Some rules seem pretty contradictory. For no future we have Duck Hunt, we didn't havehis game for so long. For very new games then why do we have Corrin? I alsp don't like how they disregarded vets. What's the point of the ballot if you are going to disregard thousands of votes? Seems like Bayonetta wan't the actual winner but Sakurai just decided to make these "rules." Well if this is true anyways.
Pootypie
Switch Friend Code: SW-4862-0398-5013 | My Nintendo: Pootypie
So Isaac had no marketing future.. but we got Duck Hunt... which, just got a VC release.
Where was this logic when Ice Climbers were added in Melee? Their original game was bleh, and they only have that ONE game to their name.
The difference is that Ice Climbers, Duck Hunt, R.O.B, Game & Watch etc. were part of the base game. The rules would likely be more lax because there's less stakes on what characters make it in (besides the important ones) when what sells is the game itself. With DLC you are selling the character, and if any of those characters weren't in the base game there'd be no chance in heck they would have even been considered for DLC because they wouldn't sell at all.
And while Ice Climbers were in Melee and Brawl, Sakurai did say that the lack of a marketable future was part of the reason they didn't attempt to find a workaround to get them working on 3DS, so the rule can apply to them.
@IceClimbers Yeah...sorry, but I'm having a bit of a hard time believing all that when the source is from Gamefaqs. Also, WOW. Seeing a lot of salt in there...
There is nothing here...except for the stuff I just typed...
a little random, but I didn't want to start a new thread. my local target's stock of Wii Us(bundles or otherwise) were completely sold out. People were calling asking if any were left(overheard an employee talking to some customer on the phone) and I was pleased to hear they were gone. On the flipside, i was not pleased to know people weren't getting Wii Us because they were sold out.
"When expecting booby traps, always send the boob in first." -Megatron-
Splatoon has no future?
Well, I'm going to take that whole ballot information with a grain of salt, then. However, assuming it's true at least they did reconsider Inklings.
Funny thing: Vote for Shrek, Spongebob, John Cena, etc. weren't considered to be legitimate votes, and were tossed out. Votes for Goku on the other hand were actually considered to be legitimate votes.
This makes sense when you consider that Bandai Namco publishes the Dragon Ball games and had a hand in Smash's development. Goku would technically be their second representative after Pac-Man.
@Vee_Flames: It wasn't that Splatoon had no future. Inkling was deemed irrelevant initially because the franchise was too new to properly gauge interest. This decision was made prior to Splatoon's launch, of course.
Anyways, the big thing here is that marketability and being able to pitch it to Nintendo's higher ups was a major factor, primarily because it's DLC. I imagine those things do apply to some extent on the base game as well, but as @cookiex said, they're much more lax.
Even if what this guy is saying isn't true, the business and marketability stuff definitely played a part in the DLC choices, especially Corrin.
From the sound of it, Sakurai/Nintendo started negotiations for many 3rd party characters well before the Ballot closed, and most of them fell through at some point. Negotiations for Cloud went far smoother than they expected, so they decided to do him outside of the Ballot. From there, Bayonetta was the highest placing character that was, as Sakurai said, "negotiable and realizable". The part he didn't mention is "justifiable".
I'm kinda two minded on this guy. On one hand, it's a guy using his friend's account on GameFAQs of all places, which is a massive red flag. On the other hand, what this guy is saying makes a TON of sense in a retrospective view.
-Bayonetta: Irrelevant due to poor sales of Bayonetta 2, legal issues, and too sexual. She was deemed "impossible."
There we go. Now it's more inline with the rest of the post. If Bayonetta wasn't the ballot winner, the dude who wrote this post would probably put something like that. LOL
-Isaac: Irrelevant due to poor sales of Golden Sun.
Golden Sun and its sequel sold a million copies each. The third game is the only one that bombed. On another note: Golden Sun series has sold 2 million copies worldwide. Fire Emblem series sold 5 million worldwide. I guess Golden Sun is worthy of 4 reps now.
What I gathered from this post is that literally every highly requested character (except Bayonetta) is impossible in some way. There is no reason to believe this guy. He doesn't have evidence for anything that he's saying. This is also coming from GameFAQs... lol.
Smash Mains:
N64: Captain Falcon
Melee: Mario
Brawl: Sonic
Project M: Link
Smash 3DS: Captain Falcon
Smash Wii U: Ganondorf
@IceClimbers: except obviously Sakurai did not lie, because all this is unconfirmed rumour gobbledygook. Konami lied, when they said Kojima was on holiday, as that was proven to be untrue when Konami's lawyers forbidden him from accepting his awards at the Game Awards. Notice the difference? This is the kind of s*** which makes the Internet so scummy, a guy works his butt off on a videogame and greenlights a poll for fans to have their say on his game, then one random guy posts an essay he could've made up over his Corn Flakes this morning and we're ready to call Sakurai a liar. Shame on anyone even considering this and no wonder Sakurai hates us all.
Shrek being the final Smash DLC release would've been absolutely hilarious, also would've had the potential for adding some even better music than what's in game currently like Smash Mouth's "All Star".
Yes it had no chance of happening but to be honest even that would've been better received than Federation Force.
Y'know...sometimes I come across things on the internet that just make me laugh...this is one of them: http://www.christiantoday.com/article/super.smash.bros.4.crea...
"At the moment, there are a total of eight playable Fire Emblem characters in "Super Smash Bros. 4," including Corrin, the two versions of Robin, Ike, Lucina, Roy, Mega Man, and Luigi."
There is nothing here...except for the stuff I just typed...
Since I saw a lot of people criticizing the irrelevant character rule as being contradictory, remember that this rule ONLY applied to the ballot character. I would figure they had a similar rule for DLC characters, but NOT for in-game characters.
I think the real sad thing here is that Lucas getting in was kind of a beacon of hope for Wolf fans, but in reality, Lucas's inclusion was Wolf's last chance, unless he saw overwhelming success in the ballots. And clearly he didn't. Still no ill will to Lucas or his fans.
I feel like Sakurai and crew should realize how much Wolf stands out as being the one character left with no inclusion and no excuse and maybe, JUST MAYBE we'll get another Lucario situation for him. (One can hope.)
Y'know...sometimes I come across things on the internet that just make me laugh...this is one of them: http://www.christiantoday.com/article/super.smash.bros.4.crea...
"At the moment, there are a total of eight playable Fire Emblem characters in "Super Smash Bros. 4," including Corrin, the two versions of Robin, Ike, Lucina, Roy, Mega Man, and Luigi."
@Morpheel Wait, can Luigi, Captain Falcon and Megaman also be marriage options if you're a dude (not counting Duck Hunt since they're...you know...a dog...and a duck.)? I mean, gay marriage is in the game, so...I don't see why not!
There is nothing here...except for the stuff I just typed...
Forums
Topic: Super Smash Bros. for Wii U - OT
Posts 27,501 to 27,520 of 27,914
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic