“Every hero has a Genesis,” the trailer tells us. Unfortunately, we’re not convinced anybody at Paramount has ever even seen one. Whether you’re a fan of the blue hedgehog’s original Sega Genesis/Mega Drive oeuvre, partial to his brave strides into the third dimension on Dreamcast or have been keeping up with his latest exploits across all platforms in the modern era, anybody who holds him in high esteem likely watched today’s reveal for the upcoming live-action Sonic the Hedgehog film through their fingers in absolute horror. Regardless of which era you’re a fan of, the version coming to cinema screens in November doesn’t appear to please anyone who’s ever enjoyed a platformer starring Sega’s mascot.
Perhaps his timing is simply bad. The imminent release of Detective Pikachu and the deluge of media accompanying it leads to inevitable comparisons between the two video gaming franchise movies, but where the Pokémon film and its design has met with much praise after initial shock at the Pokémon's 'fur', it’s tough to find anyone who thinks that Sonic looks like anything but a nightmare.
The trailer, reproduced above for your 'pleasure', puts the blue speed demon against a backdrop of resolutely bland environments, with most of its two minutes and forty-seven second runtime accompanied by Coolio’s classic 'Gangster’s Paradise'. Why? Well, the why of it all seems to get a little lost. Are they trying to evoke some sort of mid-90s atmosphere, perhaps? Does it tie in lyrically to the movie or trailer in any way at all like The Turtles' 'Happy Together' does in the Detective Pikachu trailer? Unless there's some big plot point they're keeping under wraps, it doesn't appear so. It seems like somebody misheard a request for a ‘cool’ song and Coolio thusly found a cheque in his mailbox.
The soundtrack is the least of our worries as Sonic enthusiasts, though. 2D traditionalists for whom Sonic Mania is the first ‘true’ Sonic game since 1994's Sonic & Knuckles will likely take one look at this ill-proportioned, half-scrawled napkin-sketch of a character and run a mile, but even fans of his lankier modern look must feel horrified at what the movie’s designers have produced. Personally, we’re partial to the blue hedgehog’s original guise – the plucky little guy with ‘tude and a rotund belly that (silently) raced through twisting glades and mystic caves to battle Robotnik – but despite losing a few pounds around the midriff, movie Sonic shares little in common with the hedgehog seen in the modern games, either. His response of “Er…, meow?” when James Marsden’s cop bursts in on him seems like an admission that somebody cocked up the character design.
Let’s (for a moment) give them the benefit of the doubt! Sonic’s never looked much like a hedgehog, and his design was famously modelled on Felix the Cat – perhaps that “meow” is actually a real ‘deep cut’ for fans to pick up on. No? Anyone?
Okay. But let’s not forget that the reaction to the ‘furry’ Pokémon in the Detective Pikachu trailer wasn’t universally positive in the beginning. As we’ve seen more and more of the ‘mon revealed over the last few months, it’s become clear that their design blends very well with the real-world setting of the film. There’s a coherency there between all of the Pocket Monsters and, perhaps more significantly, it hones very closely to the source material. Say what you like about the fur, each and every Pokémon we’ve seen stays meticulously true to its original silhouette and design in the video games. Change the colour of any of them and they’d still be recognisably Jigglypuff or Bulbasaur or Charizard.
Conversely, if you made this version of Sonic red, for example, would you even be able to recognise the character? Would the human body shape of the silhouette make you think of video gaming legend Sonic the Hedgehog if it hadn’t been seared into your nightmares since the initial teaser reveal? Movie Sonic feels like Paramount thought they could save money by putting a CG head on a guy in a suit, or maybe make money on Halloween costumes. He's what you’d get if you gave crayons to an alien and told them to draw a blue dude with spines and red shoes. Tell the same alien to draw a mouse with big ears, red shorts and yellow shoes and they’d produce something similarly off-model. There’s no evidence of respect for the shape, form or anything at all related to the video game character’s classic design. ‘Blue hedgehog thing, red shoes, fast – go!’
The thing is, though, we wonder how somebody who had no connection to the games – with no deep history or love for the character – would feel after watching the trailer. How would they compare it to, say, the Detective Pikachu trailer? After all, there are more similarities than we might care to admit. Both of them feature ‘photorealistic’ animals in a real-world setting; obnoxious furry things which wisecrack. With Pikachu voiced by Ryan ‘Deadpool’ Reynolds, how is this motormouth any different?
Both trailers follow the same tired formula that every action-comedy follows (Music-Music-Stop-Gag-Music-Slow Motion Bit-Music) and both feature jokes which come off as average, at best. Jim Carrey’s continual interruption of the army man brought to mind Doctor Evil silencing his son in Austin Powers and feels pretty weak, but the same could be said of the ‘shove it’ Mr Mime gag in Detective Pikachu. We thought you were supposed to put your best jokes in the trailer?! Let’s hope that both films are less conventional than these snippets suggest.
