
In its third year, the Nintendo Switch has gained a somewhat justified reputation as a ‘port machine’, and while games such as Onimusha and DOOM have been welcomed with glee and enjoyment, others have arrived with an Alan Partridge-style shrug and a ‘How Much?!’ shouted from the garden. With that, we have been graced with Deponia, a point-and-click game in which you control the fates of two characters named Rufus and Goal set in the garbage-filled land of Kuvaq, and it’s up to you to reach the floating city of the rich known as Elysium and live happily ever after.
Developed by Daedalic Entertainment, this is a game which was originally released over seven years ago, and alongside their other game, Silence, has been ported to the Switch. Much like Daedalic's other games, you control a character (or two) and watch on as their stories intertwine, while you use a Joy-Con (or a pad of your choice) to progress throughout the game.

As was the case with Silence, Deponia looks amazing, especially when played in docked mode. The animations and the hand-drawn graphics really pop-out on an HD TV, and the level of detail is welcome as you'll have an almost-obsessive need to just explore every screen you walk into. Even at the start – which opens with your toothbrush running away (yes, you read that correctly) – there’s an inexplicable charm to Deponia, making you care about what happens to Rufus and Goal by the time you finish the game.
Having said that, sometimes Daedalic goes too far. There did seem a desperate need to be ‘funny’ throughout the whole adventure, and while at times it did work, many gags fell flat, almost harkening back to when The Simpsons jumped the shark. Still, the puzzles – arguably the most important part of this kind of game – are plentiful and well-constructed. They're very fun to solve and while you do admittedly control a character who is the village idiot, it can still result in some funny dialogue when you succeed or fail these tasks.
This tone is what will almost certainly keep you tuned into Deponia, despite the occasionally flat joke. The fun, the comedy and the fantastic art-style – all of these elements combine to make for a really enjoyable point-and-click adventure. Similar to Silence, the style and charm on offer goes a long way, and there's a curiosity to see just where Rufus and Goal end up next. The developers have said that the subsequent games in the series are coming to Switch as well, which will be music to the ears of long-time fans.

However, this does bring us to the elephant in the room here. Deponia, like Silence, costs £30 in the UK, yet it's possible to get all of the games in the Deponia series (Deponia, Chaos on Deponia, Goodbye Deponia, Deponia Doomsday) at a reduced price on other digital stores (the PlayStation 4 collection of all the games currently retails at £33, but on Steam it has been as low as £4.49). Granted, a physical version on a Switch game card is also available, but it's impossible to ignore the fact that once again, Switch owners are paying a premium for a game which is quite old by today's standards.
Conclusion
Deponia is a fine example of the genre, but there's no getting around the fact that the game's price on Switch will be your main barrier to entry here. It plays well and has that charm that Daedalic is famous for, and it constantly reminds you of the Monkey Island series – no bad thing at all. But when you're able to find the same game for under a quid if you look hard enough – and you take into account that this Switch version has no added benefits – it becomes harder to recommend. You'd be better of waiting for a price drop, or, if you're still interested, investigate if Deponia is available on an alternative platform at a cheaper price.
Comments 72
I’d love to pick this up, but it costs double what I’d be prepared to pay!
I am so confused about perceived value for money with games. Is it reasonable to expect a game that has been out on other consoles for a while now and as low as £4.49, be £4.49 at launch on Switch? It's an honest question. That logic only follows if the person owns all the consoles and as a result, is a moot point because they can buy the cheapest version. I get £30 is steep. But I'm not going to buy a PS4 so I can get it at a discount. And like any new game on Switch (and it is new with the Switch at the forefront of the critisism) I have the choice of either buying it now because I want to play it, or wait till it's £4.49 or similar price. Games have value and I'm not sure I agree reviewing Nintendo games in some bizarre holistic fashion that implies we all own everything. I can appreciate calling a game too expensive, but I would rather that be aimed at relating to how much game there is as opposed to where else you can buy the game. Does that make sense? Dunno. Help.
