Last August, around the time of QuakeCon, id Software Studio Director Tim Willits said Rage 2 was being considered for the Switch. In February this year, Willits provided an update, explaining how id and Bethesda were "still investigating" a potential Switch release.
Fast forward to the month of April and Willits has now made another comment about the possibilities of Rage 2 coming to the Switch, during an interview with DualShockers at PAX East 2019. According to the id Software Studio Director, there are some challenges with the technology, but there are "no plans" for Rage 2 on the Switch at the moment.
“Well, we’ve been looking into it. It’s just the technology, there are some challenges, but we’re always looking for future platforms and future people to work with. So, we like to investigate, but we have no plans for that right now.”
Compared to his previous statements, at least it's no longer a case of wondering if this game will be announced for the Switch in the near future.
Was Rage 2 a title you were hoping would make the Switch? Is DOOM and Wolfenstein enough? Tell us down below.
[source dualshockers.com]
Comments 65
Honestly, that's understandable. I would always love for more games, but Bethesda hasn't been petering out on us unlike some other developers. With Young Blood's surprise announcement, you could expect more, just that Rage 2 isn't one of them.
Although, I do want a port of DOOM BFG edition. Doom 3 isn't the best game, but why not have it along with Doom and Doom 2 to have every single Doom on the Switch? (Doom 64 anyone?)
Doom Eternal for the Switch isn't even on Amazon, so I'm beginning to think that developers have given up trying to optimize their games for the Switch, and Panic Button is being overworked. Why isn't there any more studios like them?
Rage runs at 60fps on Xbox 360 and PS3. They should bring it to Switch, or try to use that level of graphics to bring a version of Rage 2 to Switch at 60fps. That would be cool!
April fools am I right?... Right?
Well, there's the Fallout games, Dishonored and Prey for Bethesda to consider.
Bethesda have been great for Switch, the console's best 3rd party for sure. Rage 2 may not be possible but I expect we'll get 1 or 2 announcements at E3. The Evil Within 2 is what I hope for most.
it was obvious
@60frames-please it would be to much work and i doubt that they are willing to dedicate that much time and resources
Translation: Panic Button has too much on their plate already.
@60frames-please
Rage 2 is 30 FPS on the base PS4/XBO.
I would prefer to see ports of Fallout 3, Fallout 4, and Fallout New Vegas over this.
@penamiguel92 Everything we know they are working on right now is all stuff they are super familiar with. They codeveloped Hob and Torchlight runs on the same engine. Wolf Youngblood and DOOM Eternal also use idtech 6 which they have been playing with for at least 3 years now. Honestly, outside of Id themselves, there is probably no one as familiar with their engine as Panic Button.
As for why there aren't other studios like them, Panic Button has had access to prototype Switch hardware since supposedly 2012 (that is not a typo.)
@penamiguel92 Youngblood wasn’t listed for Switch until they announced it the other day even though we knew it was coming. Once they have a release date it will be there.
Not especially surprising. I always suspected that Rage 2 would be too big for the Switch.
@MaverickSlasher Yeah, I just hope that if I mention what I'd like in a game it might start happening more often.
@westman98 Oh, I didn't know that. That's really sad. It's so annoying when they cut frame rates in half for remakes or sequels! Rage looks awesome on PS3 and Xbox 360, very smooth and very responsive.
@penamiguel92
“Doom Eternal for the Switch isn't even on Amazon, so I'm beginning to think that developers have given up trying to optimize their games for the Switch, and Panic Button is being overworked.“
No I think its fine, I wouldn’t worry too much. Youngblood for Switch was MIA until that last trailer a few days ago. Panic Button is certainly busy, but they’ve shown they are more than capable of handling multiple projects around the same time.
@60frames-please rage 1 wasnt tha good unfortuntely
Yeah, you can't expect every big profile game to go on Switch, and that's fine.
I'd happily take a bunch of other Bethesda titles though such as Rage 1, Evil Within, Fallout 3 etc.
@MaverickSlasher Yeah, I've only played it for an hour or so. I was impressed with the graphics, but can't give an informed opinion on the game as a whole.
@Jaalsky "50bg game and it still looks like ass highest setting on PC."
That's the "mega-textures" which ensured that every surface was unique with no repeating patterns, and while the "big picture" looked stunning, often times looking like a render or a hand-drawn image, it lacked fine detail, so things got a bit janky when viewed up close.
The gameplay, however, was solid as hell. One of the best playing FPS games I've ever experienced.
What a Playstation, X1 or PC is for. Anyone who saw the trailer knew there was no way R2 was happening on Switch.
Skip the 200 youtube videos that would pop-up with futile Switch Vs Playstation Rage 2 comparisons. And create a multi-platform game that actually works on Switch.
Is it a shooter? Does it have rubble? Is it another bobbing gun game? Is it post apocalyptic? Has there not been thousands of these games out there since the 90s? Then I'm not really missing out.
Most new AAA games will NOT come to the Switch because it is not a powerhouse ... what a shock!!!
Apparently the cost of development on the Switch is not worth the watered down graphics + bad frame rate.
