includes characters aged 15-18 but aren't all just about girls in underwear.
Pokemon, yu gi oh, dragon ball z, naruto are all anime, heck even fire emblem is an anime stylized game
@Solomon_Rambling
You are a cool dude.
@UltimateOtaku91
Cheers for the reply.
@Solomon_Rambling I don't disagree with him in terms of the gameplay itself but just about his views on the nature of this game, surely someone reviewing an anime game has to have some kind of love for anime and understand the ecchi genre and have some basic knowledge of the game he is going to review.
"Embarrassing and highly repetitive audio that you'll likely want to turn down if you don't have headphones"
I am pretty sure people who bough this game don't mind it tho. I don't even know how this could be a bad point. "This game is bad, because it's audio embarrasses me" don't sound like something that should affect scores.
@UltimateOtaku91 How about this for a novel idea, both gratuitous violence and gratuitous sexualisation of underage girls are bad. It’s not one or the other. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sexuality as a theme in games, except 99% of games haven’t reached the point where it’s actually nuanced, and instead just flash 14 year old girls in skimpy outfits. Games like Silent Hill 2 and Yume Nikki use sexuality and sexual trauma in the context of horror. Haven portrays a realistic relationship and incorporates it into its gameplay mechanics. It’s just plain lazy to design a game which clearly isn’t very fun, and then bulk it out with some 3D models of high school girls. Fair enough if the game was actually good but it really doesn’t sound like it.
Playing Gal Gun for the gameplay is like reading Playboy for the articles ...
@nessisonett I know this game is bad and to a point I know that this games main attraction is the ecchi aspect rather than the actual gameplay, it just urks me when people who don't even like anime belittle these games knowing nothing about anime or Japanese culture yet are ok with violence in their western games.
And then to have people saying people who play this are freaks, should be embarrassed and should be put on a list?
Yet it seems to always be these niche games that get targeted, persona has 16 year olds in swimsuits and themes of rape but nothing gets mentioned, heck even fire emblem games (pre three houses) has underage girls wearing provocative clothing but not many people moaned about that. But I suppose that comes back to your comment, if the games good then these things don't matter
This review is hilarious in its flat delivery. I'm sorry you had to spend the time on it. May you only have good games in your future
@UltimateOtaku91 Oh believe me, people said stuff about Fire Emblem. 1000 year old dragon has pretty much become shorthand for "creepy excuse for this 12-year old to be legal"
@Kieroni you mean Nowi? Well she was a 1000 year old lol but yes her design was a strange one.
Does anyone really play these games for the gameplay?
No thanks, I'll pass. I would rather play Super Mario 3d world, Bowsers Fury, Bravely Default 2, Monster Hunter Rise and Pokemon Snap for something new and fun. Heck I would rather play 1.2. Switch than this game. at least 1.2. Switch had some fun to it.
It's always funny to see how some people despise fictional cartoon slightly erotic content (some of them even think anime=hentai), but are totally ok with pre-teens doing erotic dances in skimpy shirts on Instagram or TikTok.
@Mariotehplumber I want real games. What I want is none of your business.
No thanks, im not a horny teenager.
You know i dont think the gameplay is the reason most people play it
@Mariotehplumber So what you're telling me is that every game is garbage that you don't like?
@monterxz
ALWAYS funny and will never get old. Its even more funny that I don't even get off on stuff like this, I just like supporting it because it strives to be different and pisses people off. Drawings/sprites/polygons are not real and people need to get over it.
I've been fighting prudes on the left (I'm a liberal) and right for decades and it seems that'll never stop it seems. Lots of Resetera users on here too if you really pay attention.
Now saying all of that, Pokemon Snap will be the better game and already have my copy preordered.
Let’s get this back on topic...........PJ mentioned over 50 love arrows, but I’m sure it was 15.
Get it right PJ!!!