@GrailUK totally agree
Games should be reviewed for what they are and not for how much they cost. This, right here, is a disservice to anyone trying to find a review for the game
@Desy64 Ye. I can understand a review saying it's too expensive because it's over in an hour. There isn't enough game for your money. But saying it's expensive because it's cheaper on other formats is a ludicrous thing to say to a Nintendo specific site. (Not so much a multi format site I grant you.)
I got the physical and I'm perfectly happy with it. Course I love the game and it would've been nice to get it cheaper but that doesn't take away from how fun and funny it is.
So pricing is part of the review scores now? Does it mean games can get higher scores if the price is lower?
Well, it’s a tricky issue for sure.
There are both pros and cons to both taking price into account and not doing it, so I suggest the best thing NL could do is decide a definitive, universal guideline on the topic, so that price is always taken into account, or never.
@Yorumi I only own a Switch. It's why I come to NLife. I kinda assume it's Switch-centric. So when a game gets a 6 and I'm told to buy it from some place else, it's worthless to me. I'm totally fine with a monopolistic environment (and I had no idea I was existing in one lol) It still doesn't answer the question in my mind, which is, is the game worth 30 quid standing on it's own two feet, relative to other games on the Switch. The reason why its a fiver on other systems is because it's not selling anymore, they made their money and now squeezing it on that system. I can't see why Switch should be exempt from that process.
I absolutely love this series, very similar in style to the third MI.
But yes, the price here is utterly ridiculous, especially considering you can often get all 4 games for mere buttons in the Steam sales.
A genre better played with a mouse anyway imo.
It's hard to judge whether price should really be commented on in a review, but I feel that this instance deserves notice.
EDIT: I paid full price for this back in the day on PC, and I'm pretty damn sure it cost nowhere near this.
It also launched on PS4 within the last few months at a much lower price.
I agree with the point of it being a brand new game for the system, but the price should at least be in line with other recent variants.
Said this from day 1.
You skip a handful of these overpriced ports on Switch. And you would have saved enough for a graphics card or PS4 ages ago. Reviews on NL are not just for people who only have a Switch.
Deponia is 4.99 on iPhone. Touch screen is perfect for these type of games.
Ι, too, totally agree with @GrailUK at comments with the number 4 and number 10 (still this ancient method of comments and replies here on Nintendo Life) that the author of the article is very one sided about the pricing of the game. And as we all know, good journalism means taking into account all sides. I do hope that the author will read your comments and be more aware of how a pricing of a game should be judged and become a proper journalist too.
I already have Deponia games for my GPD (on multiple stores to boot - IIRC Steam outright gave away the collection) and still intend to get them on Switch. And dropping by here has confirmed my suspicions of a "review" that themes its whole conclusion (and potentially a chunk of the score) around the launch price - something that's fated to deteriorate over time and couldn't be further removed from the criteria of quality if it tried.
Fans complained about Syberia games, and where are those now? Regularly discounted on their own and the first two make up a bundle that's regularly discounted as well. If you want something on Switch (which tends to make cross-platform pricing irrelevant since chances are you would have long got and stuck to a cheaper port elsewhere regardless), the launch price either meets your preferences (and/or the given moment's state of wallet) or doesn't. Better luck next month/year. To paraphrase the Blizzard guy, "don't you guys have backlogs?"
Sorry NL, but I don't think that the price should impact the score either. Stress it in the review text, but then let people decide if they still want to bite. As it stands, I am now left wondering how the game would have scored without the price issue. The whole piece is skewed due to that one factor. And what happens if a permanent price drop comes in? Please consider just scoring a game as a game.
This is one of the many cases where the pair comparison is totally unfair because of how late the Switch version releases compared to the others.
Personally, the Switch version is the only version I care about. So the price comparison is worthless to me.
@GrailUK I think they're right to call it out and the developers themselves can't have believed it should have been a £35 game as it launched at £15.99 on the PS4 and is currently less than £4. I get that some won't necessarily have the option of buying it elsewhere but many will and there really is no good reason for them to release games like this at double the price they are elsewhere, same goes for Capcom and their ludicrous pricing of the Resident Evil games on Switch. Whether the price should effect review scores is tricky as on the one hand its difficult to attribute value to a game in such a way, then on the other would say Sonic 1 in the Sega Ages lineup for example be a worthwhile purchase at £30?
