The survival genre is one that’s seen a bit of a resurgence in recent years, with a new wave of indies leading the charge. One wouldn’t think that a game intentionally designed to be difficult would be much fun, but there’s certainly plenty of satisfaction to be found in overcoming the odds and managing to eke out a victory through shrewd resource management. It’s a fine line to walk, though, and while 60 Seconds! aims to provide a slightly different take on this genre, it ultimately misses the mark and fails to provide much in the way of satisfaction.
Gameplay in 60 Seconds! is split into two primary components. The first half, in reference to the game’s title, gives Ted -the Dad - about a minute to scour the house in search of essential supplies and other family members. Water, food, weapons, games, tools and whatever else you grab must be deposited in the shelter entrance before you can grab more, and the layout of the house and location of items changes with each game. Whatever you do manage to grab, it certainly won’t be enough for the survival section that follows.
Here, Ted and whoever else he grabbed before the time was up, must ration out the supplies as efficiently as possible, while occasionally sending out a scout to find more stuff. With each day, new events happen—like bandits trying to get in or a family member coming down with a disease—and you’re often called to make some hard choices between who lives and dies. This portion of the game is primarily oriented around text; against the still backdrop of your starving family sitting in a shelter, you read through journal entries and decide on plans of action.
While all of this makes for an interesting take on the survival genre, 60 Seconds! is very much the product of good ideas marred by poor execution. In the scavenging portion of the game, for example, the controls are frustratingly floaty and unresponsive, meaning that about half of your precious time will be spent watching Ted walk into walls and get hung up on furniture. One could argue that this is part of the experience, but it feels like a cheap way of adding artificial difficulty to an already challenging enough game. It’s no fun when the character on screen doesn’t necessarily do what you tell them to, and in a game such as this where every little action is critical to one’s success, tighter gameplay in this area is a must.
The survival portion also suffers, though for different reasons than the scavenging side. Your choices don’t have enough of an effect on events, and this can make the entire affair feel like a waste of time. For example, we had one run where we had no choice but to send out a scout to get more water, and that scout didn’t end up coming back at all, which led to the rest of the family dying. Nothing wrong had been done, the game just decided not to let us win. A key element of the survival genre is giving the player a fighting chance, but 60 Seconds! weighs success much too heavily on randomized chance. It’s frustrating when you lose even after doing everything right, and the game provides little incentive for you to keep trying.
In terms of replay value, 60 Seconds! provides plenty of options, though these all ultimately boil down to the same central concept. Several modes are available that focus on specific parts of its mechanics, such as a mode that gives you random supplies and tasks you with surviving in the shelter for a as long as possible, which does do a good job of introducing new rules or twists on the core loop. In-game achievements are also present, rewarding you for surviving so many days or picking up so many supplies, and these can help incentivise you to keep aiming for new objectives in different runs. In short, for those of you that are hooked by the gameplay, there’s enough supplementary content present to keep the experience from getting tired too quickly.
From a presentation perspective, 60 Seconds! fails to impress in any way, although it does a passable job in its own right. A decent comic book-like look is adapted - with plenty of bright colors and thick lines present - that helps to give things some style, though the look has a certain air of cheapness to it that’s hard to ignore. It doesn’t help that the scavenging portion of gameplay, which is in full 3D, completely ditches the comic look in favor of a plasticky, chunky look that makes it feel like more of an afterthought. Presentation isn’t everything, of course, but it’s glaringly obvious when a proper art direction wasn’t executed right, and 60 Seconds flounders in this regard.
Conclusion
All told, 60 Seconds! is a disappointing addition to Switch's growing library and one that we would recommend you take a pass on. Although the idea at its core isn’t half bad, there’s very little here that we would say is done well, and given that there’s no shortage of excellent games on the Switch eShop, you’d be better off spending your money on something else. Big fans of survival games might find some enjoyment in this one, but we’d recommend you pick up The Flame In The Flood instead, or wait for more survival titles to arrive.
Comments 19
I was wondering where that smell was coming from. Shame it's no good as the premise looked promising. Maybe they can patch the game to sort out some of the issues.