Some of the comments on here make it sound as if every ecchi game like this is an absolute classic, it's just that the reviewer has a problem with the sexual content. This puts @PJOReilly in an impossible situation. I think that he made it quite clear what the problem with this game is... it is overly basic and repetitive. I don't think that it is okay to attack his professionalism and integrity like this. He's a great reviewer. It is fine to disagree with his actual opinion, but not to assume that the game is actually great, but he has another agenda. Yes, maybe he has expressed a dislike for these overly sexualised games in the past, but this one just sounds basic and boring. Basically, NL can't win anymore unless they give all of these games a 9... but surely it must be understood that some of them are just bad games? But NL now find themselves in a position where they can't say that an ecchi game is bad without being accused of hating all ecchi-style games. That isn't fair.
@Ooyah Or they could ask Peter Davison to review it, he atleast treat ecchi games fairly. You know, a person who gives the bad ones bad reviews and good ones good reviews and not just all ecchi games bad reviews. NL no longer review all games. They don't have to review ecchi games when they clearly are not ok with them. Its not fair to the games. It would be like asking someone like me to review something like GTA or Fifa. (Neither are necessary bad games, but I find both of them really dull)
Is every ecchi game a classic? Nope. But most of them are atleast great despite the usual bad reviews.
They are underage girls. The point of this game is to sexualise underage girls, girls who are literally school girls.
No amount of "you're ignorant and don't understand the culture" will change the fact that these games a very thinly veiled way for people to sexualise underage girls.
@Ooyah I actually don't have a problem with his review even though they should really have someone that actually appreciates these types of games more to review them even if they don't give them favorable reviews. Saying that, I am more annoyed by the anti-fan service crowd here in the comments trying to act morally superior over a videogame.
I haven't liked prudes since 1992 and will never stop fighting them.
@HydroTendonMan They're polys/pixels on a screen that don;t have or feel emotion, or care about anything going on outside of the game. They don't need defending or moral grandstanding from the peanut gallery in hopes of scoring internet brownies points from losers.
I don't even get off on this stuff and just enjoy the game for the absurdity of it all. Even if someone got off on this crap, I might judge them a little but never fully condemn them for it.
Its not real and you're pretty damn silly (and should feel silly) for trying to be the moral police over it.
@TurboTEF If it is just pixels on a screen then why might you judge someone for getting off on it? Because it implies more than pixels on a screen.
@Tobiaku
I can understand what you mean, honestly. But my core question may remain. Is this particular game worthy of a 7, 8, or 9? Maybe this particular one is just bad, which means that PJ can't win.
@HydroTendonMan implication is faaaaar different than a real situation between actual individuals, buddy.
End of the day, its still not real and no one gets hurt.
If real people were involved I'd bend them in half in a heartbeat and have the brute strength to do so.
You can't have you cake and eat it too with comparisons like that, guy.
You can mince that in your little world as much as you like but I'll still be correct in the end.
@Ooyah Yeah, I think this game is great. I'm having fun with it. I personaly don't care much for scores, but for me personaly its easily a 9. So say its a 8 or 7 for people who would call me biased. This is not a bad game. Batman the Telltale game is bad unless they fixed it with an update. (The save button stopped working for me at chapter 3. And I lost all choices I made when I died)
Gal gun returns is a fun shooter with hillarious writing and cute girls.
@Tobiaku
That does give me something to think about. Well, at the end of the day, games are totally subjective after all. I really enjoyed Akiba's Trip... I thought that it was great fun, and that was another title which drew a lot of criticism for it's content. Hmmmm. Maybe there is no one answer to any of this! And thank you for the calm and measured responses.
Exceedingly disappointed to see this, particularly after the positive steps of the last year. That's all I'm going to say.
@PeteDavison,
Well you have just joined today to say it, so tell me more.
@HeadPirate It’s like watching an adult film for the plot
This has more than enough discussion so I don't know why I am commenting. I do believe if you do not favour the genre that you can still see the positives in the game and look at it objectively, even if a fan of these games does seem like a better fit, at least you get a perspective of the gameplay at a base level. I absolutely SUCK at platformers for example and did not get on with Celeste at all, but I can see that it is still a fantastic game for those who enjoy that kind of thing. It is possible that this fan servicey game really skimped on gameplay and had many flaws regardless of the reviewer's own biases, and that comes from the perspective of someone who owns Senran Kagura peach ball, both Moero games and Omega Labyrinth life on her switch.