On balance I probably agree with you in that they should just score the game on what it is. I do however think that this type of practice in charging nearly double on Switch is completely out of order and wouldn't be top upset if it harms their sales.
Finally the not having a PS4 isn't much of an argument as you wouldn't have to buy many of these ports to have effectively spent as much money as it'd cost to buy a PS4 and these very games
Eh, I would say wait this out for a discount. I'm not blaming Nintendo or the Switch here, just publishers who try to get away with ripping off Nintendo fans. I love the Monkey Island series and didn't even know about this game, I'll have to check out the collection on Steam since it's so cheap.
I think the way this has been packaged up is important to any review, value is a core element of a purchase, indie games aren't expected to have AAA production values because they are often priced differently and that comes into the score for example. £30 for all 4 games in the series would be fair, just for the first one not so much.
Great adventure games on the Switch that are cheaper than this include, but are not limited to: Broken Age, Grim Fandango Remastered, Book of Unwritten Tales 2, Syberia 1&2, Bad Dream Coma, Thimbleweed Park, and Machinarium. It seems kind of hard to justify getting this when there are so many cheaper alternatives that are just as good.
It’s fine, they’ll figure out something is wrong when they only sell 4 copies.
@GrailUK I totally agree with you. And to add to what you said, the reviewer said that there’s nothing special about the Switch version compared the PS4 or Steam version, but I’d argue that’s not true. The Switch version is the only one of those three that can be played on a handheld, which is worth a premium to me.
Granted, I don’t have a stake in this fight, because I have no interest in this game, but it reminds me of the fussing over the price of Resident Evil 4, which is a game I very much want. And I don’t care that RE4 is $30 on the Switch, because it’s worth $30 to me to get a handheld version of that game.
Wow, that is expensive! I payed less than 20,- for the entire collection (PC). Though I agree that price shouldn't affect the score. I'd give it a 7/10
@ReaderRagfish if only I could like your comment more than once
people say they should not complain about price but whan you get it for 69p or free with a pc mag. And almost everyone has a pc than they should complain.
@ReaderRagfish I see your point mate. Really I do. I gave it a like just to show my confusion But how can we have a collection of games on Switch when we have only had the first one released. Sony has had the benefit of a huge library over the years, unfortunately, folk seem to think that benefit should carry across to the Switch lol. Maybe they should put PlayStation Hits on a banner across the top of the Switch retail box? However, I am not going to moan about the company having a punt at 30 quid. As others have pointed out, their pricing will reflect sales just like any other console and in time it will fall in line with other versions. My confusion isn't when I should buy a game. My main sticking point is how the price has affected the review of the game. To the point where am I meant to pop over to Push Square for the actual score of the game? Nonsense lol.
@GrailUK I agree and it shows how low / primitive game reviews really are. Can you imagine a movie review saying that the movie is really good but you can get it cheaper on Netflix or maybe you can just download it for free? 😂 Also the idea that this game is the same on an alternative platform is totally asinine. Yeah I'm sure that other console is just the same as the Switch (portability , design of the machine and so on). Review and add a "caveat emptor" if they want in a footnote would be more professional way to do it.
If people want to argue that video games are not a work of art , reviews like this serve them the best evidence on a silver platter, sadly .
(I confuse easily lol)
"Price shouldn't be part of the SCORE!!!!1!!" Yes, yes it should. Just because most reviews don't include this doesn't mean it isn't important. Look at any review for a car and they'll almost always mention value compared to price. It's a practice that SHOULD be common in game reviews, but isn't for reasons seen in these comments: The internet whines and cries about "objectivity". Well, I can objectively say this game isn't worth the asking price on Switch considering overall quality of the game and it's age. Not to mention this isn't the hill to die on. This game is pretty average as point and clicks go, and loves its racist and pedo jokes. So edgy.
@GrailUK The big issue here is, that "Deponia: The Complete Journey", an enhanced rerelease of the initial trilogy, released in 2014, also costs 30 bucks.
So the question isn't really "Should a game like this cost 30 bucks" and more "Why are they selling 1/3 of an already existing game for the same price".