Early whispers regarding the Pokémon film are very positive and we’re confident that it’ll be entertaining at the very least. Who knows – perhaps Sonic the Motion Picture will be an absolute masterpiece of the cinematic medium. As gamers, we may look at the trailer and weep, but how it will go down with the non-gaming public is difficult to judge. While Pokémon is undoubtedly the bigger property in business terms, our gran couldn’t point to Pikachu in a lineup, but show her a picture of a blue hedgehog and she’ll know he’s called Sonic and she’ll know that he runs.
We doubt that Paramount is targeting our gran or ‘the grey pound’ in general, but the point is that Sonic carries a brand-recognition factor which arguably matches Pokémon, even in a post-Pokémon Go world. Whether ‘broad recognition’ translates to ‘broad appeal’ is another question, but if you showed non-gamers the two trailers side-by-side, we’re not sure they’d notice a vast gulf in quality. Will they go through existential angst trying to divine the reason Gangster’s Paradise is in the trailer? Hell no – it’s just a great tune! It will largely depend what other movies are releasing alongside this one, but if enough non-gaming cinemagoers recognise that blue monstrosity as Sonic and take a punt, perhaps it won’t be the colossal bomb we’re all predicting on the evidence of the first trailer.
It’s a gamble, though. Detective Pikachu feels like it's pleasing gamers first and then hoping to attract a larger audience on the strength of Pokémon Go's success and Ryan Reynolds' box office charm. Whether or not that's true, Warner Bros.' approach feels less cynical - it seems like the filmmakers genuinely care about the source material and the studio has let them get on with making the thing.
Paramount seems to have taken a different route with Sonic, ejecting or completely reworking many things the gaming audience hold dear in the hopes of a wider appeal from the off. It feels like it's been focus-tested to death, dissected by executives who've never heard of Yuji Naka or Hirokazu Yasuhara or Masato Nakamura. We've seen the results of this before in numerous disappointing video game movie adaptations - need we mention the fundamental missteps of the Super Mario Bros. movie or Street Fighter (the 1994 one or the 2009 version - take your pick)? There are countless examples of missing the point. By alienating actual gamers this film runs the risk of falling into the chasm between an audience that actively avoids it and the masses that see nothing to indicate what the fuss is about and couldn't care less. We’ll see in November if that gamble pays off and if this attracts non-gamers, but we’re not holding our breath. A glimpse of the ‘proper’ Robotnik and some giant mushrooms in the dying seconds was, for us, possibly the best thing the trailer had to offer.
Everything else, though? My word – what were they thinking?!
What do you think? Have we missed any redeeming features? Or did you - and this is perfectly fine - like the trailer? Let us know with a comment.
Comments 168
There's only one way to win and that's by going fast.
Personally I had no interest in this film UNTIL I saw that trailer. It’s so bad I simply MUST see this. It looks epically garbage
Honestly everything about the movie seems okay to good enough. Except that awful sonic the hedghog adaption
SnooPINGAS usual I see
I am excited simply because based on the trailer it looks like Jim is back to his hilarious 90s self! This will be like seeing Harrison Ford back in the role of Han Solo in Force Awakens after all of those years. I have missed quirky crazy Jim like from his Mask and Ace Ventura days. This will be a treat for Carrey fans!
The argue that Sonic looks like this to make very easy to "adapt" a guy in a suit with CGI could explain a lot, still I can't avoid to think that using a Sonic model closer to the 3D games would have looked better at a similar cost (afterall that "thing" in the movie doesn't look either good or realistic enough to make it worthy imo).
And why does he have electrical powers/properties? Do they really want to challange Detective pikachu so badly?
At least Carrey was amazing, not the most original jokes, but he definitely knows how to deliver them XD
Let's all take a moment to imagine what detective pikachu would've looked like if they had stretched out his torso the way they did for poor ole Sonic.
Why do we want to make furry little mascots more human?
This is like Michael Bay’s characters inspired by the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. I don’t see any reason for this to be a licensed character at all - as you say in the article, paint him red, call him Boomic, and you’ve just created your own franchise that will garner as many fans of the source material you’re supposedly using. Pointless from one end to the other.
I hate the design, but the trailer was actually really good. i will def. watch it.
Yeah this looks pretty bad. I don't even think my kids would want to see this smh. Is it just me or is Sonic just not a very good franchise overall that folks just won't let go of. Seems the bad far outweighs the good.
Chronic the Bodge-job.
"Gotta go fast," does that mean you got to watch it in fast forward?
Sonic looks like a naked furry man who jumped into a bucket of blue paint and runs around in red nikes.
As someone who's grown up with the Sonic franchise, I have to ask--why does the universe want to make it so hard for me to actually like this series?? Why?!?!
Childhood trauma aside, thanks for the excellent read, Gavin. Fantastic writing as always.
None of the upcoming video game films look good.
So do the right thing and don't validate their existence with a ticket purchase.
@Elvie Detective Pikachu looks like a great time.
This is likeley loosley based on sonic 1, which would explain the absense of tails, amy, etc.
I mean...the only thing I hated about it was Sonic's look. If you make him the classic cartoony Sonic, you won't get anyone BUT gamers interested. The realistic look wasn't a bad idea, just poorly executed. Comparing Sonic to Pokemon is a bit of a stretch though since Pokemon's range of games and cuteness factor give it so many franchising opportunities. That trailer actually raised my expectations a little.
There aren't enough gamers to make this a profitable film. Sonic has undergone a number of changes during his tenure (classic sonic, modern sonic, Sonic boom sonic) so trying to appeal to the 30-40 year olds that are sharpening pitchforks is not going to really net them any money. They want kids, especially in the 5-12 range (which is the mass consumption of media ranges, but with not as much concern for accuracy, nostalgia or lore) and their parents. The adults screaming/whining about their childhood aren't the targets, and they really shouldn't be anyway for something like a movie. Appeal to them alone and then the masses dont go, so you get a "good movie" but a financial flop. This is supposed to be a silly throwaway family comedy, that will get some franchise signal boosts and are few nostalgia sells, but likely they are looking at merch and a possible video game tie in at some point (i would be shocked if that didnt happen). It is more about brand awareness.
“Don’t stop me now...”
I like it. They just need to give jim a fat suit lol.
Sonic was likely intended to look out of place to some degree, as in the plot of the movie he is from another world entirely.
He's pretty much just an alien, and for how the movie is structured could've been literally anything.
It makes Sonic less of a protagonist and more of a catalyst for what Robotnik is going to do. Or Eggman, I'm really not clear on what they're going for there.
The end of trailer teaser suggests that Robotnik is going to end up on Sonic's world anyway, the film might be setting up how Robotnik wound up on Sonic's world
Honestly this makes Robotnik a better candidate for a protagonist than Sonic himself.
For years gamers have been wondering ‘wouldn’t it be awesome if Pokemon existed in real life’
Nobody has ever thought ‘wouldn’t it be cool if Sonic the hedgehog was real?’
@BakaKnight i wouldnt go as far to say he has powers.. i think they made him look kinetically charged to try to provide a semi real world reason as to how he can go sooo dam fast for a hedgehog.
No Roger Craig Smith for Sonic's voice?
I thought it looked alright; I just don't like the new Sonic design. It's definitely not the Sonic movie I would make, but I feel that this article is trying just a bit too hard to find faults. I'm pretty certain you'd decided you hated it before even seeing the trailer.
This has the absolute garbage era of 2004-2006 Sonic and Boom written all over what a source of inspiration.
@RadioHedgeFund lol. I actually did as a kid XD..
Oh look, it's the Sonic hate squad.
You know who will love this movie? Kids.
….and whadayaknow…. it's a kids movie. No way...really? Who would have guessed.
/shrug
This article made me think... Isn't that soooooo SEGA? I mean look at how different Nintendo and SEGA treat their respective franchises and products. Nintendo gets us the NES and SNES mini, clearly made by people who CARED. SEGA licenced its stuff to the horrible @ games company who repeatedly made cheap and bad products that never worked as well as they should've.
Now Nintendo, again, treats its franchise "Pokémon" with a minimum of care, and SEGA accept to licence the Sonic character to a movie studio who's turning it into a cinematic turd and don't have a freaking clue about the actual franchise.
SEGA just doesn't seem to care about their image that much, really.
If I'd be responsible for the IP licencing at SEGA right now, I'd be on the phone with my contacts at Paramount asking WTF is that trainwreck? Sh!t, I would've been involved with how they were treating the IP from the very start. And no way something this sh!tty would've seen the light of day.
I actually really like the looks of the Pokémon in detective Pikachu. It does need some getting used to, but when you do it's actually really good.
This, however, cannot be said about this Sonic trash.
What I think is a real shame is that they used that body shape and did it digitally. If he's gonna look like that, why not go all the way to a rubber suit, it would be so much cooler. Well maybe not cooler, but I would just love that.
First cat's Vs dogs, hop and now sonic. Is James Marsden perhaps a furry?
Man, go do season 3 of Westworld instead!
It doesn't really matter regardless, to be honest. If this was the perfect sonic movie, people wouldn't give enough of a crap to support it full force. This movie was never going to hit big numbers no matter the situation, and 5 years from now people won't even remember its existence.
Just from the trailer it feels like they are trying to set up a series, with this as Robotnik's origin story. The big mistake is trying to make it fit on EARTH. Don't do that. Sonic has never been part of our Earth. Closest he ever came was when the Archie comics had his world be Earth in the future, with all the anthropomorphised characters as the results of generations of mutations from nuclear fallout. Normal humans survived and rebuilt, and the animals became people. That's about as deep as I'd ever want to go for a Sonic story. Just let the story be in it's own world where things can actually be true to the games instead of trying to bend the game to our world. Putting him in our world is just a cop out to get around actually needing to understand the games and instead focusing on the blue thing with an attitude. Because now not only do they have to convince the general audience to go see it, but they have to do so with gamers working against them instead of with them. Detective Pikachu is the exact opposite, they have a story that from the sound of things the general audience will enjoy, and gamers are absolutely excited about it making it that much easier.