Just stick to the last gen ports + the occasional miracle port of current gen and keep the amazing Nintendo exclusives.
Get that pro model out and fast. I love the Switch but i'd love it even more if i didnt have to buy games for other platforms.
Saving the announcement for E3 then
@YANDMAN So does that mean the "Pro" will be able to play Rage 2 etc. and the base model will not? This is never going to happen because then the Switch will only have a lifespan of 2.5 - 3 years.
Nintendo will NOT make a NEW console. They need to support the current one.
And this news surprises who?
This was never a realistic possibility. I hope nobody has got their hopes up.
IIRC Rage 2 isn't the idtech6 engine that Panic Button are familiar with, instead it's Avalanche's Apex engine, and it struggles to hit 30fps on the PS4/Xbox One, so it was probably always going to be unlikely to be ported to the Switch.
I think it's a good thing Bethesda doesn't port it if it wont stack up to an accaptable quality. Games like Doom and Wolf 2 really comes close to the pain treshold when the resolution drops to 480p and the games assets looks like undetailed dough. Would be really nice if Bethesda considered porting some of its older PS3/360-library to Switch. Games like The New Order and The Evil Within would probably look rather good on Switch.
No plans? No problem! Just improvise!
@Medic_alert
Well, the problem is obviously that a game like Wolf 2 is a really bad match with the Switch. But I must give it that it atleast runs rather fine. I don't think Switch needs every high-end multiplattform game out there. The best thing would be a mix of new exclusives made to run well on the Switch and upgraded handheld versions of last gen games.
Panic Button: "Give us ten minutes"
I'D be happy with a Classic Collection of ALL original Doom content with Widescreen etc... Just a very competent way to play all the Doom, Doom 2, Final Doom, even Doom 64 levels but in the original graphics – and with lots of option for graphics etc akin to the Sega 'Ages' approach.
I bought Ultimate Doom on Steam so I have all the WADs but it's bloody difficult to set-up, and had zero help to do so. Basically it's not sold as a proper ready to go game. So far the best way I've got to play those original games is with 'Chocolate Doom' on my Vita.
When no news IS the news!!
Considering the end of the game will be DLC, no thanks.
When ID is willing to sell complete games I will be willing to buy them.
Well as its Avalanche studio making the game, I'm not very excited about Rage 2 even though I loved the first game. JC3, JC4 and now Generation Zero have all sucked.
Its a shame but understandable. Playing Rage now on my PC and the game is excellent. Rage 2 looks even better. Maybe next year on the Switch Pro?
@Zuljaras It just means the pro will be able to play all the games such as this that the current version cannot play. On a seemingly daily basis we find anothera rticle about either a game that cannot be ported or has been and runs terribly. The Switch is a great platform but it will never find it full potential until it can level that playing field somewhat. Those new systems are coming whether you think it's a good idea or not.
This is why Nintendo needs to abandon their underpowered-hardware BS. It was cute during the Wii Days, but those days are long gone.
@YANDMAN But Nintendo will NOT make a new system 2 years into the lifespan of the Switch that can play newer games.
They will make better model that could display games at higher resolution and better frame-rate.
They will kill themselves if they make a NEW console system with exclusive games that the old one can't handle.
@diablo2 Abandon it?! Really?! That is exactly what the current player base want to hear!!! That their current just 2 year console will have a successor that CAN play newer games. Not a chance.
@Zuljaras You missed the point entirely. I didnt mean abandon the Switch, but rather abandon their current business model for future consoles (5-6 years from now).
@diablo2 That I can see happening. But Nintendo were almost always the underpowered console that draw the players with exclusives that can only be played on their hardware. Otherwise Nintendo would be dead long time ago.
I loved the first Rage on PC, but years passed and now the only modern system I like to play games is the Switch. So I'll wait for a Nintendo console release eventually.
@diablo2 Yes, clearly Switch is a failure.
@NEStalgia Serious question: What's your IQ level? You seem to be lacking a basic understanding of the main discussion here. Anyway nevermind, don't answer that. Im out.
@diablo2 There's no understanding involved here. Switch is a resounding commercial success. Wii was a resounding commercial success. DS was an unprecedented in the industry commercial success. 3DS was/is a resounding commercial success. Game Boy was a resounding commercial success. Nintendo's "withered technology" business model has consistently produced tremendous commercial success for 30 years. Their notable failures of Virtual Boy and GameCube occurred when they tried to move into pushing technology instead of making the most of old technology. WiiU stands alone as a sort of retro-future product that was disastrously advertised, and largely was the wrong product at the wrong time for a number of reasons and was a victim, in part, of their market focus shift during the Wii which targeted a new market that was no longer interested.
Given 30 years of successes, and only 3 failures, 2 of those coming from trying to push new technology instead of using aged tech in a field where performance tech is already dominated by two other larger companies plus all of the PC industry, what business genius would actually abandon that model? While it's in the middle of tremendous success, no less?
Nintendo isn't selling "another piece of hardware to play id's PC games on." And if Google and Ubisoft have their way, everyone's phone will be doing that anyway. Nintendo is selling their own little self-contained world of gaming. And people have been buying for decades. If id's PC games make it over, great. If not, that's not critical to what Nintendo is selling. But it remains a place to play id's other PC games in a different format.
If the model is abandoned it's because streaming/services arrives at a point that dedicated hardware is no longer viable.
@Zuljaras You just contradicted yourself, what you claim they will and won't make are exactly what they are goign to make. it's goign to be an updated more pwoerful system. how esle do you suppose it will display higher resolution etc as you state??
@diablo2 I would say the issue is not enough involvement with 3rd parties to get alternatives made. If a game can't run on the platform, why not incentivize an exclusive that plays to its strengths rather than hope for a port that is impressive, but still inferior across the board, you know?
Not a big deal, the last RAGE game was rubbish
we already got Doom and Wolf games coming to the Switch anyway
@YANDMAN yes but either both models will support the games or none of them.
Nintendo can't afford this kind of exclusives.
The pro model will only enhance older games and future games like the PS4 Pro and One X.
But the new switch model will make it work.
It's always this "right now".
But I hope the devs make Rage 2 scalable enough like Doom and Wolfenstein so that it works on the Switch.
@erv There is no new Switch model. Don't believe all the BS that people try to spread online.
Please port Fallout 76. Kthxbai
@Zuljaras You've done it again. " Future games " exactly games that are on other systems will come to the pro in the future because the current system cannot handle them. The refresh for both the xbox and PS4 was at the three year point, by the time these actually come out it will be the three year point. This is just standard practice.
@YANDMAN But the base PS4 and Xbox One CAN handle ALL games. For example RDR2.
Can you imagine how stupid would be if only the Pro and the One X can play RDR2.
This is why either both Switch models will play the new games or none of them.
They learned their lesson from the NEW 3DS XL exclusives.
I do not know why it is so difficult for you to understand that.
@Zuljaras Look at it from the perspective of a 3RD party developer, now obviously firstly it would all be dependant on install abse and sales for the pro model, but if they have a game that they can port and run on the new system but that won't run on the old system do you think they would port it on the basis that there are enough systems for them to make money or not port it because some people cannot play it??
@YANDMAN It all depends on the cost to port it vs the profit.
The new Switch with exclusive power for the games will not as well right now because many people bought the Switch for the games (shocker right?!) if they want to play the newer games they are FORCED to buy the NEW Switch.
Unlike the base PS4 and Xbox the players base can play the newest games only sacrificing graphics and frame rate. But they are still perfectly playable.
Just tell me could you imagine Pro/One X exclusive games? The outrage would be huge.
If Nintendo do that it would be hilarious to see what happens. I do not think that the sales would be as successful as right now.
At the end the main focus should be the player NOT the developers. They are given the tools to develop for the platform. If the platform is NOT strong enough to handle the game … well so be it.
Again you haven't answered my point but thats o.k, So if you have a platform that begins to essentially become obsolete like the wiiu did as far as 3rd party games because it either isn't powerful enough to run the games or is too difficult to program the games everyone is making that's an o.k situation is what you are saying? All they will do is phase out the switch as we know it and make the more advanced version the mainstay. We all know Nintendo's history Gamecube aside has been fraught with systems which were underpowered to their conterparts but never has their been a time like now where games are utilising hardware as much so it wasn't as big a deal. You can spin it around any which way you want but the fact of the matter is there will be a stronger console. Maybe they will offer a trade in deal on current gen systems to get people to adopt. The Switch should of never been released with the chipset that it was. It was out of date by a couple of years at lauch and they are at the limit of where that can go now. If i can play the games i play on PS4 on my Switch then i'm going to stick purely to the Switch and of that happens then Nintendo will take an even bigger piece of the amrket.
@YANDMAN They can't phase out a console that has been on the market for only 2 years. They just can't.
That is a big slap for the people who invested in the current Switch. Nintendo chose to release it with the current chipset. It is weak yes, but the console is a success despite of that.
The leap that you are suggesting is as big as the Xbox 360/PS3 to PS4/Xbox One. This can't be done with a console that is in the market for little over 2 years.
The Switch will thrive with older ports + its most powerful games Zelda, Pokémon, Mario, Metroid etc. Not every game is possible on the Switch. That is why we have other consoles and PC on the market.
As i have already mentioned several times at the point in which they release it will be the same time at which the others upgraded, stop talkinn about two years on the mArket, two years on the market was last month aand they aren't coming out with new systems next month. Games like Pokemon will keep it successfull but will they become the mainstay of the smaller cheapest version of the system that will phase out the 3Ds? I'm going to say yest it will as it's always been a handheld game at it's core. Metroid will be a big boost but its at least two years away and it will be optimized for the more pwoerful system obviously, it might even get a special metroid console, what better way to get people to jump ship to play the latest instalment.
@YANDMAN This is fine. Better system is good as long as there are no exclusive games for it just as there are no exclusive games for PS4 Pro over the base models.
@ritouf that is my plan
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...