The original goes for 10 bucks (Currently 1 on steam).
So yeah, while i generally would say that a games price should not influence it's review score, these fringe cases of gross overpricing should be pointed out.
Some great points everyone. (I dread to think how many thumbs down my original comment received haha. But I couldn't help wonder about it.)
i'm all for factoring price in reviews, they're research material for purchasing decisions, not crazy about "replay value" though.
you gotta think about the other experiences you're passing up by getting a overpriced game too, you could get okami hd and wizard of legend
I love Deponia. And I'm very used to the Switch tax. But when I saw that this one game costs $60 AUD on the e-shop, I honestly couldn't believe it. $60!! Even when new, the individual games were never more than $20 on Steam. And these days they are usually about $2 on GOG.
This pricing is absolutely shocking, and it definitely should dominate any conversation about this release. Hats off to Nintendo Life here for breaking their own "prices change so we review games based on their merits" rule.
just looked it up deponia is 90% off on steam now... it's $1 there and $40 on switch
One can't tell the value from the review. That's the real problem, here.
As for the price. How much more valuable would this game be if it was made today, instead? Being 7 years old means nothing to me if I've never played it before. Particularly with a point and click that uses nice 2D art.
Anyway, it probably isn't work 30-40 and the other stores having all sorts of other low prices makes it a problem, but I would just like better reasons in the review for the value discrepancy than "it's old".
@GrailUK Totally understand your frustration.
When price is being considered it should not be reviewed with too hard a focus on its price on other platforms--although that shouldn't be ignored entirely either--but whether it's worth £30 in its own right on Switch.
On the one hand, different people value the same thing differently, so price shouldn't be the main factor behind a review. If say, I don't own any other device that can play a game that I want to play, it might be worth more. If I hate a genre, it might not be worth to me what someone else would think is reasonable.
On the other hand, there's a difference between review and critique: review as a genre is aimed at an audience that hasn't purchased the work, while a critique is an analysis of a work as a work to an audience that is familiar with the work. A review is supposed to provide some information about what the product is and whether the author believes it to be a worthwhile purchase and for whom they believe it to be a worthwhile purchase. So if the reviewer believes the price to be outrageous, say, $200 USD for a copy of World of Goo, that might be worth mentioning. I would tend to say to leave the price to value consideration up to the reader unless the author considers the price outrageous, but I wouldn't say never mention the price.
While price is definitely an important point for a game, marking down the score 4 points for what seems solely for that reason being that you seemed to adore everything else is downright unfair to the title in question.
I always felt that it was harsh to complain about games like Doom and Wolfenstein launching at full price when the PS4/Xbone versions were cheaper by that time, but a Switch game launching at the same price as the 4 game compilation has just launched at on the PS4 is absurd.
Value should be part of every game's review for me, although I preferred the old print magazine approach where individual boxes contained the lowdown on (and often score for) graphics, sound, gameplay, value, lastability etc.
I’m in the camp of waiting on sales for nearly everything at this point. Unless the game is a personal MUST HAVE, my backlog is long enough I can always wait for a nice sale
Uuuhhh... isn't this actually £35.99 in the UK ...
@GrailUK Holy crap I have been saying this literally for months. Cannot believe someone else has finally said it. I love you.
Missing the real controversy.
The Simpsons never jumped the shark.
It's a pretty simple issue to solve have the review score and a separate value for money score.
Or do like switch up and break down the scores. Some gamea get a 70 That turn into 80's when they go on sale.
Or just a yes or no kind of deal. Worth the price? Yes or wait for a sale.
@Agramonte I own a PS4 and a PC and will not purchase games for either system that are available on the Switch due to the simple fact that, as a 35 year old man, portability makes the difference between being able to play 1 hour a week or 15. Many other people have made similar comments in the past in regards to that essential feature. The simple fact is that you could not pay me to play Deponia on the PS4 but I'd be happy to pay for it on the Switch. Reviewing with the assumption of equivalence (which price comparing does) misses that essential point. I don't care if it's cheaper elsewhere - if it's available on the Switch that's the only place I'd consider buying it.
I mean... I get that they're rereleased so they're is always costs involved in doing that. But that seems STEEP by comparison
I think i bought the complete edition for 3.99USD on steam.
This game doesn't deserve a 6! The reasoning to give a low score to a game becaue it doesn't add anything new is just stupid. This isn't the first game that's be released on Switch that has a higher pricetag and yet you did give those games a higer score and now a lower score because of that? Please. Just give a proper score for this game
@Quarth That is a good question. Could some piece of crap that costs 30 cents get a 7 or 8 because it's 10 hours of poor entertainment for such a cheap price? I guess I want a high price mentioned in a game review, but not affecting the score necessarily.
Price is ridiculous.
Think the reviewer is entitled to make a big deal of this due to the scale of the overcharging involved.
@60frames-please Yeah, exactly my thoughts. No problem mentioning the price, but reading this review, the game sounds more like a 7 or an 8 than a 6, which means the price must be a contributing factor to the score. And that, to me, is quite problematic. Will the score change when the game eventually goes on sale?
@EvrgrnCmln I'm a 36 year old man and I too can potentially have more playing time on the Switch compared with the PS4, so tend to by smaller/indie games on the Switch rather than PS4. However and this is what I was getting at with @GrailUK earlier, Deponia is £35.99 on the Switch and I can currently buy that game on PS4 for £3.39, or the entire collection for £32.99 why would I ever buy the Switch version in that scenario? I'll buy the PS4 version and then spend the £30 I've saved on a day out with my 2 year old son instead
I understand the likes of Doom and Wolfenstein launching at their original full price, especially when you consider how much work had to be done, yet this and Resident Evil (sorry to keep banging on about them) were never priced this highly when being ported to the PS4. Is there any reason why the collection wasn't released instead? Or the Devil May Cry collection as opposed to just the original? My point is that this would never ever happen on the PS4/XBOX or Steam yet is almost commonplace on Switch and for no good reason as many others do launch at exactly the same price and so many people on here almost seem to be supporting it based on this almost mythical "portability" argument. Its still the same game no matter that you're on the toilet whilst playing it 😉
Finally I will say that the review score shouldn't at all reflect the price of the game and just mention it as they have in the review but score the game on it's own merits
I dunno why they thought this was acceptable lol.
Also people stop defending bad practices like this.
@TechaNinja Just to be clear, it wasn't my intention to sound like I am defending this practice. I stated from the start 30 quid was steep. My confusion was more aimed at how the price impacted the final score. It definitely needs addressing in the review, but I'm left wondering how much weight it carried in the final verdict. Too little and it's a glaring omission. Too much and it stops being critique and more a statement about the industry.
@JonSpangler no, the debate is when. I say they jumped the shark almost 20 years ago. The 90s episodes still outclass almost any show on TV.
il buy it when its cheap.
Oh hey, it's that one game whose entire series is on steam for the same price! What a deal!
Fun fact: This game is ALWAYS on sale on Steam.
I love ports, I want ALL the ports.
But there really is no reason for them to be dramatically more expensive than the same exact title on other platforms.
It's not okay to compare a new port of a game to the price of the same game used on an outdated console. Or to compare the new port to a discounted version on sale on another platform. But if the game is also on Steam, PS4 and Xbone and significantly cheaper even new? At it's "regular" price? Yeah, at that point even I will complain.
A little bit more expensive is fine. But not much more. Especially when it's a game that obvious doesn't demand much of even the Switch's hardware.
@gaga64
There may have been a slight lull for a few years, but The Simpsons jumped back up with the movie and then again when they switched to HD. No shark jumping with them.
@JonSpangler each to their own. Aside from the movie (which I thought was decent but not great) I haven’t watched it religiously since the early 2000’s, and when I have it’s felt like a mess of multiple forced mini-plots in each episode rushed through for the sake of underwhelming gags - unlike the glory days where they would take a single idea (like Homer quitting church or visiting Australia) and milk that for as many gags as they could find. But it could be I just keep missing the better episodes.