Edit added:
The notion that someone who plays risque games must be a paedophile or 'there must be something wrong with them' is utterly ridiculous as well, same goes for anyone who enjoys violent games you don't see either of those groups applying that or even thinking along those lines in real life, it is FICTION. And, in the odd case where these things do happen, (acting out or being inspired by what they have seen in video games, or other media) there was something wrong with THEM in the first place long before they even got hold of the media and are not a fair portrayal of 99% of people that enjoy these things and are just normal people enjoying the things they like.
What a lovely toxic community here.
That is unfortunate...
@johnvboy
Pete Davidson wrote a couple of articles for Nintendo Life a while back after he made a bitchfit op-ed on the Gun Gun Pixies review. Now that was a complete ***** storm.
@PeteDavison
Well covid taught me the art of disappointment and channeling into wokeness.
Peak professionalism from the guy who runs Rice Digital here ladies and gentlemen.
https://twitter.com/MoeGamer/status/1362116096178999297?s=19
@RedKhan Peter is a better fit to review ecchi games because he likes them. The game should atleast be reviewed by someone who don't seem to have a ax to grind with fanservice.
@Tobiaku
So the idea is that we should go back to the 90's era of journalist where the reviewer is little more than overenthusiastic mouthpiece for corporations vs someone with actual criticism that has been relegated to being called social justice just because they don't have the same flippant attitude as someone in their teenage years to young adulthood. Sometimes you just got admit you win some and lose some and move on.
And Pete's tweet aimed at sniping me shows how unprofessional he is when he comes handling criticism from the peanut gallery. He can do better than what other like minded but failed journalists who cover this genre can do because that is how they failed.
@RedKhan The idea is that a reviewer should not review games if they have a beef with the genre, in this case ecchi. I think games like GTA, Fifa or Nintendogs are boring. Someone who shares my opinions on the should review those games. I'm not saying every ecchi games are fantastic, but they deserve to atleast be reviewed by someone who don't seem to dislike fanservice.
HAHA, what a ***** game... What? no, it's not in my shopping cart.. what No no what are you talking about I'm not downloading it... What? No, I cancelled my subscription to porn hub pro because I am becoming a good Christian man I'm trying to stop sinning... No no stop assuming things. Ok bye! Leave me alone turn off the lights and lock my door on the way out. Thanks!
@Tobiaku
And once again, you are NOT entitled to anything. It's the site's decision to decide to gets to publish a review for the game and when they make that decision, its final. Live with that decision and if you like the game, you like the game. But do not cry about how you are entitled to subjectivity once the decision is made.
Late to the party!
My issues with this review is as someone said further up, it's clear the reviewer dislikes the genre, i don't mean he is a prude or dislikes ecchi but more this is a rails shooter game and his over use of "dull" for descriptive wording felt a bit bland in its self. I think most their points making it a bad game can be attributed to almost all on the rail shooter genre games which leads me to ask why he reviews a genre he hates, me reviewing a sports game will certainly end in a low score as i find them boring.
HOTD was one of my favourite games and when nintendo got it i was so happy, sure most will call it a boring repetitive game but i loved that basic arcade style rail shooter.
Playing this game, sure it doesn't feature multiple paths (though this is apparently fixed in later editions) felt average, it sure isn't special and certainly over priced, it's hardly "over sexualised" as most of the "Sexual content" is just a girl falling over moaning and a skirt slightly lifting - probably would work better with adults but still it feels very "teen" level of sexual content, it feature no actual elements beyond moaning. Some games feature full nude and sex, this is a kiss vs sex in a comparison. I would probably give it a "average", it's fun enough to enjoy on the hard mode, score attack is fun and i like the collection folder idea, seems a good method to add replay.
Objectively speaking i think many "negatives" raised in the comments (not the review, the review was bland and dull by reusing them very words, very uninspired) are valid though. Just don't shoot the rail shooter genre because it isn't COD.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...