Of course this was fake. Ubisoft treats Nintendo like utter garbage. I don't see Sakurai giving Rayman a spot on the roster at all. He can stay as a trophy. No Far Cry 4 for Wii U? No AC anymore for Wii U? Watch Dogs Wii U is garbage? Yeah... Screw off, Ubisoft.
Capcom is treating Nintendo the same way.They released two Resident Evil games for every system besides the Wiiu,the only thing they released on a Nintendo console recently is Monster Hunter 4.Even with this treatment they let Megaman in Smash bros,so i don't see the problem in Rayman being in this.
Nah... Ubisoft has treated Nintendo far worse. Capcom does stupid stuff but nowhere near how bad Ubisoft has treated Nintendo. I could literally type a huge paragraph about Ubisoft and it all begins with when the Wii U had that Rayman game as exclusive but it became multiplatform. Then there's the AC fiasco. Watch Dogs fiasco. They don't even understand the Wii U fanbase. Have you seen the game they have for Wii U but won't release?!?! They don't understand Wii U owners at all.
Of course they don't understand Wiiu owners.You guys don't buy their games!It's a business to them,what else do you need to understand?And no i'm not defending Ubisoft either.
The Harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. When the going gets tough, the tough gets going.
Of course this was fake. Ubisoft treats Nintendo like utter garbage. I don't see Sakurai giving Rayman a spot on the roster at all. He can stay as a trophy. No Far Cry 4 for Wii U? No AC anymore for Wii U? Watch Dogs Wii U is garbage? Yeah... Screw off, Ubisoft.
Capcom is treating Nintendo the same way.They released two Resident Evil games for every system besides the Wiiu,the only thing they released on a Nintendo console recently is Monster Hunter 4.Even with this treatment they let Megaman in Smash bros,so i don't see the problem in Rayman being in this.
Nah... Ubisoft has treated Nintendo far worse. Capcom does stupid stuff but nowhere near how bad Ubisoft has treated Nintendo. I could literally type a huge paragraph about Ubisoft and it all begins with when the Wii U had that Rayman game as exclusive but it became multiplatform. Then there's the AC fiasco. Watch Dogs fiasco. They don't even understand the Wii U fanbase. Have you seen the game they have for Wii U but won't release?!?! They don't understand Wii U owners at all.
Of course they don't understand Wiiu owners.You guys don't buy their games!It's a business to them,what else do you need to understand?And no i'm not defending Ubisoft either.
Ummm... I bought AC 4 for Wii U. And it does sound like you are defending the company that's been hated by tons of gamers... Not just Nintendo fans!!! Dear gawd! Do I really need to launch into a speech on Ubisoft and their practices?
Sorry but I can't help but think that... Mega Man is in because of Monster Hunter and past RE on Nintendo. Sonic is in because Sega is (ironically) more loyal than other 3rd parties for Wii U and other reasons. Snake was in not just because of Kojima but cuz of past MGS stuff on Nintendo. Pac-man is in because of Namco and has legacy like Mega Man and Sonic.
My point is... Relations with other companies do matter alot, in my opinion.
I'm sorry this is an honest question I'm not trying to be mean: You think Mega Man is in because of Monster Hunter and Resident Evil games on Nintendo systems? Did I read that right?
Just in case I read that right: MegaMan had 6 games on the NES. The series is one of the most fondly remembered on the NES. MegaMan X started on the SNES (3 in total) and is considered one of the best games in the whole franchise. The entire Mega Man Battle Network series is exclusive to Nintendo systems unless something has been ported to IOS recently I'm not aware of. MegaMan is an icon in the entire gaming industry and has a very rich history with Nintendo and you claim he's in Smash because of MH and RE..
Sonic is in because of his famous rivalry with Mario. The 16-bit console wars. It's a no brainer to put him in Smash. Sonic 06 which was supposed to be an epic remaining of Sonic (even if it was an atrocious mess) didn't come to Wii (Dodged a bullet there) and his best game in decades, Sonic Generations, did not come to Wii U but instead got a lesser version on 3DS. Again here I don't think loyalty was a reason.
Pac-Man yeah, he's in because of Bandai Namco helping develop and for being a legend. Shigeru Miyamoto wanted him in since Brawl. I really don't think "relationship" with other companies is considered when picking characters for Smash. Snake getting in just really drives that home for me. I can think of 20 characters that would fit better before him, but he got in. I was ecstatic and want him back but he was just so out of place. At this point I think almost anyone could be argued into Smash honestly lol.