To anyone getting outraged over the price being a big factor in this review: it's not so simple. The Switch does not exist in a vacuum so pricing should naturally factor in all of the other platforms. Many people own more than just a Switch wether it's another console or a PC. I'd like to remind everyone of the Mass Effect 3 situation on WiiU when EA released Mass Effect 3 at the same price point as the Trilogy on other platforms around the same time frame. Now, you could say "I only care about Nintendo so it's fine" or you could say "why am I supposed to pay the same price for a 3rd of the content".
Also, pricing should always be considered in reviews. There are many games on Steam that will cost you 1000€+ if you were to purchase all of the additional content. If you think that should not be considered in a review, I don't know what to tell you.
At the end of the day, the price will give in to demand. If enough people are confident in paying that much money even though they could get it for a 5th of it on other platforms, then it will stay that high. Otherwise we will see a sale or price drop pretty soon.
@carlos82 That was essentially the point I was trying to make - pricing should be mentioned, especially when there is a large disparity in pricing between competing systems, but I don't see how it's really relevant to a review that attempts to assess the merits of the actual game. My personal example was meant to illustrate the point that, for a variety of reasons, the existence of competing ports is not relevant to many consumers.
I'm not getting Deponia because, to me, the game isn't worth its price tag, but that has nothing to do with the existence of the PS4 version. I wouldn't have played this game on the PS4 if it were free - time in which I could play it is simply better spent elsewhere.
@FrowningCoach sanity - exhibit A.[/zerosarcasm]
@EvrgrnCmln So this review are for gamers like me. Who travel for work - but still make it home and carve out time to play with their PS4/PC
Who have been doing it long before Nintendo ever made a Switch and have tons of other gadgets and services to keep them entertained on the GO.
I watch ACG reviews on every game I think of buying (regardless where or what I will play it on). They rate "Buy, Rent, wait for sale, never touch". Publishers need to give me something worth the price.
https://www.youtube.com/user/AngryCentaurGaming/videos
@Agramonte A review shouldn't be for gamers like you OR for gamers like me. We individually only comprise a small percentage of the audience for both this game and this website. The reality is that the average gamer does not 'carve out' time to play and do not own multiple consoles. They also tend to look at scores more than they read the content of reviews. It is patently ridiculous to score a game down because it can be found more cheaply elsewhere when a large chunk of the site's intended audience cannot or will not get it elsewhere.
@EvrgrnCmln Reviews touch on points that matter to gamers. 60FPS, Motion Control, Resolution, chat, online... and yes price. Not everyone cares about all of those points. But when combined - it does reflect the bigger group.
Tons of videogame fans have more than 1 system. You see it mentioned here and PushSquare all the time.
I have read a million times in comments here "good game for the price"... or reviews that mention "pass paid DLC included" as a "plus" when getting the Switch version.
But somehow NL cant point out we being robbed with the price as a negative in their review. Can't have it both ways.
I think price matters only if it cost less at launch on those other systems. If the price is the same at launch then this is a mute argument as to why it scored so low. Now with the recent Resident Evil games lowering a score is warranted in my book because those games launched cheaper on those other systems. It's still not right as you should rate a game only on its merits and not price but maybe in the closing say the price is not fair to Switch owners.
@GrailUK The price is a disgrace. Gamers should be aware that all 4 game chapters released the same day on PS4, for the same price as the first chapter only on Switch. It is disgusting, but raging fanboys will constantly stick up for the pricing structure on Switch.
Got this on sale based on reviews. I love point and clicks and thought this would be for me as I enjoyed the look of the world. The humour and writing really let this game down though, with it falling flat and feeling dated. This wouldn’t usually bother me so much but the humour is kind of front and centre of the game. Not interested in playing the other three based on this.
well the price have been massively reduced like many other switch games
Right now all the games in the series are € 1.99 each.
@Desy64
Agreed. I’m writing this from 4 years in the future when the entire collection is currently on sale on Switch for $3. Now I’m looking at this review like is this actually an 8 out of 10 at that price or is it still a 6 out of 10 and not really worth my time even if it was free?
@skullivan well done!
In the end we all try stuff, regardless of critics' reviews. It actually pisses me more to believe games are great when they're just rehashes of rehashes (looking at you "new" God of War)
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...