It all looks so so bad 😂😂😂
Also, I'm just now realizing that there are giant mushrooms behind Dr. Robotnik in that last picture. Huh??
@Yodalovesu they are in the games, Sonic and Knuckles I believe, probs a final shot setting up the sequel.
I actually don't think it looks that bad. I'll probabaly check it out in all honesty. I've come to terms that most video games that are brought to life on the big screen tend to be bad. But not unwatchable strictly because those movies appeal to me, as a gamer. Take being a gamer out of the equation and it's no doubt a bad movie. But that's not the point sometimes you just watch crappy movies to entertain you, be it a master piece, or stupid fun. I'll probabaly go check out detective pikachu in the coming weeks even though I don't play or like Pokemon. I'm a gamer though, so I'm sure ill enjoy the movie. Oh no doubt coolio is in the trailer for obvious reasons. Sonic came to prominence in the 90s as did coolio. I for one used to blast gangsters paradise while playing sonic on the daily, and thats no joke. 😊
I thought it was fairly average but redeemed by the 'Are you carrying your child in that bag?' 'No. I mean, yes it's a child, but it's not mine' .
But most of the sonic games don't appeal to gamers lol. Also in the movie trailer it had rings, sonic's genesis and that moustache. Shame he got a face not even a ma could love and it looks so bad its good.
I'm excited to show this trailer to my kids to see if they would want to see it. They haven't really played any Sonic games and only really know him from Smash so I'm not really sure if they would care about it or not, they were definitely excited about detective Pikachu though, I didn't once hear them complain about how real world Pokemon were imagined.
When I was a kid I saw the Super Mario Bros movie in theaters and I was super excited. I didn't necessarily like how they imagined the world but I still remember having a sense of wonder and enjoying every single time there was something that referenced the game series I loved, even if it was completely different in so many ways.
In my late teens and early life I became way more rigid in what I liked, which also meant I enjoyed things less, but I learned to be more open to changes, to be less rigid in how things need to be in order to enjoy them. If my kids want to watch this, I will be there watching it with them. The trailer put a smile on my face and I imagine the movie will do the same.
Kids will want to see it, parents will take them, it will make money, and it will probably get a sequel.
I honestly think that even the worst, low quality cgi cutscenes of any 3D-sonic game looks better and more appealing than this crap. Also what's with jim carrey? After all that "getting woke" and "out of hollywood business" he sells out to THIS project? Wow.
Have video game moves ever really been successful minus Resident Evil?
I would love for that rumored MGS movie to come out. Otherwise, meh.
It’s not curiosity-bad like the Mario Bros movie, it’s plain boring-bad, so not even worth any discussion because it just looks so bland, not even a fart joke!
Is Sonic Mania that high regarded by fans? In my own experience the stages are long and make you feel like you're in a maze, more like Sonic CD.
Any "traditionalist" would see Sonic Advance as the superior 2D game that still tried to be like the Genesis games.
@Ryu_Niiyama It may not hafta appeal to gamers, but it does hafta be a decent to good movie to make some of its money back.
Frankly, I think this thing looks like a hilarious trainwreck and I might dedicate a day to making fun of of it on tv.
@Jeronan So are you saying that kids only deserve bad movies?
@Metrazi Technically no.
@idrawrobots How do you know there will be a sequel to this movie? Do you how movie reviews and sales works?
@Yodalovesu At least now we know what drugs the filmmakers were on when they made this. 😂
@Tempestryke yeah but what are you basing that on? Your expectations as a gamer? To me this looks like another mascot/animal friend movie not made by Disney for the current cool/edgelord kid set. Which means it likely won’t tank but will need to be decent to hit any high goals.
@Trajan The first Mortal Kombat and Silent Hill are pretty good
I personally think it looks quite good. I'll give it a watch
To me, this trailer comes across far better if you view it as Robotnik being the good guy whom has been called upon to help defeat an unknown intergalactic terrorist, a blue hedgehog/human hybrid/experiment. Sonic here has well and truly pulled the wool over James Marsden's eyes convincing him that he is in fact the good guy.
@Ryu_Niiyama Its a vg movie so its natural to judge it on that partly. Same as you would judge a book based movie partly on the book, a show movie on a show, or a comic movie on the comic.
The other part is how well it carries itself as a film. And the trailer does look like a generic, run- of-the-mill cgi/live action film based on a talking animal hero. I doubt it'll do much better then the Smurfs or Chipmunks or Garfield.
Very paint-by-the-numbers with its humor, action and a number of other elements that audiences have seen a hundred times before.
@Jeronan
Sonic isn't relevant enough in this era for children to care, let alone even know who he is.
Nice try though.
Someone at Sega must have approved this hideous thing being labeled as Sonic and that person should be fired immediately. Everything about this abomination is just wrong and reminds me of the Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog (the one Urkel voiced). At least that one resembled Sonic. This seems to take that design to an extreme. They copied the blue legs just like in the cartoon and said "Cover him entirely in fur. Sonic will show NO skin." And then they stole his gloves because why not. I'm surprised they gave him red sneakers.
@chiptoon If they were going to do that, they'd have done fur-lined spandex and a prosthetic nose with small animatronics in it.
You go uncanny valley, you go full uncanny valley.
Interestingly, Neal McDonough was in the Chun Li movie as M. Bison and he’s also in this film. I think he needs to fire his agent for letting this happen twice.
@KrisChavez Bah. A kids movie can be still be good and enjoyed by everyone.
You can not kill what is already dead.
@Tempestryke in general I view media in its own vacuum. Way easier to consume and keeps me neutral. I think the name will push it a little higher than smurfs or garfield (especially as those movies came out without a relevant franchise push to keep ut mainstream) At least sonic can point to its last few games to get the current young demographic to take a look.
So bad I’ll probably watch it! Is he some sort of alien in this movie ‘I’ve got to save your planet!’, lol
@idrawrobots sonic 2 lol 🤦🏼♂️
It looks hilariously awful which is good enough for me.
The Sonic franchise may have lost today but the internet has won.
@Ryu_Niiyama To each their own. What I mean to say is, the movie still has to be good and appealling to suceed.
Two examples: I am not familar with Deadpool, my boyfriend took me out to go see it and despite lack of familiarity I had an absolute blast and enjoyed it as a comedy/action film. DP fans seem to enjoy it too.
This is a good example of a movie being able to carry itself well, with fans and non-fans.
The Jem and the Holograms movie not only managed to enrage fans, by sucking all the fun, glamor, sci-fi elements and mangling the key characters beyond recognition, but even non-fans passed it off as a low- budget Hannah Montanna clone and found it confusing, lack-luster and shoddily made.
This is a good example of a film that can't carry itself well with fans and non-fans.
The director has not directed anything but a crappy animated short, the writers have nothing but garbage movies on their resume, this feels like a tax writeoff more than an honest attempt at a hit.
This should've been a made for Cartoon Network movie.
@Tempestryke totally forgot about those. Never saw either one.
Saw the trailer for the sonic film a few minutes ago as an advertisement. It doesn't look bad. Idk if I'll ever watch it, but doesn't seem bad.
The trailer is fine. I didn't think the first Pokemon trailer was good at all myself.
The fact remains Pokemon is more popular than Sonic and therefore will make more money. I think both movies will do just fine at the theaters.
This is an awful lot of words written about a trailer for a film nobody cares about. The sonic movie looks bad? So like every other video game movie then. No big deal. Just forget it exists.
@Trajan Eh. I could see myself watching it on tv if I'm bored. I certainly wouldn't pay to see it is all.
Well us grumpy old people can moan about it all we like, but...
I showed the trailer to my 7-year-old who is a fan of Sonic and really and he wants to see it. He watched the trailer four times in a row and thought it was awesome.
I think this will appeal to some gamers. However, it will mostly appeal to kids. They are the target audience.
Oh, and, erm... I’m ashamed to admit it. But I liked it too... a bit.
@Ralizah I understand why you say that but personally I don't have high hopes for it.
I think it looks alright for this type of film and the very end of the trailer suggests something closer to the games designs. My 2 year old son loved it and that's what counts and I'll definitely be getting the film for him
I think a majority of people seeing the film won’t care about the connection to the game, it seems like they’re making a movie to appeal to everyone.
Not sure why people freaked out over Fury Pokémon of course some of them are going to have fur. The look of Sonic though... I am going to show the trailer to my eight year old and see what she thinks. She knows who Sonic is but has not invested the time into the character or the game that I have. Maybe she will be OK with the look.
@Ryu_Niiyama Yeah I guess you are right. I mean I got in line to see that horrible Super Mario film when I was 5, so that con was a success.
Though I think they are going the wrong route by making this such a low effort affair. They put a first time director on the helm and looks like they told Jim Carrey to pretend he is Ace Ventura.
If enough kids are interested, it will be a success, but it looks like it will bomb if that’s not the case.
Terrible in many ways. Definitly not going to theathers watch it.
Jim Carrey is an absolute favorite of mine, so despite the cockamamie Sonic design I will absolutely con some friends into seeing this with me.
Definitely won't spend a cent in this movie. Sonic don't deserve this humiliation. Can we go and ask Whitehead (or someone else competent) to be in charge of all the decisions regarding Sonic?
I cannot stress enough that this is not okay.
Who greenlit this final draft?
We could've had an actually good Sonic movie - we literally just would've needed to have Sonic team animate it.
What the heck, guys.
It’s the eyes they make the character model look like a cheap knockoff. I saw (possibly on here) someone redrew the character with the eyes joined together like the original and it looked vaguely passable. Provided the story was decent of course!
Looks better than most indie games that get a 9 outta 10 on this website.