Sorry but I can't help but think that... Mega Man is in because of Monster Hunter and past RE on Nintendo. Sonic is in because Sega is (ironically) more loyal than other 3rd parties for Wii U and other reasons. Snake was in not just because of Kojima but cuz of past MGS stuff on Nintendo. Pac-man is in because of Namco and has legacy like Mega Man and Sonic.
My point is... Relations with other companies do matter alot, in my opinion.
I'm sorry this is an honest question I'm not trying to be mean: You think Mega Man is in because of Monster Hunter and Resident Evil games on Nintendo systems? Did I read that right?
Just in case I read that right: MegaMan had 6 games on the NES. The series is one of the most fondly remembered on the NES. MegaMan X started on the SNES (3 in total) and is considered one of the best games in the whole franchise. The entire Mega Man Battle Network series is exclusive to Nintendo systems unless something has been ported to IOS recently I'm not aware of. MegaMan is an icon in the entire gaming industry and has a very rich history with Nintendo and you claim he's in Smash because of MH and RE..
Sonic is in because of his famous rivalry with Mario. The 16-bit console wars. It's a no brainer to put him in Smash. Sonic 06 which was supposed to be an epic remaining of Sonic (even if it was an atrocious mess) didn't come to Wii (Dodged a bullet there) and his best game in decades, Sonic Generations, did not come to Wii U but instead got a lesser version on 3DS. Again here I don't think loyalty was a reason.
Pac-Man yeah, he's in because of Bandai Namco helping develop and for being a legend. Shigeru Miyamoto wanted him in since Brawl. I really don't think "relationship" with other companies is considered when picking characters for Smash. Snake getting in just really drives that home for me. I can think of 20 characters that would fit better before him, but he got in. I was ecstatic and want him back but he was just so out of place. At this point I think almost anyone could be argued into Smash honestly lol.
When I said "legacy" that's pretty much what I meant regarding Mega Man and Sonic and even Pac-Man.
Of course this was fake. Ubisoft treats Nintendo like utter garbage. I don't see Sakurai giving Rayman a spot on the roster at all. He can stay as a trophy. No Far Cry 4 for Wii U? No AC anymore for Wii U? Watch Dogs Wii U is garbage? Yeah... Screw off, Ubisoft.
Capcom is treating Nintendo the same way.They released two Resident Evil games for every system besides the Wiiu,the only thing they released on a Nintendo console recently is Monster Hunter 4.Even with this treatment they let Megaman in Smash bros,so i don't see the problem in Rayman being in this.
Nah... Ubisoft has treated Nintendo far worse. Capcom does stupid stuff but nowhere near how bad Ubisoft has treated Nintendo. I could literally type a huge paragraph about Ubisoft and it all begins with when the Wii U had that Rayman game as exclusive but it became multiplatform. Then there's the AC fiasco. Watch Dogs fiasco. They don't even understand the Wii U fanbase. Have you seen the game they have for Wii U but won't release?!?! They don't understand Wii U owners at all.
Of course they don't understand Wiiu owners.You guys don't buy their games!It's a business to them,what else do you need to understand?And no i'm not defending Ubisoft either.
Ummm... I bought AC 4 for Wii U. And it does sound like you are defending the company that's been hated by tons of gamers... Not just Nintendo fans!!! Dear gawd! Do I really need to launch into a speech on Ubisoft and their practices?
You didn't read my post did you?I said it's a business every company including your precious Nintendo is trying to get every cent they can from you.And i know Ubisoft been doing some shady stuff,that's them cause they know nothing's going to happen to them.
The Harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. When the going gets tough, the tough gets going.
I feel like we're missing some info here. Feel free to tell me to mind my own business (I have a controlling family too) but what do they have against CDs? Or is it the shipping they have a problem with?
If you add me, I need to at least know you or I won't add you back.
I feel like we're missing some info here. Feel free to tell me to mind my own business (I have a controlling family too) but what do they have against CDs? Or is it the shipping they have a problem with?
I don't have any idea why either lol
Pootypie
Switch Friend Code: SW-4862-0398-5013 | My Nintendo: Pootypie
Forums
Topic: Super Smash Bros. for Wii U - OT
Posts 21,301 to 21,320 of 27,914
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic