3D platformers have come a long way since their inception, but back in the mid-'90s, the genre was a wild west of ideas and applications. It’s weird to think of something as straightforward as moving around in a 3D space being a technical challenge, but that was absolutely the case, as the flood of mediocre attempts to cash-in attest. Thankfully, there were some efforts that proved to be more memorable than Bubsy 3D, and although Super Mario 64 was undoubtedly the king at the time, Crash Bandicoot gave people a very different kind of 3D jumping simulator. The titular bandicoot makes the leap to Switch in the form of Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy, but have the years been kind?
This offering is a trio of the first three games released in the series that have been remade from the ground up with all-new assets - the classic example of a remake. You take control of Crash as he runs through a series of linear levels smashing crates, grabbing fruit, and eventually making it to the end. This is true for the most part in all three games, but there are occasionally levels that mix things up. These include riding a motorbike in a sort-of race, riding a jet ski, riding a polar bear, basically an awful lot of riding other things.
The core gameplay is probably closest to something like Super Mario 3D World in design, but with more long corridors with only the occasional branching path. The primary objective is just to get to the end in the first game, and in the other two you’re required to find a Power Crystal that’s usually in plain sight and then reach the end. It’s a simple premise and works in the game’s favour; there aren’t a huge amount of mechanics or moves to learn and remember - it’s just good old-fashioned 3D platforming, just not as open as a Mario outing.
However, the way in which you control Crash is quite different. Despite having an analogue stick at your disposal the original games were designed with a D-Pad in mind, meaning your directions are notably limited. This is actually a benefit, as many times you’ll want to just move forward and not drift one or two degrees left or right, potentially throwing you off course. You can use the D-Pad instead, and for some, this may well be preferable. The game boasts analogue input with the stick, but really it’s not worthwhile. Crash walks or runs but there’s nothing in between - and walking was never something we found useful whilst playing, again likely due to the original games’ design.
As for the actual jumping and platforming, well, that’s a meaty subject. The levels are fantastic to run through, but Crash feels strangely floaty and jumps can take a few frames to kick in, which means enemies you feel you should miss end up catching you out. Various jumps also feel unusually challenging, especially in the first game. What appears to just be a standard chasm can require near-perfect timing or you’ll just hit the edge of the platform and slide off. This is supposedly due to the hitboxes used for Crash, which are rounded rather than square. We repeatedly failed on several jumps time and time again when it felt like we really should’ve been able to make it. It’s a real shame as it can render an otherwise brilliant level frustrating and repetitive. We do want to point out that these levels are the minority, and most of the stages are devoid of any ludicrous leaps.
Speaking of difficulty, these games are seriously tough at points. Some levels we breezed through, but others were really troublesome, causing us to drain all of our lives and have to restart the stage from the beginning. The first game sometimes hides pits behind objects that only reveal themselves when you’ve got just a split second left to react, which feels like a very cheap move and is thankfully not something that happens in the two later games. It really feels like a call back to the platformers of the period, which if anything is a testament to just how accurately the developers have managed to replicate these games.
For long-time fans of the series, it’s brilliant to see the older games realised so precisely with modern graphics. However, we can’t help but feel that a remake is the perfect chance to make changes and fix issues that classic games had. N. Sane Trilogy sometimes feels like a missed opportunity in that sense; the developers did throw in additional checkpoints to take the edge off, and its absolutely a boatload of fun for a majority of what the games throw at you, but then you’ll come across one section that spikes the difficulty up to an enormous degree without warning, and it’ll really take the wind out of your sails.
Against normal logic, if you're new to the series and having a tough time with the first game, it might be worth playing the games in reverse order. The later games do have more mechanics to learn, but they’re still fairly straightforward by modern standards so it shouldn’t be an issue - and they give you the practice you need to play the first game without tearing out every follicle. This collection has clearly been designed with those who have played the originals in mind, to the point that there’s basically no hint of a tutorial beyond a bit of text popping up on the side of the screen when you start a new game for the first time. Various techniques aren’t explained to you, such as body slamming to gain a tiny bit of extra height, and whilst it doesn’t seem to be required for standard progression, these advanced moves are often mandatory in bonus rooms, and they’re never explained.
When you do get through each game though, there’s plenty to keep you coming back. Unless you smash every single crate in a level you won’t have properly completed it and obtained the illustrious gem that definitely looks more like a diamond. There’s also a time trial mode in each level, meaning for 100% completion you have to play each stage at least twice. The crate challenge often involves taking hidden paths as well, so chances are slim that you’ll smash every crate on your first run - and when you spread that over three games, that’s a serious amount of replayability. Oh, and the Switch version also gets the two bonus levels that have just launched on other formats, too - right out of the box.
Where the game really excels is in its visual design. Every single screen is absolutely bursting with colour and tiny details, and Crash’s Jim Carrey-style rubber face is always ludicrously expressive, and it's perhaps this aspect of the game that has benefitted the most from the HD face-lift. Whether it’s celebrating after completing a level or glancing worriedly behind him as he’s chased down by a colossal boulder, the character really feels alive - he did back on the 32-bit PlayStation, but here his personality really shines.
N. Sane Trilogy is locked at 30fps, and we weren’t able to find a single instance of a dropped frame. The resolution isn’t as perfect a story though, as we've had it confirmed by Digital Foundry that we're looking at a 720p image upscaled to 1080p when in TV mode. You'll also see a lot of anti-aliasing and motion blur, which makes for a softer image than we’d like, but on the plus side, there’s not a single saw-toothed edge to be seen. Portable play is much the same, although the game looks even softer than when on the TV, as you might expect. It’s been very cleverly handled though and still looks pleasing to the eye despite this.
Conclusion
All in all, Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy is a ruthlessly faithful recreation of some of the earliest successes in 3D platforming. Levels are slick, gorgeous to look at, and recreate the feel of the originals superbly. However, newcomers to the series may be put off by the steep difficulty spikes and little to no explanation of some of the finer mechanics. All the fun and the foibles of the original three games are here, for better or for worse, and despite some odd design choices it still manages to be a really enjoyable retread of some old classics, warts and all. This is definitely worth a look if you're a fan of 3D platformers, but just as was the case back in the '90s, Crash isn't in quite the same league as Mario when it comes to playability, inventiveness and entertainment.