@Indominus_B calm down junior. I was playing Sonic games since before you were even born lol. I don't listen to too many Sonic you tubers though so you're wrong there. Glad you enjoy the series and hope you like the movie
Also paragraphs, use them
@Custom1991 Look at 2014 Ninja Turtles. Horrible reviews, made a huge profit, had a sequel.
Even The Emoji Movie made a modest profit.
Jim Carry... check
Coolio... check
Sonic the Hedgehog... check
Abysmal video game movie adaptation... check
Wow, it’s like I really am back in the 90’s!
This is the difference between Sega and Nintendo. Sega will give their properties to anyone throwing money at them, not caring about sacrificing the integrity of the character.
Granted, Nintendo did release the atrocious (but fun for what it was) Super Mario Bros. back in the 90's, but it also had the excuse of it being one of the first video game movies ever made. It was uncharted territory.
Fast-forward (no pun intended) to today, Nintendo is making an all-CGI Mario movie with Shigeru Miyamoto directly involved. He even stated that if it's crap, it won't be released. That is how it should be done.
Not a dangerous strategy, a stupid one.
@idrawrobots So what you're saying is this is just another bad movie based on an video game series?
@idrawrobots Also, I still don't believe that this will get a sequel regardless.
Mostly sjitty video game series, sjitty movie adaption.
Sonic fans get what they're used to by now: mediocrity with some crap on top.
Not appealing to Gamers first is at least some potential basis of a good movie. That's my view anyway.
I don't think this is going to be a good movie – but if it was 'true' to the games it would almost certainly be bad. Great games are not the basis of great films – the medium's are just too different. However aspects of a great game can be great inspiration for a movie.
I'm more of a gamer than a film buff - but let's be truthful - how many times has trying to appease the gamers turned out a good movie.
@Indominus_B cool thanks man, like I said glad you enjoy the series!
Also paragraphs, use them.
@abbyhitter Yeah,different VA.So I was very surprised to find out that in my language's dub (italian) he has the same VA from the games.
Not Appealing To Gamers First?
Who is this movie appealing to exactly aside from people who want to see Jim Carrey playing the type of role he's famous for.
I'm not sure why every "gamer" feels the need to be catered to these days but last I checked, we're everywhere. Everyone is a gamer. I'm not special, you're not special, old school Sonic fans (of which I am one) are not special. Movies are a business and they're meant to make money. If we're only making a Sonic movie for the people that enjoyed the original 2 or 3 games and are in the market to go see a film based on a nearly 30 year old video game character, they won't make a dime - and hey, maybe they won't. Thing is though, if they make a film using that character as inspiration, and they make it for modern family viewers, it actually might work. Me and my kid will be there for the first showing, not because I expect it to be great, but because anyway you look at it, it's going to take me back to the early 90s - as will Jim Carey. The last thing on my mind is whether or not its going to be loved by a bunch of "fans" on the internet. Who cares? I'm a fan. I'm on the internet. I just want to be entertained for two hours, with zero expectation that Paramount has to live up to my nostalgia.
I hate that I don't hate it.
This looks really fun
I don't like the series but I've always enjoyed the shows so maybe that is why I prefer this?
Did Sega and Paramount do any focus testing or research before they decided to make this movie??
When this movie inevitable flops, every executive involved in greenlighting this should be fired immediately.
This should be a Broadway musical.
This is gonna be SEGA's Mario brothers movie
This will give Gigli a run for its money.
@NotTelevision why do you deem it low effort? Looks like standard mascot CGI fare to me.
Sonic definitely looks off, but i think saying he's beyond recognition in case of a simple palette swap it's a bit of a stretch.
@Tempestryke That is fair, but until we actually see the movie we can't say which is which. Trailers don't always portray a movie accurately, and a lot of people are having nostalgia knee jerk reactions.
No interest until I saw this trailer. Frankly it looks like one hell of an awesome movie, one that fully embraces itself as camp and knows that you'll never 100% please fans of the source material. They were better off making the movie on their own terms while giving only the occasional wink to the video game franchise. Which frankly could never hope to sustain so much public interest.
It also looks like some of Carrey's best work in a long time, a return to the slapstick he perfected in the 90s.
It's a kids film though right? It's meant to be for you know, kids... Looks great.
Another thing, how about having a soundtrack with Crush 40 and Cash Cash, with songs like Live and Learn, Escape From The City, Reach For The Stars and others? Nope, let's have Coolio instead.
@Custom1991 You know, I think it does. The blue hedgehog suggests going fast, it must be what he means.
It’s the quintessential video game movie (and we all know the history of video game movies 😩)
@westman98 I heard that Hollywood almost never invests in new ideas, always goes to make sequels, remakes, reboots and adaptations of already popular stuff, never creating new franchises or adapting unpopular stuff, is not only because these movies being easier to market, it's because if they fail, no one gets fired, because at least that stuff already had an audience and made money.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PlausibleDeniability
@Ryu_Niiyama Very true.
that definitely looks like dr robotnik on that last photo.
The only thing wrong with this movie so far is the garbage sonic model
@eRaz0r What the hell are your talking about dude? You're supposed to ignore the fact that the movie looks like good fun and join the hating mob because Sonic looks odd and we were predisposed to hate it no matter what.
Can't wait to see all the whiny babies cry their hearts out when the movie turns out to be a smash hit and they announce a sequel.
I didn't think it looked as bad, as every one online is saying. I think me and the kids will enjoy it. Jim Carey is hilarious!
I feel like this will be one of those movies that people hate just because it's popular to without really thinking through it and forming their own opinions about it. My honest thoughts are: Does it look good as a whole? Not really. Sonic's design definately went in the wrong direction but I don't see it as absolutely horrible or freaky. It's just meh. Jim Carey will be hilarious and perfect as Robotnic because it's Jim Carey. And the music for the trailer was a totally weird and unfitting voice. Why didn't they use 'The distance' by Cake? Got that cool feel and is actually about speed.
https://youtu.be/cno20onK9dY
People are way too invested in this movie. Personally I'm just meh about it. I suspect it's going to be a terrible movie that I don't watch. Guess what, there are terrible movies coming every weekend, and a lot of them make truckloads of money without my help.
I love Jim Carrey but this film reeks of sweaty gym shoes, dated 90s references and complete desperation....
Where does this fit in the Sonic timeline?
@SalvorHardin Boom's TV show was good, it was the game that sucked.
@Kevember LOL i’m seeing a Smurfs and Angry Birds crossover here
@Synthetic you say that like it’s a bad thing!
The first time we saw a picture of Sonic, it was obvious this movie was going to be God Tier awful.
Just ignore the movie, and let it die a quiet death.
If you want to evoke a 90s feel you should try to find the promotion guy in a Sonic costume I encountered in the real 90s. That costume looked good and might still hold up today. Better than whatever this is for sure.
The only.good thing about this movie is Jim Carrey but it isn't enough to get to pay to see this garbage
@abbyhitter Ik, I was sad, too.
@KrisChavez But even today's kids can simply play Mania and get a vibe for this character and how he should look. Honestly, the Design is the worst thing about this one: no one pupil, covered in fur effects, and a humanish body. But change it to maybe Sonic Unleashed Sonic and along with the plot and settings, it could have been average. I just don't think this movie was made for anyone except parents who want a movie that will shut the little ones up for a good 2 hours.
Thanks for the article! It lowered my expectations so much that when I watched the trailer it actually made me interested in a “There’s no way this will be as bad as Resident Evil” kind of way.😂
This movie looks like a dumpster fire that I have to watch.
This movie would be better(meaning worse) if he had a human love interest like Sonic '06
Wreck it Ralph was great. It had immense respect for gamers and gaming history. The best superhero movies do the same with comics. There's a lesson there. Treat your source material honorably.
Poor future kids who watch this movie and think this is who Sonic is. The movie looks okay to garbage. I’m not spending money to watch this movie. I’m not going out my way to see it. I think the trailer was enough movie for me. If it comes on Netflix one day I might watch it. Just not interested in the trailer.
I don't expect this to be any better than Detective Pikachu. So that should tell you what I think of BOTH abominations.
I don't know. The trailer was pretty generic, yet I am still happy to see one of my favorite video game icons on the big screen. I will probably check this one out when it hits Redbox, but I don't expect it to be great.
@BakaKnight Disney got it right. Why not any other company?
Is this like a principles thing? Do they want to be creative and step away from the norm? Like Michael Bay's TMNT? I can respect that, but that is pretty looking.
@Mr_Pepperami I’m thinking the same thing. It looks so bad I’m actually entrigued
This movie is gonna kill it at the Razzies.
I'm not going to pay to see this. Maybe if it comes to Netflix I'll give it a go.
Oh well, I guess it’s in line with Sega’s own efforts to turn Sonic into a dude-bro teenager. And it’s nice that CG animation has reached the point where it might as well be someone in a fur suit.
Meanwhile, Disney continues their mission to to redo all their classic animated films as live action. Can’t wait to see live action Mickey Mouse creep us all out with his toned calves and knobby knees.
@Kevember read what i wrote: i hate the design from sonic, but the trailer looks good. i will watch the movie.
I didn't expect much else from people who made "the fast and the furious" honestly.
@eRaz0r Read my comment again and tell me the sarcasm isn't obvious.
lol whoops ;P when i first read it, it just sounded like an attack ;P was early in the morning aaaaand english is not my primary language. so sorry hahaha.
@Jeronan Actually, I heard they're aiming for a PG-13 with this one. Time will tell, though.
@Heavyarms55 Sonic is definitely worse and is most likely to win Worst Picture at the Razzies. It would still be better than NSO, though.
Wow! And not in a good way. It has ‘straight to Netflix’ written all over it...
Jim Carey at his painful, repetitive worst. Some blue CGI thing that bears no resemblance to any SEGA character I’ve ever seen. And terrible humour worsened by its predictability and delivery.
But your mileage may vary - so if it’s your bag, I hope you enjoy. As for me, I’ll probably give it a chance on my next long-haul flight when I’ve run out of other options. At least my expectations are suitably low.
I think anyone so badly bothered by this trailer must have had something extremely specific in mind when they heard this movie coming out. It was fine. Yes Pokemon looks like the better of the two but that's got a lot to do with the world of pokemon being easier to explain with humans taking the lead. If it were a illumination flick completely animated then yeah i'm sure it'd follow the game more thoroughly, but what you're getting here looks fun. They new to make the Genesis pun, the ring sounds, Robotnick looks cool... give it a chance
I dunno, man, I'm pretty sure this movie is being made with the express purpose of BEING a complete dumpster fire. They know exactly what they're doing and want to make the movie as bad as possible so that it'll achieve meme status. I wouldn't put it past Sega, given how the Sonic Twitter account is handled.
Alright, for the absolute worst videogame to movie adaptation, this monstrosity versus Super Mario Bros movie. A movie featuring the most grotesque looking blue furry manlet-looking thing that's so far filled with intense cringe, or a movie so unabashedly plot-averse and so horribly written that it's actually charming? Go.
I'm shocked this is Paramount. If it were Columbia, I'd have been convinced it was Sony Entertainment trying to sabotage Sega.
@TheBigK I'd have believed that but what's present there cost way too much money, even just paying Carrey alone. Sadly, I don't think it's trolling.
@NickDaddyCool I mean, it's legitimately a trademarked mascot film featuring a character that doesn't actually look like the trademark. "Bad" is a kind description. If this were for Nintendo characters it would be immediately followed up by a takedown notice and C&D letters sent out!
@Yorumi Forget kids of the 90's. Kids loved Boom a few years ago. Kids see the Macy's float every Thanksgiving (when Sonic rips up a chunk of mid-town), it's not like modern kids don't know what Sonic is supposed to look like even if they're not quite fans enough to have their own Sonic Deviantart page. This is a fail from top to bottom with no redeeming market reason at all.
We knew Sega was asleep at the wheel on Sonic for decades now, but this highlights it beyond proportion. They license the brand out to movie production and don't even keep tabs on the project to make sure it's meeting design guidelines of a trademark! I think we just figured out what happened to the last six Sonic games. And Sega's operating budget, apparently.
I'm not a sonic fan, but this just looks like trash
@HumanDog Visuals shouldn't matter much, but funny enough, most of those hype-train "perfect 10" indie games are doing exactly what this movie is doing- copying what's made money for everybody else without much regard for how things actually were.
Also, I would almost put money on there being an obligatory fart joke in this film that makes use of the phrase "blast processing".
@RetroOutcast What little fondness of my childhood memories remained after having witnessed this trailer, you have successfully just destroyed.
@NEStalgia At least, if that does happen (and I'm almost positive it will), you will have had months of preparation for it.
@Yorumi Sega's just a very special case, I think. They manage to fail the impossible more consistently than anyone. I'm guessing there's corporate imperatives that say it must be something new to make it a major mainstream COD-like blockbuster hit, so they forever search for a mass market hook that will never happen, while alienating the niche market they had.
But the movie....it defies any and all explanation. I can see a bad, cheesy, campy, badly written kids movie. Turning Sonic into a military-themed Michael Bay type spectacular featuring a rendering that doesn't even fit a fan-art definition of an actual merchandisable character....... I mean their own LEGAL team should have shot this down, let alone Business!
I suppose to be fair Sonic games have also included more "real world locations" (Unleashed) But, still...
@Yorumi What we expected was an equally bad movie from Sega. What we got was something that finally promotes The SMB movie to Oscar-worthy.
@Metrazi I know.
@TheAwesomeBowser Not a chance.
@Heavyarms55 It was a joke about how crappy NSO is.
@TheAwesomeBowser I understand, and yeah NSO is lacking. But being kind, I think they are intentionally making this Sonic movie poorly. So the joke doesn't really work for me. Cause one is only subpar and the other seems so bad that I literally cannot say anything truly kind about it.
@Heavyarms55 It's WAY worse than intentional...
"We’ll see in November if that gamble pays off and if this attracts non-gamers, but we’re not holding our breath"
Its focused on the mass-market, wich immediately means fail for us gamers. They do it all the time with game-movies, but also other movies. And in the end it brings them money, otherwise they wouldn't do it. Take Ghostbusters for example. They knew people would hate a female-only cast, but they went through. And later they did it again with other movies. They don't care about the backlash, in the end it earns them money. And if a special-effects driven movie fails in the west...no worries, they will love it in China. Chinese go insane for special effects. By the way, more and more movie company's are owned by chinese. So there lies often the main-focus.
Back to Sonic: He looks awful, but Robotnik is faaaarrr worse. Okay, I admit I am not a Jim Carrey fan. Robotnik is almost always the redeeming factor, but this time not!
Oh, I almost forgot: You know Sonic will do the floss at least once (Fortnite, of course). A sad world we live in...
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...