That's a shame because the concept was kinda interesting. Oh well, plenty of other games to play.
I'm not surprised... it looks bad.
Funny how just yesterday I was looking for a NintendoLife review of this.
I might give it a go regardless. The only thing that truly puts me off is the reportedly clunky controls during the scavenging part, but that can probably be worked around with some getting used to. The text-based section and achievements both sound good to me.
I think the mentioned example of the scout not returning is a poor one, because if anything that would make the experience more realistic - just because you set out to do something in a survival situation, doesn't mean you'll succeed.
It’s no fun when the character on screen doesn’t necessarily do what you tell them to, and in a game such as this where every little action is critical to one’s success, tighter gameplay in this area is a must.
And with that, any remote interest I had with this game was gone in 60 seconds!
Having loved this on Steam, I gave this a go. The gathering section controls rather poorly, can‘t remember that from Steam. Yeah, it‘s not the longest game or one you‘ll play for hours on end but reading through the descriptions of events you‘re going through is quite charming and funny at times. But also that loses its charm after a few times.
That's such a shame! I thought the concept was very interesting. I'll buy if there's a VERY big sale just to support them,though.
I'd rather like to have "The Long Dark" as a survival game on the Switch.
But "The Flame in the Flood" is a good choice for the time being.
It was a fun diversion on PC for the $2 I paid for it. Wouldn't go higher than 5, and it is beyond brutal. Kept me coming back for quite awhile tho. It has a great sense of humor, and I don't remember the controls being bad.
I was interested when I first saw a trailer of it, but yeah, sounds like a bad port. I'll pass.
@LinkSword I agree that in a real life survival situation, luck would play a big part. However, being realistic often does not lead to fun gameplay. In a survival game, I would want it to be possible to employ strategies which mitigate the luck aspect of the game. If the gameplay just boils down to rolling dice, I'm not going to find that fun for long.
@bilboa I've been playing for a couple hours and when it comes to mitigation of luck, yes, you can do just that. Sending your characters out with a sane state of mind and no thirst or hunger improves your chances of success a lot, as does equipping them with something useful for the journey, like an axe or a map. So far the closest I've had to a failed expedition in 16 of them was one where the character didn't get any items, but still managed to come back at least - and he had gone insane prior to it.
I've read this site for years now and Mitch always came across as a bit of an easily frustrated player, no offense intended. So it's no surprise for me to try this out and find that its random/unfair nature has been greatly exaggerated.
Personally, the game feels like a good choice to play in short bursts now and then.
@LinkSword Makes sense. I haven't tried this game, so I don't have my own opinion about it. I know what you mean about getting to know the reviewer. I'm not very familiar with this reviewer, but in the past I've had a similar experience, where I came to realize a certain reviewer often criticized games for being unfairly difficult, and when I'd try those games I didn't find them so.
I'd say your experience with this could vary wildly. The only complaint I have is that I'd like to have some sort of action sections or something during the survival section as it can feel a bit monotonous after playing a long session.
But, the game is fun in short bursts. You can play just the scavenge or survival sections to get better at them. The random nature of the game makes it very repayable. You learn what to look out for but you're not usually going to be in the same exact situation again.
The game wouldn't run on my computer for a while some reason so I'm glad it came out for switch. The way the scavenging and survival sections work together is clever and some of the situations your family can get into are entertaining.
Wow, this score comes unexpected.
This is my second favourite game in my Switch eShop Top 20 and I give it a 9/10 for originality and replayability.
I love it but I love really hard games.
I knew it was a pass when I saw people playing it. Neat, but something I totally don't need.
@LinkSword who reviews the reviewers
Now that it’s on sale and thanks to your comment i gave it a go, and must say i like it quite much. I have no problems with the controls at all and i like the humour and gameplay mechanics. Sure it might not be for everyone, but with that huge discount, i’d give it a huge recommendation!
I didn’t understand the game, to the degree where I am confused that it’s really a game. I hear people enjoy this but surely I’m missing something. One of the most broken games I’ve played but also feels like a non-game in concept. Nothing fun about it 2/10
Tap here to load 19 comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...