Comments 184
Um, okay. Good to hear.
90's Platformer is ain't Super Mario Odyssey (No Game Over screen).
Newbie players better be prepared of Game Over screen oftenly.
DKC/R > Mario >.........Crash
It looks good but I'm not too sure how good it is without the nostalgia of the originals...
7/10 seems fair to be honest. They were pretty fun at the time but to me they're not really timeless classics like Super Mario 64 for example. Not really excited to play the games again but picking up a copy anyway.
I'll pass. I always thought this series was overrated and not in the same league as Mario.
I tried this on the PS4 (demo) because I wanted to give it another try and I just couldn't get into it.
Hmmm but crash bandicoot is better than boring mario , then again never liked mario which is bad, always preferred what crash bandicoot had to offer
On any other console this is a top platformer. But Nintendo is king of platformers.
these games were fun but i have no nostalgia for them like say mario64.
Bought this digital. Can't wait to get stick into it tonight.
Perfect for a quick platforming fix on the go. The levels are short enough for a blast here and there!
Crash is alright, but it clearly aged.
At the very least, this title isn't as humiliating to the franchise compared to the games from the late 2000s.
I didn't grew up with Crash but I did enjoy his original 3 games on the PS1 when I got one so this is right at home with me. It's a fun and challenging compilation of games but certainly not 7/10 though, I would give it a solid 8.5/10 as these were not just lazy remastered of the old ones since Activision had to recreate all three games from the ground up as the source code for the old ones were gone forever. Glad to finally have all 3 Crash in portable form, now if only Crash Team Racing got a remastered. Hopefully a Crash racing compilation is in the work too that would give us remastered versions of Crash Team Racing, Crash Nitro Kart, and Crash Tag Team Racing in one package, that would be sweet.
I always thought these were garbage back in the 90's. I can't see that changing. I'll get this dirt cheap used in a year or two just because I'd like to remind myself how garbage they were (compared to Mario 64).
Three crashes reviewed and up, but Mario + Rabbids kingdom battle donkey kong which has been out a few days, no review.
I used to be a big Crash fan, so I will definitely be picking this up eventually.
I still got my fingers crossed for Spyro on Switch though.
7/10? We have three solid, good remastered games here. For me 9/10
I was hoping the review would say that Coco was playable even in the non-standard levels,unlike the PS4 version.
Easy: if you like the originals, you will love this. If you don't, this is not for you.
Great platformers imo, I really liked them at the time, and this remake is just awesome.
And yes - the trilogy is at the same league as Mario in the 90's
I bought it digital today, played the first world of the first game and remembered a lot of things, especially how this is a different kind of game if compared to today's standards: no tutorials, a good bunch of lives that you'll eventually lose due to the difficulty (the first game being the hardest). I loved them back when they were released and I'm sure I'm gonna have a lot of fun with them again. Graphics are nice and it's running the way it should be.
Being strictly direct: not for everyone. If you didn't like them 20 years ago, it'll be the same, and for young players who are accustomed to easier games and more varied designs, I don't think it has enough appeal. It's of the first 3d franchises, so...
To me 7 is a low grade. 8 would be the least, but deserves a 9
Certainly getting this down the line. I only played the original (first game) occasionally at other people's homes back in the day and that was pretty fun, and I never owned these games myself so I'll be happy to get this collection into my home at long last.
Sounds about right. As somebody who remembers playing the original series, alongside other platformers from the PS1 era, the games were always fun but....they always seemed like merely a passable replacement for those of us who opted out of purchasing an N64 (a decision that, to this day, I don't regret). I would lump this in with games like Croc, Spyro, Tomba, and others that were really well made games, but not quite able to reach the upper pantheon.
Looking forward to playing this at some point.
Now waiting for a possible Spyro port for Switch!!!
I know it's no Mario. Any Mario. But I didn't play these games back in the day and this is the best way to do it now.
And it cost me 25 euros with a coupon. More than fair. Its starting price, 35, should give it some slack.
I forgot how great (and hard) Crash Bandicoot was. It had been many a year since I played it last.
I’m a sucker for 3D platformers so naturally I’m pretty excited to play this one when I get home from work, especially since I was an N64 kid back in the day and never got to play the originals. And I absolutely welcome the steep difficulty. Gives me a huge sense of accomplishment when I can conquer a difficult game.
Funny that those guys who had N64 moan that Crash is not in the same league as Mario (even if they did not play it). Crash defined the genre 2.5 platform games. Great that the first crash is just as difficult as it was.
Is there a Funky Crash mode???? I will need it
Hang on one minute. You give Crash Bandicoot a 7/10 and yet you'll give Yooka Laylee an 8/10?
Don't you think those scores should be the other way around? Sorry but Yooka Laylee may have fixed up the issues of its game, but Crash Bandicoot and its sequels was still miles better than Yooka's offerings.
@Megadeth for me crash may not be as iconic as sonic or Mario but the games are classic and all three plus extras for under £30 - it’s amazing value and one of the best packages on the switch surely.
@Megadeth I played both back in the day, and I can confirm that Mario 64 was miles better than Crash.
Not interested as I never played the originals but it looks like the developers put some real effort into updating the game while maintaining the original experience, so props to them.
I remember trying Crash Bandicoot on the demo disc that came w/ the PS1, but I did not really care for it & so never bought it (or played it — same w/ the other two games in the series).
I'm with @Stocksy. Really looking forward to replaying these. It's been a while!
@Anti-Matter not if ya stock up on those extra lives. 😏That’s what I did back in the day.
7? No way. Solid remaster of solid 3D platformers. 8 is more fair.
@kirbygirl I’ve only dipped in and out of these before as PSone is one of the rare consoles I never own but played at Uni one someone else ps1. Can’t wait to enjoy them
Fair review. It's probably a 9 for me, since I have a lot of nostalgia for these titles.
It's going to be soooo nice to have these three games portable.
720p upscaled.... I wish we had a Switch Pro which could just manage 1080p docked everything... I don't feel like that's a lot to ask for when other companies are doing 4k. Yet here comes the "graphic elitist" comments...
The game is pretty good, even though the remasters botched the collisions and jumping somewhat. Prefer the PSX experiences but it is certainly good fun regardless.
@Megadeth
I mean, everyone has a different taste, but even SMB 3 on the NES was better than every Crash Bandicoot platformer.
Woah!
@sixrings From what I can see, this is more down to Activision not wanting to put in the extra work to make use of the GPU unclocking of the Dock and preferred to just use the 720p made for undocked.
A Switch Pro, unless that came with a 1080p screen probably wouldn't change anything in this regard.
Clearly the reviewer is one of those who didn't have a PS1 at the time, and a very proud one of Mario 64 lol.
I didn't have the N64, so for me Crash is very iconic, and such good games.
In my opinion another person should review this game, a person that actually LIKED the original trilogy. Because is TOTALLY worth the 40 bucks it costs. At least give it a 8/10, come on. Only for the effort put into this version.
@XenoShaun Developers are going to be lazy. I can't just be satisfied with Nintendo First party games being 1080p only.. In fact Mario / Zelda did not manage 1080p so even first party is mixed. The fact is if this was a bit more powerful then even the "lazy" developers would get these resolutions up and all Nintendo first party games would be 1080p. This and voice chat are my only two complaints about the system and neither do i find unreasonable.
Incredibly harsh review. Some damn fine platforming action here.
Don’t be fooled by Crash getting the same mark as that tedious Kirby game from earlier this year. This is MUCH better than that.
Good port of a decent remaster of a mediocre bunch of games.
Hoping Spyro gets ported, though.
Can’t wait to try this!
@the_beaver That sounds an awful lot like you're requesting a reviewer with bias rather than one that can look at the game as objectively as possible.
Crash bandicoot trilogy remastered and on the go? Yes please. Happy to pick this up along with Wolfenstein today, gives me another excuse to play the N sane trilogy AGAIN, not like I needed one 😂
@AlexOlney but I feel the same. Absolutely no offense, but I think that the score 7/10 is unfair for this title. Even if someone does not like Crash. 3 (three) beautiful remastered games with extra level (as DLC in PS4) "Future Tense" in good price and 7/10? I think 8/10 and everyone would be happy...
@Megadeth Shouldn't reviewers base their judgement on the quality of a game, and not the quantity? Three mediocre games bundled together doesn't make a good game.
@Megadeth A review is just someone's opinion. You and some others here may think it's worth an 8/10 or higher but that doesn't make them wrong for only giving it a 7/10. I played them back in the day as well and enjoyed them but I personally think it's about right. Good games but nothing to write home about, in my opinion. 7/10 isn't a bad score.
@Octane people just love to hype mario up even though crash and sonic were more interesting than mario, I’ve played lot worse games that are rated higher than this
@Octane Mediocre? I do not force anyone to like this game, but it's worth being objective. The old crash games were well rated in 90'.
Remember most people just like mario for some reason, mario has been rather overrated and had some terrible games
I honestly can't take the reviews of this site seriously anymore. Cheap mobile games like Pokémon Quest and that Chameleon Run Deluxe also get a 7 like this well done remake of a classic series. While games like Star Fox Zero and Mario Tennis Aces both got a 8.
way too many people concerned about the review scores on this site then how games run on Switch in docked mode.
@MajorTom I feel just that when Nintendo is the game producer then the score is at least +1 ....
I have it on PS4, and it was my first Crash Bandicoot experience (So no nostalgia). Personally, I would give it a 9 or 10 /10. It's just pure fun, classic platforming with good level design. It's hard, but fair.
@DjinnFighter same although I would say 8
Now this is a Switch game - and a good bang for the buck. Yeah it is a rehash, but 3 games at a budget price - and extra NEW level (yeah, a Zelda shield is not new content). And works well on the GO and at home.
Switch will shine with this one.
@the_beaver Be careful when discussing review scores on this site. The Opinion Nazis will come out of the woodwork
I honestly think this is worthy of the price. Sure, you have to deal with the first Crash (the worst one) but Crash 2 and Crash Warped are one of the most fun games out there and are worth it for this collection alone.
It's neat that Switch owners will get to play Crash games, but as someone who already bought this collection on my PS4 there is no way I am going to double dip on this. The only thing playing this on my PS4 achieved was showing me how poorly Crash Bandicoot has aged when it comes to 3D platformers. Mario has aged well, Spyro seems to have aged well, but Crash really didn't age that well. I think the problem I have with Crash is how the games come off as an early attempt at 3D gaming, back when developers were still using a lot of the old 2D era game design with 3D environments. Mario 64 really showed everyone how a 3D platformer can be made, and Spyro came out at a later time period when those Mario 64 influences became an industry standard. Crash on the other hand feels like a relic of a bygone era that is best left in the past.
I'm totally gonna buy this when I have time.
@Kimyonaakuma its good regardless even without nostalgia when you combine the sheer number of levels, gameplay variety, and the many different secrets that lay rampant (mostly in 3).
@JayJ at the same time its also like a chunk of history when you get down to its basics.
I just hope this one sells well so maybe we'll be getting Spyro: Reignited Trilogy on Switch... I won't like to double dip on the game, but if there is no announcement on Switch version starting next year, I might be buying it on Xbox
@MajorTom Well it's a Nintendo site with a lot of bias on Nintendo games don't expect a fair review on games like this one that used to be the rival of Mario back in the PS1 era
To buy on Switch or Xbox One X, that is the question. I have some pondering to do
Ripper roo, welcome back
@sixrings The original Xbox One can't even do 1080p all the time. This is a hybrid console, it's always going to be limited compared to a home console.
@Megadeth @GKO900
True that, some Nintendo games certainly seem to get a free pass. That Pokémon Quest game certainly doesn't deserve the 7 it got while I am actually a pretty big Pokémon fan. XD
Same goes for that weird Sushi Striker puzzle game. It didn't look bad but saying it is worth a 8, no way.
Still some non-Nintendo game also seem to have inconsistent scorings. Ys VIII, got a 9 which I consider it deserved (although a 8 would also have been good for it). But they gave games like Gal*Gun 2 a 5, which is a pretty harsh score. I can agree it is not for everyone and I myself also haven't played it but it still seems really low. Then there is one score that I really don't understand which is a 7 for some mobile port of an endless runner called Chameleon Runner Deluxe. XD
tl;dr : It seems like the scoring system of this site is pretty random.
@Megadeth I'm with you I grew up with a PS1 and Crash was big back then and having not 1 not 2 but 3 amazing games remastered for a lowly price this game deserves at least an 8 and anyone who says this games are mediocre it's nothing more than a hater that never played this games in the first place
I am waiting for Spyro Switch myself. Never have had a desire to play Crash all that much.
@Hughesy it can on games like this.... it sometimes struggles on more powerful games. 1080p is not always equal. The more realistic the graphics the harder to keep up a high resolution. If Nintendo is having a hard time getting cartoon games running at 1080p we have a problem even if no one here wants to admit it...
@sixrings Zelda BOTW doesn't run at 1080p and that's a first party game.
Nintendo didn't develop this game, so no it's not their problem. Cartoon graphics doesn't equal easier to render, quite often it requires more than a realistic game if you are using lots of effects and post processing. I'd suggest before commenting on what is easier or harder to render you either do some research or mess about in the Unreal engine and have a go at coding a game yourself.
It amazes me the amount of Switch owners that worry about graphics and resolution. Surely you know when buying a Switch it's going to be highly limited as a hybrid console. It doesn't turn into a monster when docked, it's still using the same hardware as handheld, just with higher clocks.
Crash bandicoot was really brilliant game at the time and having played this on the PS4, I can confirm it is still great. An 8.5 for me if you’re wondering 👍
Unfortunately when up against a certain plumber who revolutionized 3D games, you are up the creek (see what I did there) and will always be remembered as second best. But that is not a slight against Crash; Mario 64 was just that good and no game has ever done what Mario 64 did for 3D let alone future expectations for any game.
However I feel Crash has a special place in anyone’s game collection and really do hope this series gets properly revived with the treatment it deserves!
Mario 64 will always be king, but you can still enjoy Crash as well as Mario ☺️
@Hughesy you do realize that lower resolutions dont translate the greatest to 4k tvs and at the same time we are moving to a 4k world. All I am asking for is 1080p.
@sixrings Yes because I have a 4K TV. But if that bothers you then it was silly to buy a Switch. It's comparable to a last gen console, getting 1080p with all games is extremely hard, even for the og Xbox One. If you want the best graphics and resolution then buy something that matches your needs.
I have an Xbox One X, PS4 Pro and PC, but I still love gaming on my Switch as I know it's limitations.
I own the originals on PS1 and have played the hell out of them. I also pre ordered the PS4 remaster and have completed it (not 100% tho). I don't think I need to double dip on this version even if the pricing is lower than a completely new game would have. If it's on sale digitally for like 20€ then I might be tempted, just for the portability.
@AlexOlney I understand your point, but in my opinion is better if it's done that way. For example, if they ask me to review Majora's Mask 3D, I'd score it very bad because I just don't like that game at all, and I'd compare it to the other Zeldas all the time, my favorite saga. Would that be fair?? No, because actually the remake is just great, such a well done port that one, and that remake was mainly done for the people that liked the original. And I know scores are subjective, but the point is trying to be as objective as possible, as many people LOVED Majora's at the time, as well as Crash...
@Hughesy So if you love Nintendo games you should just accept 720p gaming... thanks for the tip nintendo customer service... I miss the times (NES, SNES, 64, Gamecube) when Nintendo was on par or greater then the rival systems.
I have this on PS4. great game. Should be great on switch too.
@Hughesy I seriously don't get why some people are so hung up on resolution when it comes to gaming. Maybe I don't sit close enough to our 55" (https://lifehacker.com/can-you-tell-the-difference-between-720p-1080p-and-4k-1731323537), or maybe it's just because my primary interest is gameplay, not pixels.
I'll probably pick this up down the line after sifting through more reviews. I have no nostalgia for Crash but am curious about these three games.
I want to point out that these are not a very faithful remaster of the originals. The feel and hitboxes are sloppy, lacking the trademark precision.
@ACK
Could you explain this any further, please?
@kirbygirl I mean I love high end graphics and resolution, that's why I own so many systems. But I knew what I was getting when I got the Switch, gaming is about having fun, I have fun gaming on pretty much anything with proper controls. Considering what the Switch is, I think it does great and quite often punches above what should be possible on the system.
Never got into crash so ill just skip this.
@Ambermoon Haven't played the Switch version, but on PS4 the game is not very good if you have played the originals recently.
Not sure why this is largely ignored around the internet, but the hitboxes for enemies is not consistent, such as jumping on an enemy hurts the player when it should have damaged the enemy. Further, hitboxes are not consistent with the original, making some levels improperly spaced, instead unnecessarily frustrating and unreliable.
In a way it is a broken platformer considering how important consistent hitboxes and spacing are for the genre. For some reason the Crash Trilogy gets a free pass.
There are more problems but it is fairly technical. The games are still pretty fun and may not be a problem for most beyond cheap deaths and poor flow.
I see. Thank you for this detailing.
@Megadeth
It really wasn't.
I grew up with the SNES, and then got a PS1 so I did play some of these games when they were new, and for the time they were amongst the finest 3D platform games you could get your hands on, at least until Super Mario 64 came along. Having owned both a PS1 and N64 back then, yeah, these games don't have anything on Super Mario 64, and 7/10 is still a "good" score. Those games are just that. Good. They are timeless classics to those who only had a PS1 back then for sure, but only for lack of better competition in the same genre on the platform at the time, that's all. Had those games come out on the N64 back then alongside Super Mario 64, they would have paled by comparison, but because the market was more secluded with each platform getting their exclusive mascots, those who were stuck on PS1 back then will have a hard time accepting the painful truth that they grew up with the lesser series compared to Mario... at least they weren't stuck on Saturn though where, in terms of 3D platform games, I can't think of a single great classic. Saturn was the king of 2D though, no question about that.
For the record, before anyone accuses me of fanboyism, I do own the originals and love them just fine, and that's why I'm still getting the remastered trilogy on Switch, cause I want to replay through them for nostalgia's sake.
While return of the Crash doesn't make quite the same impact on platformers galore console like Switch as it did on PS4, this review seems much more nitpicky than usual nintendolife fare. Especially considering that the most of the issues with N. Sane Trilogy could be blamed on the first game in the series, that indeed aged badly, could have used some more improvements in the remake and wasn't even that good back then. The other two are really nice games, with 2 probably deserving a title of a classic 3D platformer. The one problem which I think plagues all three games in this are worse hitboxes, which are very unforgiving and just happen to pronounce less-than-stellar design of the first game.
It's just so weird to see Crash Bandicoot receiving the same score as Kirby Star Allies, although I realise they were reviewed by two different people, it just seems to me that someone wanted to be unnecessarily harsh to Crash in light of the rivalry he had with Mario long time ago.
I'm more amused by the 'Mario Rules, Crash Drools' take of the review rather than the score itself.
"just as was the case back in the '90s, Crash isn't in quite the same league as Mario when it comes to playability, inventiveness and entertainment."...lol
@Megadeth if it's got Nintendo's name on it, it's guaranteed it'll get a pass. I'd add a point or two to that "+1".
I'm going to get this, but Crash Bandicoot was NEVER on the same level as Mario, Donkey Kong, or even Sonic the hedgehog. It was a perfectly good series of platformers for PlayStation, but I would argue that the Spyro PS1 games were much better. There's a reason Crash got a remaster and hasn't seen a proper sequel to 3.
@bratzdoll These games were inconsistent, and the platforming was not that tight. It isn't like the Crash trilogy is seeing Mario Odyssey scores on other sites. Nintendo Life didn't underscore this game just because it isn't Nintendo.
@Preposterous The review fails to highlight this, possibly considering it a flaw from the original, but the trilogy has broken hitboxes... A massive no-no in a platformer.
@GKO900 and where is Crash now? Meanwhile Mario Odyssey is one of the best 3D platformers of all time, and it'll age much better in the same amount of time these three games have been out. Face it, these games are still good, but they've not aged all that well, and NintendoLife is not the first website to point that out. IGN said pretty much the same things about the game.
@Spudworthy The reason was that the IP changed hands after CTR and its owners did not quite know what to do with the series. Let's not forget that Nintendo's policy of maintaining old series (well, at least some of them) is not the norm in the industry. Lack of a 'proper' sequel is unrelated to the game's quality; you might as well say 'there's a reason Mother hasn't seen a proper sequel to 3.'
@ACK Yes, I'm aware, hence why I wrote 'worse hitboxes'. Halfway through the first game I've already died more than I would have in the original, mainly because of little too precise hitboxes on enemies and rounded platforms you can slip off of.
@Preposterous
That's fine, but Nintendo knew what to do with Mario. Time and time again, Nintendo has shown that they know platformers better than anyone in the industry. I never thought Nintendo would outdo Mario 64 as a kid, and then they gave us Sunshine, Galaxy, and now Odyssey. Mario games are consistently some of the highest rated games ever made. I like Crash, but to say he's on the same level as Mario is crazy to me.
I enjoyed what I played on the PS4 version, but let's be honest, I bought it in hopes that Spyro might get the same treatment, and he did! I hope the Spyro Reignited Trilogy gets a Switch release, but I'm getting it on PS4 to put next to the Crash N-Sane Trilogy!
Stop with this "well xY did get a 8 but this one only a 7 so this site is clearly biased and their review scores are stupid". If you don't agree with their scores look for another reviewer that better suits your tastes but stop pretending like your opinion of the game is better and more accurate than anyone elses.
@Spudworthy Let's not forget that before Odyssey we got a whole lot of underwhelming Mario games under the banner of the New Super Mario Bros. series. And I don't get what does it have to do with the topic at hand, no one is arguing that the Crash remake is a masterpiece.
@Ensemen
The funny thing about these guys calling NintendoLife biased is that they probably haven't read that many reviews of the Crash Trilogy on other sites. Most reviews I read complained about the same problems as NintendoLife.
@Preposterous
No, but they're acting like Crash stood toe to toe with Mario back in the day, which was simply not true. Crash 1 was a technical marvel, sure, but it was very simple gameplay-wise compared to Mario 64.
The New Super Mario Bros DS, Wii, and Wii U games were all very good, polished games. They just didn't really do anything new or memorable. Would still rather play all of them over Crash 1.
@KayFiOS
I can't wait for the Spyro Trilogy! Those games were much better than Crash. If the trilogy doesn't come to Switch, I'll buy it on PS4. I'm willing to wait if it gets delayed though.
Definitely picking this one up, i enjoyed it a lot back in the day.
I would personally rate it higher but i don't expect everyone to like Crash as much as Mario or Donkey Kong. Also 7 is far from bad, is anything below 9/10 considered shit?
@Spudworthy Like I said, I'm not bothered by the score. But an all-things-Nintendo website telling me how much better Mario is...forgive me for raising an eyebrow there. That last line in the review was particularly unnecessary, I'd probably not have commented at all were it not for it. So, in a way, maybe it was necessary?
For the record, I didn't claim non-Nintendo games like this one get underscored. I said it's Nintendo games that get a pass (as in, are overscored).
@Tokiwa 7 is a good score, I don't see the need to complain about it. The first three Crash games ARE good, albeit dated and a bit simple. They weren't without their problems, though, and I'm glad the review addressed them.
@bratzdoll
I'd agree on Kirby getting overscored, but Mario Odyssey deserved all the praise it got.
@bratzdoll
It's nothing to do with Nintendo games getting a pass. Crash was simply never in the same league, even when it first released it was a 'poor man's platformer' compared to Nintendo's games.
Crash 2 - gamespot mediana : 8.6
Crash 3 - metacritic mediana: 91%
But ok. These are not nintendo games.
Great game for those that haven’t experienced them. 9/10
@CaPPa "Crash was simply never in the same league, even when it first released it was a 'poor man's platformer' compared to Nintendo's games. "
Fanboy at its finest 😂
I never really got into this. I always thought it was a Mario wannabe. My brother had them on the PS1 and I had Mario64. I would troll him back in the day. I called it Generic, but then he held the FF7game over my head and said N64 doesn't have that and trolled me.
I grabbed it, seems perfect on my switch <3 Adorable <3
Rating the Crash Trilogy a C-rank collection is indicative of the obscene fanboyism Nintendo fans are prone to exhibit. What's worse is the resounding applause following the article that pervades the discourse in more or less words: "ok there gud but not mario tho NT GG."
@River3636 It plays pretty differently from 64, so idk where you got that idea. Plus it’s still a lot of fun to play all the way through, unlike Mario 64 which aged like hot garbage.
@Sjmaster I know. That is why I trolled him because I had the games he wanted and he had the games I wanted. It is the prosodification of fanboyism.
Don't be fanboys. We are blessed to get this on a Nintendo console. One of the finest platformers of all time and definitely on par with N64 platformers if not better than most of them. A PS classic!
Never owned a PS or played crash. My personal impression after a few hours in, it's a very fine platformer - yes the first one is difficult, toke me 10 times to pass to the second world but it was fun. started playing crash 2 - you can see how it improves on the first and my guess the 3rd even better.
Can't understand the score 7 based on it's difficulty spikes, it's a classic and should be judged by it's passed also. GameSpot gave it 6! and the reviewer declared he didn't finish the game, like what? yes it's hard but the same outlet gave a Kirby game 6 based on how easy it is...
If you want some solid review from a Nintendo outlet that understands platformers go and watch GameExplain on YouTube.
Honestly it's a sweet game.
Just played the first 10 levels or so of Crash 1. Loving it. Pure fun and not too difficult yet. I just don't see the problem with this game yet - I heard people say it's archaic gameplay - but it's varied enough for me. And the graphics? - look, if they look bad in some technical way compared to console X, I wouldn't know or give a monkeys uncle. It looks bloody stunning to my eyes.
I adore Mario games but after finding Odyssey a wee bit flat in the fun department (sorry), another competent 3D platformer on the system is not going to be sniffed at since they are like gold dust.
Since I adore this genre you can take 10 good/great JRPG's and a bunch of online multiplayer whatevers (both of which are common as muck) add the review scores together (lets say 15 x 8.5/10) and you have a game that for me is worth about 127.5 out of 10
Blood maths genius right there. Now everyone go forth and make more 3D platformers already.
I've never played these games before, but I bought the collection for Switch last night and it's a blast. Difficult, but an excellent platformer, much better than what I was expecting. Anyone on the fence should just buy it.
@Spudworthy Ok first I never compared Crash to Mario I'm just saying that it deserves more credit and second I love Nintendo too that's why I'm here too and while I agree that back then Mario 64 was better mainly because it's the game that revolutionized 3d platforms it's also its main flaw and hasn't age good at all especially with those horrible n64 controllers the camera it's a nightmare now crash on the other hand doesn't have that problem and while the first game it's a little rough the second and third are amazing games no matter what people says and finally why the hate you guys should be happy to be able to play this gems not only Nintendo games
@GKO900
I could have played this game when it launched on PS4. I didn't because of the problems reviewers talked about and because I knew it wasn't exclusive and would come to Switch. I just mostly associate Nintendo with platformers so I was willing to wait. I didn't mean to sound so defensive, but Crash was a perfectly fine mascot platforms for the original PlayStation and nothing more. I just don't see how these games are compared to Mario is all.
A real retro day for me. I am currently downloading this right now, plus I just brought home an NES Classic Mini. Just strolled into a store and bought it like an available product. Only took a year and a half.
Although I understand the complaint that developing these remasters and ports could be keeping development teams from making new games, I’m all for rereleases on Switch. Even if I don’t take the Switch out of the dock much yet, the more titles I have on it certainly add to the appeal.
I’d like to see many more PS1/N64/or even Saturn games updated like this. Although the move to 3D was a big shift in gaming, the early years had to suffer though some pretty fugly graphics back then. Crash was actually pretty good for the time, but it was still an awful lot of jaggedy trianglesromping around on screen.
@TheCurator I'm not even as into Mario 64, but that game had a lot more going for it than the original Crash. I personally thought Banjo Kazooie was better than Mario 64, and no way is Crash even close to Banjo. Spyro, maybe.
I don't understand why people get so upset over the number. Keep in mind, practically the entire Nintendolife staff reviews games, so you're getting different people with different tastes/viewpoints etc. Also, why does every game have to be compared to another game, whether it's similar or not?
Still a better port then Eurocom's garbage port of Wrath of Cortex on Gamecube. Couldn't even run a steady 60 fps lol.
played the original, got bored at the end of crash bandicoot 2.
bought it for ps4, exactly the same.
a triology was just too much. gameplay just becomes repetitive.
all with all, for the hard work to remaster it.
still worth an 8 out of 10, and a must buy if you never played it.
I would rather see Crash bandicoot team racer. it the only great competitor ever made next to mario kart.
i found it even beter then mario kart 64.
@parasnail
In the third, you get to see him in his pink underpants!
Already bought it on PS4 so I'll pass. They're great games, though the original has some wonky physics compared to the other two.
@Spudworthy
Crash Bandicoot on Nintendo machines was like a Dream comes true. It was since during Gamecube era. 😀
Just played for an hour, yes, it has its flaws, it had to make graphical sacrifices, but consider it's stable 30 fps, and the original trilogy on a Nintendo system...well let's just say it feels good.
I am glad Crash finally comes to Switch. Crash Bandicoot feels at home.
@Anti-Matter Remember this commercial, now he finally got his games on Nintendo.
too many favoritism
cringe here
Been playing it all day; This is a solid 8.5 minimum...
7/10 seems a bit harsh considering some of the other 7/10 games on this site.
The review is too biased. Besides, I wonder what's the point in comparing it to Mario when the only comparable Mario game is Super Mario 3D Land which is not available on Switch and even that is quite different. It's like comparing Breath of the Wild with The Witcher 3. No point in comparing Crash or Sonic with Mario. The mechanics and gameplay of each of them three are different. You could only compare Banjo-Kazooie with Super Mario 64 and Banjo-Kazooie is likely better.
Also, same game but with "Mario" in the title and the reviewer would have written a higher score and more positive review. No doubt. Considering the price and that the best three games in the series are included and totally remade this is a very good deal! Don't pay much attention to the review.
Woah!
Top quality fanboy review and some top quality fanboy comments. Oh the horror at the possibility that good platform game slight have been made for one of Nintendos rivals. Zealots getting triggered all over the shop.
I’ve never played any of these, so I don’t really have an opinion about the quality myself. The reaction to the review score made me a bit curious so I had a look over at Metacritic...
The PS4 has an average of 80, but there are plenty of well known sites giving it scores way below that. Polygon and Gamespot give it a 6/10 while PlayStation Universe & PlayStation Official Magazine UK both give it a 7/10. It is hard to comprehend why NL giving it the same score as the last two is in any way controversial...
Get rid of scores. Just have a written review and let people make up there own score.
@NickFalk Gamespot is known for giving low scores to many games and being quite harsh in general while Nintendo Life is known for overrating games produced by Nintendo.
@NickFalk @BlueOcean gamespot like to give a unfair scores to many games. For me its a great clickbait hit from their side. Low score for a good game - almost 1000 comments
Heck. Three full games for 40 bucks, and classics at that. Sold.
@GKO900
It's simply true. I owned both the PS1 and N64. My PS1 was awesome for Resident Evil, Wipeout and Tekken but no platformer on it (2D or 3D) could match any of Nintendo's.
Now if you think that Crash was better than Mario 64 when they released then I'd say that would be fanboyism.
The score itself is not a problem, it's only a single point below what I would give it personally, but the way the review is written is the real issue here. Alex basically opens it by saying that Crash never stood a chance against Mario, and if it was a statement by someone who actually played both series back in the day, that would be fine, because everyone has their preferences. However, this being said by Alex, who admitted to never playing the original trilogy seems like a pointless jab for the sake of making clear which series is superior in a sort of fanboyish way and the whole review follows on that note. Every little thing is elevated to the level of a huge issue, particularly the 'lack of tutorial' and information how to execute 'advanced techniques', which seems like an extreme case of nitpicking, especially considering that the amazing Super Mario Odyssey didn't really explain the full range of Mario's movement options in the game either.
I honestly would have expected from Alex a more positive review, celebrating how more and more gaming icons are coming to Switch and its library has to offer something to everyone, even if it wouldn't be entirely objective, but I don't really think that would be an issue, since hardly any game reviews are written to that standard nowadays. It was wholly unnecessary to add even more fuel to fanboy wars.
I never imagined playing those games on a Nintendo device, but here I am (I played number 3 and maybe number 1 at a friend. Their household had a Playstation)!
Got it today. So far it looks good and plays nice. Quick loading too. And yeah, so far it really is not up there with a great 2D Mario or a DKC. But fun nonetheless. Great that I can finally play it to the fullest!
@Preposterous I agree exactly. I do not want to be banned here, of course the reviewer has his own right, but seeing what is written here in the review, it seems to me that Alex was quite prejudiced to play Crash. Maybe nostalgia to Mario64 eclipsed a reasonable scoring to this tittle.
I think 7 is a fair score, you could argue 8, but it’s in the right ballpark. I’ve had some gripes with reviews at times, but this is not one of them.
@BlueOcean @Megadeth
It doesn’t appear that either of you really got my point (which might be to my poor communication skills). NL’s score for this game is well inside the normal range, and even matches UK’s official PlayStation magazine.
Why would anyone find this controversial?
@NickFalk Like others have already said, it's more the fanboyism tone of the review than the score itself. Besides, Nintendo Life's scores are usually inflated, Nintendo-published games in particular, so when you see a 7 here is like seeing a 5 everywhere else.
I hope that this clears it up.
Continue to be bemused by the inevitable quibbling over the minutiae of the scores.
@BlueOcean
Yeah, I've seen the claim quite a lot, but I don't think it's particularly accurate. Most of the time it seems NL's scores are well inside the range of other sites.
They probably do mismatch occasionally, and perhaps they do so more often for Nintendo-related titles. But, isn't it fair to to assume people performing reviews for a Nintendo-centric site prefer "Nintendo-styled" games?
@NickFalk There is no "Nintendo style" any more if you ask me. They have lost that touch that made almost all of their games wonderful. There are some recent Nintendo games that are often considered the worst in their respective series. Not all, of course, as Breath of the Wild and Super Mario Odyssey were critically acclaimed but on NL almost every Nintendo game seems to be essential and also better than the competition.
Even Breath of the Wild and Super Mario Odyssey are considered empty and boring by many people in here and have written so. Of course those two are good games but not the best for many people, Mario and Zelda fans included, that might prefer other Mario and Zelda titles with better story, gameplay, soundtrack or whatever.
Besides, Nintendo have newer staff like those who made New Super Mario Bros. 2 (the worst Mario game in my opinion) and many second/third-party studios that make their games and sometimes the results are bad (Star Fox Zero) or good (Luigi's Mansion 2).
Am I the only one who really wants a remastered CTR and Crash Bash? Those were such a blast back in the day.
@kirbygirl I think no chance of that. But hope we will see Spyro Reignited Trilogy on Switch.
@Megadeth I think we'll definitely get the Spyro trilogy, just a while after the PS4 release. I could get it on the PS4, but then it would just sit with the pile of PS4 games I never make time to play.
@BlueOcean I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. As I mentioned initially I personally can't see this review as controversial, even if trying to.
I do think Nintendo is still doing Nintendo stuff like always. Zelda & Mario are in top shape, and they've recently built a solid new franchise with Splatoon. They tried with Arms as well, and I think it's a very enjoyable game, if perhaps something of an acquired taste. At least it is pretty different from most of the AAA output the industry delivers.
But, as I said, I'm content with agreeing to disagree.
@Alex Olney Lack of analog controls? The games had to be designed on digital as analog wasn't standard on PS1 (though it was available on later controllers). I think the first game might even predate the first PS analog controller.
@KingMike The first Crash Bandicoot game didn't support analog / dualshock controller
@Snaplocket I don't care if some people here don't like other people (you mean me) that think differently at all because they are usually blind immature zealots but thanks for your advice anyway. The second they start being unkind the second I stop wasting time reading.
As I said earlier, it's not the score but how extremely biased some reviews are and the prejudices that permeate.
It's not making me lose sleep, it's just worth commenting and that's what this is for and what I, we are doing. I think getting mad because of other people's opinions just show how obsessed they are with a brand. They are the ones looking bad for any reasonable person.
@NickFalk That's not a problem for me, it's a pleasure having a healthy discussion with someone as well-mannered as you and I respect everything that you say.
Yes, I thought Splatoon was a very cool idea when it was revealed but playing it on Wii U I found it chaotic personally. Arms looks fun like Wii Sports boxing but not a game that I'd buy full-priced because I don't know if I'd play it much. Not a fan of motion controls although I loved Wii Sports and played it a lot.
About great ideas I don't think that they belong only to Nintendo. I am having a lot of fun this generation with games not made by Nintendo, from indie games like Ori and the Blind Forest to new IPs like Sea of Thieves, classics like Rare Replay, remasters like The Master Chief Collection or sequels like Forza Horizon 3, Monster Hunter World and, of course, all my Wii U games that I love.
@dkxcalibur Why?
@BlueOcean Splatoon popularised motion controls for shooters for Nintendo fans. Heck, it got so popular that even doom 2016 even got an update for the switch version for motion controls.
Even with those people who don't like the new Mario and Zelda, the games still have a huge attach rate to the system even after months of release. Heck, Breath of the Wild and Mario Odyssey received 1st and 3rd place respectively in the game of the year awards. That just shows you that these games are very well received by a lot of people. And the ones that don't like them are a vocal minority
the first three Crash games might not be on par with Mario but Crash Team Racing is better than any Mario Kart game
I like this game better than mario odyssey...this game rocks...well worth the purchase...
@BlackenedHalo I wouldn't say that, but I do love CTR and would welcome a remastered version. With Crash Bash as bonus content!
@Dog The character is cool and the remake is definitely well done visually. I have no problems with the graphics at all. My problem is with the controls and perspectives/camera. I wish I could be more specific with what levels we played but I can't...I don't remember. But I can say that it involved jumping from horizontal platform over water from the bottom of the screen to the top and we had issues. To be clear, this was not a difficulty issue. I have no problem with platformers being difficult. This was more of a issue with the fact that it appeared we were making a safe jump only to die!
But I'm very happy for all the Crash fans out there. It was a good move by Activision and one that may bring the series back to the current generation in future games.
Surprised to see such a low score, was expecting 8 or 9. Whatever, Crash games are some of the finest linear 3D platformers. I wish they remaster CTR next, arguably the greatest kart racer ever.
I don't get why 480p on handheld mode because the developers already cut several stuffs compare to the other versions of the game.
480p... really ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCteF4zvd2c
Great collection that I've been enjoying the heck out of but let's be honest it's not even close to the same league as 3d Mario's or DKC, 7 seems more than fair imo
Never played the first, wasn’t fussed on the 3rd but loved the second. Just hoping they do release Spyro for the switch.
Could also think of a few more that would probably do well on the switch such as TY the Tasmanian tiger, Jak and Daxter and maybe sly the raccoon
I would give it a 8/10 because its a great remaster but of course theirs the switch graphics drop and the death animations can be pretty clippy and messed up at times but im very fond of it even though im new to the crash series! great game!
@TonyDude101 And what i mean by messed up deaths is like when crashes shoes would clip through things like platforms and stuff like that
@Phostachio Sure. If you ignore that it's easy to the point of almost being braindead.
I know I'm a few years late, but I had to comment.
I don't so much a have a problem with the score they gave the game as I do the attitude of a lot of individuals in the comments.
There's a lot of Nintendo elitism going around, which I suppose isn't surprising, but it is disappointing.
I love Mario, but all you guys singing it praises while bashing Crash? I'd say your precious 64 aged worse than any of the games in the Crash trilogy. And that line of New Super Mario Brothers games? Nuh-uh. No thanks.
These games are better than those any day of the week.
Acting as if Crash wasn't a big deal back in his prime? Think again.
I'm starting to think there's a bit of bias going around in here... Shocking, I know.
@TeddyBearSolid
Yeah, replying to a 6 year old comment was pretty odd. Not all Mario games are created equal, sure, but the first 3 Crash games are janky. Crash just doesn’t feel as good to maneuver as Mario does imo, and as aesthetically boring as the NSMB series is, I’d still much rather play one of those games than a Crash game. My favorite Crash game is actually CTR. I don’t have a lot of love for Mario 64, so I’m not going to argue about which one is better. 64 reviewed much better than Crash did, though.
There’s no Nintendo elitism in thinking that the Mario series as a whole is better than Crash Bandicoot. Metacritic scores for the mainline games and the fact that one franchise is basically dead and the other isn’t is testament to that. If you’re not okay with people preferring a Nintendo franchise over one that you enjoy more, maybe a Nintendo fan site isn’t your thing.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...